The (((ISOLATOR)))

fullhouse

Member
Due to popular demand...laughs, this weekend I will be unveiling the third episode in the trilogy of bookie bashing strategies.

More anticipated than Star Wars "Return of the JEDI"

More epic than Lord of the Rings "The Return of the KING"

I will present to you the ((((ISOLATOR))) watch this space...
 

syscrash

Member
fullhouse said:
Due to popular demand...laughs, this weekend I will be unveiling the third episode in the trilogy of bookie bashing strategies.

More anticipated than Star Wars "Return of the JEDI"

More epic than Lord of the Rings "The Return of the KING"

I will present to you the ((((ISOLATOR))) watch this space...

Fullhouse!!!

I can'T wait anymore!!!! :p:

Tell us where'S the truth! lol
 

fullhouse

Member
Okay,

Sorry about yesterday. I had a party to attend that I had forgot about. So I was in no fit state to make any sense on here once I got home. Not that I usually am anyway, Laughs.

Okay the wait is over.............

With the Eliminator we deal with ALL 49 possible numbers.

The (((ISOLATOR))) only deals with 35 numbers. Below is what an isolator grid would look like on paper.

01,02,03,04,05,06,07
11,12,13,14,15,16,17
21,22,23,24,25,26,27
31,32,33,34,35,36,37
41,42,43,44,45,46,47



As you can see, each of the five sections covers numbers 1-7 in its line. We have no use for the other 14 numbers.
 

fullhouse

Member
Here are the basic rules.

(01) You Eliminate the numbers using the draws as usual. There are 5 Isolators per month (NOT CONCRETE YET) Spaced 12 draws apart. So the 1st of the month would be followd by the 7th & then the 13th and so forth.

(02) Once you are down to the last number in any given line, the line has qualified for betting.

(03) The objective is to get the last number in a maximum of 2 bets. So for example if number 5 is the last number in line 1--7. You bet on it for 2 bets. If it is drawn in one or two bets. The Isolator is FINISHED.

(04) If it doesn't rack up in 2 bets, you now wait for the next line to qualifiy and repeat the process.

(05) The results for 2006 have been very impressive. And I will be posting them on here tommorow. You average a win every 5 bets, at odds gauranted of 5/1

(06) Sometimes a line will complete before you get to one number, for instance lets say numbers 21 & 22 are the last two numbers in line 21--27. And they are drawn together. Then that line is VOID. And you've saved yourself 2 bets.

I can't say this strategy is better for certain than the other two YET. But the return is better for certain. I will do a comparison with the Side by Side strategy tommorow for 2006. To illustrate my point. And I think you will see why I am excited about it.

As usual any questions, will be a pleasure to answer. Peace...
 
Last edited:

endbox

Member
Hi fullhouse

Thanks as always , great reading , looking forward to your comparison with S by S ,take care endbox
 

syscrash

Member
fullhouse said:
Here are the basic rules.

(01) You Eliminate the numbers using the draws as usual. There are 5 Isolators per month (NOT CONCRETE YET) Spaced 12 draws apart. So the 1st of the month would be followd by the 7th & then the 13th and so forth.

(02) Once you are down to the last number in any given line, the line has qualified for betting.

(03) The objective is to get the last number in a maximum of 2 bets. So for example if number 5 is the last number in line 1--7. You bet on it for 2 bets. If it is drawn in one or two bets. The Isolator is FINISHED.

(04) If it doesn't rack up in 2 bets, you now wait for the next line to qualifiy and repeat the process.

(05) The results for 2006 have been very impressive. And I will be posting them on here tommorow. You average a win every 5 bets, at odds gauranted of 5/1

(06) Sometimes a line will complete before you get to one number, for instance lets say numbers 21 & 22 are the last two numbers in line 21--27. And they are drawn together. Then that line is VOID. And you've saved yourself 2 bets.

I can't say this strategy is better for certain than the other two YET. But the return is better for certain. I will do a comparison with the Side by Side strategy tommorow for 2006. To illustrate my point. And I think you will see why I am excited about it.

As usual any questions, will be a pleasure to answer. Peace...

Thanks again Fullhouse,
 

syscrash

Member
So today...

If I started an ISOLATOR Aprils 1st. 2006

24 was elegible for lunchtime and didn't come up.
37 should come up tomorow...
 

Springbok

Member
Hi Fullhouse

Checked out your Isolator system picking at certain random start points in the last 50 draws. It actually works especially with progressive betting. Often the Isolator is completed in 6 draws and if you start the next one straight away the system still works. Occasionaly it goes beyond 6 draws. Well done you clever fellow, very neat. You say you might get only 4 of these a month but I think you can get many more. Will be checking another 10 isolator going even further back just to make sure this was no flash in the pan. You can actually start an isolator at any point in the month not necessary at the beginning of the month. Lottery draws are dumb as they do not know what the date is. I take my hat off to you. You have an advantage being a technophobe as you have to use pen and paper. We users of powerful computers often miss out on basic simplicities as we are blinded by a technological fog.
 

syscrash

Member
I take my hat off to you. You have an advantage being a technophobe as you have to use pen and paper. We users of powerful computers often miss out on basic simplicities as we are blinded by a technological fog.

Very well said Springbok! As I said on my previous post, sometimes simplcity is frightening.

