ComboManiac
Member
BLACKMAMBA IS TRYING
01-05-25-34-43-44
09-10-34-39-40-43
05-12-25-38-39-48
05-20-22-34-40-47
Luck to All....
01-05-25-34-43-44
09-10-34-39-40-43
05-12-25-38-39-48
05-20-22-34-40-47
Luck to All....
Picks July 26,2003
- Thread starter Pradeep
- Start date
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Results tonite are...11 22 26 35 41 46 bonus 08
Congrats to all the winners!
Congrats to all the winners!
Dennis Bassboss
Member
I am very surprized that the 36 did not show ..... 
Beaker
Member
WOW
I know it is useless posting predictions after the fact - anyone could do this. But I'm looking through some of the predictions from WinHunter AI runs. Take a look
b9kj8w94.xml Predicts (010) :4-11-15-18-22-26-28-33-35-46
Inverted (039) :1-2-3-5-6-7-8-9-10-12-13-14-
16-17-19-20-21-23-24-25-27-29-
30-31-32-34-36-37-38-39-40-41-
42-43-44-45-47-48-49
Now, 5 numbers hit in a 10 number wheel is alot of $$$
Somehow, we have to find and play these
....another good one
z0n499np.xml Predicts (010) :7-16-23-26-28-29-35-41-45-48
Inverted (039) :1-2-3-4-5-6-8-9-10-11-12-13-
14-15-17-18-19-20-21-22-24-25-
27-30-31-32-33-34-36-37-38-39-
40-42-43-44-46-47-49
I know it is useless posting predictions after the fact - anyone could do this. But I'm looking through some of the predictions from WinHunter AI runs. Take a look
b9kj8w94.xml Predicts (010) :4-11-15-18-22-26-28-33-35-46
Inverted (039) :1-2-3-5-6-7-8-9-10-12-13-14-
16-17-19-20-21-23-24-25-27-29-
30-31-32-34-36-37-38-39-40-41-
42-43-44-45-47-48-49
Now, 5 numbers hit in a 10 number wheel is alot of $$$
Somehow, we have to find and play these
....another good one
z0n499np.xml Predicts (010) :7-16-23-26-28-29-35-41-45-48
Inverted (039) :1-2-3-4-5-6-8-9-10-11-12-13-
14-15-17-18-19-20-21-22-24-25-
27-30-31-32-33-34-36-37-38-39-
40-42-43-44-46-47-49
Beaker
Member
These are predictions I ran before the drawMaggie said:Are these preds from this past draw that you ran these or are they from past draws? And if they are from past draws, how far back do they go? WOW IS RIGHT!!
And they are from AI runs which use 300 draws of history.
There are gems in here Maggie - JACKPOT GEMS
Beaker
Member
Maggie, there are 58 of these predictions. I'm not sure if you are looking at WinHunter but with AI, these stacks get produced by the software and for all intents and purposes stacks produce predictions. Then, AI will look through these stacks and remove or dump the ones she doesn't like. This process can continue for a long time.Maggie said:So, Beaker, on average how many sets of lines would you normally come up with using this? Or do you control how many you want by "asking" for a certain amount? And if it's in the 100's, that would be a helluva job trying to weed them out, wouldn't it?
What I have done is let AI run for 3 days and removed all the 'good' stacks she kept. Most of these stacks predict 10 numbers.
What I am currently doing is reviewing which of these 58 gives the most consistent results. Some of these stacks are very very good.
With the recent functionality incorporated into WinHunter, the job of reviewing what is good and bad is alot easier.
Last edited:
Maggie
Member
Beaker, have you been using these stacks lately when you choose your picks or are you just studying them for now to get a handle on how it measures up? And if you are using them now, do you go with one stack or are you using some numbers from one stack and some from others as well? (kinda like mixing and matching) Or are you picking numbers a la WinHunter along with your other methods of choosing picks? (I promise, no more questions after this)
Beaker
Member
Maggie, I always thought that the AI stacks had some value but the problem was you couldn't manually load 300 stacks and look at them - it was just too time consuming. At the present time, I'm trying to evaluate how to use what these stacks are giving me. For example, take the 10 best stacks that produce between 3-5 from 10 numbers and make sure you have 5 or 6 from each stack or get the 10 best stacks and count the predictions and play the top 10 numbers (this can be done in WinHunter). There are so many possibilities here So, short answer to your first question is I am measuring them up to see what I have.
