Winnalotto-Sangoma 2

[Patrick123]

Hi black prince,

Yep, the programming took a bit longer, but the concept that basically no filter is hard-coded in the program allows for the more knowledgeable persons in regard to lotto skips and triggers to build & test these filters themselves immediately without relying on me to have to convert their ideas into code

Regards
Patrick

 

[Patrick123]

Hi Everyone,

WinnaLotto - 19 June 2008 Build 1 has been released.

This adds in the function 'ExceedSkip(x)' where x is whatever value you want.

This will return the number of skips until that skip value is exceeded. So if you use it as a view column with the formula : ExceedSkip(4) It will display this number for you taking the first skip value as zero.

Using it as a Filter Column, you would very likely have the criteria entered as ExceedSkip(4) > 20 to show all rows that have at least 20 consecutive skip values equal or below 4.

There is a sample filter of its use in the included ColFilters.zip called ExceedSkip4.

Regards
Patrick

ps. The selection screen is still not complete yet.

 

[turtle0747]

Hello BP from turtle0747

Turtle0747
This is an update of my column filters. 'N+x>=H', 'Median Due' and 'ReBal Perc'.
I search for Balls, Pairs and Trips. When a number(s) repeat in each I use them
as key fields. As I've mentioned before I also use 'Very Hot Numbers'. There are
some purge criteria that can wipe out all your selections, such as, match all
prior draws with more than 4 matching numbers. I use more than 3 matching numbers.
Keep backtesting and the routine gets easier. I won today with just 5 draws
and earned over $100. I want to refine this process and make this a daily
happening.

-BP

Hello BP

I tried running thru the above process. 1 number did stand out - 38. All the other numbers never appeared thru out the process - 05 06 17 23 26. What do you use your key field with. I didn't know how to use the 38 with anything else. I knew that had to be a key field. It stood out in everything.

 

[black prince]

Hi Turtle0747

Originally Posted by Turtle0747
Hello BP

I tried running thru the above process. 1 number did stand out - 38. All the other numbers never appeared thru out the process - 05 06 17 23 26. What do you use your key field with. I didn't know how to use the 38 with anything else. I knew that had to be a key field. It stood out in everything.

Turtle0747,

Let's take this one step at a time.
1) Backtest 'SpringBok2' filter for each prior winning draw. There should be
1 or 2 numbers that hit in the next future draw. Go back say 30 prior draws.
Check this and let me know your results.

-BP

 

[Patrick123]

Will check out the filter settings this evening. If you set it to Skip(0) = 4 then you will destroy the logic. We are seeking pairs/trips which have not exceeded 4 draws. We ned to find these folk. With the settings you wrote out they will only be effective if the current ongoing skip is 0. Also we need to find out how many draws they went before they exceeded the 4 benchmark.

Good Morning Springbok & Everyone,

Duh!, I've been a bit asleep, to ensure we don't exceed 4 draws, we must use a maximum value of 3 ( skips 0,1,2 and 3) not this value of 4 that I've been throwing around.

My apologies everyone. Thanks Springbok, this is a pretty powerful filter

Regards
Patrick

 

[Springbok]

Konnichiha Patrick

Laduma! I got the filter to work or rather you got it to work by putting up the skips filters to be downloaded. I drilled down to see how you set up the filter. I will be altering the settings. At the moment I look at the current ongoing skips of 0,1 and 2. I am not sure if higher ongoing skips are as predictable, that remains to be seen. For the 0 type pairs and trips I set up the filter to locate the zero types and the watermark is set to 4. For the ongoing skip types of 1 the watermark is set to 5, and for the 2 type the watermark is 6.So in other words each skip type(0,1,2) will have its own set of skip filters.
The logic is firstly to select a pair/trip that is highly reliable in that it should hit in the next 4 draws. Once these have been identified and the hooligan types eliminated then the original Sniper1 evaluations are looked at to determine if they will hit in the next two draws or the two after that.

 

[Patrick123]

Sawubona Springbok,

The ExceedSkip function will basically assist you as well. I will in the meantime try and add more functions relating to skips in the mix

Regards
Patrick

 

[Patrick123]

Hi Springbok,
You may find, it is easier to use notepad to work & manipulate the filter, simply select everything in the criteria block, cut & paste it into Notepad, there you can search & replace as required then simply paste it back in the criteria block.

I feel the addiction to GUI growing stronger in you

Regards
Patrick

 

[Patrick123]

Hi Springbok,

Here is an interesting exercise, as you have created your alpha & zulu filters,

Use this filter:

0 10 20 30 40
1 11 21 31 41
2 12 22 32 42
3 13 23 33 43
4 14 24 34 44
5 15 25 35 45
6 16 26 36 46
7 17 27 37 47
8 18 28 38 48
9 19 29 39 49

The SA Lotto has not had a digit end of 6, 7 or 8 for the past 3 draws,
Using the ExceedSkip3a Filter (more than 20 skips equal or below 3 AND last skip = 3) I get 2 rows being returned by trips, 9:29:49 and 16:26:46)

I would say that the 16:26:46 trip would be a high possibility

The flip side is that 36 is riding as a historical high ... choices, choices.