I've done some previous test too and they ended to a positive conclusion. I didn't done 50 test as you do... but I think this method is really promising.
 

Springbok

Member
To syscrash

Experiment with isolator leaving out the first 3 numbers of each line and replacing by using the last 3 numbers and see if there is any difference in the long term results. Theoretically there should be no difference. I think the main difference between isolator and eliminator is that they look at different skip values. Isolator focuses on the numbers that have skips of between3 and 6(sometimes more) whereas eliminator is looking at numbers with skips between 20 and 24. Using these two systems you should be able to catch 2 numbers for the next draw.
 

fullhouse

Member
Re: Hi Fullhouse

Springbok said:
Checked out your Isolator system picking at certain random start points in the last 50 draws. It actually works especially with progressive betting. Often the Isolator is completed in 6 draws and if you start the next one straight away the system still works. Occasionaly it goes beyond 6 draws. Well done you clever fellow, very neat. You say you might get only 4 of these a month but I think you can get many more. Will be checking another 10 isolator going even further back just to make sure this was no flash in the pan. You can actually start an isolator at any point in the month not necessary at the beginning of the month. Lottery draws are dumb as they do not know what the date is. I take my hat off to you. You have an advantage being a technophobe as you have to use pen and paper. We users of powerful computers often miss out on basic simplicities as we are blinded by a technological fog.

SpringBok you beat me to the punch. I was about to revise my rules on the frequency per month.

Yes here is what I believe is the best way to go about using this strategy. You have (((10))) per month so if the first one starts on the first of the month the second one starts on the 4th the third on the 7th and so forth. But then again you could start ANYWHERE, I am just a stickler for some kind of organized chaos, laughs!

And instead of giving each line 2 bets on the final number you give it 1 bet. Because so many of the isolators finish in one bet. So you are halfing your bets, and as you mentioned using a slight progression will have a very positive outcome. I have yet to take the month of January for example and see how 10 isolators will perform with one bet per line. But even if the strike rate is only 1 win for 7 or 8 bets. We have to remember we are gauranteed 5/1 so with a progression we will still be certain of good profit. I will report my findings soon.

If you don't beat me to it. Laughs.

I can tell you that for 2006 so far. The Side by side strategy has had a total of 98 bets and 17 wins. Which is an average of 1 win every 5.7 bets for the STRICT 16---19 ZONE. With a win to loss ratio of 17---02 so far this year. And that is pretty impressive. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
syscrash said:
So today...

If I started an ISOLATOR Aprils 1st. 2006

24 was elegible for lunchtime and didn't come up.
37 should come up tomorow...

Yes, actually line 21--27 had its go yesterday if you use my new STRICT one bet per line Syscrash. That means number (37) gets its shot at the title LUNCHTIME tommorow. And if it doesn't pop we wait was the next line to qualify. In the last ISOLATOR in March. Number (33) was the winning number, coming in the second qualifying line 31--37. So I would expect this one to be the 4th or 5th line if we are gonna get a win this time. Peace....
 

fullhouse

Member
syscrash said:
thank you very much Fullhouse your confirmation is very appreciated.

Hey you wanna know who inspired the Isolator ? Half the credit has to go to Syscrash and his pilgrimage theory. It got me thinking. So I am grateful to YOU syscrash for inspiring me to look at different angles. This is the beauty of exchanging ideas with other people. I appreciate what you guys have to say as much as you appreciate me. And simplicity really can be frightenning.

But I also admire the way you guys can manipulate computer programs to dissect strategies and patterns really fast. I would like to learn stuff like that. And maybe you can set me on the right track. Peace....
 

fullhouse

Member
Okay the first Isolator of April. Is down to the last number in the 3rd qualifying line. Since number 15 popped today. NUMBER (14) is eligible for a one shot bet for line 11--17. The first two qualifying lines 21--27 & 31--37 didn't produce instant wins, as I expected.

So I will be putting some money on inumber 14 tommorow lunchtime. If it doesn't rack. We still have two lines left. Line 1--7 & Line 41--47 And if there is to be a winner in this Isolator, I think one of those two lines will produce it.

I will keep you posted. Peace...
 

fullhouse

Member
syscrash said:
So...

I think this strategy has some potential I will update the matrix from isolator.

You will be able to follow the matrix progression here...

http://blog.myspace.com/index.cfm?f...n=DCDCEF8A-11C3-9DFE-919DDFC722D6048D18567706

Hope Moderator will not ban me for redirect some url to a personal website...

Hi Syscrash,

Thanks I hope you will be okay on this. You have probably wondered why I haven't added to this thread. The reason is, in the beginning I was going to have only 5 ISOLATORS a month. One every 12 draws. After some thought and prompting from Springboks analysis. I realized this strategy has the potential for a greater monthly frequency that either the Eliminator or Side by Side strategies.

So I decided we will work it against (((10))) PER MONTH. And go for only ONE BET per line. So the max number of bets an individual ISOLATOR can have is 5. And the MINUMUM is 1. The most recent ISOLATOR for example is already over in one bet. I will elaborate on this when I post the full results for 2006 soon. Peace...
 

Springbok

Member
2 Isolators running in parallel

Hi Fullhouse
Your first isolator grid was in the form of:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
and so on

You can use the following form:

4 5 6 7 8 9 10
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
and so on

I have tested the second grid and it is as successful as the first grid.
 

Sidebar

Top