The ISOLATOR (REVISED)

Scruff

Member
2002 – 49’s Historical Draw Records

Hi fullhouse,

I was hoping to check the revised Isolator against some 2002 historical draw data.

Unfortunately the draw data for the teatime Sunday 22nd September 2002 draw is missing from the 49’s official web site.

I was wondering if you might have this particular draw data amongst your old records?


 

fullhouse

Member
Scruff said:
Hi fullhouse,

I was hoping to check the revised Isolator against some 2002 historical draw data.

Unfortunately the draw data for the teatime Sunday 22nd September 2002 draw is missing from the 49’s official web site.

I was wondering if you might have this particular draw data amongst your old records?



Sorry Scruff.

I don't even have last years records as I used to keep them in a smart phone that was stolen. You could try going to Ladbrokes website and checking their records. I am not sure how far back they go. But it might go back to 2002. What you also have to realize Scruff is on certain days of the year. The bookmakers won't have draws. For example on Good Friday in April 14th. There were no draws.

Okay to update the ISOLATOR. Number 58 was another winner. Line 41--47 qualified in draw three and split in draw 6. We are now onto ISOLATOR 59 which is 2 draws old. So after 58 completed ISOLATORS here is how things stand.

WINS 48
LOSSES 10
OVERALL S/R 4.8--1

I have come to accept that the likelyhood of getting a perfect 10 out of 10 month is extremely remote. It is hard enough to achieve that with the Eliminator which is 6 per month. But knowing you will virtually always win 8 out of 10. Is no bad thing either. Even more potent to me. Is the fact that you will have at least 4 of those 8 wins in 2 bets or less. I will keep you posted. Peace...:burnt:
 

syscrash

Member
Some Stats

Hi Folks,

I've compiled some stats from 10 Isolators with 4 grids, since May 28th,. That makes 40 bets occurences. So here what happened

14 grids are declared winner after 1 draws the after grid was eligible.
7 grids are declared winner after 2 draws the after grid was eligible.
2 grids are declared winner after 3 draws the after grid was eligible.
6 grids are declared winner after 4 draws the after grid was eligible.
2 grids are declared winner after 5 draws the after grid was eligible.
1 grid are declared winner after 6 draws the after grid was eligible.
5 grids are declared winner after 7 draws the after grid was eligible.
1 grid are declared winner after 8 draws the after grid was eligible.

That make 38 wins from 40 draws if we hunt a grid for 8 draws. Only one grids fails... after 14 draws. :-( and 1 voided.

I know that some of you will say that betting 8 draws on 2 number seems a bit risky. But starting with minimal betting on 2 numbers during 8 draws with a reasonable increase factor seems the key of the sucess. A conservative factor for a beting on 2 numbers would be 1.5 to make some profit.

I followed Springbok recommendation before put some real money this time. I played with "virtual money" and I have started 28th may with 100$. 100$ is the amount need to hunt two number with 1.5 factor for 8 draws.

Here's the bet pattern that I followed.

Bet 1: 1$ on each isolator number
Bet 2: 1.5$ on each isolator number
Bet 3: 2.25$ on each isolator number
Bet 4: 3.38$ on each isolator number
until...
Bet 8: 17.09 $ on each isolator number

As you can see, you start with minimal bet and if you grid didn't win, then multiply the last bet by 1.5.

Here's the result :

After 40 draws, if someone has bet and follow the patern it would make a 155% profit since May 28th. Even if it has 2 loosing grids from 40.. that person would make easyly a 50% profit.

If we boost the factor to 1.7 that person would make an astonishing 510% profit with one loosing grid and 300% with 2 losing grids from the possible 40!

Sure we can boost the factor more higher, but we need to put more money on table.

Springbok, I'm starting to re-evaluating to combine grids, because some really strange occurance happened today teatime. 3 of 4 grid was elegible... so that makes a total 6 number.

From 6 numbers, 3 has shows up.

I have read your post about the 7 number string. That seems to be very interesting. Can you tell me how many bets should be put from the very first bet?

Also, I'm very confident with actual ELEMINATOR with 13 and 45. As I said previously, 13 is one of the most consistant number since ever. It has broke de 30 skips barrier only 4 times since the beginning! Last time was Febuary 18th, 2002.

