Repeaters

N

Nick Koutras

Member
gsobier said:
Nick:

Yes there is... ...1890 and 1990 are the ones to correct.

Regards,
George:)
Click to expand...

My webs 1890: 3,11,13,28,40,47,16
BCLC = the same

My webs 1990: 3,11,12,25,32,38,36

BCLC= the same.

I did not read the thread completely...
but I do not see the difference.
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
Below is a CRC like algorithm to do
checks sums.

' Evaluate the 16-bit Checksum of an array of bytes

Function SemiCRC(bSource() As Byte) As Long
Dim lngCRC As Long
Dim lngTemp As Long
Dim lngSize As Long
Dim I As Long

Const divisor As Long = 32768

lngSize = UBound(bSource())

For I = 0 To lngSize
lngTemp = 0
If lngCRC \ divisor Then lngTemp = 1
lngCRC = (((lngCRC * 2) And &HFFFF&) + lngTemp) Xor CLng(bSource(I))
Next

SemiCRC = lngCRC
End Function
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Nick read this thread...How do you count the skips....It seems that your device is counting the first draw as a 0 skip for all the 7 numbers from that draw...
But this adds up to the total of repeaters...
It shouldn't :no:
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
From what I conclude is...

My ORIGINAL database had these errors.

The error have been corrected on the following uploads.

As it stands up to now the data base at my web site IS correct as the BCLC database.


Does anybody knows if any other website has the complete database of the Can 6/49 other than BCLC?
 
G

gsobier

Member
Nick:

I just sent to you a copy to your HOTMAIL which has those 2 errors in it to help you figure this out... ...the last draw recorded was 2050 in that one.

Regards,
George:)
Nick Koutras said:
My webs 1890: 3,11,13,28,40,47,16
BCLC = the same

My webs 1990: 3,11,12,25,32,38,36

BCLC= the same.

I did not read the thread completely...
but I do not see the difference.
Click to expand...
 
G

gsobier

Member
Nick:

Which draw was it when those errors have been corrected? Anyone who has your software for a long time is stuck with those errors.

Regards,
George:)
Nick Koutras said:
From what I conclude is...

My ORIGINAL database had these errors.

The error have been corrected on the following uploads.

As it stands up to now the data base at my web site IS correct as the BCLC database.


Does anybody knows if any other website has the complete database of the Can 6/49 other than BCLC?
Click to expand...
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Nick Koutras said:
From what I conclude is...

My ORIGINAL database had these errors.

The error have been corrected on the following uploads.

As it stands up to now the data base at my web site IS correct as the BCLC database.


Does anybody knows if any other website has the complete database of the Can 6/49 other than BCLC?
Click to expand...
The database thing is O:K: now...
what I'm talking about is a possible bug or error in which LottoStatistic count the number of repeaters...The error lies in the very first draw with a 0 skip for all these numbers....
Got to find a way to avoid that count... :agree:
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
Nick read this thread...How do you count the skips....It seems that your device is counting the first draw as a 0 skip for all the 7 numbers from that draw...
But this adds up to the total of repeaters...
It shouldn't :no:
Click to expand...

To verify how the program counts the Skips/Hits do the following:

Under Duration enter 1
and press the Button Skip/Hits

If the 6 or 7 numbers show as 1 Skip then
the program counts the skips/hits correct.

The algorithm is then ok.
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Nick Koutras said:
To verify how the program counts the Skips/Hits do the following:

Under Duration enter 1
and press the Button Skip/Hits

If the 6 or 7 numbers show as 1 Skip then
the program counts the skips/hits correct.

The algorithm is then ok.
Click to expand...
I understand that Nick ...But if you count the first draw as 0 skips for all the numbers...when you check for repeaters...you wind up having 7 more repeats in your total of repeat...I agree that 0 skip=repeater
But the very first draw can't count it that way...Even if the 0 skip for those is correct...repeaters count wont...
As Beaker noticed the % will also be affected...
I'm not asking you this for me I know where the mistake in these counts lies...
But any other person looking at this might get a bad interpretation about this ...and when comparing with others might ask or search for nothing in his data...
Maybe it would be wise to put up another option in Lotto Statistics for repeaters only seperating repeaters from skips counts!
 :agree:
 
G

gsobier

Member
Nick:

That is very interesting because there is something going on where View New Posts fails to display everything... ...look at the post "Mark All Forums Read". You missed seeing this thread because it was probably not listed... ...I've been asked by Maggie a few times if I responded to a post and I'd ask "which post?" because new posts are not displayed properly like they should be.

