6/49 Discussion For April 17, 2004
- Thread starter gsobier
- Start date
Maggie
Member
Shiraz, is least due the same as what someone would call lukewarm? Actually, I don't see a whole lot of difference between cold and least due and maybe that's because I'm not following you in the way you've explained it. Are you taking certain groupings of numbers and figuring out which is least due after only those certain ones come out and then doing the same with another group? Or are you using the numbers that are drawn every week? 
The latter, Maggie. The way we pick now is we look at what's been drawn, say 1,2,3,4,5,6 and we look for the most likely numbers to be drawn (historically) whenever that (1,2,3,4,5,6) full or partial set has been drawn before. We take into account set-sum, LD's, even/odd ratio, etc and based on all of that determine which numbers have historically been the most likely to follow the combination of this set of data.
I want to follow the same strategy, but determine what numbers are the least likely to follow that (1,2,3,4,5,6) set, based on the same set of data.
Cold numbers, on the other hand, are simply numbers that literally "haven't come up in a while".
Hope that made sense, Maggie.
I want to follow the same strategy, but determine what numbers are the least likely to follow that (1,2,3,4,5,6) set, based on the same set of data.
Cold numbers, on the other hand, are simply numbers that literally "haven't come up in a while".
Hope that made sense, Maggie.
Maggie
Member
Yup, makes sense, shiraz. Thanks for that explanation.
So, once you've determined which are the least due after a certain set, then you will NOT play them at all if certain numbers are drawn. Correct? And you will play them if they are not the least due when others are drawn? I feel like I'm talking in circles, hope I'm making some sense here. When you speak of a partial set, how many, for example, would that include?
So, once you've determined which are the least due after a certain set, then you will NOT play them at all if certain numbers are drawn. Correct? And you will play them if they are not the least due when others are drawn? I feel like I'm talking in circles, hope I'm making some sense here.
When you speak of a partial set, how many, for example, would that include?Maggie, I intend to play the least due numbers exactly then - when they are least due, as determined by the previous draw's data. If probability states that over an "x" number of draws that the "occurence" of each number will closely approach if not equal the occurence of every other number in our lottery (1 to 49), then it only stands to reason that these "least due" numbers may have some catching up to do at some point.
Just like that draw recently that hit us with the entire LD-zero, because LD-zero had (and still has) some major catching up to do, I expect an entire draw soon to be made up of these "least due" numbers right when everyone else is expecting the most due/probable numbers to be drawn (which is pretty much every draw the way we look at them now).
I want to eventually have two sets every draw. One small "most due/probable" set and one small "least due/probable" set. Attack it (the lottery) from both ends, so to say.
Just like that draw recently that hit us with the entire LD-zero, because LD-zero had (and still has) some major catching up to do, I expect an entire draw soon to be made up of these "least due" numbers right when everyone else is expecting the most due/probable numbers to be drawn (which is pretty much every draw the way we look at them now).
I want to eventually have two sets every draw. One small "most due/probable" set and one small "least due/probable" set. Attack it (the lottery) from both ends, so to say.
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Often you have them in mind....peter said:
Tomi...
You can do a search for some question you asked or check out the Glossery at the bottom of page.. If you then can't find the answers go to the questions and answer thread and ask away.. We will get the answers you are looking for and maybe the jackpot Numbers... Good Luck and again welcome..
Sheba__
~~~
Everybody's got a dream....GO! LEAFS! GO!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
You can do a search for some question you asked or check out the Glossery at the bottom of page.. If you then can't find the answers go to the questions and answer thread and ask away.. We will get the answers you are looking for and maybe the jackpot Numbers...
Good Luck and again welcome.. Sheba__
~~~ Everybody's got a dream....GO! LEAFS! GO!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
That is the gambler's fallacy. Read The Skeptic's Dictionary:
The gambler's fallacy is the mistaken notion that the odds for something with a fixed probability increase or decrease depending upon recent occurrences.
LT should add this definition to the glossary. The odds are always the same, no matter what numbers have been selected in the past.
The gambler's fallacy is the mistaken notion that the odds for something with a fixed probability increase or decrease depending upon recent occurrences.
LT should add this definition to the glossary. The odds are always the same, no matter what numbers have been selected in the past.
shirazbai said: