The (((ISOLATOR)))
- Thread starter fullhouse
- Start date
And another thing
If your isolator number for Friday's lunchtime draw is not on the skip list then on the balance of probabilities it will not appear in that draw and you will be wasting your money on that number in the lunchtime draw. The skip list must be re-done for every draw. Using this method will help enormously in deciding whether to bet or not.
If your isolator number for Friday's lunchtime draw is not on the skip list then on the balance of probabilities it will not appear in that draw and you will be wasting your money on that number in the lunchtime draw. The skip list must be re-done for every draw. Using this method will help enormously in deciding whether to bet or not.
correction
I noticed that I repeated 32 twice. I rechecked by skip tables. Here is the corrected version for the lunchtime draw.There were other errors:
Skip
7:............23:31
8:............6:39
9:............17
10:........... null
11:.......... 11: 29: 36 :43
12:.......... 5:16
In future I will double check my figures especially when I post late evening.
I noticed that I repeated 32 twice. I rechecked by skip tables. Here is the corrected version for the lunchtime draw.There were other errors:
Skip
7:............23:31
8:............6:39
9:............17
10:........... null
11:.......... 11: 29: 36 :43
12:.......... 5:16
In future I will double check my figures especially when I post late evening.
Saturday lunchtime
Yesterday I posed the question -would 43 come up? Well it racked up in the teatime draw although I forecasted it for the lunchtime draw based on what my other isolators predicted. It also appeared on the revised skip table at skip 11. Now if I had not fouled up the first skip table I would have bet on it and made some loose change.
Let's look at tomorrow. All my isolators were closed down by the appearance of 43 except for an experimental one based on random 35 numbers chosen from the 49. This isolator forecasts 16 and 29 on different lines. My new Northwind isolator is now up and running and forecasts number 44. Here's the skip table for the Saturday lunchtime draw.
skip
7.........10;13;28 ;44
8......... 2;26;49
9..........20;32
10......... 23
11.........6;39
12........17
Now the experimental isolator forecasts look like rubbish numbers so I will ignore them for the draw. 44 looks interesting as it is in the hot spot so I will kick off on the new Northwind isolator with some money on that number. It may not come up but I am pretty sure as it makes its pilgrimage through the skips it will clock up pretty soon. Let's see what tomorrow brings.
For those interested in the Skip sequences(let's face it, it is the only way to go) check out the web address I gave to fullhouse a short while ago. It basically automates the process which could take you many,many long minutes.
Yesterday I posed the question -would 43 come up? Well it racked up in the teatime draw although I forecasted it for the lunchtime draw based on what my other isolators predicted. It also appeared on the revised skip table at skip 11. Now if I had not fouled up the first skip table I would have bet on it and made some loose change.
Let's look at tomorrow. All my isolators were closed down by the appearance of 43 except for an experimental one based on random 35 numbers chosen from the 49. This isolator forecasts 16 and 29 on different lines. My new Northwind isolator is now up and running and forecasts number 44. Here's the skip table for the Saturday lunchtime draw.
skip
7.........10;13;28 ;44
8......... 2;26;49
9..........20;32
10......... 23
11.........6;39
12........17
Now the experimental isolator forecasts look like rubbish numbers so I will ignore them for the draw. 44 looks interesting as it is in the hot spot so I will kick off on the new Northwind isolator with some money on that number. It may not come up but I am pretty sure as it makes its pilgrimage through the skips it will clock up pretty soon. Let's see what tomorrow brings.
For those interested in the Skip sequences(let's face it, it is the only way to go) check out the web address I gave to fullhouse a short while ago. It basically automates the process which could take you many,many long minutes.
Springbok has really made this strategy his own and developed it into his own personal baby. And I am glad that I have started something good on here.
I have been sitting on my own personal method for the ISOLATOR for a while now. A combination of being busy lately, and not having 100% confidence in the Strategy YET. Has made me hold back on it for a while.
In my method I only give each line ONE BET. So any one ISOLATOR has a minumum of 1 bet (if the first line wins) and a maximum of 5 bets for either a win in the 5th bet or a losing ISOLATOR.
So here are the results for 2006 so far, starting with the month of January tonight. Here are the 10 results for January, as always feel free to ask any questions you want.
(JANUARY 2006)
ISOLATOR N0.01 (WON---BET NUMBER 4)
ISOLATOR N0.02 (WON---BET NUMBER 4)
ISOLATOR N0.03 (LOST 5 BETS)
ISOLATOR N0.04 (LOST 5 BETS)
ISOLATOR N0.05 (WON---BET NUMBER 1)
ISOLATOR N0.06 (WON---BET NUMBER 4)
ISOLATOR N0.07 (WON---BET NUMBER 4)
ISOLATOR N0.08 (LOST 5 BETS)
ISOLATOR N0.09 (WON---BET NUMBER 4)
ISOLATOR N0.10 (WON---BET NUMBER 3)
So to summarize, January produced 7 winning ISOLATORS out of a possible 10. A total of 39 bets and 7 winners. That is a strike rate of about 1 in 5.5 which is pretty good. I will post February over the weekend. Peace...