Comments are welcome.
 

fullhouse

Member
syscrash said:
Hi Folks,

I've compiled some stats from 10 Isolators with 4 grids, since May 28th,. That makes 40 bets occurences. So here what happened

14 grids are declared winner after 1 draws the after grid was eligible.
7 grids are declared winner after 2 draws the after grid was eligible.
2 grids are declared winner after 3 draws the after grid was eligible.
6 grids are declared winner after 4 draws the after grid was eligible.
2 grids are declared winner after 5 draws the after grid was eligible.
1 grid are declared winner after 6 draws the after grid was eligible.
5 grids are declared winner after 7 draws the after grid was eligible.
1 grid are declared winner after 8 draws the after grid was eligible.

That make 38 wins from 40 draws if we hunt a grid for 8 draws. Only one grids fails... after 14 draws. :-( and 1 voided.

I know that some of you will say that betting 8 draws on 2 number seems a bit risky. But starting with minimal betting on 2 numbers during 8 draws with a reasonable increase factor seems the key of the sucess. A conservative factor for a beting on 2 numbers would be 1.5 to make some profit.

I followed Springbok recommendation before put some real money this time. I played with "virtual money" and I have started 28th may with 100$. 100$ is the amount need to hunt two number with 1.5 factor for 8 draws.

Here's the bet pattern that I followed.

Bet 1: 1$ on each isolator number
Bet 2: 1.5$ on each isolator number
Bet 3: 2.25$ on each isolator number
Bet 4: 3.38$ on each isolator number
until...
Bet 8: 17.09 $ on each isolator number

As you can see, you start with minimal bet and if you grid didn't win, then multiply the last bet by 1.5.

Here's the result :

After 40 draws, if someone has bet and follow the patern it would make a 155% profit since May 28th. Even if it has 2 loosing grids from 40.. that person would make easyly a 50% profit.

If we boost the factor to 1.7 that person would make an astonishing 510% profit with one loosing grid and 300% with 2 losing grids from the possible 40!

Sure we can boost the factor more higher, but we need to put more money on table.

Springbok, I'm starting to re-evaluating to combine grids, because some really strange occurance happened today teatime. 3 of 4 grid was elegible... so that makes a total 6 number.

From 6 numbers, 3 has shows up.

I have read your post about the 7 number string. That seems to be very interesting. Can you tell me how many bets should be put from the very first bet?

Also, I'm very confident with actual ELEMINATOR with 13 and 45. As I said previously, 13 is one of the most consistant number since ever. It has broke de 30 skips barrier only 4 times since the beginning! Last time was Febuary 18th, 2002.

Comments are welcome.

Thanks for the onfo on number (13) Syscrash. That gives me more confidence to go for it. Although today number 11 popped after 30 draws and number 22 after 29. So 13 is now at 29. So maybe it is time for it to break the 30 draw barrier for the 5th time Syscrash. We shall see. I didn't even cover the first bet today. Because the last two ELIMINATORS won in BET 1. So I will begin my campaign from tomorrow for 4 bets.

I am not sure about your proposal to cover a pair of numbers for 8 bets. You will get pairs that sometimes go 20 draws or more. My preference is to actually become more selective. And only cover an ELIMINATOR AND ISOLATOR for 2 bets per qualifier. But increase the stakes on proceeding qualifiers. The reason being is there is always wins in 2 bets every month for both strategies. And in good months nearly all the winners will come in 2 bets.

Well ISOLATOR 59 qualified today. With line 31--37 qualifying in only 3 draws. Leaving numbers 31---32. Now I get kind of nervous when a side by side pair qualify. So I am going light on this pair. I didn't even cover the first bet at teatime. So I will start from lunchtime tomorrow. Peace...:rolling:
 

fullhouse

Member
Ignore S-b-s Pairs.

Just as I have decided to impose the 5th bet rule in the Eliminator. I have also decided to avoid lines that qualify with a S-B-S pair. I avoided line 31--37 because the final pair were 31/32. And instead chose the next line to qualify. Line 11--17. It payed off as that line split in draw 6 bet 1. Also when a line qualifies in only 2 or 3 bets. I have decided not to begin covering the final pair until draw 5. As very few lines ever split before the 5th draw.

So here is how things stand after 59 completed ISOLATORS.

WINS 49
LOSSES 10
OVERALL S/R 4.9--1

ISOLATOR 60 qaulified in only 3 draws, with line 21--27 leaving numbers 22 & 26. So I will begin covering them from lunchtime tomorrow which will be draw 5. Keep you posted. Peace:agree:
 

fullhouse

Member
lONELY POSTER.