Regards,
George:)
Nick Koutras said:
I missed this thread...

It seems that there is a discrepancy
between my database and the BCLC

I'll check the data and I'll report the results.
Click to expand...
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
gsobier said:
Nick:

Which draw was it when those errors have been corrected? Anyone who has your software for a long time is stuck with those errors.

Regards,
George:)
Click to expand...


George,
I do update the databases from different sources since I do not keep a correct track of all the results.


It seems that one of these sources do have the discrepancy with BCLC.

But do we know 100% that the BCLC database is correct?

It would be very important if OLGC had available the same database to compare.
But these guys are crooks for me!
Not even a database in their web site!
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Nick Koutras said:
George,
I do update the databases from different sources since I do not keep a correct track of all the results.


It seems that one of these sources do have the discrepancy with BCLC.

But do we know 100% that the BCLC database is correct?

It would be very important if OLGC had available the same database to compare.
But these guys are crooks for me!
Not even a database in their web site!
Click to expand...
I agree 100% with you Nick...We have to trust their database like blind people...
I have acces to another official source of 6/49 results from
'la bibliothèque Nationale Du Québec''
I will get my hands on this...I'll compare it to BCLC data...
These----> :heul: are crooks..Couldn't have put it better...
 
G

gsobier

Member
Nick:

Most here feel BCLC is the gospel for data... ...LOTTERY DIRECTOR has been corrected by myself as well if you were thinking about looking there. I'd have to say OLGC is the WORST for useful information and I'm betting it is done on purpose.

Dennis:

Does "La Belle Province" have any data in a useful form?

Regards,
George:)
Nick Koutras said:
George,
I do update the databases from different sources since I do not keep a correct track of all the results.


It seems that one of these sources do have the discrepancy with BCLC.

But do we know 100% that the BCLC database is correct?

It would be very important if OLGC had available the same database to compare.
But these guys are crooks for me!
Not even a database in their web site!
Click to expand...
 
N

Nick Koutras

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
I understand that Nick ...But if you count the first draw as 0 skips for all the numbers...when you check for repeaters...you wind up having 7 more repeats in your total of repeat...I agree that 0 skip=repeater
But the very first draw can't count it that way...Even if the 0 skip for those is correct...repeaters count wont...
As Beaker noticed the % will also be affected...
I'm not asking you this for me I know where the mistake in these counts lies...
But any other person looking at this might get a bad interpretation about this ...and when comparing with others might ask or search for nothing in his data...
Maybe it would be wise to put up another option in Lotto Statistics for repeaters only seperating repeaters from skips counts!
 :agree:
Click to expand...

Hi Dennis,

I do not see the 0 skips.

I may do have an updated version of LottoStatixticsXL I use.

If your version shows 0 Skips for the last draw then that version is on error.
 
G

gsobier

Member
Dennis:

That sounds great:agree:... ...Peter, look at the can of worms you have opened this time my friend. Good thing you did:agree2:!

Regards,
George:)
Dennis Bassboss said:
I agree 100% with you Nick...We have to trust their database like blind people...
I have acces to another official source of 6/49 results from
'la bibliothèque Nationale Du Québec''
I will get my hands on this...I'll compare it to BCLC data...
These----> :heul: are crooks..Couldn't have put it better...
Click to expand...
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Nick Koutras said:
Hi Dennis,

I do not see the 0 skips.

I may do have an updated version of LottoStatixticsXL I use.

If your version shows 0 Skips for the last draw then that version is on error.
Click to expand...
What is the current version...I have version 114 :confused:
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Nick Koutras said:
Hi Dennis,

I do not see the 0 skips.

I may do have an updated version of LottoStatixticsXL I use.

If your version shows 0 Skips for the last draw then that version is on error.
Click to expand...
Not for the last draw...Nick...For the very first draw...
The 7 numbers on the very first draw shows 0 skip
the 42 other numbers will mark a skip 1...
 
D

Dennis Bassboss

Member
Anyway I'll leave it like it is.... Your chart for skip and hits looks good with the pale greenish color highliter...
Lots and lots of interesting features in it...I can live with this one being inaccurate for repeaters counts only... :agree:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sidebar

Top