The ELIMINATOR

[fullhouse]

hi Syscrash

Hi fullhouse,

What's up?

you can send a mail to lotto649ws@yahoo.com, to ask if they can allow us to send private message.

Today, side-by-side strategy honor us, but unfortunatly, I didn't stake on it. Waiting for the next Eleminator

Hey man, well if you were referring to (12) (13) they weren't qualified under our revised rules. Remember we aren't touching any pairs until they reach 16 draws no split. Remember what I said about PATIENCE. Find it and the Side by Side strategy will give you the greatest win to loss ratio I have ever seen. Nothing will touch it.

What typically happens Syscrash, is when the previous Eliminator (such as no.14) produces several late splits 16--19 draws.

The following Eliminator doesn't produce ANY! So as you can see, Eliminator 15 has no pairs remaining after just 15 draws. But Eliminator 16 is likely to rebalance things again. It works like clockwork Syscrash. JUST BE PATIENT!

Okay the state of play after 15 draws is we have 5 numbers remaining. They are (04) (13) (22) (35) & (41) So its is very likely we have our third consecutive qualifier under 20 draws coming. And hopefully our 5th consecutive winning Eliminator. I will try and contact that address Syscrash. I would love to see your files. Peace...

 

[wazzappenning]

hi ive been reading your thread and it looks like this is working very well for you. i dont really understand all of this but i am curious if it could be applied to the canadian 6\49. 6 numbers drawn from 49 plua a bonus number. minimum to win is 2numbers plus the bonus but thats only worth 5dollars (costs 2dollars for one ticket)

 

[syscrash]

hi ive been reading your thread and it looks like this is working very well for you. i dont really understand all of this but i am curious if it could be applied to the canadian 6\49. 6 numbers drawn from 49 plua a bonus number. minimum to win is 2numbers plus the bonus but thats only worth 5dollars (costs 2dollars for one ticket)

Hi there,

It may work, but you'll probably win less or not at all.

I'm a Canadian too.

 

[wazzappenning]

thanx, im trying a new method of choosing numbers for 649. ill post it if i see it works

 

[syscrash]

Re: hi Syscrash

Hey man, well if you were referring to (12) (13) they weren't qualified under our revised rules. Remember we aren't touching any pairs until they reach 16 draws no split. Remember what I said about PATIENCE. Find it and the Side by Side strategy will give you the greatest win to loss ratio I have ever seen. Nothing will touch it.

What typically happens Syscrash, is when the previous Eliminator (such as no.14) produces several late splits 16--19 draws.

The following Eliminator doesn't produce ANY! So as you can see, Eliminator 15 has no pairs remaining after just 15 draws. But Eliminator 16 is likely to rebalance things again. It works like clockwork Syscrash. JUST BE PATIENT!

Okay the state of play after 15 draws is we have 5 numbers remaining. They are (04) (13) (22) (35) & (41) So its is very likely we have our third consecutive qualifier under 20 draws coming. And hopefully our 5th consecutive winning Eliminator. I will try and contact that address Syscrash. I would love to see your files. Peace...

Thank you very much Fullhouse, I reallly would like to send you my file. But the only way I can see that we can exchange some information is to go on antoher forum.

 

[Teufellj]

Eliminator question...

I am aware that this system is for the 6/49 games but as I have been reading into what you folks are discussing, it occurs to me that a condensed version can or could be setup to handle the American Pick 4 games. You are probably aware that Pick 4 has sets from ...1 thru 10... and there are four quadrants or fourty balls. I don't see it as a stretch to have a cutoff for the eliminator at somewhere around the halfway mark as in your game where someplace near the 23rd hits then drops off could be applied to the Pick 4 games then an arbitrary figure of so many single digit hits would give a close ballpark strategy to work with. Possibly, I believe that a one year sheet of past hits will provide the necessary information. Now this is all off the top of my head but I would like to have a better understanding of your information for the 649 so that I or anyone else could come up with a workable setup. If you could comment or give some guidance in what direction to go with my thoughts that you have provoked, it would be a blessing in disguise!

Thank you,

Teufellj ...

 

[syscrash]

give me a url with a historical result, and I may setup a spreadsheet for you with eleminator setup

 

[Teufellj]

RE:RE: Eliminator...

Hello syscrash,

I take all of my information directly from the Ohio Lottery website...http:www.ohiolottery.com/

Look for the Pick 4 games past on the main web page. There is some hefty money to be made with the right approach to the Pick 4 lottery. Thru the years, I have made many nice returns with this game and know for fact that there has to be a way to get even further ahead. I never expect to win all of the time but I do manage a minimum of three per week. This game is played six days a week...Monday thru Saturday and has an evening game that is Monday thru Saturday. They use pingpong type balls for the draws. There are a total of fourty balls(?) so the lottery commission says and the balls are listed...one thru 10... This last bit of information is periferal to what is needed but because of the constant changing of ball sets, it can be important to the math setup that is involved.
Thank you for your interest and time,

Teufellj ...

 

[fullhouse]

Re: Re: hi Syscrash

Thank you very much Fullhouse, I reallly would like to send you my file. But the only way I can see that we can exchange some information is to go on antoher forum.

