Winnalotto-Sangoma 2

Springbok

Member
Bonjour Taaroa

The problen is to decide which trip. Sometimes the highest percentage is the one, sometimes it is the lowest. I am working on this problem at the moment to try and find a good solution.
 

Patrick123

Member
Hello Ladies & Gentlemen,

Okay WinnaLotto 10 June Build 2 has been released.

This essentially adds in the 'nextskip' function.

As I have yet to see any of these functions been utilised, I've enclosed a sample filter called MyTesting that uses these functions. With these, we should be able to build up fairly elaborate filters(struxo post #299).. more functions can be added as requested.

Taaroa, when it comes to understanding filters, I am but a tool in Springbok's hands, he would be able to assist you in building up more. The function that would help you the most there is called the skip(x) when x starts at 0 for the first skip.

BP, I've added in your filter for you as well called 'BPMedianD' check that it works okay.

Good luck everyone... It's now time to start winning 5+ lottos :)

Regards
Patrick
 
Last edited:

bloubul

Member
Hi Patrick123

I'm unable to download the latest version: reason incompleate file its only 115kb.
Will you look at it please.

BlouBul :cool:
 

Patrick123

Member
Hi Everyone,

My Internet messed up, & corrupted the upload, I've redone it, & tested it, should be fine now.

Regards
Patrick
 

Springbok

Member
Bonsoir Taaroa

We have to be brutally honest when we play with winnalotto sangoma in the bookies lottery. Again take the analogy of the horserace. When working with pairs we have 24 horses running, 7 horses will win. Out of 7 we need just one and only one to win the race in the next draw. With all the statistical information and filters we should be able to find just one horse to win for us. This is the benchmark to work to. Hitting in the next 4 draws is not good enough, it has to be the very next draw.
 

taaroa

Member
Springbok said:
We have to be brutally honest when we play with winnalotto sangoma in the bookies lottery. Again take the analogy of the horserace. When working with pairs we have 24 horses running, 7 horses will win. Out of 7 we need just one and only one to win the race in the next draw. With all the statistical information and filters we should be able to find just one horse to win for us. This is the benchmark to work to. Hitting in the next 4 draws is not good enough, it has to be the very next draw.

Bonsoir Springbok,

You are right. A hit in draw1 or draw2 is the best. I just play one pair daily, and a second pair more rarely when I feel it's a good one. I'm happy with my results.

With good money management, you cannot be wiped out. I follow Fullhouse system. I'm looking at the Kelly criterion for proportional betting. I don't know how to find the good percentage of capital to stake. Fullhouse say to play 10%-12% of capital but I don't know if that is the kelly criterion percentage for his method of betting 4 draws.

I tested your Pick632 layer method. I made a 50000 lines files with real files on the top, and search for lines at lines 1,2001,4001,6001,etc...These are the places of Pick632 layers. I have automatise the process with a simple basic program. So you see that I just kept the skip=0 layers. The reports show that the most of All column are at 0. The difficulty is to have them at the same skip on all layers. But, if you use many layers, some of them will be at skip=0. Thanks for the tip.

I split the lines in trips and analysed them in Winnalotto hitting the pair tab. I just kept the 10 top pairs. Eliminating the doubles, I got 17 numbers. 1 number hit on the first drawing and 5/6 hit on the second drawing. These are good results. I must go on testing to see if the results are regular.

For 11 JUN drawing, I have played the pair 14-15. I will look at the pair 2-4 from Isolator qualified 9 JUN.


taaroa
 

Springbok

Member
Hello Taaroa

I think the Kelly Criteria is dependent on the risk you run. So if you are running with a 30% probability, it would be different from a 50% probability. The best is 100% but no bookie will give you a bet that the sun will not rise the next morning:) I am ultra conservative and you never risk more than 5% of my fighting fund on a round.To me a round in the bookies lottery was up to 4 bets and no more. This makes betting stress free. If you feel stressed you will make stupid mistakes. But I want a round to be a max of two bets and eventually a max of 1 bet. I would be relaxed with a 90 to 99% probability, very relaxed:)
You may like to try Sniper with the 5/34 section of the UK Thunderball and using the filters. It is rather good, actually very good.
 