I have been sitting on my own personal method for the ISOLATOR for a while now. A combination of being busy lately, and not having 100% confidence in the Strategy YET. Has made me hold back on it for a while.
In my method I only give each line ONE BET. So any one ISOLATOR has a minumum of 1 bet (if the first line wins) and a maximum of 5 bets for either a win in the 5th bet or a losing ISOLATOR.
So here are the results for 2006 so far, starting with the month of January tonight. Here are the 10 results for January, as always feel free to ask any questions you want.
(JANUARY 2006)
ISOLATOR N0.01 (WON---BET NUMBER 4)
ISOLATOR N0.02 (WON---BET NUMBER 4)
ISOLATOR N0.03 (LOST 5 BETS)
ISOLATOR N0.04 (LOST 5 BETS)
ISOLATOR N0.05 (WON---BET NUMBER 1)
ISOLATOR N0.06 (WON---BET NUMBER 4)
ISOLATOR N0.07 (WON---BET NUMBER 4)
ISOLATOR N0.08 (LOST 5 BETS)
ISOLATOR N0.09 (WON---BET NUMBER 4)
ISOLATOR N0.10 (WON---BET NUMBER 3)
So to summarize, January produced 7 winning ISOLATORS out of a possible 10. A total of 39 bets and 7 winners. That is a strike rate of about 1 in 5.5 which is pretty good. I will post February over the weekend. Peace...
Sunday lunchtime
Now with the Saturday lunchtime draw 29 came up as forecasted by my experimental isolator and despite the fact I thought it was a rubbish number. Northwind isolator missed the lunchtime draw but it brought the bacon home in the teatime draw. Anybody taking my advice in the Northwind isolator would by using progressive betting increases their wealth by a couple of hundred percent. Anyone ignoring my advice on the experimental isolator would also have increased their wealth by a couple of hundred percent. I think this is a freakish result.
OK let's look at Sunday lunchtome draw. My brand new Northwind isolator forecasts 46. My brand new experimental isolator forecasts 9 and 37.
Skip chart
skips
7:............27;30;47
8;..............18 ;21;25;34;46
9;............. 13
10;.............2;26 ;49
11;..............20 ;32
Number 46 looks good as it is in the sweet spot but 9 and 37 look like rubbish numbers.
I hope by giving examples that I have helped people look at Fullhouse's isolator from a slightly different viewpoint.
Now with the Saturday lunchtime draw 29 came up as forecasted by my experimental isolator and despite the fact I thought it was a rubbish number. Northwind isolator missed the lunchtime draw but it brought the bacon home in the teatime draw. Anybody taking my advice in the Northwind isolator would by using progressive betting increases their wealth by a couple of hundred percent. Anyone ignoring my advice on the experimental isolator would also have increased their wealth by a couple of hundred percent. I think this is a freakish result.
OK let's look at Sunday lunchtome draw. My brand new Northwind isolator forecasts 46. My brand new experimental isolator forecasts 9 and 37.
Skip chart
skips
7:............27;30;47
8;..............18 ;21;25;34;46
9;............. 13
10;.............2;26 ;49
11;..............20 ;32
Number 46 looks good as it is in the sweet spot but 9 and 37 look like rubbish numbers.
I hope by giving examples that I have helped people look at Fullhouse's isolator from a slightly different viewpoint.
Fullhouse
You are quite right, Skips represent how many times a number last appeared. So if a number has a skip of 26 then it last appeared 26 draws ago. If a number has a skip of 1 then it appeared in the last draw. Every number has a skip value. This value changes from draw to draw. Your methods, whether side-by-side, eliminator and isolator use these values although you might not realise it. These ideas on skip values had been floating around my mind for many, many months. Your initial posting on the eliminator re-energised these ideas in my mind. I became very interested and started testing your strategies and trying ti find out why they work.
You are quite right, Skips represent how many times a number last appeared. So if a number has a skip of 26 then it last appeared 26 draws ago. If a number has a skip of 1 then it appeared in the last draw. Every number has a skip value. This value changes from draw to draw. Your methods, whether side-by-side, eliminator and isolator use these values although you might not realise it. These ideas on skip values had been floating around my mind for many, many months. Your initial posting on the eliminator re-energised these ideas in my mind. I became very interested and started testing your strategies and trying ti find out why they work.
