Springbok said:
Hello Fullhouse
To give you an example of how I tested the isolator last weekend. I made 4 bets over the weekend. 2 on Saturday and 2 on Sunday. I am using tiny sums of money. I started with 50p. Over the 2 days I turned over 4 pounds over the weekend. Each day I made 2 pounds profit. Each day I add up the total spent then subtract losses. After the weekend I realised that that was a dumb thing to do. Reporting should be done over the timescale of an isolator because an isolator can actually last longer than one day. One isolator I was using on Sunday teatime draw only racked up on Monday lunchtime draw. Now do I report this for Sunday or Monday's profits? Obviously it should be reported for the timespan of that particular isolator. This makes reporting less confusing.
At the moment I am thinking about what to do when an isolator gives you 2 betting opportunities at the same time.i.e you have 2 lines and each has a single number. Do I bet on each number ? In other words you have 2 mini isolators in one isolator.
Do I know anything you don't know. Well I look at the structure of each lottery draw from the point of view of skip values of each number. A skip value of 1 means that a number appeared 2 draws ago. 0 means it appeared in the last draw, so 1 means 2 draws ago. A typical draw tends to have this formation- 3 2 1. There are 3 fields in a draw. the first field is from 0 to 5 skips. the second field goes from 6 to 11 skips and the third goes from 12 skips to infinity(this is variable). So the "3" in the formation tells you that half the numbers in a draw have a skip value from 0 to 5. The "2" indicates that 2 numbers have a skip value form 6 to 11 and the "1" shows that 1 number will have a skip value of 12+. Of course this formation varies from draw to draw but it is typical. Your methods whether you know it or not takes skip values to trap these numbers. Eliminator chases numbers with skips of 20+. Side by side looks for numbers with skip values of 16 to 20. Isolator chases numbers with a skip value of between 6 and 12 or thereabouts. That is how my mind interprets your methods. I hope I am not confusing you.
I expect Northwind.1 to rack up at the lunchtime draw with either 11 or 33. This particular isolator seems to be going the full course. Let's see what happens.
Hi Springbok,
Yes there will be times when 2 lines qualify together, so in thoses cases you cover both numbers. Another thing I am not clear on is how many ISOLATORS for northwind and southwind you opperate per month. There will be isolators where you don't get a win in any of the 5 possible lines. Also there will be lines that are void. Because both of the last two numbers rack together. That is why if you can achieve even a true increase of 50% of your innitial bankroll each month. You're doing VERY WELL. When you take all the ups and downs into consideration. It does take a long period of time to see what can happen with any strategy.
But once you achieve a monthly average of 50% or thereabouts, so will be feeling very good a year down the road.
For example, the way I run the Isolator is 10 per month. So this is the frequency for the month of March.
NO.01 01/03
NO.02 04/03
NO.03 07/03
NO.04 10/03
NO.05 13/03
NO.06 16/03
NO.07 19/03
NO.08 22/03
NO.09 25/03
NO.10 28/03
On two months of the year February and December (Because of the xmas break) there are only 28 betting days. So in thosescases there would only be 9 ISOLATORS.
The ISOLATOR is the newest of the 3 strategies. So in my eyes it has not proven itself beyond doubt yet. I have ABSOLUTE faith in the Eliminator and S-B-S strategies, because they've been working for over 3 years. I have only back tested on this years results for the ISOLATOR. So I am still not certain it will stand up to the test of time.
In the world of betting, and systems any profit it positive. Whether you make 1% a month or 100% if you are making money that is a good thing. But if anyone tells me they've a strategy that will even increase their bankroll by an average of 30% per month. I am interested. That is why when you said 500% a WEEK. I was amazed, if you set aside £50 for the ISOLATOR Springbok. And you have even £200 by the and of 2 months play. Then I want to talk to you, really. Because that will be AMAZING to me.
I will let you publish your results as time goes by. Peace...
