The ELIMINATOR
- Thread starter fullhouse
- Start date
Re: Re: Re: Thanks Syscrash
Lol! Come on Syscrash, you are doing just fine with the Eliminator and other stuff. You're in danger of becoming the richest Canadian by Xmas the way you're going. But if the Isolator is as good as I think it is. You guys are gonna love it. So far it hasn't lost ONCE in 17 in a ROW! Serious stuff. But I am not 100% certain yet. And like I said, for me to endorse any strategy, it must be the business. The Eliminator is close. But I always felt it can be improved upon. So I believe the Isolator takes things that little bit further. Peace...
syscrash said:
Lol! Come on Syscrash, you are doing just fine with the Eliminator and other stuff. You're in danger of becoming the richest Canadian by Xmas the way you're going. But if the Isolator is as good as I think it is. You guys are gonna love it. So far it hasn't lost ONCE in 17 in a ROW! Serious stuff. But I am not 100% certain yet. And like I said, for me to endorse any strategy, it must be the business. The Eliminator is close. But I always felt it can be improved upon. So I believe the Isolator takes things that little bit further. Peace...
The Eliminator update...
Okay today the numbers SLOWED DOWN. It has always amazed me that random numbers can perform in an almost organized fashion. While an Eliminator can qualify as late as draw 25. One has never qualified inside 12 draws. The other extreme of the spectrum.
And in theory all 49 numbers could be drawn in 7 draws for the 7 number draw. But there is more chance of winning the lottery than that ever happening. I am certain it never will. There will always be at least 6 or 7 numbers that are multi-drawn in any seven draw sequence.
So the state of play for Eliminator (16) is, after 12 draws we have 6 numbers remaining. They're numbers (08) (09) (11) (35) (37) & (43).
Now number (35) is in the zone (Draws 22---29) At 24 draws no show. And that would be a good number to practice Syscrashes staking plan on. Although it has been over 30 draws twice in the last 2.3 years. It has a consistent pattern of going over 30 then 20-26. It last went over 30 in November last year. And is now in the mid 20s. So it could be showtime very soon. Peace...
Okay today the numbers SLOWED DOWN. It has always amazed me that random numbers can perform in an almost organized fashion. While an Eliminator can qualify as late as draw 25. One has never qualified inside 12 draws. The other extreme of the spectrum.
And in theory all 49 numbers could be drawn in 7 draws for the 7 number draw. But there is more chance of winning the lottery than that ever happening. I am certain it never will. There will always be at least 6 or 7 numbers that are multi-drawn in any seven draw sequence.
So the state of play for Eliminator (16) is, after 12 draws we have 6 numbers remaining. They're numbers (08) (09) (11) (35) (37) & (43).
Now number (35) is in the zone (Draws 22---29) At 24 draws no show. And that would be a good number to practice Syscrashes staking plan on. Although it has been over 30 draws twice in the last 2.3 years. It has a consistent pattern of going over 30 then 20-26. It last went over 30 in November last year. And is now in the mid 20s. So it could be showtime very soon. Peace...
Hi Fullhouse
You can improve the accuracy of the eliminator when it comes to betting on the remaining 3 numbers by taking certain facts into consideration. In the 49s lottery(including the boosterball) the midpoint is 17 draws. In other words the pool of numbers that come into play can be below the pool in the last 17 draws or one or two numbers can come from the numbers not represented in the previous 17 draws. These numbers not in the previous 17 draws are represented in the eliminator. in each draw there is a 50/50 chance that the numbers will swing either from the previous 17 draws or some will come from the numbers not represented in those draws. Now if you are sitting on your eliminator with 3 numbers or 2 numbers and in the two previous draws the pool came from the previous 17 draws then the chances are that in the next draw one or two numbers will pop up from the numbers not represented in the previous 17 draws. In other words there is a greater chance of a rebalancing to occur by a swing in the opposite direction ie above the pool of numbers in the last 17 draws.
