I just don't understand why you pick so many numbers. To compare with your picks, I am producing 30 numbers also like Beaker. just for fun. More number picks, more chances to win but lower prizes.gsobier said:Players:
Here are the ones my program says to use:
01 02 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 12 14 17
19 21 22 25 26 27
28 29 30 32 33 35
37 38 39 40 41 48
The ones NOT to use are:
03 11 13 15 16 18
20 23 24 31 34 36
42 43 44 45 46 47
49
Good luck to all!
Regards,
George
Florie said:I just don't understand why you pick so many numbers. To compare with your picks, I am producing 30 numbers also like Beaker. just for fun. More number picks, more chances to win but lower prizes.
Here are 2 sets from the prediction program. Let us see which ones will come up tomorrows draw. Actually, these are the same sets I am using. Just reduced them to 15numbers, more or less.gsobier said:Florie:
The 30 numbers usually contain 4 or more numbers which are drawn.
You could use 4 from the 30 and 2 from the 19 others. This will work.
The idea is... ...playing all 49 is more crazy. 30 is more manageable.
Regards,
George
Beaker said:Given our history of wins, say 0-4 per player, and assuming all the numbers are covered, you want something from everyone's set.
I only want 12 numbers to play. 12 people have sets which will yield between 0-4 winning numbers. If we combine all the hitting sets (1+) sets we will cover all the winning picks.
Some of these hints(Best Bets) will hit.
Here's the question:
Give me the optimum set of 12 to play.
Peter will you. Start it George. We've talked about it but nobody has kicked it off. I'm in The only thing I would add is, you can second someone else's Best Bet - a few people might feel very strongly about one number and this is good.gsobier said:Beaker:
We need a BEST BET thread dedicated to only one thing... ...your best number. If someone else posted a number already, you go down your list until you have one which was not declared yet.
We don't want any discussion in BEST BET, just one number and NO coments so it will be possible to spot duplicates faster.
Do you think this will work?
Regards,
George
Beaker said:Peter will you. Start it George.