6/49 Discussion For Aug.2/03

SINCE THE # 8 SHOWED UP FOR THE BONUS..I'WILL BE PLAYING THESE THREE NUMBERS ON SATURDAY....

..8..31..40.. NOW I JUST NEED THE OTHER THREE..:rolleyes:
 
I will post my toughts later....I have to :read: first....In the meantime...My DN tracker 2nd version is on his way(going to be ready to go for the next)....So we might have up to 3 Dns or 4 DNs on target in the upcoming draws...out of 4 or 5 lazy numbers that is....:eek: :agree2:
 

gsobier

Member
Here is what my program says:
(either four, three, or five most of the time from here) :agree:
01 02 03 04 05 07
08 09 12 14 16 17
18 21 22 25 28 29
30 31 32 33 34 39
40 41 44 46 47 49


No more than three from here is most likely:
(2 were here, in the last draw)
06 10 11 13 15 19
20 23 24 26 27 35
36 37 38 42 43 45
48


For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
4 and 2: 337
3 and 3: 263
5 and 1: 238
2 and 4: 087
6 and 0: 050
1 and 5: 022
0 and 6: 003


Good luck to all players:agree2:!

Regards,
George:)
 

Maggie

Member
No 20's or 30's, we could start off high on Sat. I'm also thinking LD 0. We could see maybe 2 out of 10-20-30-40 as well. :agree:
 
Re: PETERS PICK..

luckystrike said:
I'M LOOKING AT PETERS BEST BET FROM THE LAST DRAW......

..2 .. COULD BE HERE THIS DRAW...ANY THOUGHTS:notme:
Hummm....2 out of only 7 in the last.....Here's one customer that is about to explode folks...The floodgate is coming....
But even if it doesn't look like it...I always have an eye on these peter's picks....
:agree:
 

Beaker

Member
I mentioned this before - last time 20's and 30's missed - that this 2-decade miss doesn't happen that often. Looks like 6 of the past 9 times this happened one of those decades missed again. although this didn't happen on the July 12th draw :sick:

We haven't had 3-in-one-decade (regular numbers) for 6 draws - might see that one soon ;)

:read:
 
And I still like 21-22-46 a lot .....And now that the 08-18 has come up...Better watch for the dancing set in the upcoming draws....It has hit hard in many 6/49 lotteries yesterday....4 + bonus in the Québec/49 ...another 3 in the African draw...etc...And it is coming around here....In fact it is overdue for a 5 hitter in our lottery....Be aware about this at all time folks!!! :eek:
 
Beaker said:
OK, give us a hint ;)

I'm on the hunt for some 2-3 hitter stacks :uzi: :bomb:
Here's one...
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
- <STACK>
<INITIAL_HISTORY_FILE>C:\Program Files\WINHunter\history\Can 649.txt</INITIAL_HISTORY_FILE>
<INITIATE_AI_TEST>YES</INITIATE_AI_TEST>
- <OUTPUT>
- <PROPERTIES>
<PROPERTY keyname="jackpotcutoff">49</PROPERTY>
</PROPERTIES>
</OUTPUT>
- <GROUPS>
- <GROUP usegroup="-1">
<GROUP_NAME />
- <FILTERS>
- <FILTER usefilter="-1">
<FILTER_NAME />
- <PROPERTIES>
<PROPERTY keyname="skip">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="use">15</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="oncycle">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="offcycle">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="startcycle">-1</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="startoffset">0</PROPERTY>
</PROPERTIES>
- <PROCESSORS>
- <PROCESSOR useprocessor="-1" keyname="singlehit">
<PROCESSOR_NAME>SingleHit</PROCESSOR_NAME>
- <PROPERTIES>
<PROPERTY keyname="lowweight">3</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="averageweight">3</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="highweight">3</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="maxhitsweight">3</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="maxhits">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="avgmin">8</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="avgmax">7</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="coldweight">1</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="avgweight">2</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="hotweight">3</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="hitcountweight">2</PROPERTY>
</PROPERTIES>
</PROCESSOR>
- <PROCESSOR useprocessor="-1" keyname="announcers">
<PROCESSOR_NAME>Announcers</PROCESSOR_NAME>
- <PROPERTIES>
<PROPERTY keyname="announcerweight">-1</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="announcermultiplierweight">1</PROPERTY>
</PROPERTIES>
</PROCESSOR>
</PROCESSORS>
</FILTER>
- <FILTER usefilter="0">
<FILTER_NAME />
- <PROPERTIES>
<PROPERTY keyname="skip">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="use">1</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="oncycle">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="offcycle">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="startcycle">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="startoffset">0</PROPERTY>
</PROPERTIES>
- <PROCESSORS>
- <PROCESSOR useprocessor="-1" keyname="compoundhit">
<PROCESSOR_NAME>CompoundHit</PROCESSOR_NAME>
- <PROPERTIES>
<PROPERTY keyname="overdueweight">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="notrecentweight">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="hitspan">3</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="repeatabilityweight">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="undertotalrepeats">1</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="underrepeattest">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="undermaxrepeatsweight">0</PROPERTY>
</PROPERTIES>
</PROCESSOR>
</PROCESSORS>
</FILTER>
- <FILTER usefilter="0">
<FILTER_NAME />
- <PROPERTIES>
<PROPERTY keyname="skip">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="use">1</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="oncycle">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="offcycle">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="startcycle">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="startoffset">0</PROPERTY>
</PROPERTIES>
- <PROCESSORS>
- <PROCESSOR useprocessor="-1" keyname="previousdwgs">
<PROCESSOR_NAME>PreviousDwgs</PROCESSOR_NAME>
- <PROPERTIES>
<PROPERTY keyname="prevdwgtestvalue">2</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="prevdwgweight">1</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="prevdwgmethod">-1</PROPERTY>
</PROPERTIES>
</PROCESSOR>
</PROCESSORS>
</FILTER>
</FILTERS>
- <SELECTOR keyname="highavglow">
<SELECTOR_NAME>High/Avg/Low (Inversions)</SELECTOR_NAME>
- <PROPERTIES>
<PROPERTY keyname="selector">1</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="type">0</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="action">-1</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="selectmin">2</PROPERTY>
<PROPERTY keyname="keeps" />
<PROPERTY keyname="deletes" />
</PROPERTIES>
</SELECTOR>
</GROUP>
</GROUPS>
</STACK>
 