You can improve the accuracy of the eliminator when it comes to betting on the remaining 3 numbers by taking certain facts into consideration. In the 49s lottery(including the boosterball) the midpoint is 17 draws. In other words the pool of numbers that come into play can be below the pool in the last 17 draws or one or two numbers can come from the numbers not represented in the previous 17 draws. These numbers not in the previous 17 draws are represented in the eliminator. in each draw there is a 50/50 chance that the numbers will swing either from the previous 17 draws or some will come from the numbers not represented in those draws. Now if you are sitting on your eliminator with 3 numbers or 2 numbers and in the two previous draws the pool came from the previous 17 draws then the chances are that in the next draw one or two numbers will pop up from the numbers not represented in the previous 17 draws. In other words there is a greater chance of a rebalancing to occur by a swing in the opposite direction ie above the pool of numbers in the last 17 draws.
Re: Hi Fullhouse
Hi Springbok,
Nice post...
I have found that the ZONE (as I call it) of losing streaks that go beyond 17 draws is (22--29) Most will come to rest in that zone. And 22 is the number one spot so far in 2006. There have been 40 losing streaks of 22 draws or greater so far in 2006. And 32 of them came to rest between (22--29) That is an 80% strike rate.
And 12 of them popped out after 22 draws no show. That is over 25% of all the losing streaks. Our most recent qualifier is NO.35 which is now 24 draws no show. And may well pop in the next 4 or 5 draws. So the longer the losing streak the more exclusive it becomes. But 22--29 offers the zone where you can pick off the majority of them. And with fixed odds of 5/1 on the 7 number draw. That makes it very workable into a profit making exercise. Peace...
Springbok said:
Hi Springbok,
Nice post...
I have found that the ZONE (as I call it) of losing streaks that go beyond 17 draws is (22--29) Most will come to rest in that zone. And 22 is the number one spot so far in 2006. There have been 40 losing streaks of 22 draws or greater so far in 2006. And 32 of them came to rest between (22--29) That is an 80% strike rate.
And 12 of them popped out after 22 draws no show. That is over 25% of all the losing streaks. Our most recent qualifier is NO.35 which is now 24 draws no show. And may well pop in the next 4 or 5 draws. So the longer the losing streak the more exclusive it becomes. But 22--29 offers the zone where you can pick off the majority of them. And with fixed odds of 5/1 on the 7 number draw. That makes it very workable into a profit making exercise. Peace...
Eliminator update.
This Eliminator shows how things always balance out from one to another. I thought it was going to be a fast qualifier. But in the last 4 draws only ONE of the last 7 numbers has racked up.
And now at 14 draws we have 6 numbers remaining. So It could still qualify tommorow but I am not so sure. What I forgot was the last Eliminator went pretty fast. And had no losing streaks over 30 draws. A hint I have taken from Syscrash. I now realize number 35 is highly likely to break 30 draws to restore the balance.
So I am going to let it go and pick up on it for Syscrashes PILGRIMAGE STRATEGY. So we have 3 numbers all at 20 draws no show. And its a question of waiting to see what happens to number 35. But there is going to be some long losing streaks coming. I will keep you posted. Peace...
This Eliminator shows how things always balance out from one to another. I thought it was going to be a fast qualifier. But in the last 4 draws only ONE of the last 7 numbers has racked up.
And now at 14 draws we have 6 numbers remaining. So It could still qualify tommorow but I am not so sure. What I forgot was the last Eliminator went pretty fast. And had no losing streaks over 30 draws. A hint I have taken from Syscrash. I now realize number 35 is highly likely to break 30 draws to restore the balance.
So I am going to let it go and pick up on it for Syscrashes PILGRIMAGE STRATEGY. So we have 3 numbers all at 20 draws no show. And its a question of waiting to see what happens to number 35. But there is going to be some long losing streaks coming. I will keep you posted. Peace...
Last edited:
wazzappenning
Member
hey syscrash, just curious if you re canadian are you buying tickets online? you guys seem to be doing very well at this and im wondering if there s a way i can get in?
