6/49 prediction method
- Thread starter Nikolai
- Start date
Grandmaster
Member
Hi Nikolai,
Very nice excel prog.
I'm looking for a 14/42 version of your system..
Regards
Very nice excel prog.
I'm looking for a 14/42 version of your system..
Regards
anxious
Member
Hi Nikolai,
These are the results after testing the last 6 draws in my 6/49 lottery :
Numbers to play: 17 3 6 7 8 13 15 16 20 21 24 26 29 31 33 34 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1524 14 16 17 18 28 47 2
Numbers to play: 17 1 3 6 7 8 13 15 16 17 21 26 29 31 33 42 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1523 13 19 22 34 35 39 1
Numbers to play: 18 1 3 7 8 11 13 16 17 26 29 31 32 33 36 38 42 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1522 1 11 21 36 42 48 4
Numbers to play: 16 1 3 7 11 13 16 17 21 26 29 31 33 36 38 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1521 19 23 32 35 45 49 1
Numbers to play: 16 3 7 11 13 16 17 18 26 29 31 33 36 38 43 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1520 1 4 21 39 41 43 1
Numbers to play: 14 3 4 11 13 16 17 18 26 29 31 34 38 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1519 4 7 16 18 41 43 3
regards
anxious
These are the results after testing the last 6 draws in my 6/49 lottery :
Numbers to play: 17 3 6 7 8 13 15 16 20 21 24 26 29 31 33 34 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1524 14 16 17 18 28 47 2
Numbers to play: 17 1 3 6 7 8 13 15 16 17 21 26 29 31 33 42 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1523 13 19 22 34 35 39 1
Numbers to play: 18 1 3 7 8 11 13 16 17 26 29 31 32 33 36 38 42 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1522 1 11 21 36 42 48 4
Numbers to play: 16 1 3 7 11 13 16 17 21 26 29 31 33 36 38 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1521 19 23 32 35 45 49 1
Numbers to play: 16 3 7 11 13 16 17 18 26 29 31 33 36 38 43 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1520 1 4 21 39 41 43 1
Numbers to play: 14 3 4 11 13 16 17 18 26 29 31 34 38 47 49
Draw 1 2 3 4 5 6 Hits:
1519 4 7 16 18 41 43 3
regards
anxious
Hello Nikolai,
congratulations for this nice piece of coding and mathematics !
I wish to test it on a 6/42 lottery, and I took the liberty to change '49' to '42' each time it appeared in your code.
Will this correction be sufficient to give accurate predictions, or are there also values to be updated in the parameters of the equation ?
Also, can you give more explanation regarding the 'equation curve' ?
Thanks in advance and regards,
Nicodemus
congratulations for this nice piece of coding and mathematics !
I wish to test it on a 6/42 lottery, and I took the liberty to change '49' to '42' each time it appeared in your code.
Will this correction be sufficient to give accurate predictions, or are there also values to be updated in the parameters of the equation ?
Also, can you give more explanation regarding the 'equation curve' ?
Thanks in advance and regards,
Nicodemus
Nikolai
Member
Nicodemus said:
Hi Nicodemus,
Please feel free to modify the code as per your requirements.
The program should work fine if you change '49' to '42' each time appeared.
However, it will be a bit difference between the equation's curve and the original intervals, you would need to test for few draws what result shows.
Let me know if i can help you.
Nikolai
Nikolai
Member
Nicodemus said:
I've changed the parametter, it should work a bit better for 6/42 :
http://weblink-ec.com/Method642.zip
Will set the pc to calculate 6/42 curve this night.
Thanks for adapting the code for 6/42
Bye for now & take care.
Nikolai
Hello
Thank's for your work.
it's very easy to use
i have make some test with French loto
there is actually 4494 draws.
After launch the build tables, i have tested the num test
i have found an error
For exemple:
if i select draws no 4493 on the value of til draw for number 1 or 6 or 7..
i give a prediction for an anterious draw (here 4490)
is there an error of calculation??
For other numbers, it's work...
http://cjoint.com/?bhrpYVaTsK
i have also make some simulation
for exemple:
i delete 10 draws, i lauch the build table calculations, make the draw test
after, i compare the prediction numbers with the real draw
i put the result on the draw table, repeat all the operations
the result is 14 to 21 numbers to play and 1 to 4 predict numbers
What parameter to modify for best result ?
Numbers of points?
What is the value to put / numbers of draws
The value of equation curve lenght can be modify?? What value?
Cordialement
Thank's for your work.
it's very easy to use
i have make some test with French loto
there is actually 4494 draws.
After launch the build tables, i have tested the num test
i have found an error
For exemple:
if i select draws no 4493 on the value of til draw for number 1 or 6 or 7..
i give a prediction for an anterious draw (here 4490)
is there an error of calculation??
For other numbers, it's work...
http://cjoint.com/?bhrpYVaTsK
i have also make some simulation
for exemple:
i delete 10 draws, i lauch the build table calculations, make the draw test
after, i compare the prediction numbers with the real draw
i put the result on the draw table, repeat all the operations
the result is 14 to 21 numbers to play and 1 to 4 predict numbers
What parameter to modify for best result ?
Numbers of points?
What is the value to put / numbers of draws
The value of equation curve lenght can be modify?? What value?
Cordialement
the link for the French loto Nikolai system
if you want to make some test Nikolai
cdt
http://cjoint.com/?bhrpYVaTsK
if you want to make some test Nikolai
cdt
http://cjoint.com/?bhrpYVaTsK
Nikolai
Member
Conclusion
Unfortunately, after thousand of tests and calculations i am about to call this method ineffective.
The coefficient of goodness K = (hits) / (numbers for play) after thousands of trials shows 0.1224... for 1 draw (6/49), 0.2448... for 2 draws (12/49) and 0.36734... for 3 draws (18/49).
No matter by which way we change the coefficients and parametters of the calculation, the results are the same.
We will try to do some research in the future, using the fractal theory, will post some results if they are satisfying.
Good luck.
Nikolai
Unfortunately, after thousand of tests and calculations i am about to call this method ineffective.
The coefficient of goodness K = (hits) / (numbers for play) after thousands of trials shows 0.1224... for 1 draw (6/49), 0.2448... for 2 draws (12/49) and 0.36734... for 3 draws (18/49).
No matter by which way we change the coefficients and parametters of the calculation, the results are the same.
We will try to do some research in the future, using the fractal theory, will post some results if they are satisfying.
Good luck.
Nikolai
anxious
Member
Failing pursuing something ambitious is not failure Nikolai..
Most of the time i fail when it comes to lottery..
My personal feeling is that an entirely discrete process will never yield the future with acuracy..
Discrete processess must be suplemented with the human brain and its ability to mobilize non-discrete functions like intuition in order to see the future..
best wishes
anxious
Most of the time i fail when it comes to lottery..
My personal feeling is that an entirely discrete process will never yield the future with acuracy..
Discrete processess must be suplemented with the human brain and its ability to mobilize non-discrete functions like intuition in order to see the future..
best wishes
anxious