It sure is a lonely experience posting on here these days. It seems the initial excitement over the strategies has gone to the coast. And the reality of the slow but steady grind has kicked in. Lol!

Nevertheless. The ISOLATOR continues to prove the most consistent strategy I have yet seen. ISOLATOR 60 completed today. And was another winner in draw 7 bet 3. With number 22 splitting 22-26. So here is how we stand after the first half of the year.

WINS 50
LOSSES 10
OVERALL S/R 5--1

ISOLATOR 61 is 2 draws old. I will keep you posted. Peace.:agree:
 

taaroa

Member
Hi fullhouse,

I think everybody is looking at Football WorldCup matches. I even bet 10 euros today on England and lost!

I'm continuing learning the money management method. From the beginning of the month, I have better earnings results and play only with my benefits.:)

taaroa
 

Springbok

Member
Hi Fullhouse

Always good to read your comments and hear from you. I have finally settled on this grid-lets call it the Magic Grid:-

2 3 5 7 11 13 17
19 23 29 31 37 41 43
1 9 15 21 25 27 33
35 39 45 46 47 48 49
4 6 8 10 12 14 16
18 20 22 24 26 28 30
32 34 36 38 40 42 44

The first 2 lines are the prime numbers. The third and fourth lines are the odd numbers minus the primes except for no 47. 48 is an asylum seeker from the even numbers, the last 2 lines are the even numbers. Every line string is played until they win or fsil after the 4th draw. The grid is started from the previous draw and numbers are eliminated until all the lines show 2 numbers.Once a line qualifies you ignore any numbers in that line that pop up as you go backwards through the draws so all the lines qualify. Lunchtime draw today and 3 of the lines hit. Teatime another line hit.
 

Scruff

Member
Isolator Rules

Hi fullhouse,

In reply number two at the beginning of this thread you give the following rules if two or more lines qualify simultaneously.

a. You favour line 31-37 if it is among them.
b. Or line 21-27. If the thirties are not there.
c. Or thirdly 41-47.

Could you please clarify what preference you should give if just lines 1-7 and 11-17 qualify simultaneously.
 

fullhouse

Member
Scruff said:
Hi fullhouse,

In reply number two at the beginning of this thread you give the following rules if two or more lines qualify simultaneously.

a. You favour line 31-37 if it is among them.
b. Or line 21-27. If the thirties are not there.
c. Or thirdly 41-47.

Could you please clarify what preference you should give if just lines 1-7 and 11-17 qualify simultaneously.

Hi Scruff
Well line 11--17 has a pretty good record. So I would probably go with that one. UNLESS! It had produced the winner in the last couple of ISOLATORS. I always say this, and it always happens. EVERTHING gets its turn. I really don't like simultaneous qualifiers. But its something we can't control. For the most part you will get one clean qualifier on its own. Like today, line 41--47 qualified in ISOLATOR 61. After 4 draws leaving numbers 41 & 46. So they are elegible for betting on from tomorrow. And we may get a win in the first bet draw 5. The thing that remains constant scruff is a line virtually always splits inside 9 draws. The problem is which one. Usually its the first, sometimes it will be the second or third qualifier. If it was always the first. We would have the greatest strategy of alltime. And I am not kidding you. It wouldn't be gambling anymore. But 8 times out of 10 its usually the first line. And it usually comes in the first 4 bets. Mostly the first 2 bets.

Every month produces wins in draw 5 or draw 6. That is a given. It may not always be the first qualifying line. But there will always be lines splitting on those 2 draws. Peace...:beer:
 

fullhouse

Member
Springbok said:
Always good to read your comments and hear from you. I have finally settled on this grid-lets call it the Magic Grid:-

2 3 5 7 11 13 17
19 23 29 31 37 41 43
1 9 15 21 25 27 33
35 39 45 46 47 48 49
4 6 8 10 12 14 16
18 20 22 24 26 28 30
32 34 36 38 40 42 44

The first 2 lines are the prime numbers. The third and fourth lines are the odd numbers minus the primes except for no 47. 48 is an asylum seeker from the even numbers, the last 2 lines are the even numbers. Every line string is played until they win or fsil after the 4th draw. The grid is started from the previous draw and numbers are eliminated until all the lines show 2 numbers.Once a line qualifies you ignore any numbers in that line that pop up as you go backwards through the draws so all the lines qualify. Lunchtime draw today and 3 of the lines hit. Teatime another line hit.

