6/49 Discussion For May 28

gsobier

Member
Peter:

You got that right:agree:! A "recipe" for a set specifies LDs and decade management. From the other post, you are so right, the missing does make selection easier. I am going to use it, that is for sure.

I've seen some books being sold on the internet which explain winning the lottery and never bothered to get one... ...I bet you guys are better than what are in those books (they don't answer my silly questions:lol: either). Did any of you by any chance read the one by Ken Silver (bet you that is not his real name)?

Regards,
George:)


peter said:
Actually George, there were two sets of LD pairs, 5 & 6, although one 6 was the bonus, but get 2 pairs of The right Ld's in your set mixed in with one of your other numbers, and your good to go with 5 numbers.
 

gsobier

Member
Re: Warm and hot numbers .

Pradeep:

There is a difference where Cool is not as COLD (has to do with how long it has been not used). There is also Warm as well which is less in activity than HOT. Hope this helps.

Regards,
George

Pradeep said:
What is the difference?

Cool & Cold what is the difference?
 
Re: Where is Dennis Bassboss?

Pradeep said:
We all are missing him.
Without Dennis this discussion is like Egg without salt.
Kitchen without knife.
Call him. We need him.
Don't worry Dennis is just preparing lunch for some skeptics... :lol:
 
Re: Lunch

Beaker said:
Well, I'll give you a few to munch on :liplick:

5-7-28-48


Something is going on with these numbers :clown:
And I can see that you already have some pretty good cooks around here.....But the sauce needs something...Beaker remember when I told you about these curious open pairs...not the ones that we are used too...well take a look at the last draw and look back a little....not that far back just a little..you will see the real values of this type of open pairs...it catch 4 numbers yesterday from two draws involving them...as simple as that...Don't worry I did not play them..And nobody will never know what I played yesterday...but I'm about to launch some pretty good dam ones ....Just like that... :lol: :clown: :agree2:
 

gsobier

Member
Here is what program says:
(either four, three, or five most of the time from here) :agree:
01 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 19
22 24 25 26 28 29
31 32 33 34 35 38
41 43 45 46 48 49


No more than three from here is most likely:
(2 were here, in the last draw)
02 13 14 15 16 17
18 20 21 23 27 30
36 37 39 40 42 44
47


For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
4 and 2: 337
3 and 3: 261
5 and 1: 237
2 and 4: 087
6 and 0: 052
1 and 5: 023
0 and 6: 003


Good luck to all:agree2:!

Regards,
George:)
 

gsobier

Member
Peter:

Thanks! You must be aware of the "4 and 2" split which is most likely and happened in the last draw. 3 numbers come from the 30 I post 88.7% of the time according to the last 1,000 draws. That is pretty good when looking at odds:agree:.

Regards,
George:)

peter said:
George, your split of most and least is awsome this go around, you'll see why, when I post my picks.:agree2:
 

Beaker

Member
peter said:
5 and 7 Beaker, will be DN For Wed.:agree2:
I was thinking the same thing ;) Both of them are very good candidates :agree2:

Don't discount that 6 - that one could repeat out of the blue. :eek:
 

GillesD

Member
To gsobier

gsobier said:
Here is what program says:
(either four, three, or five most of the time from here) :agree:
01 03 04 05 06 07
08 09 10 11 12 19
22 24 25 26 28 29
31 32 33 34 35 38
41 43 45 46 48 49


No more than three from here is most likely:
(2 were here, in the last draw)
02 13 14 15 16 17
18 20 21 23 27 30
36 37 39 40 42 44
47


For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
4 and 2: 337
3 and 3: 261
5 and 1: 237
2 and 4: 087
6 and 0: 052
1 and 5: 023
0 and 6: 003


I am not too sure if I read you well.

If we call set A the 30 values 01-03-...-48-49 and set B the 19 values 02-13-...-44-47, does that mean that for draws #1019 to 2018, there were 3 winning combinations with all 6 numbers from set B and 23 winning combinations with 5 numbers from set B and 1 number from set A.