Beaker

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
I'll e-mail you one....a dandy Beaker...Awesome...simply awesome and it is not this one...here..
OK I'll be watching.

I'm just going through some old AI runs. Very interesting. :agree:

I have one result I will post. Might give us a clue what is coming up :agree2:
 
Beaker said:
OK I'll be watching.

I'm just going through some old AI runs. Very interesting. :agree:

I have one result I will post. Might give us a clue what is coming up :agree2:
You now have two dandy stacks waiting for you in your mailbox Beaker...And as an experimented player with Win Hunter you might even be able to improve them furtermore... :agree:
 

Beaker

Member
This one caught my eye :eek:

thebest01-3-5.xm
16: 17, 1 of 7
15: 17, 2 of 7
14: 17, 1 of 7
13: 17, 0 of 7
12: 17, 2 of 7
11: 17, 3 of 7
10: 17, 1 of 7
9: 17, 4 of 7
8: 17, 3 of 7
7: 17, 3 of 7
6: 17, 3 of 7
5: 17, 3 of 7
4: 17, 5 of 7
3: 17, 2 of 7
2: 17, 4 of 7
1: 17, 5 of 7

thebest01-3-5.xml

17 Predictions for the next drawing:

2-4-5-8-
12-13-14-16-17-18-19-
26-
36-38-39-
41-46

Might see a few from here. :agree:
 
Beaker said:
This one caught my eye :eek:

thebest01-3-5.xm
16: 17, 1 of 7
15: 17, 2 of 7
14: 17, 1 of 7
13: 17, 0 of 7
12: 17, 2 of 7
11: 17, 3 of 7
10: 17, 1 of 7
9: 17, 4 of 7
8: 17, 3 of 7
7: 17, 3 of 7
6: 17, 3 of 7
5: 17, 3 of 7
4: 17, 5 of 7
3: 17, 2 of 7
2: 17, 4 of 7
1: 17, 5 of 7

thebest01-3-5.xml

17 Predictions for the next drawing:

2-4-5-8-
12-13-14-16-17-18-19-
26-
36-38-39-
41-46

Might see a few from here. :agree:
Wow what a nice little run...Interesting indeed! :agree:
 

Beaker

Member
I think one of these decades will hit hard (3 or 4 hit) and the 2 that are in the race are the 10's and the 40's

If you take a look at George's lists - the 30 list has alot of 40's.

I'm leaning that way. 42 looks very good here :agree:
 
When ever the 08-18 hits....The 43 is never too far way...It is in my next set for sure....
Here the LDs for the last 10 draws...(with bonus)
LDs 6 = 12 times
LDs 4 = 9 times
LDs 5 = 9 times
LDs 1 = 8 times
LDs 8 = 7 times
LDs 3 = 6 times
LDs 7 = 6 times
LDs 9 = 6 times
LDs 2 = 5 times
LDs 0 = 2 times
 

Beaker

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
You now have two dandy stacks waiting for you in your mailbox Beaker...And as an experimented player with Win Hunter you might even be able to improve them furtermore... :agree:
Still not there yet :no: I think something is wrong with hotmail - can't login.

I can run the stacks through the optimizer and see if we can get any improvement. If I see a stack, like that one I posted, that is giving consistent results above expections then I think that is a good result - 5 out of 7 from 17 numbers is awesome there and as you say if your stacks are hitting 1-3 consistently you can use that as a guide.

One thing I'm :mad3: at is that damn 12 - should've played that one last time Beaker's law but moved off it becuase of a stack I had. Sometimes I don't follow my own advice :gunfire: :teach:

Have to remember that these predictions are only guides - until we find the real awesome stacks. :agree:
 
Top