Regards
Patrick

 

[Springbok]

Kunjani Patrick

Choice can be a good or bad thing. In lotteries the less choice we have the better. Even going into to a supermarket to buy a tin of baked beans can be a challenge as there are so many makes. Even worse now with the reduced salt and reduced sugar types of baked beans.
I have not looked at the SA lottery for a week or so, obviously what you saw with digit endings is relevant but which digit ending? To paraphrase this oke Hamlet in To be or not to be, if he had been musing on lotteries he would have said which digit ending will be or not to be

 

[Patrick123]

Maybe I should be asking 'Et 2 Brutus?'

At least it's telling me # 6 is low probability.

 

[Springbok]

Hi Patrick again

Here is another take on lotteries, During the days of King Arthur the knights of the Round Table were pursuing the Holy Grail or even the Spear of Destiny. We are the modern day knights pursuing the knickers of the Golden Fleece. Our weapons are not the sword or lance but either the Intel or AMD processor with the shield of Windows

 

[Patrick123]

Waiting for the Nights of the Round Balls

 

[Springbok]

Howzit Patrick

The Knights of the Round Balls. King Arthur will be spinning in his tomb at such disrespect.

I pushed a file up to 70 skips and then did some quick tests with trips by diving in and out of the 49s seven ball game. Wow! It pans out as I expected. I was also looking for a stage where after x amount of skips the trip would then turn unstable or become hooligan like. I cannot detect it at the moment. I think many people are diving into the programme too quickly in attempting to hit the jackpot. It takes time to absorb all the information and allow it to sink in and allow you to construct a mental framework of the behaviour of these wretched balls and to tame and civilise them. Anyway I got too take a work break.

 

[Patrick123]

Hi Springbok,

Go to Columns, Reset Columns:

Add a column Call it exceed0 - 'View Column Checked - Formula: ExceedSkip(0)
Add a column Call it exceed1 - 'View Column Checked - Formula: ExceedSkip(1)
Add a column Call it exceed2 - 'View Column Checked - Formula: ExceedSkip(2)
Add a column Call it exceed3 - 'View Column Checked - Formula: ExceedSkip(3)
Add a column Call it exceed4 - 'View Column Checked - Formula: ExceedSkip(4)
Add a column Call it exceed5 - 'View Column Checked - Formula: ExceedSkip(5)


Save this as Exceeds then click Recalc

This will spit out the maximum numbers of skips until these values are reached, which you are then able to sort or graph by. You can even save the rows to load up in Excel for further analysis, e.g. the median, etc.

I updated http://www.onyxsa.co.za/timedesign/ColFilters.zip to include this filter.

Regards
Patrick

 

[turtle0747]

Hello BP from turtle0747

Turtle0747,

Let's take this one step at a time.
1) Backtest 'SpringBok2' filter for each prior winning draw. There should be
1 or 2 numbers that hit in the next future draw. Go back say 30 prior draws.
Check this and let me know your results.

-BP

Hello BP

Thanks for the help. I did some testing and at least 1 number does show, but it is hard to determind. Sometimes the number really stands out. I did SpringBok2 and sorted on the 3 columns. Sometimes Balls show nothing. It was mainly Pairs that showed the number. Here is my last 50 draws:

06 15 23 32 33 38
05 13 27 34 42 46
07 16 27 39 47 53
02 09 23 27 42 47
01 21 27 31 34 52
12 15 20 26 28 39
04 11 29 39 47 51
01 12 19 35 37 48
04 25 33 40 41 45
04 06 07 15 18 52
13 16 28 30 38 50
01 17 37 40 41 45
20 21 36 42 48 53
01 10 24 27 44 47
02 20 25 26 28 30
04 12 18 20 33 49
10 12 20 25 28 39
17 18 23 29 34 51
06 09 18 29 52 53
02 20 23 33 43 50
04 10 20 27 34 52
02 13 16 26 48 51
22 29 31 36 46 51
16 20 22 32 44 51
23 25 27 28 33 44
01 07 08 11 13 51
06 10 26 37 46 50
09 17 20 29 41 49
01 04 11 24 42 53
10 15 25 35 47 53
19 22 23 32 36 47
10 23 25 30 37 39
01 33 34 40 41 53
13 23 31 33 35 38
04 10 19 34 38 45
03 11 29 36 38 48
06 11 29 30 41 48
01 13 23 26 41 47
02 14 15 25 46 52
11 15 22 23 25 42
07 08 40 41 44 45
12 13 17 22 41 53
19 30 36 41 44 52
01 14 17 32 40 46
03 14 18 27 28 47
04 06 08 22 37 40
01 24 25 26 42 45
24 41 42 46 47 52
07 18 19 26 32 33
05 06 17 23 36 38

