Sheba said:I have the 27 as my best bet for this week!
mon said:OK LOOKS LIKE NO ONE WANTS TO START A NEW THREAD SO I GUESS I WILL
WE HAD A FEW WINNERS LAST NIGHT SO WEDNESDAY IS 2 MILLION
I LIKE 2 TO SHOW UP
Beaker said:See alot of LD 7 and 8 for this one
This 2 decade miss can run but it can't hide
George, you need to look at 4 things to put what you have over the top.gsobier said:Beaker:
I'm watching for LDs more and more because of you, Peter, Dennis. We has 5 last time. Most of the time, there is at least a pair of LDs. I'm adding it to my criteria when checking the validity of a set from now on. You guys are a great influence and I'm very glad to have found this forum for such great input and the source of some very good ideas. I'm understanding much more of what needs to be done to assemble a winning set.
Beaker said:George, you need to look at 4 things to put what you have over the top.
1) LD's is a given - each ticket needs at least 1 of them
2) repeaters - got to have at least 1 from the last draw
3) consecutives - must have in each ticket
4) at least 1 decade missing.
You incorporate those and you'll win more.
Last one LD 5 was a given - I played the 5-45 hoping to hit - too bad for me.
Often when I pick numbers I always look at LD's because that could be the gem.
For example 38 is high on my list for this one. I'm looking to see where 8-18-28-48 might lead me.
Beaker said:Yes George, as I have mentioned in the past, I look at hot/warm/cool/cold designations for numbers from different histories.
But, there are two steps to the process here. 1 is picking them and 2 is putting them into tickets.
I wheel them and never filter. You build the tickets with filters. Both ways can work.
Heck, you could have started the BEST Bet thread here. I did it for you guys and then I see you posted there too.
I guess I'm the designated caretaker of "BEST Bet" (really doesn't bother me one bit, could be a respect thing, oh, is that it, to be flattered)... ...is that the score here?
Beaker said:George question for you.
What numbers would be classified 'HOT Inactive' and 'COLD Active'?