The ELIMINATOR
- Thread starter fullhouse
- Start date
syscrash said:
Well that is within the Eliminator strategy Syscrash. There are few numbers that I will pursue on their own merit. As you know number 30 is one of them. And it has the best record of any number. Even number 12 went 47 draws in 2003. Number (30) has not seen 29 draws in more than 3 years.
Number 2 is another number I will pursue, but always I like to defend with another good number. Placing just enough to retrieve my stake from the 4th bet on.
This is how I would stake for 8 bets in points.
1,1.5,2,3,5,7,10,15 I rarely make it to the 8th bet with numbers like 2 and 30 they're that good. Peace...
yes,
I started to hunt down the number 4 before he was elegible for eleminator, because I saw that he performed pretty well and he was under my 12 draw range
.
I didn't won a lot with number 4 but I won. That's why i'm asking myself if I should preserve me stake strategy or go for a more aggressive stake
I started to hunt down the number 4 before he was elegible for eleminator, because I saw that he performed pretty well and he was under my 12 draw range
.I didn't won a lot with number 4 but I won. That's why i'm asking myself if I should preserve me stake strategy or go for a more aggressive stake
syscrash said:yes,
I started to hunt down the number 4 before he was elegible for eleminator, because I saw that he performed pretty well and he was under my 12 draw range
I didn't won a lot with number 4 but I won. That's why i'm asking myself if I should preserve me stake strategy or go for a more aggressive stake
I would preserve your staking until you make your first grand syscrash. Where do you stand now with your bankroll. I would say once you make a 1000 get serious. There will be no looking back from there. Especially if the new strategy I am proofing continues like it is right now. You will be able to make a living from this alone by xmas my friend I am telling you.
syscrash said:
Yeah always maintain a respect for the odds Syscrash. You will never go wrong. I have seen people lose $3000 in a day or more because they got too cocky. Thinking they could never lose. Having said that, they Never had the Eliminator or Side by Side strategies. Only unproven guess work. And there is a big difference there.
Well if you have $500 now I congratulate you. It took me 4 months to go from £200 to £500 when I first started. Imagine what you will have by Xmas at your present growth rate ?
fullhouse said:
yes, I can't believe how many people hope to win the jack pot when the odds are 1 vs 13 000 000
. I mean... that's ridiculous.3000$ a day?! That's crazy. There's a big difference between $CAN and £.
I may be living from this, but I don't think that I'll quit my job... this is the bonus and we don't know when they can change the rules.
Sorry If I seem to be a bit pessimist, but I think it's always good to be a bit parano.syscrash said:yes, I can't believe how many people hope to win the jack pot when the odds are 1 vs 13 000 000
3000$ a day?! That's crazy. There's a big difference between $CAN and £.
I may be living from this, but I don't think that I'll quit my job... this is the bonus and we don't know when they can change the rules.
They won't change the rules from us Syscrash Lol! I mean they've even increased the odds from 9/2 to 5/1 for the 7 number draw because they're making so much money from it.
Like I said a while back, the only way they could get rocked and panic and make changes. Would be if several multi-millionaires were to follow this strategy and fleece them for millions a month. THEN they would wake up I can tell you. As the saying goes MONEY TALKS. Well in the gambling world it SCREAMS....
I quit my job once I made £5,000 Syscrash. From that point I thought I am making twice as much as I used to working, and I hated my job and boss. And life is too short to take orders and waste precious time. That is when the Eliminator and other strategies became my job.
Re: Hi all
Glad to see you are back in the spin Endbox.
Actually there are 8 numbers remaining for Eliminator (16) they are as follows.
(08) (09) (11) (17) (28) (35) (37) & (43)
I am very pleased with the way things are going. This is better than last year. We are now 13 wins from 15 for 2006. And I myself am now only covering the last 3 numbers as 2 doubles for a max of 4 bets, and then the last 2 as singles and a double.
We have just had our 5th winning Eliminator in a row. But still have a way to go to match the last longest streak. From november of last year through to the 3rd Eliminator of January, there were 12 in a row if my memory serves me right. I will check back on it.
So wonderful runs are possible. Peace...
endbox said:
Glad to see you are back in the spin Endbox.
Actually there are 8 numbers remaining for Eliminator (16) they are as follows.
(08) (09) (11) (17) (28) (35) (37) & (43)
I am very pleased with the way things are going. This is better than last year. We are now 13 wins from 15 for 2006. And I myself am now only covering the last 3 numbers as 2 doubles for a max of 4 bets, and then the last 2 as singles and a double.
We have just had our 5th winning Eliminator in a row. But still have a way to go to match the last longest streak. From november of last year through to the 3rd Eliminator of January, there were 12 in a row if my memory serves me right. I will check back on it.
So wonderful runs are possible. Peace...
Re: Re: Hi all
Hey Syscrash, I don't know if you will be able to get those files to me. Lets hope we can figure something out. You missed out number (17) Sys, you're slipping Lol!
Yes I will be favouring 8 slightly too. With a 100/80 split.
I will add that to the Side by Side post...
syscrash said:
Hey Syscrash, I don't know if you will be able to get those files to me. Lets hope we can figure something out. You missed out number (17) Sys, you're slipping Lol!
Yes I will be favouring 8 slightly too. With a 100/80 split.
I will add that to the Side by Side post...
Re: Hi fullhouse
Endbox, I stand corrected. Yes number (17) did come out on Thursday lunchtime. So we do stand at 7 numbers after only 10 draws.
I took that result by phone, and I mis-heard the guy, I thought he said 7.
My only concern is this Eliminator is going TOO FAST. And may qualify as early as draw 14 or 15. And that is often the type of Eliminator that produces a loss, because it doesn't allow for longer losing streaks. So we shall see. Peace...
endbox said:
Endbox, I stand corrected. Yes number (17) did come out on Thursday lunchtime. So we do stand at 7 numbers after only 10 draws.
I took that result by phone, and I mis-heard the guy, I thought he said 7.
My only concern is this Eliminator is going TOO FAST. And may qualify as early as draw 14 or 15. And that is often the type of Eliminator that produces a loss, because it doesn't allow for longer losing streaks. So we shall see. Peace...
Re: Thanks Syscrash
Yes, I am proofing a new Strategy right now called the ISOLATOR. It is looking very promising. And may have a higher strike rate than even the Eliminator or Side by Side. I will release it upon this forum at the start of May if it continues to deliver. Peace...
endbox said:
Yes, I am proofing a new Strategy right now called the ISOLATOR. It is looking very promising. And may have a higher strike rate than even the Eliminator or Side by Side. I will release it upon this forum at the start of May if it continues to deliver. Peace...