The ISOLATOR (REVISED)

[endbox]

Hi all

This is all good stuff........But MAXIMUM returns from MINIMUM stake is what we're all after (don't mean to sound negative)...........Too many bets here & there could prove negative........Profits are only made with intelligent & progressive betting.......That's out of your rule book fullhouse , which I respect unconditionaly , take care endbox

 

[endbox]

Hi all

This is all good stuff........But MAXIMUM returns from MINIMUM stake is what we're all after (don't mean to sound negative)...........Too many bets here & there could prove negative........Profits are only made with intelligent & progressive betting.......That's out of your rule book fullhouse , which I respect unconditionaly , take care endbox

Hi all sorry for babbling on a bit (Had a few last night ) , take care endbox

 

[fullhouse]

I respect all conributions

This is all good stuff........But MAXIMUM returns from MINIMUM stake is what we're all after (don't mean to sound negative)...........Too many bets here & there could prove negative........Profits are only made with intelligent & progressive betting.......That's out of your rule book fullhouse , which I respect unconditionaly , take care endbox

Hi Endbox & Springbok.

Yes the thing we want is frequency but not TOO MUCH. Or confusion can easily creep in leading to lack of focus and the end result will be diminished results. I have already decided to cut down the S-B-S strategy in favour of the ISOLATOR. Because, I see alot more potential and consistency with it. If anyone brings a better strategy than the ISOLATOR to the table. I would do exactly the same. The aim is to win consistently with the best strike rate possible. The Eliminator used to be the best thing I had. Now the ISOLATOR has surpassed it. Who knows, one of you guys may come up with somethng that blows the ISOLATOR AWAY. I hope so. Remember Endbox, I didn't pull the revised ISOLATOR out of thin air. It was through an exchange with you that I got thinking about it.

Having said that. As expected ISOLATOR 49 lost. It was really asking too much to go 12 for 12. The Eliminator has done that ONCE in 4 years when it went 14 wins in a row. So you know how special that is. I tell you something though. It seems that a line always has to split sub 10 draws. If its not the first qualifier it will be the second or third. Line 21--27 was the third line to qualify and split yesterday after 7 draws. Line 11--17 split yesterday after 8 draws. And line 1--7 split today teatime after 10 draws. This occurance seems to be very consistent. So there is room for thought and developement there. To get more out of each ISOLATOR.

The thing I like most about this new strategy is you don't have to dwell over a loss for long. With the Eliminator you could wait a week for your next attempt at a win. With the ISOLATOR. There will be times when a win or loss is followed by a win the very next day. I love that improvement.

So after 49 ISOLATORS here is how things stand for 2006.

WINS 42
LOSSES 07
OVERALL S/R 6--1

ISOLATOR 50 is now 4 draws old. And may well qualify lunchtime tomorrow. So lets hope this will be win 43 for the year. Peace.

 

[syscrash]

Hi folks,

I have a question to Springbok, you mentionned about the other grid possiblities, I would like to confirm what you try to say... if I started an Isolator May 28th, 2006 and put it on two frid (North and sound) I will get something like this

Can you give me some exemple what would look like the West and East wind grid?

Many thanks

 

[Springbok]

Hi Syscrash

Basically yes. although your Southwind grid is incorrect at the last line. Last line should read:-
43 44 45 46 47 48 49

Westwind

3 4 5 8 9 11 12
13 16 17 19 21 22 23
24 25 26 29 30 31 32
33 34 35 36 37 38 39
40 41 43 44 45 47 49

Eastwind

1 2 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 26 27 28 29 30
31 32 36 37 38 39 40
41 42 43 46 47 48 49


I think any 35 number group of combinations written in groups of 7 in ascending order should do the trick but I have not tested this thoroughly as Fullhouse has done with his original grid which I call Northwind. Partial testing with Southwind seems to point this way, What is interesting is they often predict different numbers.

 

[syscrash]

Thanks Springbok,

I'll try to follow all four poles for one week or two and I'll give you some feedbacks. Everyone will be able to see the progression here.

 

[endbox]

Hi fullhouse

So we had 3 lines qualify at lunchtime today (Draw 5)
Line 1....7
Line 11.....17
Line 41....47


So have gone for No's 41 & 42......, Take care endbox

 

[fullhouse]

3at once!