Hey Sycrash, well you name the forum and I will go there, I sent an email to the address you gave me but they never replied. Today Eliminator 15 delivered number (04) in the teatime draw. So there are now 2 numbers remaining after 18 draws. They are (35) & (41) One of them could easily rack up tommorow to bring Eliminator 15 to an end.

We will see, Eliminator 16 is coming along nicely, with 10 numbers remaining after 8 draws. So we could have our 4th consecutive qualifier inside 20 draws on the way. I will keep you posted.

This is all going too well at the moment. I can't see it lasting much longer. But lets see. Peace...

 

[LT]

Re: Re: hi Syscrash

Thank you very much Fullhouse, I reallly would like to send you my file. But the only way I can see that we can exchange some information is to go on antoher forum.

The solicitaion of members from here to other forums is in contradiction of the membership rules.

The exchange of email addys etc. are also not permitted.

Unfortunately these requirements are necessary due to previous abuse by a few former members.

Please feel free to post your notes, comments etc. out in the open so that all members can benefit and exchange in the discussion.

 

[fullhouse]

Thankyou LT, Well Syscrash. You can post your files on here and we can all share them. So go for it...

 

[syscrash]

What'S up fullhouse
Number 4 as show up yesterday. That's really good, i think that our number will show up tomorow too.

 

[fullhouse]

hi Fullhouse,

http://www.lotterypost.com/forums.htm

Hey Syscrash what will I be looking for on there?

 

[syscrash]

Hey Syscrash what will I be looking for on there?

Register yourself to the forum there and send me a private message.

 

[fullhouse]

What'S up fullhouse
Number 4 as show up yesterday. That's really good, i think that our number will show up tomorow too.

Yes Syscrash, but I will be surprised if its in the Lunchtime draw. I would expect either (35) or (41) from the teatime draw onwards. Might be wrong. But it is unusual to get two Eliminators in a row where the last 2 numbers split in the first draw after the 3rd ball racks up. Although it does happen.

I am currently testing a new strategy called the Isolator. If it continues to work as well as it is at the moment I will share it with you. It might even be better than the Eliminator and Side by Side strategies. Only time will tell. Peace...

 

[syscrash]

Hi Fullhouse,

I don't know what to do exactly right now. At the moment, my bankroll is about 10 times bigger than my initial bankroll. That's a bit unbelievable.

I have two choice, to apply my stake strategy, that seem to work really well and keep the progression as it is. Or, to stake with the same "proportion" as my bankroll as grow up.

 

[fullhouse]

Hi Fullhouse,

I don't know what to do exactly right now. At the moment, my bankroll is about 10 times bigger than my initial bankroll. That's a bit unbelievable.

I have to choice, to apply my stake strategy, that seem to work really well and keep the progression as it is. Or, to stake with the same "proportion" as my bankroll as grow up.

WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That is unbelievable Syscrash. How much do you normally stake on a bet. I mean are you telling me you started with $50 and now have like $500. No way man Lol! I know the Strategies are good. But not that good. In reality you should only have about $150 at this point. So you must surely be risking more than I would in proportion to what you have.

 

[syscrash]

WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

That is unbelievable Syscrash. How much do you normally stake on a bet. I mean are you telling me you started with $50 and now have like $500. No way man Lol! I know the Strategies are good. But not that good. In reality you should only have about $150 at this point. So you must surely be risking more than I would in proportion to what you have.

yes I put more risk that you suggest and I stake less that you suggest too. ;-)

As I said earlier, my stake strategy is to stake the minimum with a conservative multiplier.

For exemple... the last number that make me sweat was the 46 during his pilgrimage. lol

Here's how it goes...

I started to stake the minimum, 1$
it didn't show up the first draw, the second draw i stake 1.4$ it doesn't show up to... third draw, i stake 1,96.until my stake reach 56.69.. 13th draw later. I won my biggest amount I ever had at the lotto.

As you can see, I always start my stake at the minimum and multiply that stake with an 1.4 factor.

Also, I stopped to stake on double unless I feel that the pair is due.

 

[fullhouse]

yes I put more risk that you suggest and I stake less that you suggest too. ;-)

As I said earlier, my stake strategy is to stake the minimum with a conservative multiplier.

For exemple... the last number that make me sweat was the 46 during his pilgrimage. lol

Here's how it goes...

I started to stake the minimum, 1$
it didn't show up the first draw, the second draw i stake 1.4$ it doesn't show up to... third draw, i stake 1,96.until my stake reach 56.69.. 13th draw later. I won my biggest amount I ever had at the lotto.

As you can see, I always start my stake at the minimum and multiply that stake with an 1.4 factor.

Also, I stopped to stake on double unless I feel that the pair is due.

So if you started with a $50 bankroll, how much do you have now Syscrash ? Also I have sent you a private message on that forum...

 

[fullhouse]

Yes number 46 made me sweat and I wasn't even betting on it Lol! That is why I don't cover a number even when it goes over 30 draws before Syscrash. I have seen a number go 35 draws then 19 draws right afterwards.

Now if you use your 1.4 method on numbers I suggest. I am pretty sure you won't be going to 13 draws to get the win. Peace...