6/49 Discussion For October 22, 2003
- Thread starter gsobier
- Start date
?Dennis Bassboss
Member
Sorry if it bothers you what interval do you propose??gsobier said:Dennis:
Please excuse ignorance, why 225 Draws?
Regards,
George
Dennis:
Sorry, it was not bothering me... ...just curious why 225. Does 225 produce more reliable results?
What I would do with a program like that is get the totals from several counts of draws and then compare to see which one performs the best in regression testing. I hope you have enough CPU power to run it
I haven't done this type of report so I'm just curious.
Regards,
George
Sorry, it was not bothering me... ...just curious why 225. Does 225 produce more reliable results?
What I would do with a program like that is get the totals from several counts of draws and then compare to see which one performs the best in regression testing. I hope you have enough CPU power to run it
I haven't done this type of report so I'm just curious.
Regards,
George
Dennis Bassboss said:
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Not sure what you want exactly?? But It does sounds interesting...What do you mean by ''totals from severals counts of draws''? Number of hits...?regularity in skips? etc...gsobier said:Dennis:
Sorry, it was not bothering me... ...just curious why 225. Does 225 produce more reliable results?
What I would do with a program like that is get the totals from several counts of draws and then compare to see which one performs the best in regression testing. I hope you have enough CPU power to run it
I haven't done this type of report so I'm just curious.
Regards,
George
Dennis:
Do it like this...
1. pretend you are in the past not knowing the future
2. run the report using different number of draws (100 to 400 in steps of 5 or 10) on draws from a point down towards the first draw
3. look at the next draw result and see which report will help the best more consistantly
I've done this kind of hunting with many things and the results will knock you off you chair:eeK:.
You will need a program to collect and sort all the results to see for sure which is best depending on the amount of outputs. This procedure is not for someone who is a "wanna be" programmer
.
BTW, your post never bother me... ...there is always something new to exploit
.
Regards,
George
Do it like this...
1. pretend you are in the past not knowing the future
2. run the report using different number of draws (100 to 400 in steps of 5 or 10) on draws from a point down towards the first draw
3. look at the next draw result and see which report will help the best more consistantly
I've done this kind of hunting with many things and the results will knock you off you chair:eeK:.
You will need a program to collect and sort all the results to see for sure which is best depending on the amount of outputs. This procedure is not for someone who is a "wanna be" programmer
.BTW, your post never bother me... ...there is always something new to exploit
.Regards,
George
Dennis Bassboss said:
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Beaker good luck...With these bonus draws around I just hope that thisBeaker said:For the first time - ever - I'm playing all the Best Bets posted so far
won't become that 
after the draw... 
I don't like 13 as a Best Bet.
13's trend reminds me of 25's most recent pattern. 25 was cold, hit twice as a bonus in 4 draws, then hit hard in the regulars, pairing with 27 and then 26, who were both
13 has just swung around for two hits as a bonus and I expect him to return to the regular pack and hit hard with 12 and 15, who are at the moment. I expect 13 to thaw out no sooner than next Wednesday. Just my observations.
13's trend reminds me of 25's most recent pattern. 25 was cold, hit twice as a bonus in 4 draws, then hit hard in the regulars, pairing with 27 and then 26, who were both
13 has just swung around for two hits as a bonus and I expect him to return to the regular pack and hit hard with 12 and 15, who are
at the moment. I expect 13 to thaw out no sooner than next Wednesday. Just my observations. 
Beaker
Member
You are going to see that 11-13 hit.martek said:I don't like 13 as a Best Bet.
13's trend reminds me of 25's most recent pattern. 25 was cold, hit twice as a bonus in 4 draws, then hit hard in the regulars, pairing with 27 and then 26, who were both
13 has just swung around for two hits as a bonus and I expect him to return to the regular pack and hit hard with 12 and 15, who are
And your 15 could be very close by.
Beaker
Member
12 will hit because of Beaker's Lawmartek said:12 has been due on my list for 2 draws now. Since it hasn't hit, I'm expecting it to thaw out with 13 as a sequential pair 12-13.
martek, you are new so Beaker's Law is when you see a number that can be reversed, the reverse number is in play for 4 draws. Example 21 hit in 2058, so 12 is in play for 4 draws. In fact, I think it likes to hit 2 draws after 21. Another example, 1/10 hit in 2059 so both of those numbers are in play for the next 4. We saw the 10 in 2060 and we should see that 1 hit again soon.
There are many examples of this. Now, you spoke of 13. It has hit twice lately as you said - it's time for the 31
Beaker:
Remember when I asked about a possible typo in a post like this many months ago when I was new here?
Regards,
George
Remember when I asked about a possible typo in a post like this many months ago when I was new here?
Regards,
George
Beaker said:12 will hit because of Beaker's Law
martek, you are new so Beaker's Law is when you see a number that can be reversed, the reverse number is in play for 4 draws. Example 21 hit in 2058, so 12 is in play for 4 draws. In fact, I think it likes to hit 2 draws after 21. Another example, 1/10 hit in 2059 so both of those numbers are in play for the next 4. We saw the 10 in 2060 and we should see that 1 hit again soon.
There are many examples of this. Now, you spoke of 13. It has hit twice lately as you said - it's time for the 31
I must have missed it. Do you see a problem?