Peter:
You got that right! A "recipe" for a set specifies LDs and decade management. From the other post, you are so right, the missing does make selection easier. I am going to use it, that is for sure.
I've seen some books being sold on the internet which explain winning the lottery and never bothered to get one... ...I bet you guys are better than what are in those books (they don't answer my silly questions either). Did any of you by any chance read the one by Ken Silver (bet you that is not his real name)?
Regards,
George
You got that right! A "recipe" for a set specifies LDs and decade management. From the other post, you are so right, the missing does make selection easier. I am going to use it, that is for sure.
I've seen some books being sold on the internet which explain winning the lottery and never bothered to get one... ...I bet you guys are better than what are in those books (they don't answer my silly questions either). Did any of you by any chance read the one by Ken Silver (bet you that is not his real name)?
Regards,
George
peter said:Actually George, there were two sets of LD pairs, 5 & 6, although one 6 was the bonus, but get 2 pairs of The right Ld's in your set mixed in with one of your other numbers, and your good to go with 5 numbers.