o yes, the awesome O chart.
That does work with choice 6, *hits with*. Only drawback is that you can only enter 21 #s to hit with. But taking last 3 games with a pick 7 would give you exactly 21 #s if there's no repeats.
In my game, {taking the last 3 winning combos) a 2# match produced 174 games out of 290.
3# match has 72 games
4# match = 14 games.
Of course the last 3 games don't count as those are your criteria/filter for matching, so subtract 3 from the above. So a 4# match would have 11 games out of 290 in it's history.
I notice {mostly with 2-3# matches) that it trends from one hit a month for a couple months to 3-4 hits per month, for a couple months. Which I'd expect. Altho the strategy sounds like the lottery should have a set time frame which reliably repeats, reality always proves different than the theory doesn't it?
days between each 4# match:
72-154-7-21-7-17-238-153-163-51-69-1-1
Interesting strategy, but not as *guaranteed* as it's tauted to be. Making a graph of the days between hits would give a better visual of the set's trends. For those visual folk like me.
For me, this strategy just emphasizes the basic lottery rule:
EVERYTHING TRENDS
meaning trends hot & cold.... hitting, to not. The trends aren't that reliable or predictable. If they were, many more of us would be winning bigger cows. right?