Springbok,
I won't pretend to understand this, Lol! But if its working great. I think the quote I am looking for right now is the one Syscrash made about me using Einstein as reference.

Is the breakdown the same pace as my version Springbok. For example the first line to qualify the standard ISOLATOR usually occurs by draw 4 or 5. And usually by draw nine you have two of the 5 lines split. Peace...:beer:
 

Springbok

Member
Hi Fullhouse

The same qualifing results happen. The problem is I have been experimenting 11 different isolators in trying to catch the doubles and trebles and have not been able to do this. It actually gets quite confusing and you end up with 12+ numbers and trying to figure out which ones to use can put your mind into a serious spin. I think sticking to catching one number makes life much easier and on the brain. Your original isolator which I call Northwind is a money spinner. the way I see it now is to run the other 3 wind isolators as well as Northwind. Each has its own separate bank. You only bet on one isolator but the other 3 shadow your chosen wind isolator. Let's say that southwind is shadowing and the qualifying line has not come in within 2 draws, then you start betting on that line. You could do this with any qualifying line that does not come in within 3 or even 4 draws or even more. Or you could just use 2 isolators with one shadowing the other to make things simpler.
 

taaroa

Member
fullhouse said:
Hi Syscrash and Springbok,

A week ago I would have agreed with you Syscrash. But the angle Springbok has given this strategy with the Northwind and southwind method. Makes it far more realistic to at least hit doubles on a regular basis. It will still require a little luck. But by matching a number that is due from a line in the northwind with one that is due in the southwind. It is bound to happen every now and then.

I too noticed that 19 & 20 popped today but I wasn't on them. I wish I had been becuase I was observing something from a strategy I had even before the Eliminator called the 3 number bridge. Numbers 28,29,30 had gone 13 draws no split. Let me tell you. This is gold. Few 3 number bridges EVER break 13--14 draws. Most split after 13 draws. This is basically an even money chance. Like going to a casino and betting on red or black on a roulette wheel.

The difference is this will win alot more. BUT, you need the patience of the pope. Because you only get 3 maybe 4 qualifiers a month. That is why I don't make a big deal of it on here. Bet for bet there is nothing that can touch it. But you only get 30-40 bets a year. But you will win nearly ALL of them in 2 bets a piece max. So I got number 29 at teatime today. And I noticed 19 and 20 came in the same draw too. These are the chances to get doubles. A rock solid strategy like the 3 number bridge matched with Springboks grids will do it.

In May 1,2,3 split after 13 draws. 23,24,25 split after 13 draws. 38,39,40 split after 14 draws. And today 28,29,30 split after 13 draws. I have studied strategies for about 10 years. And there is nothing that is as certain as the 3 number bridge. But you need PATIENCE. Peace...

------------------

Hi neighbours!

The 3 number bridge strategy hit pretty well last drawings. Lots of bridges this month.
For today 7/7/2006 lunchtime, 38 pop up for 27-28-29 bridge.
At teatime, we got 27 for 27-28-29 and 25-26-27. In fact 25-26-27
pop up all 3. Yes fullhouse, "This is gold" and thanks again.

taaroa
 

taaroa

Member
fullhouse said:
Hi Syscrash and Springbok,

A week ago I would have agreed with you Syscrash. But the angle Springbok has given this strategy with the Northwind and southwind method. Makes it far more realistic to at least hit doubles on a regular basis. It will still require a little luck. But by matching a number that is due from a line in the northwind with one that is due in the southwind. It is bound to happen every now and then.

I too noticed that 19 & 20 popped today but I wasn't on them. I wish I had been becuase I was observing something from a strategy I had even before the Eliminator called the 3 number bridge. Numbers 28,29,30 had gone 13 draws no split. Let me tell you. This is gold. Few 3 number bridges EVER break 13--14 draws. Most split after 13 draws. This is basically an even money chance. Like going to a casino and betting on red or black on a roulette wheel.

The difference is this will win alot more. BUT, you need the patience of the pope. Because you only get 3 maybe 4 qualifiers a month. That is why I don't make a big deal of it on here. Bet for bet there is nothing that can touch it. But you only get 30-40 bets a year. But you will win nearly ALL of them in 2 bets a piece max. So I got number 29 at teatime today. And I noticed 19 and 20 came in the same draw too. These are the chances to get doubles. A rock solid strategy like the 3 number bridge matched with Springboks grids will do it.

