lottoarchitect
Member
I answered based on the analysis you made with covermaster, which shows 93% for the 2nd wheel. Now I see you deleted them.
lottoarchitect said:Please, do not post wheels derived within Lotto Architect. They are not intended for public release; they are designed for users of the program only.
tomtom said:you now what lottoarch...you are disappointing me every day more and more. Coming here to collect information and attacking people who helped you in finding answer is pretty rude..
Therefore you said about your program, if someone is interested may bay it in what I don't believe because here are a bit more numbers experts than you may imagine. So how about if you take your progie and your wheels home now ?
Hi trilby,trilby said:TomTom,
I am happy as a purchaser of Lotto Architect program to reap the benefit of what it has to offer including any future updates and also including the Wheel Generator program when it becomes available. I have paid for it and expect to get such benefit. If Wheel Generator turns out to be a premium wheel maker (and I suspect that it will) tell me why people like yourself should benefit from that when you have not paid for it. I see from the website that the wheel list builds and builds, and I have no doubt that building such a complement of wheels takes some time. I can wait. Access to this wheel list is one of the benefits to purchasers of the program.
From your posts you seem enthuisiastic about a program called Expert Lotto. Good for you. I see from your recent posts it has included an optimiser. Good for it. But isn't this good enough for you? You still seem to be looking over the fence to see where the grass may be greener.
lottoarchitect said:Improvements refer to open-cover wheels for now. You can check them and see what I'm talking about. When and if I break a close-cover world record wheel, I'll let you know. Small relatively wheels is very unlikely to be reduced more. Besides, the point is not always reducing tickets, there is the optimisation matter involved. Gain more with the same amount of money, given a wheel cannot be reduced more.
As for the wheels, once released in the program, I cannot control if they go away published somewhere. If the person is willing to mention the source, ok but there is no way to enforce this. The great news is that WG is always to WR wheels whilst other programs don't. I don't say I have found the complete solution to the covering design (for those who don't know, it belongs to NP-hard problems) and so far I'm more than satisfied watching WG produces wheels other systems can't (at least the known ones).
Grandmaster said:I agree,
I have a folder with Lotto freeware and free wheels with a size of 1.5GB,
I made experiments daily with LottodesignerXL and Covermaster trying to find better wheels,
I have any type of wheel for at least 8 different authors,
In your response LA you assume I am publishing your wheels because I am an user of LA, before post consider I am an user of other 8 different authors of wheels including Peter Rosendahl.
If we are supposing "things", I have to add that many of the LottoArchitect wheels are not yours, you simply copy and paste for free sites like Peter Rosendahl, Dragan, and others including me (I sent you a wheel), adding the wheels to your private collection, I could say that because I am an user and I can compare wheels.
The credit of your wheels are the optimized with WG1.4 only, if we are talking about copyrights then before add a wheel to your collection recognize the source of each wheels that you don't create.
My mistake and I apologize Peter Rosendahl for not adding source in my first message.
Grandmaster said:<deleted>
LD (MODERATOR) PLEASE DELETE ALL MY MESSAGES

SRM said:lottoarchitect,
while I wish you every success in marketing your software product - please ensure that any claims made or suggested & posted on the forum are accurate.
Also please bear in mind that this is a lotto forum - not advertising space.
Rgds....
Grandmaster said:I agree,
I have a folder with Lotto freeware and free wheels with a size of 1.5GB,
I made experiments daily with LottodesignerXL and Covermaster trying to find better wheels,
I have any type of wheel for at least 8 different authors,
In your response LA you assume I am publishing your wheels because I am an user of LA, before post consider I am an user of other 8 different authors of wheels including Peter Rosendahl.
If we are supposing "things", I have to add that many of the LottoArchitect wheels are not yours, you simply copy and paste for free sites like Peter Rosendahl, Dragan, and others including me (I sent you a wheel), adding the wheels to your private collection, I could say that because I am an user and I can compare wheels.
The credit of your wheels are the optimized with WG1.4 only, if we are talking about copyrights then before add a wheel to your collection recognize the source of each wheels that you don't create.
My mistake and I apologize Peter Rosendahl for not adding source in my first message.
lottoarchitect said:SRM, whenever something new appears, critisism will go on till it is accepted as something new or revolutionary, or something that does not worth the trouble etc. This is normal and welcome. Only cows would accept something without criticism first. I accept you don't have any examples to make your criticism on. As for the accuracy of what I say, you know my position does not allow me to make mistakes or faulty statements. It is the same as being a teacher; you have to know 10 times more things before you can teach the 1/10 of those you know.
I'll present an example of improvements achieved by WG. I choose an C(6,14,5,6)=98 wheel (it seems this cannot be reduced further) and optimise it. You can make any tests you want on the wheels and derive your conclusions.
Feel free to post your own conclusions.