If this is right, could you post just the draw numbers for the 1 and 5 (23 draws) and the 0 and 6 (3 draws). I seem to get different results.
 

gsobier

Member
Re: To gsobier

Gilles:

The numbers in A and B are dynamic (in constant change). Each report is driven by the results of all the previous draws (latest one to the first one). The best way I could explain is... ...the ranking of numbers are resolved (ties are broken too) first and then the most populated columns in my report from the first step are designated as "A" and the remainder are in "B".

In other words, this is NOT the same thing as Dennis' dancing set or awesome set. I hope this helps to understand how the numbers are divided into bunches of 30 and 19.

Regards,
George:)

GillesD said:
I am not too sure if I read you well.

If we call set A the 30 values 01-03-...-48-49 and set B the 19 values 02-13-...-44-47, does that mean that for draws #1019 to 2018, there were 3 winning combinations with all 6 numbers from set B and 23 winning combinations with 5 numbers from set B and 1 number from set A.

If this is right, could you post just the draw numbers for the 1 and 5 (23 draws) and the 0 and 6 (3 draws). I seem to get different results.
 

GillesD

Member
To gsobier

So basically you say two things:

1 - Your analysis gives the best sets (30 and 19 numbers) for the last 1000 draws but how about the future?

2 - There is no way I can verify your data unless I use the same program.

Thanks.
 

gsobier

Member
Re: To gsobier

Gilles:

Yes, you would need my program to verify it. Those numbers are a projection for the next draw. NOT a "this was where things were" that much. It is designed to predict. Think of it that way.

This 30 and 19 is NOT a BEST SET. It is a guide and nothing more. It helps you to decide where a number comes from. You should NEVER EVER have sets where all the numbers come from the 19. It ONLY happened 3 times in the last 1,000 draws. Then again a few just to cover those bases would not hurt but don't expect it to produce many hits. The most you should have there is 3 in any set.

Regards,
George:)
GillesD said:
So basically you say two things:

1 - Your analysis gives the best sets (30 and 19 numbers) for the last 1000 draws but how about the future?

2 - There is no way I can verify your data unless I use the same program.

Thanks.
 
Re: Re: To gsobier

gsobier said:
Gilles:

Yes, you would need my program to verify it. Those numbers are a projection for the next draw. NOT a "this was where things were" that much. It is designed to predict. Think of it that way.

This 30 and 19 is NOT a BEST SET. It is a guide and nothing more. It helps you to decide where a number comes from. You should NEVER EVER have sets where all the numbers come from the 19. It ONLY happened 3 times in the last 1,000 draws. Then again a few just to cover those bases would not hurt but don't expect it to produce many hits. The most you should have there is 3 in any set.

Regards,
George:)


Below are combinations of 19 choose x
0 1 2 3 4 5 6

593775 2707614 4686255 3934140 1686060 348840 27132

And below are the expected times each should have come
in the last 1000 draws

42.5 193.6 335.1 281.3 120.6 24.9 1.9


So this table can be used used to identify the
significance of the 19 numbers


Nick
 

gsobier

Member
Consecutives

Beaker:

You posted this earlier...
1) LD's is a given - each ticket needs at least 1 of them
2) repeaters - got to have at least 1 from the last draw
3) consecutives - must have in each ticket
4) at least 1 decade missing.

For 3 points, I agree totally. I am wondering about consecutives:eek: because a report on all 2018 draws tells me no consecutives are more than 50% in draw data. 1 consecutive is a close second. 2 or more is a long shot:agree:. I think "maybe" one consecutive would be better.

Missing decades are very good:agree::agree2: to use because out of 2018 draws, only 288 had no missing decades. 1073 draws had one missing which is MORE than 50%. 2 missing decades was found 606 times and the longshot of 3 missing decades was found 51 times.

The last 2 draws did NOT have a missing decade back to back which is not typical.

Regards,
George:)
 
Last edited:

Beaker

Member
The consecutive count is alot higher than that if you include the bonus. :agree:

Use the bonus and count triples as 2, quads as 3 and quints as 4.

I'll confirm my stuff without bonus when I get chance.

OK this is what I get.

2018 draws

no bonus at least 1 consecutive 977/2018 = 48.4%

with bonus at least 1 consecutive 1242/2018 = 61.8%

Remember I count triples as 2, quads as 3 and quints as 4!
 
Last edited:

Sidebar

Top