In May 1,2,3 split after 13 draws. 23,24,25 split after 13 draws. 38,39,40 split after 14 draws. And today 28,29,30 split after 13 draws. I have studied strategies for about 10 years. And there is nothing that is as certain as the 3 number bridge. But you need PATIENCE. Peace...

------------------

Hi neighbours!

The 3 number bridge strategy hit pretty well last drawings. Lots of bridges this month.
For today 7/7/2006 lunchtime, 28 pop up for 27-28-29 bridge.
At teatime, we got 27 for 27-28-29 and 25-26-27. In fact 25-26-27
pop up all 3. Yes fullhouse, "This is gold" and thanks again.

taaroa
 

endbox

Member
Hi fullhouse

I've not posted for some time , maybe I should have followed your money management .........Anyways , I've done the doubling up when I've lost & sometimes lost again......Never been able to increase my betting pot to a satisfactory level.........In honesty don't think I've got the patients to try & try again.......Thanks again for your input to this forum , take care endbox
 

Springbok

Member
A question

Which grid where you using and what were your start dates and time of draw when you started to cross off numbers? What was your betting sequence.? I want to follow your steps and see what happened.
 

fullhouse

Member
endbox said:
I've not posted for some time , maybe I should have followed your money management .........Anyways , I've done the doubling up when I've lost & sometimes lost again......Never been able to increase my betting pot to a satisfactory level.........In honesty don't think I've got the patients to try & try again.......Thanks again for your input to this forum , take care endbox

Hi Endbox,

Yes I too am surprised you got wiped out. If you were following my suggested betting frequency and start times. You should be ahead. As there have been enough wins to make a profit. The key is indeed how you use the bankroll. And the reason I always say you should have at least 10 times the amount is takes to cover one ISOLATOR. I have been away for a while. But will update all the ISOLATORS that have occured in my absense. And I know today there was another winner in draw 8 BET 1. For ISOLATOR 63. But I will give the full update tomorrow. Peace...:dang: :dang:
 

endbox

Member
Hi All

endbox said:
I've not posted for some time , maybe I should have followed your money management .........Anyways , I've done the doubling up when I've lost & sometimes lost again......Never been able to increase my betting pot to a satisfactory level.........In honesty don't think I've got the patients to try & try again.......Thanks again for your input to this forum , take care endbox
It's confession time.........Got wiped out chasing a 3 number bridge a few weeks ago , don't know if you recall.....Think they finally split after 20 or so draws , that will never happen again !!
I've learn't ......Had a good week at work , starting a fresh betting bank , take care endbox
 

fullhouse

Member
endbox said:
It's confession time.........Got wiped out chasing a 3 number bridge a few weeks ago , don't know if you recall.....Think they finally split after 20 or so draws , that will never happen again !!
I've learn't ......Had a good week at work , starting a fresh betting bank , take care endbox

Hi Endbox,

Okay now that sounds very possible. It is my fault I think for not making it clear, that you only give a 3 number bridge TWO BETS. DRAW 14 & DRAW 15. If it hasn't split at that point you let it go. And wait for the next one.

I don't want it to sound like I am being too controlling Endbox. But If you follow the ISOLATOR EXACTLY as I advise. I Guarantee you will make money. I know everyone wants to feel they're adding their own twist to things. But this is a percentage game. I have been doing it for over 5 years. I promise you will make money. Or I will personally send you a cheque for any losses.

But you must stick to it like glue. Its easy to get side-tracked. I am responsible in part. Because I introduced TOO MANY strategies to this forum too soon. And that allows confusion to enter the frame. I am not too precious about strategies. I want the best one I can get. And if I am totally honest. The ISOLATOR is head and shoulders above the rest. It really is.

My suggestion to you Endbox. Is when you reload. Forget everything else. And simply focus on the ISOLATOR. And you will not go wrong. It is pure magic. It needs nothing special to happen. It isn't directly affected by nasty long losing streaks, like the Eliminator. And it has a perfect monthly turnover.

I am going to drop all other strategies. And concentrate PURELY on the isolator. Because it is THE BEST. You might adopt Springboks northwind--southwind idea. But give your FULL attention to the ISOLATOR. That is my advice. It has no equal. I say that with no hesitation. I have back tested it on sections from years ago. And it works better than the Eliminator EVER DID. So stick with it Endbox. I will offer nothing else on here. We have pure gold with the ISOLATOR. And always remember you were partly responsible for its creation. So that should make you feel that you are really part of it. Peace....:agree: :agree: :agree:
 

Sidebar

Top