The ISOLATOR (REVISED)

I

Icewynd

Member
lotto_cat said:
For Keno, instead of doing 5 decades (1-10, 11-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49), you would be doing 7 decades instead (1-10, 11-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69).
Click to expand...

D'oh!:eek: Must learn to READ what is written before replying!

Either 7 decades or 10 groups of 7 would work. I think the second option might move a little quicker and generate more numbers. Keno is a quick turnover game, so you want to get those numbers earlier, rather than chasin' the ones that have gone stale. IMHO.:eek3:
 
K

king-maze1

Member
hie people is there anyone still using the isolator nor the eliminator ? i have been trying it for the past 2 months and i made a progress in the 1st 2 weeks after that it got stuck. i have started with a bank roll of 150 bucks and i have reached 300 bucks but it goes up and down around that figure :(. i don't know what am doing wrong. i have re-read the isolator forum many times, drank many energy drinks in the process too lol :confused:
 
I

Icewynd

Member
The isolator is like any other lotto system -- it blows hot and cold. I did a limited backtest and I found that you would get hot times when your numbers would be hitting all the time and then other times when none of them were hitting.

I don't think the original poster has been around for years, nor any of his followers that I know of. He certainly was reporting huge success with his method, but remember: Don't believe everything you read on the internet!

Good Luck
:thumb:
 
bloubul

bloubul

Member
Springbok passed away several years ago.... I do use it from time to time.
So King-maze1 contact me and we can work on it....

BlouBul :cool:
 
T

TheConcept

Member
king-maze1 said:
hie people is there anyone still using the isolator nor the eliminator ?
Click to expand...
I experimented with both for a while, but had similar findings to Icewynd.

There is a variation that has resulted from this however, which I'm currently monitoring. Instead of waiting for the last three numbers (Eliminator), or the first row to qualify (Isolator), take the four most popular numbers, wait until two have been matched, then play the remaining two numbers over two or three draws (half the median for a single ball, so about 50% likelihood of a match)

What I have yet to establish is the best conditions for using the most popular numbers?
- The entire history of draws
- The last 25 or 49 draws (for a 7/49 lottery)
The reason for the smaller range of draws is an attempt to get round the problem of the 'hot and cold' spells.

I'm also not sure whether to use a set of four numbers, wait until three numbers are matched then find the next set of four numbers, or to check after each draw what the most popular four numbers are and then start monitoring them.

Stakingwise, the plan is to re-invest half of any profits from an initial bet, to take advantage of streaks, rather than progressive staking.
It may be a while yet before I'm any wiser. If I can get down to a definite strategy, I'll start a thread to post the numbers being used and the results (I'm currently using the Hong Kong lottery)

Until the end of the academic year, I haven't really got enough time to do in-depth research (i.e. use previous draws), so am just waiting for the current draws.
 
I

Icewynd

Member
If I recall correctly, the OP was using a progressive wagering scheme. So for every loss he'd increase the bet. I think that was part of how he was reporting such great returns.

He was playing 49's in Britain at a Bookies which probably gave him a lot of flexibility with regard to his bets. It gets expensive real quick when you have to buy extra tickets at the government-run lottery.

Good Luck!
:thumb:
 
K

king-maze1

Member
Thanx guys i will give it another month , if i fail to progress i will give the strategy a rest but i must admit it feels good to play not using your own money, for the past weeks i have been playing using profits.

@bloubul will inbox you a mail soon.
 
I

Icewynd

Member
I also used a variation on this idea which I believe Fullhouse called his side-by-side strategy.

What I did was wait for two or more numbers to be out for exactly 16 games. Then I would play the pair (triple, etc.) for 4 games. About 45% of them will hit in this time frame, sometimes one of them, sometimes two or more. If they didn't hit by 4 games I abandoned them and found a new group of matching skips to play.

This also works if you have just two numbers left on any line of your Eliminator grid with about equal success.
 
K

king-maze1

Member
Hie icewynd

are you still using this strategy ? If yes, have you created your own grids or you are using the original grids created by fullhouse and springbok
 
I

Icewynd

Member
king-maze1 said:
Hie icewynd

are you still using this strategy ? If yes, have you created your own grids or you are using the original grids created by fullhouse and springbok
Click to expand...

I'm not using it as such. I moved on to a related idea. I track the hits of all the 49 numbers in my lottery until all have been hit and then start a new cycle. At each draw in the process there is a predictable number of hits from the unhit group and a predictable number of repeats from the previously hit group. You just have to pick the right ones :sad:

I hadn't thought of it before you brought it up, but I could probably impose the eliminator framework on my data and see which numbers have been hit in each eliminator line.

This thread has more information:

http://www.lottoforums.com/lottery/...up-18-numbers-6-a.html?highlight=long+numbers

I still use the side-by-side strategy, but in an informal way if I notice that two numbers have the same skip.

Good Luck!
:thumb:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sidebar

Top