Your second question about how to use them is interesting and I'll tell you why.
Let's say you have a number - like your best bet 11 - and say one other number like 46, so 11-46 you are sure are coming. Why not look for the stacks that have 11-46 in them That might leave you with 5 stacks left to choose from and you can pick the best one form there.
I think until I find/create a really outstanding stack or set of stacks I will use WinHUnter along with my other picking strategies. But, I really believe that WH can help you win more.
I'll give you a great example of how I use it now, my Eliminate list. This is a set of stacks that consistently eliminates 1 number. I have 30 of these stacks and the results are very promising. I am also building a list of mayhit stacks - between 1-4 numbers that may come.
Lot's of possibilities to help here.
Anything else?
So, short answer to your first question is I am measuring them up to see what I have.Your second question about how to use them is interesting and I'll tell you why.
Let's say you have a number - like your best bet 11 - and say one other number like 46, so 11-46 you are sure are coming. Why not look for the stacks that have 11-46 in them
That might leave you with 5 stacks left to choose from and you can pick the best one form there. I think until I find/create a really outstanding stack or set of stacks I will use WinHUnter along with my other picking strategies. But, I really believe that WH can help you win more.
I'll give you a great example of how I use it now, my Eliminate list. This is a set of stacks that consistently eliminates 1 number. I have 30 of these stacks and the results are very promising. I am also building a list of mayhit stacks - between 1-4 numbers that may come.
Lot's of possibilities to help here.
Anything else?
Maggie
Member
THANKS, for all that Beaker. Just one more little question (if I may) In your Eliminate list, you say it looks very promising, does that mean more often than not, it's correct? It sounds like using this would make it easier to find those gems than trying to find a needle in a haystack.
Just one more little question (if I may) In your Eliminate list, you say it looks very promising, does that mean more often than not, it's correct? It sounds like using this would make it easier to find those gems than trying to find a needle in a haystack. Dennis Bassboss
Member
I have similar results from many differents stacks too...And let me add this here...For keno it is even more awesome ....
Beaker
Member
Take a look for yourself MaggieMaggie said:THANKS, for all that Beaker.
Predictions Generated at 4:59:41 PM on 07/24/2003
History File: E:\Program Files\Winhunter\history\can749.txt
-----------------------------------------------------------
mayhit01.xml Predicts (004) :9-28-38-42
mayhit02.xml Inverted (009) :3-5-6-7-9-11-38-46-49
mayhit03.xml Inverted (001) :13
mayhit04.xml Inverted (003) :16-28-38
mayhit05.xml Inverted (008) :3-8-20-23-31-33-42-47
mayhit06.xml Inverted (001) :8
nohit01.xml Inverted (001) :16
nohit02.xml Inverted (001) :29
nohit03.xml Inverted (001) :18
nohit04.xml Inverted (002) :11-39
nohit05.xml Inverted (001) :24
nohit06.xml Inverted (000) :
nohit07.xml Inverted (001) :4
nohit08.xml Inverted (001) :31
nohit09.xml Inverted (001) :7
nohit10.xml Inverted (002) :25-33
nohit11.xml Inverted (002) :11-39
nohit12.xml Inverted (003) :1-2-3
nohit13.xml Inverted (004) :17-30-32-42
nohit14.xml Inverted (001) :40
nohit15.xml Inverted (001) :3
nohit16.xml Inverted (001) :17
nohit17.xml Inverted (002) :26-40
nohit18.xml Inverted (002) :7-30
nohit19.xml Inverted (001) :12
nohit20.xml Inverted (001) :46
nohit21.xml Inverted (001) :24
nohit22.xml Inverted (001) :2
nohit23.xml
nohit24.xml Inverted (002) :16-37
nohit25.xml Predicts (026) :3-4-5-8-9-13-14-15-16-21-22-23-
26-29-30-33-36-37-38-41-42-43-
46-47-48-49
Inverted (023) :1-2-6-7-10-11-12-17-18-19-20-
24-25-27-28-31-32-34-35-39-40-44-
45
nohit26.xml Inverted (001) :26