So we had 3 lines qualify at lunchtime today (Draw 5)
Line 1....7
Line 11.....17
Line 41....47


So have gone for No's 41 & 42......, Take care endbox

Hi Endbox,

Yes this is the classic senario. Where we have to make a decision. I wouldn't even consider line 11--17 because it just split in bet 1 in ISOLATOR 49. Line 1--7 split after bet 5. So that would be a pretty good choice to split in 4 bets. But line 41--47 has 2 things going for it. One it is also a S-B-S pair. And 2 that line has yet to complete in ISOLATOR 49. So it gets my vote. Lets hope we made the right choice, lol! Peace.

 

[fullhouse]

1--7 dang it!

Well a line split today in draw 7. It wasn't the one that I had in mind. But that is the problem with 2 or 3 simultaneous qualifiers. You know you are going to get a win from one of them sub 10 draws. But sometimes you will pick the wrong one. I had a feeling line 1--7 might split. Because in the previous ISOLATOR it took 5 draws to split while line 11--17 split in 1 draw.

The one thing I didn't take into consideration with line 41--47. Is we are left with numbers (41) & (42). Now recently there has been plenty of action in draws 13--15 in the S-B-S strategy. But poor form in the 16--19 zone. Now after today three bets are gone. And tomorrow is bet 4 and they're at 15 draws no split. That tells me that they are unlikely to split lunchtime. I didn't cover them teatime today because I realized what is going on.

We are due some success between 16--19 in the S-B-S strategy. And I believe (41)(42) are headed there. So I will give them 2 shots at the title from teatime tomorrow if they don't split lunchtime. Sometimes you have to use these kinds of judgements and believe me they can save you plenty of wasted money.

There should be one more line at least split tomorrow. Lets hope its line 41--47. Peace...

 

[endbox]

Hi fullhouse

Well the next ISOLATOR has qualified after only 2 draws , No's 3 & 7.......Begining to loose a bit of faith........Could be a second loosing ISOLATOR in a row...! (Only kidding , I know this has great potential)

 

[endbox]

Hi fullhouse

Well the next ISOLATOR has qualified after only 2 draws , No's 3 & 7.......Begining to loose a bit of faith........Could be a second loosing ISOLATOR in a row...! (Only kidding , I know this has great potential)

Wonder if it's worth waiting until we have a clear SINGLE qualifier......If more than one line qualifies then the ISOLATOR is VOID ......Just bouncing some ideas about that's all , take care endbox

 

[endbox]

Hi fullhouse

Forgot , we don't start another ISOLATOR until the first of the month , take care endbox

 

[syscrash]

Has mentionned earlier, I decided to follow four different grid for ISOLATOR. For the Isolator that started May 28, south and east pole and I can't believe that they are both winner .

 

[syscrash]

I made a typo on lunchtime result... so South, East, WEST pole was WINNER. But I think (41)(42) is a loosing one... so... can we concider original form of revised Isolator as loosing one?

 

[fullhouse]

Cover them ALL!

I made a typo on lunchtime result... so South, East, WEST pole was WINNER. But I think (41)(42) is a loosing one... so... can we concider original form of revised Isolator as loosing one?

Yes the original ISOLATOR proved negative over the long run. So this revised version is now in opperation

Well today. Line 11--17 split and I put some on it. Because like I said yesterday. I forgot that numbers 41-42 were due to split in the strict 16--19 zone which would start from teatime today. I hear what you're saying Syscrash. But there is one CONSTANT. A line Always splits inside 10 draws. Usually draw 6--9. And quite often as happened today 2 lines have split by the 8th draw. So you are pushing your luck to get a 3rd inside 10. I think we should use this fact as a platform to consider covering the first 3 lines that qualify. Knowing we should get at least two of them. Once we have 2 split lines that ISOLATOR is over. We don't pursue anymore lines. We are after the first 2 inside 10 draws. From my research. With this tweak to the strategy. Quite simply there would have been no losing ISOLATORS this year.

You read right. We would now be 50 out of 50. Simply by not favouring the first qualifier but the first 2 or 3 lines that qualify. We will always win inside 10 draws. I like that thought. Even if your profit margin is cut a little. It is worth it. To know you won't lose. Or certainly very rarely. I will implement that tweak to the strategy from the next ISOLATOR which began today. Peace...

 

[syscrash]

Hi Fullhouse,

Not sure to understand... because you mentionned that when many lines qualified in the same time to only take one... and it was 41-47 one... so I started to hunt (41)(42) yesterday... I'll continue my hunt for two or tree more...

Many thanks...