Fullhouse
You are quite right, Skips represent how many times a number last appeared. So if a number has a skip of 26 then it last appeared 26 draws ago. If a number has a skip of 1 then it appeared in the last draw. Every number has a skip value. This value changes from draw to draw. Your methods, whether side-by-side, eliminator and isolator use these values although you might not realise it. These ideas on skip values had been floating around my mind for many, many months. Your initial posting on the eliminator re-energised these ideas in my mind. I became very interested and started testing your strategies and trying to find out why they work.
You are quite right, Skips represent how many times a number last appeared. So if a number has a skip of 26 then it last appeared 26 draws ago. If a number has a skip of 1 then it appeared in the last draw. Every number has a skip value. This value changes from draw to draw. Your methods, whether side-by-side, eliminator and isolator use these values although you might not realise it. These ideas on skip values had been floating around my mind for many, many months. Your initial posting on the eliminator re-energised these ideas in my mind. I became very interested and started testing your strategies and trying to find out why they work.
Monday Lunchtime draw
the brand new Northwind isolator predicts number 47. The experimental isolator predicts 9 and 37-no change here.
Skips
7:............3;7;40
8:............22
9:............27;30;47
10:............10;34
11;.............13
12:..............12; 26
I think 47 is a good bet-in the sweet spot and 9 and 37 are rubbish numbers avoid like the plague unless you are in a kamikazi mood and believe that losing money is fun.
the brand new Northwind isolator predicts number 47. The experimental isolator predicts 9 and 37-no change here.
Skips
7:............3;7;40
8:............22
9:............27;30;47
10:............10;34
11;.............13
12:..............12; 26
I think 47 is a good bet-in the sweet spot and 9 and 37 are rubbish numbers avoid like the plague unless you are in a kamikazi mood and believe that losing money is fun.
Re: Monday Lunchtime draw
I love that line Springbok, "UNLESS YOU'RE IN A KAMIKAZI MOOD AND BELIEVE LOSING MONEY IS FUN" Laughs...
Having said that, it is possible one of those two will rack tommorow, because they're part of Eliminator 22 which is down to its last 3 numbers (09) (16) (37). So maybe dodgey pilot would be a better description. Lol! Peace...
Springbok said:
I love that line Springbok, "UNLESS YOU'RE IN A KAMIKAZI MOOD AND BELIEVE LOSING MONEY IS FUN" Laughs...
Having said that, it is possible one of those two will rack tommorow, because they're part of Eliminator 22 which is down to its last 3 numbers (09) (16) (37). So maybe dodgey pilot would be a better description. Lol! Peace...
Fullhouse
Sure the isolator can pick numbers as suggested by your eliminator. But I believe in concentrating on the 7 to 12 skip zone, especially the. 7,8,9 skip zones which are rich in numbers that tend to come up.
Nevertheless, Northwind scored again with the 47 coming up at lunchtime. At the moment no forecasts as I have just returned from work and am too exhausted. Will post in the morning if i wake up in time.
I trust you were not in a kamikazi mood with those numbers.
Sure the isolator can pick numbers as suggested by your eliminator. But I believe in concentrating on the 7 to 12 skip zone, especially the. 7,8,9 skip zones which are rich in numbers that tend to come up.
Nevertheless, Northwind scored again with the 47 coming up at lunchtime. At the moment no forecasts as I have just returned from work and am too exhausted. Will post in the morning if i wake up in time.
I trust you were not in a kamikazi mood with those numbers.
Re: Fullhouse
Good predicting Springbok. I know you will hit quite a good range with the 7---12 skip range. I have always been amazed by the patterns I see with losing streaks. Here we are nearly one third through the year and only 2 losing streaks have even breached the 40 draw barrier.
Knowing that the majority of long losing streaks will come to rest between draws 30-----40 is powerful knowledge in itself. If they say the rich get richer. Then someone with a healthy bankroll simply cannot lose knowing that. The only thing required is patience. But then again, that is often what is lacking.
But you have found a zone that produces more frequency. The only thing I am not clear on Springbok is (as Syscrash puts it) how many draws do you hunt any one number for ? So for example if number 48 went 7 draws no show. Would you cover it until draw 12 or just for one or two draws ? That will clarify alot to me. Because I am always looking for the best strike-rate I can find.
So far this year the Side by Side strategy has ruled. But the Isolator as I know it although not proven to me fully yet. Looks to have an edge. The Eliminator is a constant. I know what to expect and I always get it, an average strike rate of 3--1 or 75%
Anything that can greatly improve upon that, and I wanna know about it. So once I fully understand your version of the ISOLATOR. If I see a better strike rate. You can count me in. Peace....