taaroa

Member
Springbok said:
I think the Kelly Criteria is dependent on the risk you run. So if you are running with a 30% probability, it would be different from a 50% probability. The best is 100% but no bookie will give you a bet that the sun will not rise the next morning:) I am ultra conservative and you never risk more than 5% of my fighting fund on a round.To me a round in the bookies lottery was up to 4 bets and no more. This makes betting stress free. If you feel stressed you will make stupid mistakes. But I want a round to be a max of two bets and eventually a max of 1 bet. I would be relaxed with a 90 to 99% probability, very relaxed:)
You may like to try Sniper with the 5/34 section of the UK Thunderball and using the filters. It is rather good, actually very good.


Agree. Since I play again the bookie lottery with your methods of choosing numbers, I always just played 2 next draws, never more. I try to be conservative and stay under 10% of my little fund. I succeed till now.

I'll look at the 5/34 UK Thunderball. I don't know this lottery.

taaroa
 
Hi All

I've been tracking with a spreadsheet which filters are picking numbers
that appear the most in future draws.

1) Very Hot Numbers

2) Yo Yo High Prob

3) Fullhouse6

4) Springbok2

5) Special3

6) Hot Numbers

-BP
 

Springbok

Member
Hello Taaroa

I got back at 10pm and updated the bookies data file. I loaded the datafile excluding the last 4 draws. My target was the 3rd draw from the top. I managed to slot in two trips from my omega trips and three pairs from the full monty file:) . 5 of the 7 slots were filled in. The pairs were a historical high, and inbetweener and a draadsittter. The trips were identified in the last 3 skip cycles as equal or less than the median.. It not often when they synchronise like this but when it happens it is a thing of great beauty:) You should be able to replicate this. This was with the 7/49 version.
 

Springbok

Member
Hi Taaroa

I should add, I was using a 500 draw history, excluding the last 4 draws. The file was current to and including the teatime draw 11 June. This shows you how we can creep up to the jackpot. There is no other software out there that in the big wide world that can do this.
 

taaroa

Member
Springbok said:
I got back at 10pm and updated the bookies data file. I loaded the datafile excluding the last 4 draws. My target was the 3rd draw from the top. I managed to slot in two trips from my omega trips and three pairs from the full monty file:) . 5 of the 7 slots were filled in. The pairs were a historical high, and inbetweener and a draadsittter. The trips were identified in the last 3 skip cycles as equal or less than the median.. It not often when they synchronise like this but when it happens it is a thing of great beauty:) You should be able to replicate this. This was with the 7/49 version.
-----
I should add, I was using a 500 draw history, excluding the last 4 draws. The file was current to and including the teatime draw 11 June. This shows you how we can creep up to the jackpot. There is no other software out there that in the big wide world that can do this.

Bonjour Monsieur SpringBok,

Interesting results. Indeed, I don't know any other software that can do that.
I have tested with the parameters you gave. I could not test the Omega trip as I have not it. And I'm not sure the Omega pair filter I have is the good one.

#15 hit a draw2 today. I got the pair 14-15 with 100 lines of 49S7 and Opening Batsmen. I also had the 5-6 pair with 6 Hit from Zero2 filter but didn't played it.

About Isolator, 2-4 is now a draw4 without hit. Your methods are better.

taaroa
 

Patrick123

Member
Hello Everyone,

This is a note to let you know WinnaLotto 12 June 2008 - Build 1 is available.

The Major update is the Selection Tab.

Essentially when you're looking at the numbers in the Drawing Analysis Screen, you can now select a row, right-click and select 'Add Selection'.

On the Selection Screen, the 'Show Rows' will list these rows out for you. You can filter per ball, pairs or trips, as well as per number.

Selecting the row, you can right-click & delete the row or modify the comment you added. You can also have the option of un-selecting 1 or 2 of the numbers for a pair or trip.

The beauty of this, is that you can start looking for patterns among the various filters as well as at different levels.
You also have the capability of saving your selections and possibly emailing it to someone else who is then able to open it & check your selection.

I will be adding a 'Merge File' and a "Favourite Numbers' Option soon:

Merge File - Merge your selection with other person's selection for syndicates (Bloubul, Joesam :) )
Favourite Numbers - Build your selection here, this will ultimately carry over to the purge screen.