Expected results
In the last 4 draws the results have come from a pool of numbers as follows 13-13-15-10. the first number being the very last draw. Now the midpoint is 16 or 17 and in today's lunchtime draw the pool should come from above 16 or 17. Now there are 4 numbers remaining after the last 17 draws with no show, namely 8,9, 35 and 37. If the expected swing occurs then at least one of those numbers will come up. This was posted at 12:05 UK winter time.
In the last 4 draws the results have come from a pool of numbers as follows 13-13-15-10. the first number being the very last draw. Now the midpoint is 16 or 17 and in today's lunchtime draw the pool should come from above 16 or 17. Now there are 4 numbers remaining after the last 17 draws with no show, namely 8,9, 35 and 37. If the expected swing occurs then at least one of those numbers will come up. This was posted at 12:05 UK winter time.
AT the lunchtime draw the pool of numbers was below the midpoint of 16 and nothing came up. Teatime draw and a rebalancing occurred and it swung above the midpoint and the 9 dropped in. If it swings above the midpoint again then one of the three remaining numbers will come up(8, 35 or 37) at tomorrow's lunchtime draw. Accuracy depends on knowing what the midpoint is and which way the numbers will swing as in below or above the midpoint. Normally 3 consecutive swings above and below will result in a reversal in the next draw although the current draws show some freaky behaviour. In my view this should occur in maximum of 3 draws, and one or more should drop in by the Saturday lunchtme draw.
Springbok said:
Nice work Springbok,
Although there are actually 4 numbers remaining. And they are
NO.08 (22) DRAWS NO SHOW
NO.35 (28) DRAWS NO SHOW
NO.37 (22) DRAWS NO SHOW
NO.43 (24) DRAWS NO SHOW
Now in 2006 the 22 draw streak is king so far with 12 out of a possible 41. And now there are 2 more contenders. If a number or 2 is going to pop lunchtime tommorow, it could well be either number 8 or 37.
After 16 draws those are the 4 left. And it is highly likely that tommorow Eliminator 16 will qualify. Although I am now only concentrating on stage 2 (the last 2 numbers)
If this Eliminator wins, it will be 6 in a row, and I will be very happy. Although last year there were more than 15 in a row. So there is a way to go yet to match that excellence. Peace...
Question about "Eliminator...?"
Hi again,
Your base numbers I understand and am beginning to see the ballpark numbers of your game and how they drop . My question is...do you use a part of a month or a year or more of the games past history to set a base for forming the startup? In other words, where would it be appropriate to begin the countdown or countup to begin my spread sheet? I am asking because as I mentioned before, I am looking for a way to setup the Pick 4 game. So far, what I have done with the pick 4 is start my basic setup---beginning from January 1st foreward. In my setup, I can see that January of 2006 is not enough information yet it may be too much, too. Roughly, how far back would I go in the 6/49 or would it be better to use a smaller time period?
Has anyone tried the setup..."Eliminator" with other countrys and if so, how well has it produced? I'm sorry that what I am beginning to setup is not the game that you folks are discussing but...you guys got me started... and it looks very good with the 6/49 game which in turn may do wonders with the Pick 4 game.
Thank you,
Teufellj ...
Hi again,
Your base numbers I understand and am beginning to see the ballpark numbers of your game and how they drop . My question is...do you use a part of a month or a year or more of the games past history to set a base for forming the startup? In other words, where would it be appropriate to begin the countdown or countup to begin my spread sheet? I am asking because as I mentioned before, I am looking for a way to setup the Pick 4 game. So far, what I have done with the pick 4 is start my basic setup---beginning from January 1st foreward. In my setup, I can see that January of 2006 is not enough information yet it may be too much, too. Roughly, how far back would I go in the 6/49 or would it be better to use a smaller time period?
Has anyone tried the setup..."Eliminator" with other countrys and if so, how well has it produced? I'm sorry that what I am beginning to setup is not the game that you folks are discussing but...you guys got me started... and it looks very good with the 6/49 game which in turn may do wonders with the Pick 4 game.