 

[endbox]

Hi fullhouse

Yes the original ISOLATOR proved negative over the long run. So this revised version is now in opperation

Well today. Line 11--17 split and I put some on it. Because like I said yesterday. I forgot that numbers 41-42 were due to split in the strict 16--19 zone which would start from teatime today. I hear what you're saying Syscrash. But there is one CONSTANT. A line Always splits inside 10 draws. Usually draw 6--9. And quite often as happened today 2 lines have split by the 8th draw. So you are pushing your luck to get a 3rd inside 10. I think we should use this fact as a platform to consider covering the first 3 lines that qualify. Knowing we should get at least two of them. Once we have 2 split lines that ISOLATOR is over. We don't pursue anymore lines. We are after the first 2 inside 10 draws. From my research. With this tweak to the strategy. Quite simply there would have been no losing ISOLATORS this year.

You read right. We would now be 50 out of 50. Simply by not favouring the first qualifier but the first 2 or 3 lines that qualify. We will always win inside 10 draws. I like that thought. Even if your profit margin is cut a little. It is worth it. To know you won't lose. Or certainly very rarely. I will implement that tweak to the strategy from the next ISOLATOR which began today. Peace...

Hi fullhouse , can you just clarify something for me ?.............I thought that once the first line qualified in a particular ISOLATOR that was it , and we wait until the next qualified ,take care endbox

 

[fullhouse]

Draws 5--9

Hi Endbox,

That was my initial thought Endbox. But as this is a new strategy. I have done further research. And believe that to get the most out of each and every ISOLATOR. We should cover the first 2 or three lines. The thing I want to get across Endbox is that the important thing about this strategy isn't being precious about any one line. But realizing that there will virtually ALWAYS be 2 and certainly 1 line split by the 9th draw at the latest. And the last two ISOLATORS failed to produce a win with the first qualifier. BUT they both produced wins by the 7th draw with the 2nd or 3rd qualifying line.

There has to be a line split by the 8th or 9th draw barring any void lines (ones where 2 of the last 3 numbers are drawn together) So this is powerful knowledge that we should take full advantage of.

If we adopt this approach Endbox we may sacrifice a bit of profit return. BUT you would have so many consecutive wins. You won't be complaining. How does a winning streak of 50 or 60 hit you.

I will give you an example of how we handle 2 or 3 qualifiers at the same time Endbox. The only thing to bare in mind is the the draw margin. ISOLATOR 49 produced splits in draw 6 and draw 7. ISOLATOR 50 produced splits in draw 7 and draw 9. Even though the first qualifiying lines weren't among them. I had some money on line 11--17 today. Because I realized 41--47 wasn't likely to happen. And number 17 popped. So this draw section of 5--9 draws. Is are target region Endbox. That is where one or two lines will virtually always split. I like knowing stuff like that. Peace...

 

[endbox]

Hi fullhouse

Hi Endbox,

That was my initial thought Endbox. But as this is a new strategy. I have done further research. And believe that to get the most out of each and every ISOLATOR. We should cover the first 2 or three lines. The thing I want to get across Endbox is that the important thing about this strategy isn't being precious about any one line. But realizing that there will virtually ALWAYS be 2 and certainly 1 line split by the 9th draw at the latest. And the last two ISOLATORS failed to produce a win with the first qualifier. BUT they both produced wins by the 7th draw with the 2nd or 3rd qualifying line.

There has to be a line split by the 8th or 9th draw barring any void lines (ones where 2 of the last 3 numbers are drawn together) So this is powerful knowledge that we should take full advantage of.

If we adopt this approach Endbox we may sacrifice a bit of profit return. BUT you would have so many consecutive wins. You won't be complaining. How does a winning streak of 50 or 60 hit you.

I will give you an example of how we handle 2 or 3 qualifiers at the same time Endbox. The only thing to bare in mind is the the draw margin. ISOLATOR 49 produced splits in draw 6 and draw 7. ISOLATOR 50 produced splits in draw 7 and draw 9. Even though the first qualifiying lines weren't among them. I had some money on line 11--17 today. Because I realized 41--47 wasn't likely to happen. And number 17 popped. So this draw section of 5--9 draws. Is are target region Endbox. That is where one or two lines will virtually always split. I like knowing stuff like that. Peace...

Thanks as always fullhouse , understand what you mean now , take care endbox

 

[endbox]

Hi fullhouse

Hi fullhouse , well teatime draw today produced 2 qualifiers after 4 draws.........13 & 16 in the 11.........17 line and 41 & 43 in the 41........47 line , are you saying we now bet on both pairs for up to 4 draws ? take care endbox