Springbok said:
Good predicting Springbok. I know you will hit quite a good range with the 7---12 skip range. I have always been amazed by the patterns I see with losing streaks. Here we are nearly one third through the year and only 2 losing streaks have even breached the 40 draw barrier.
Knowing that the majority of long losing streaks will come to rest between draws 30-----40 is powerful knowledge in itself. If they say the rich get richer. Then someone with a healthy bankroll simply cannot lose knowing that. The only thing required is patience. But then again, that is often what is lacking.
But you have found a zone that produces more frequency. The only thing I am not clear on Springbok is (as Syscrash puts it) how many draws do you hunt any one number for ? So for example if number 48 went 7 draws no show. Would you cover it until draw 12 or just for one or two draws ? That will clarify alot to me. Because I am always looking for the best strike-rate I can find.
So far this year the Side by Side strategy has ruled. But the Isolator as I know it although not proven to me fully yet. Looks to have an edge. The Eliminator is a constant. I know what to expect and I always get it, an average strike rate of 3--1 or 75%
Anything that can greatly improve upon that, and I wanna know about it. So once I fully understand your version of the ISOLATOR. If I see a better strike rate. You can count me in. Peace....
Re: Hi fullhouse
Hi Endbox,
Yes I go with the one bet per line because I have seen enough evidence to suggest it is worthwhile. You get numbers racking in 2,3,4 & 5 draws too per line. But if you had a bad ISOLATOR you could bet 15-20 times before you got a win. So that is why I decided to give it one shot per line.
And at its worst I have had to wait 11 bets for a win so far. At its best I have had 3 winning ISOLATORS in a row ranging from 1 bet to 5. Once I get it up to date. You will see why I am enthusiastic about it. But as my results for january show. You can expect 5--- 7 wins per month out of 10. And knowing this alone inspires great confidence. Peace...
endbox said:
Hi Endbox,
Yes I go with the one bet per line because I have seen enough evidence to suggest it is worthwhile. You get numbers racking in 2,3,4 & 5 draws too per line. But if you had a bad ISOLATOR you could bet 15-20 times before you got a win. So that is why I decided to give it one shot per line.
And at its worst I have had to wait 11 bets for a win so far. At its best I have had 3 winning ISOLATORS in a row ranging from 1 bet to 5. Once I get it up to date. You will see why I am enthusiastic about it. But as my results for january show. You can expect 5--- 7 wins per month out of 10. And knowing this alone inspires great confidence. Peace...
Hi Fullhouse
At this stage thinking of how many draws to bet on a single number is tricky. At the moment I would not go past 3 draws. More research is needed here. Looking at the frequencies of the occurence of the skips 7,8,9 over the last 200 draws you get the following strike rates:
skip..................strike rate
7.........................36%
8.........................27%
9........................31%
Perhaps checking when an overdue skip might help in determining whether to bet on the number or not. For example a number with the skip vale of 7 has appeared 7 times in the last 6 draws. Now if the strike rate is 36% then some rebalancing is due and I would hesitate to bet on a number with the skip value of 7 in Friday's lunchime draw. Remember I use the isolator as a tool to identify numbers in the 7 to 12 skip range.
At this stage thinking of how many draws to bet on a single number is tricky. At the moment I would not go past 3 draws. More research is needed here. Looking at the frequencies of the occurence of the skips 7,8,9 over the last 200 draws you get the following strike rates:
skip..................strike rate
7.........................36%
8.........................27%
9........................31%
Perhaps checking when an overdue skip might help in determining whether to bet on the number or not. For example a number with the skip vale of 7 has appeared 7 times in the last 6 draws. Now if the strike rate is 36% then some rebalancing is due and I would hesitate to bet on a number with the skip value of 7 in Friday's lunchime draw. Remember I use the isolator as a tool to identify numbers in the 7 to 12 skip range.
Re: Hi Fullhouse
Hi Springbok,
Yes trying to cover every number that went to 7 draws no show even for 3 bets would prove negative. As I did some testing. And you can have 4 or 5 streaks in excess of 9 draws between hits. So unless you're willing to bet up to 20 times for a single win. It would prove a negative practice.
That is where your selection method comes in. Another good option I think would be to wait for 3 numbers to go beyond 9 draws before starting on any subsequent 7 draw qualifiers. That would greatly increase the strike rate. Well just food for thought. Peace...
Springbok said:
Hi Springbok,
Yes trying to cover every number that went to 7 draws no show even for 3 bets would prove negative. As I did some testing. And you can have 4 or 5 streaks in excess of 9 draws between hits. So unless you're willing to bet up to 20 times for a single win. It would prove a negative practice.
That is where your selection method comes in. Another good option I think would be to wait for 3 numbers to go beyond 9 draws before starting on any subsequent 7 draw qualifiers. That would greatly increase the strike rate. Well just food for thought. Peace...