Thank you,
Teufellj ...
wazzappenning
Member
thank you very much fullhouse
Teufellj hi,
I am not sure if this will help you. But I always start the Eliminator from the 1st of each month. Then every new Eliminator 10 draws apart.
So for example, this month the First Eliminator started on the first of March, the second on the 6th of March, the third on the 11th of March and so forth. Producing 6 Eliminators per month and 72 a year.
Basically it takes on average, 22 draws for 48 of the 49 numbers to be drawn. Sometimes it occurs faster, sometimes slower.
That is why I have found that spacing Each new Eliminator 10 draws apart is perfect. If I spaced each one 5 draws apart, I wouldn't be allowing enough gap to cope with the innevitable losing streaks that pass 30 draws. And I would suffer more losing Eliminators. By using a 10 draw gap you can enjoy winning streaks of 10 or more in a row. From October of last year to January of this year there were 17 winning Eliminators in a row if you use Stage 2. And that is phenomenal.
This would never have happened if the spacing between each one had been less than 10 draws. And apart from the idea of the Strategy, the 10 draw gap is the fundamental reason the Strategy is a winner. So I hope that anwsers your question. How you would apply this to a multiple number lottery I am not sure. But I hope it makes you realize why the 10 draw gap is so important. Peace...
I am not sure if this will help you. But I always start the Eliminator from the 1st of each month. Then every new Eliminator 10 draws apart.
So for example, this month the First Eliminator started on the first of March, the second on the 6th of March, the third on the 11th of March and so forth. Producing 6 Eliminators per month and 72 a year.
Basically it takes on average, 22 draws for 48 of the 49 numbers to be drawn. Sometimes it occurs faster, sometimes slower.
That is why I have found that spacing Each new Eliminator 10 draws apart is perfect. If I spaced each one 5 draws apart, I wouldn't be allowing enough gap to cope with the innevitable losing streaks that pass 30 draws. And I would suffer more losing Eliminators. By using a 10 draw gap you can enjoy winning streaks of 10 or more in a row. From October of last year to January of this year there were 17 winning Eliminators in a row if you use Stage 2. And that is phenomenal.
This would never have happened if the spacing between each one had been less than 10 draws. And apart from the idea of the Strategy, the 10 draw gap is the fundamental reason the Strategy is a winner. So I hope that anwsers your question. How you would apply this to a multiple number lottery I am not sure. But I hope it makes you realize why the 10 draw gap is so important. Peace...
Last edited:
syscrash said:
Yeah I got something started in Canada didn't I ? Lol!
Well today Eliminator 16 qualified after 18 draws. Although I will be waiting for stage 2 (2 numbers) I will cover the 3 remaining numbers in two doubles (08) (37)----(37) (43)
I think 37 is the number to focus on, Syscrash knows why. So I will give it a slight favour in staking if it is in the final two.
I am going to update the staking the Eliminator thread this weekend. And only use stage 2 (2 numbers) as it will be alot faster to get it up to date. And is what I and others really concentrate on now anyway. Peace...
about the double... I think that the (8)(37) and (37)(43) will have no chance to come out. Sorry fullhouse...
First,
Last time we saw (8)(37) together was the last we saw (8)too... so that mean 23 draws ago only.
Concercing (37)(43) it was 27 draws ago... that's pretty low if we know that the pair have some tendencies to show up every 47 draws as average.
If we look at (8)(43)... I think they are due... we saw them 137 draws ago...
First,
Last time we saw (8)(37) together was the last we saw (8)too... so that mean 23 draws ago only.
Concercing (37)(43) it was 27 draws ago... that's pretty low if we know that the pair have some tendencies to show up every 47 draws as average.
If we look at (8)(43)... I think they are due... we saw them 137 draws ago...
syscrash said:
Interesting, then I will go with that one and put a smaller stake on the other 2 to get my money back. I only do the double Syscrash because I am not covering the last 3 numbers as singles anymore. And it would really peev me off if two of them were to come out together. Because then basically you've had a wasted Eliminator. And I like to try and get something out of each one. Peace...