May 14 Discussion

[gsobier]

Dennis:

I'm going to do some regression testing to see how announcers improve performance. I didn't have a clue about announcers until explained by Beaker (thanks again dude!). I've got lots of work to do and more hope thanks to you, Beaker, and Peter to name a few.

I am thinking about using announcers in my filtering... ...if there are no announcers in the 6 numbers generated, REJECT.

Triple announcers has helped Mon. Its a tricky balance from what I see.

Like I've already iterated, programming and testing will show me how effective a method is. That is if I stay clear of stupid bugs in my code. The bigger ones are called cockroaches in my book!

Regards,
George

Now george you have to use your imagination to reduced the numbers your playing and you will enter into the ball game...By using only the best announcers in the last draw your 30 would have been under 30....take a look 4 +bonus yesterday....Could have been 5 ....Now I saw some posts about looking at 3 down...I wouldn't recommend this....It is much much better to cut chunks in the history...and it is even better to do it along the double and triple announcers grids when these are threated the same ways...When you are using announcers you will find out that it is a very dynamic way of finding the numbers...You can't go static with them...you got to follow the flow...

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

I don't think that Mon is using triple announcers George....

 

[gsobier]

Opps, sorry, she is looking 3 deep, right?

Does triple announcers mean you need 3 to agree before you will select the number or am I way off on this?

I don't think that Mon is using triple announcers George....

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

Opps, sorry, she is looking 3 deep, right?

Does triple announcers mean you need 3 to agree before you will select the number or am I way off on this?

Yes George way,way off...You do not understand what double announcers are and what triple announcers are....I'll explain that to you later as I have to go now...

 

[Florie]

Re: Top 30

Players:

My top 30 had 4 of the 6 this time. 3 matches twice this time around in 50 sets. Not great but atleast something.

Congratulations to all who won!

Beaker:

Here are the best from your 100... ...2 hits was the best I'm afraid. Hope you didn't play them my friend.

(2) 004. 02 03 18 23 37 38 121 0
(1) 108. 02 04 19 25 33 37 120 0
(1) 109. 02 06 09 35 37 48 137 0 Pair "09 35" not found
(1) 010. 02 07 09 18 22 43 101 0 Pair "22 43" not found
(1) 011. 02 07 11 14 31 33 098 0
(2) 012. 02 07 30 35 38 47 159 0 Pair "07 30" not found
(1) 016. 02 14 15 22 29 38 120 0
(1) 021. 03 04 12 29 38 47 133 0
(1) 024. 03 06 07 09 11 47 083 0 Too Low!
(2) 027. 03 07 15 31 38 48 142 0
(1) 028. 03 07 22 25 33 46 136 0
(1) 030. 03 09 21 25 29 37 124 0
(1) 034. 03 14 28 33 35 37 150 0
(1) 036. 03 17 30 37 40 48 175 0
(1) 038. 03 21 22 30 33 38 147 0 Pair "03 21" not found
(1) 039. 04 06 09 31 38 43 131 0
(1) 041. 04 07 09 19 21 46 106 0 Pair "21 46" not found
(2) 042. 04 07 11 37 43 48 150 0
(2) 043. 04 07 14 17 38 46 126 0
(1) 044. 04 07 15 28 29 35 118 0
(1) 045. 04 09 14 22 37 40 126 0
(1) 050. 04 21 35 38 40 48 186 0
(1) 051. 06 07 12 14 18 35 092 0 Too Low! (last 3)
(1) 052. 06 07 15 19 23 25 095 0 Too Low! (last 3)
(1) 053. 06 07 28 33 40 48 162 0 Pair "07 28" not found
(1) 056. 06 11 14 19 37 46 133 0 Pair "19 37" not found
(2) 058. 06 12 25 28 37 38 146 0
(1) 061. 06 15 29 30 31 37 148 0
(1) 062. 06 22 23 38 40 47 176 0
(2) 063. 07 09 17 29 38 40 140 0
(1) 064. 07 12 15 21 22 40 117 0
(2) 065. 07 12 17 19 37 47 139 0 Pair "19 37" not found
(1) 066. 07 14 19 30 40 43 153 0
(1) 067. 07 17 21 23 33 43 144 0
(1) 068. 07 18 29 31 46 47 178 0
(1) 069. 07 21 25 28 30 31 142 0
(1) 071. 09 11 21 30 38 48 157 0
(1) 074. 09 15 18 25 38 46 151 0
(1) 080. 11 15 21 33 37 47 164 0
(1) 082. 11 19 22 25 31 38 146 0
(2) 083. 11 35 37 38 40 46 207 0 Too High!
(1) 084. 12 14 23 33 38 48 168 0
(1) 087. 12 17 35 38 40 43 185 0 Pair "17 35" not found
(1) 088. 12 18 33 37 43 46 189 0
(1) 092. 15 17 22 23 35 37 149 0
(1) 093. 15 19 21 29 38 43 165 0
(1) 095. 17 18 28 33 38 47 181 0
(1) 096. 18 19 21 31 35 37 161 0
(1) 098. 19 23 28 30 38 46 184 0
(1) 099. 22 28 29 37 46 48 210 0 Too High!
(1) 100. 25 31 37 40 43 47 223 0 Too High!

Regards,
George

Hi,
Just to point out re 30# set, first set of 30 I posted in reply to yours managed to hit 5+Bonus. I will reduce the 30 number by maybe increments of 2-3 if it will still give me the same number of hits and maybe test and watch how it goes as far as how many is "acceptable" regarding getting more hits against the minimum number played/wheeled.

 

[Florie]

Correction

Sorry. I stand corrected-it is 4+Bonus only. Done the checking late last night.

 

[gsobier]

Re: Correction

Florie:

I ignore the bonus number because its only in play when you have 5 numbers... ...if it happens, it happens.

If you have a reliable method of reducing 30 by 2 or 3 I'd be happy to hear about it.

Regards,
George

Sorry. I stand corrected-it is 4+Bonus only. Done the checking late last night.

 

[charles2]

Re: Re: Correction

Florie:

I ignore the bonus number because its only in play when you have 5 numbers... ...if it happens, it happens.

If you have a reliable method of reducing 30 by 2 or 3 I'd be happy to hear about it.

Regards,
George

how about not playing any of the last 6 numbers drawn? that should eliminate 1 or 2 from the 30?????

 

[gsobier]

Re: Re: Re: Correction

Charles2:

The biggest delima is WHICH number to drop. We do have repeaters so often so its a tricky balance. I have a few ideas and thoughts which I will have to test.

When a method produces better results, I'll adopt it.

Regards,
George

how about not playing any of the last 6 numbers drawn? that should eliminate 1 or 2 from the 30?????