LottoStatisticsXL

[Nick Koutras]

New version uploaded v110

Now Hit/Skip table added

Just enter your Start Draw & Duration

I'll add the percentage Hit per Skip
to indicate which position has been more
profitable when reached.

 

[Nick Koutras]

Hi Dennis...

Next function will be the Announcers
but I need your help as of
How to represent the output screen
so that can productive in recognizing
what is really important.

Any ideas?

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

Hi Dennis...

Next function will be the Announcers
but I need your help as of
How to represent the output screen
so that can productive in recognizing
what is really important.

Any ideas?

Lots of things to considers here....My favourites are double announcers...I'll e-mail you some things as it is difficult to explain in details on such a board...And I don't want some people to think that I think that I know everything.... Beaker has also a good knowledge about this announcer theory too and a few others as well...Your device is looking better and better Nick!

 

[morocco]

error

HI NICK,
THANK YOU for your WORK.
I have update to new XL
when i use it for lotto it work good but if i use it for KENO
a window appear with this message:
Run time error 9'
Subscript out of range.

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

When trying to print best performing set I have an error in the cache module mGlobal...so it only prints part of the data....

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

Sorry Nick didn't have enough time yesterday for e-mailing you stuff on announcers...I'll try to do it today...

 

[Nick Koutras]

New Function added

Since Last Appeared Report...

Indicates the Last Draw ID that
each number appeared n Times.

It can be used to identify Hot/Cold and
all in between numbers.

I use that function very frequently.
I will also add the ability to track
each number at each position.

 

[Irvin]

Sorry just figured it out.

 

[Nick Koutras]

New version uploaded

Added: N-tuplets

Now you will be able to identify
any frequency of any N-tuplet.

I had to rewrite some subroutines
from scratch to accommodate ALL the games
for 6 to 99 numbers and improve the accuracy of the
Best Performing Set.
The update for that sub is coming soon now.


*** Warning for games with pool>70
You may have to wait some time
until all the combinations are checked.


You can download as always from:
http://www.geocities.com/socratiou/index.htm


Cheers and good hunting!

Nick

 

[hot4]

Nick,

sometimes after searching Best Performing Set of e.g. 10 numbers, it happens that last number is smaller than the first 5 in the Best So Far line (line 12 of the spreadsheet) and in the line 14 of the spreadsheet it doesn't appear. This way the set has not 10 numbers but only 9.

Perhaps this happens because there is some incongruence among Duration, Set Size, Categories ...

I'd like to know if the set of numbers in line 14 satisfies all the conditions configured by me.

Thanks,

Frank

 

[Nick Koutras]

Nick,

sometimes after searching Best Performing Set of e.g. 10 numbers, it happens that last number is smaller than the first 5 in the Best So Far line (line 12 of the spreadsheet) and in the line 14 of the spreadsheet it doesn't appear. This way the set has not 10 numbers but only 9.

Perhaps this happens because there is some incongruence among Duration, Set Size, Categories ...

I'd like to know if the set of numbers in line 14 satisfies all the conditions configured by me.

Thanks,

Frank

Hi Frank,

Can you send me a copy of
such a case?

 

[Nick Koutras]

Version 114

Version 114 uploded.

114 9/1/2003 Minor changes to Trivial Report, Added Date of Drawing
114 9/1/2003 Added: Ability to use a Draw's numbers at the What Comes…
114 9/15/2003 Added: Ability to highlight a number in N-tuplets report

 

[hot4]

Hi Frank,

Can you send me a copy of
such a case?

Let's see this example Nick:

Database= CAN649
StarDraw=2048
Duration=25
SetSize=6
Categories='0
Trial=10000
Best So Far=022839494343 <---------
Best Observed 20-4-1 .... 001,1
Line14= 02283949 <---------
Complement=010304050607080910111213141516171819202122232425262729303132333435363738404142434445464748

This may happen because some conflict among Input configuration. In the last 25 draws may be there is more than 43 numbers...