 

[black prince]

Hi Turtle0747

Originally Posted by Turtle0747
Hello BP

Thanks for the help. I did some testing and at least 1 number does show, but it is hard to determind. Sometimes the number really stands out. I did SpringBok2 and sorted on the 3 columns. Sometimes Balls show nothing. It was mainly Pairs that showed the number. Here is my last 50 draws:

06 15 23 32 33 38
05 13 27 34 42 46
07 16 27 39 47 53
02 09 23 27 42 47
01 21 27 31 34 52
12 15 20 26 28 39
04 11 29 39 47 51
01 12 19 35 37 48
04 25 33 40 41 45
04 06 07 15 18 52
13 16 28 30 38 50
01 17 37 40 41 45
20 21 36 42 48 53
01 10 24 27 44 47
02 20 25 26 28 30
04 12 18 20 33 49
10 12 20 25 28 39
17 18 23 29 34 51
06 09 18 29 52 53
02 20 23 33 43 50
04 10 20 27 34 52
02 13 16 26 48 51
22 29 31 36 46 51
16 20 22 32 44 51
23 25 27 28 33 44
01 07 08 11 13 51
06 10 26 37 46 50
09 17 20 29 41 49
01 04 11 24 42 53
10 15 25 35 47 53
19 22 23 32 36 47
10 23 25 30 37 39
01 33 34 40 41 53
13 23 31 33 35 38
04 10 19 34 38 45
03 11 29 36 38 48
06 11 29 30 41 48
01 13 23 26 41 47
02 14 15 25 46 52
11 15 22 23 25 42
07 08 40 41 44 45
12 13 17 22 41 53
19 30 36 41 44 52
01 14 17 32 40 46
03 14 18 27 28 47
04 06 08 22 37 40
01 24 25 26 42 45
24 41 42 46 47 52
07 18 19 26 32 33
05 06 17 23 36 38

I use Balls only for 'Springbok2'. If nothing shows for balls then the filter
couldn't find the criteria to show. My lottery is 5/30 and maybe this filter
need tweaking. Today 'Springbok2' recommended 16 and 19. I used 16 and
made it a key number in every drawing I created. It did appear. My other
numbers came from 'N+x>=H', 'Median Due' and 'Rebal Perc'. The only numbers
from these was 26 and 30. I made my wager and a few bucks from all draws.
Try backtesting 'Very Hot Numbers' filter and see what results you get for
Balls only.

-BP

 

[Springbok]

Salaam Patrick

You might like to try this filter. Current skip 1 and watermark 4 and go for 26 draw history and a 30 draw history You are using pairs. Use the 7 ball SA game.

The great thing about the programme is that it is suitable for low powered computers. My ancient IBM 500 celeron laptop with 160megs of memory handles it with ease so I am not confined to the more powerful desktop. I wonder if the programme would work on a linux system. I would assume the coding would be different. I was checking out the tiny Asus eee machine in the shop recently and boy is it ultralight and portable.

 

[turtle0747]

Hello BP from turtle0747

I use Balls only for 'Springbok2'. If nothing shows for balls then the filter
couldn't find the criteria to show. My lottery is 5/30 and maybe this filter
need tweaking. Today 'Springbok2' recommended 16 and 19. I used 16 and
made it a key number in every drawing I created. It did appear. My other
numbers came from 'N+x>=H', 'Median Due' and 'Rebal Perc'. The only numbers
from these was 26 and 30. I made my wager and a few bucks from all draws.
Try backtesting 'Very Hot Numbers' filter and see what results you get for
Balls only.

-BP

Hello BP

I tried Springbok2 Balls only. Got some numbers. 'Very Hot Numbers' gave me 1 number.
Have a question about your 'other numbers came from 'N+x>=H', 'Median Due' and 'Rebal Perc'. I ran thru Balls only with 'no filters' and sorted on each of the columns mentioned above. Do you only take the first number or more than 1 number?

 

[black prince]

Hi Turtle0747

Originally Posted by Turtle0447
Hello BP

I tried Springbok2 Balls only. Got some numbers. 'Very Hot Numbers' gave me 1 number.
Have a question about your 'other numbers came from 'N+x>=H', 'Median Due' and 'Rebal Perc'. I ran thru Balls only with 'no filters' and sorted on each of the columns mentioned above. Do you only take the first number or more than 1 number?

Yes! I take the first number from each filter in each group
of Balls, Pairs and Trips sorted high to low.

For example:

'N+x>=H'...........'Median Due'.......'Rebal Perc'

06....................22....................26 ---> Balls
22:26...............06:15................15:26 ---> Pairs
07:18:25..........03:10:18............15:23:25 ----> Trips

My process is still a work in progress. I'm developing a filter to
track prior winning numbers. It's getting there. I just tested
SpringBok1 against Springbok2. So, far Springbok1 works better,
but I need to backtest 50 or more draws to verify this.

-BP