It is still in the test phase, so any suggestions to improve it would be welcome.

Regards
Patrick
 
Hi Patrick123


Originally posted by Patrick123
Hello Everyone,

This is a note to let you know WinnaLotto 12 June 2008 - Build 1 is available.

I noticed the Purge Screen has a 'tab 4' that's blank. Could a filter for SDP
be included as earlier planed.

Thanks

-BP
 

taaroa

Member
Patrick123 said:
Hello Everyone,

This is a note to let you know WinnaLotto 12 June 2008 - Build 1 is available.

The Major update is the Selection Tab.

Essentially when you're looking at the numbers in the Drawing Analysis Screen, you can now select a row, right-click and select 'Add Selection'.

On the Selection Screen, the 'Show Rows' will list these rows out for you. You can filter per ball, pairs or trips, as well as per number.

Selecting the row, you can right-click & delete the row or modify the comment you added. You can also have the option of un-selecting 1 or 2 of the numbers for a pair or trip.

The beauty of this, is that you can start looking for patterns among the various filters as well as at different levels.
You also have the capability of saving your selections and possibly emailing it to someone else who is then able to open it & check your selection.

I will be adding a 'Merge File' and a "Favourite Numbers' Option soon:

Merge File - Merge your selection with other person's selection for syndicates (Bloubul, Joesam :) )
Favourite Numbers - Build your selection here, this will ultimately carry over to the purge screen.

It is still in the test phase, so any suggestions to improve it would be welcome.

Regards
Patrick

Bonjour Patrick,

Thanks for this new release. Will be of great help.

taaroa
 

Springbok

Member
Aloha Patrick and Taaroa

Doing my late night look at a what if scenario on the Friday teatime draw in the 7/49s game I was amazed at the accuracy of the draad,inbetweener and opening batsmen. 3 pairs 3 hits. Beautiful synchronisation here. The problem is that this does not always happen. There may be a rhythm or beat to the flow of random numbers that is irregular. An surfing analogy will explain this. You paddle out to where the swell rises out. You wait for the swell to rise up with you on top. Then you paddle like mad to catch the swell as it moves forward and if you get it right and the swell turns into a wave then you surf in. If you don't get it right then the swell passes underneath you and you are left on the trough behind the breaking wave. This weekend I will back test to see if the "swells" can be predicted or to be musical, to learn the rhythm of the lottery and learn how to catch the the swells of random numbers:) Of course surfing the lottery is like surfing 6 waves so we got to see how many waves we can surf at the same time.
 

taaroa

Member
Springbok said:
Doing my late night look at a what if scenario on the Friday teatime draw in the 7/49s game I was amazed at the accuracy of the draad,inbetweener and opening batsmen. 3 pairs 3 hits. Beautiful synchronisation here. The problem is that this does not always happen. There may be a rhythm or beat to the flow of random numbers that is irregular. An surfing analogy will explain this. You paddle out to where the swell rises out. You wait for the swell to rise up with you on top. Then you paddle like mad to catch the swell as it moves forward and if you get it right and the swell turns into a wave then you surf in. If you don't get it right then the swell passes underneath you and you are left on the trough behind the breaking wave. This weekend I will back test to see if the "swells" can be predicted or to be musical, to learn the rhythm of the lottery and learn how to catch the the swells of random numbers:) Of course surfing the lottery is like surfing 6 waves so we got to see how many waves we can surf at the same time.

Bonjour SpringBok,

What a happy man you are! I have not played the bookie this Friday because I did not feel the numbers I got were good. I was right. None hit. I remembered Fullhouse's advice that after some wins in a row, there will be a loss. Cyclic nature of everything in Earth probably.

I used your alpha3.flt filter which gave me good results in a row last weeks. But this time, pairs where not confirmed by trips and almost all were different. After-checking showed that using no .flt filter gave good results. I wonder what to do for Saturday draws. For to-morrow, I have used Pick632 layers triples and tested them with Opening Batsmen4 which gave me a 9-25 pair.
Without any filter and sorting on MaxVal col, 9-25 is on top with 50% but 4-45 and 8-25 are at 72,72%. I'll test other filters.


taaroa
 

Sidebar

Top