Frank

 

[Nick Koutras]

Let's see this example Nick:

Database= CAN649
StarDraw=2048
Duration=25
SetSize=6
Categories='0
Trial=10000
Best So Far=022839494343 <---------
Best Observed 20-4-1 .... 001,1
Line14= 02283949 <---------
Complement=010304050607080910111213141516171819202122232425262729303132333435363738404142434445464748

This may happen because some conflict among Input configuration. In the last 25 draws may be there is more than 43 numbers...

Frank

I see what you mean Frank.

I'll correct the problem.

Learn to use 2 digits for Categories.
The Low Limit & the Upper Limit

The algorithm I use is not suited for '00
Categories.

I'll alter this also for '00 categories.
Then this will become like the RedCar
procedure.




Thanks for your input.

 

[hot4]

I see what you mean Frank.

I'll correct the problem.

Learn to use 2 digits for Categories.
The Low Limit & the Upper Limit

The algorithm I use is not suited for '00
Categories.

I'll alter this also for '00 categories.
Then this will become like the RedCar
procedure.




Thanks for your input.

As a matter of fact Nick, I didn't know how to configurate categories until you explained Vic how to do it by means of '23, remember. Then I tried with other configurations like '01 '034 etc and it works fine ... the computer searches for the bigger amount of hits in past draws regarding 0_hit and 1_hit or 0_hit 3_hit and 4_hit.

I think this routine can give us good sets of numbers.

Frank

 

[Irvin]

Best performing set question

Hello Nick,

With the best performing set I noticed that it gives you a different best set if you run this more than once with the same settings.

My settings are;

Duration: 100
Size: 16 (thats a big shoe )
Category: 46
Trials 500.

Questions:

Is that suppose to happen?

Can we get around that?

Would increasing the trials fix that?


Regards,

Irvin

PS. That leap frog thingy is brilliant unfortunately I noticed it too late...3 popped up in the last draw.

 

[Nick Koutras]

Re: Best performing set question

Hello Nick,

With the best performing set I noticed that it gives you a different best set if you run this more than once with the same settings.

My settings are;

Duration: 100
Size: 16 (thats a big shoe )
Category: 46
Trials 500.

Questions:

Is that suppose to happen?

Can we get around that?

Would increasing the trials fix that?


Regards,

Irvin

PS. That leap frog thingy is brilliant unfortunately I noticed it too late...3 popped up in the last draw.

Each time we use this function, the quality of the Set
that the function finds, is *rated* under "Times Better than Average".
So if you run the same test more than once, then mark this Rating and
compare it with the next test's number. Select the higher Rating to use.

As of Leap Froggers we shall expect (12*6/49)=1.47 each time.
So use this, knowing if a delay of n Leap Froggers has occured.


Notice:
When you use the BPS function and your purpose is to *play* that set,
I do not recommend to use 6 as the upper limit of the Categories.
I recommend 5 or even 4. The reason is that theoretically a 4-tuplet
shall repeat within ~900+ draws. So this may be a waste, to use such
4-tuplets + .

Nick

 

[hot4]

Re: Best performing set question

Hello Nick,

With the best performing set I noticed that it gives you a different best set if you run this more than once with the same settings.

My settings are;

Duration: 100
Size: 16 (thats a big shoe )
Category: 46
Trials 500.

Irvin,

If you set Trials to a bigger number, the program will get, by *try_and_check*, a new set performing better and better regarding the categories you selected( e.g. 4 and 6). I've not tried with 16 numbers but sometimes I configure Trials to 10,000.

I supose it needs a lot of time to search 16 numbers but we are all at the beginning.

Frank

 

[Irvin]

Hello Frank,

I set the trial values higher until I got to a point which seemed high enough.

ie the 1000 trial and the 2000 trial ended up with the same numbers.

So no need to go higher than 1000.

Might save you some time if you try a lower value than 10000.

I did a trial of 10000 with duration set to 100 and 16 numbers.

I think it took 10 or 15 minutes.

Regards,

Irvin

 

[hot4]

Yes, you are right Irvin.

With 16 numbers there's no need to set Trial=10000; for lower sets (8-10) I've seen some modification till 10,000 tries.

As we don't know which is the best configuration (how many numbers? how many past draws? which categories?), do you think it would be good to make a weekly thread with the BestPerformingSet of CAN649, so that we could check hits?


Frank