That software is NOT for the faint of heart and many will not perservere with it. Too bad. I think we are only scratching the surface and those that work with it will be rewarded.Maggie said:Reading everybodys positive posts about WH has made me a little more curious about it, more so now than when Andrew first came on board with it.
Agree on all here....Beaker said:That software is NOT for the faint of heart and many will not perservere with it. Too bad. I think we are only scratching the surface and those that work with it will be rewarded.
Andrew has been awesome with some great enhancements and if he is willing to do the code I am willing to use it to find that jackpot. It truly is like peeling the layers away from an onion - soon we will get the gem at the core.
Can you imagine![]()
And you are already seeing some great success with it in banco. With your other tools you are going to hit moreDennis Bassboss said:Agree on all here....![]()
Don't worry Maggie the current version is now for the most part clean of major bugs that would kick you out of the program on repetitions...You only have to take it one step at the time .... I'm still experimenting a lot of stuff and criterias with it And the more I dig into it the more interesting it becomes...Maggie said:I know for a fact, I would not be good with it. As soon as I ran into a glitch I would get very frustrated with it, probably give up on it and then be ticked off at myself for giving up on it. And then start all over again. Vicious circle!! I certainly do wish all of you luck using it and hope that it gives you what you want out of it.![]()
Yes ....you are right what worked well in the past will work again in the future...Adding Win Hunter into the picture Makes us laughing even more...Beaker said:And you are already seeing some great success with it in banco. With your other tools you are going to hit moreand that's no coincidence
![]()
![]()
Sometimes I wonder what we would do without WinHunter![]()
We'd have to have fun some other way
![]()