Side By Side Stratedgy

[fullhouse]

Still spitting early.

Okay today numbers (35)(36) split in the teatime draw after 14 draws. I didn't think they would make it to 16 as they did so on the first of the month. So I made some loot on them.

We now turn our attention to a trio of numbers. As a trio numbers 23,24,25 are 13 draws no split. And that is a long time for 3. And of course among those 3 is the super elusive number 24. At the pivotal centre. So I will be covering numbers (23)(24) from tommorow. Because they are at 14 draws no split. And put just enough money on number 25 to retrieve my stake. We really are due a pair making it to the 16--19 ZONE. So I feel one of these 2

(23)(24)=14 draws N/S

(24)(25)=13 draws N/S

Should take us there. But number 24 really is the number that could split both pairs tommorow. Also on the horizon is numbers (03)(04) which are now 12 draws N/S. So we have some action on the way over the next few days.

Whether we will have another month as great as February this year. I can't say. It was a great month for the strategy producing 7 wins in a row. All spaced out nicely. And 4 of them in a row split after 16 draws. Which is very rare. I will keep you posted.

 

[fullhouse]

Okay FINALLY we have a legitimate qualifier in the strict 16--19 ZONE. Numbers (23)(24) are now 16 draws no split. So they will be up for betting tommorow. Also numbers (03)(04) are now 14 draws no split. So they could well qualify tommorow too.

The 13-15 gap has produced alot of action lately. And numbers (24)(25) split lunchtime today after 13 draws. So that has kept things running while I have been waiting for qualifiers for the strict 16--19 zone. I am confident that one of those 2 pairs will split in the ZONE. But things have been truly excellent for both strategies this year. And they are performing above my expectations. So lets see if (23)(24) will give us the 22nd win of 2006. Speak soon. Peace...

 

[endbox]

Hi fullhouse

Okay FINALLY we have a legitimate qualifier in the strict 16--19 ZONE. Numbers (23)(24) are now 16 draws no split. So they will be up for betting tommorow. Also numbers (03)(04) are now 14 draws no split. So they could well qualify tommorow too.

The 13-15 gap has produced alot of action lately. And numbers (24)(25) split lunchtime today after 13 draws. So that has kept things running while I have been waiting for qualifiers for the strict 16--19 zone. I am confident that one of those 2 pairs will split in the ZONE. But things have been truly excellent for both strategies this year. And they are performing above my expectations. So lets see if (23)(24) will give us the 22nd win of 2006. Speak soon. Peace...

Don't think No 24 is being put in the machine!!!.......Only kidding , I too made a bit today on 25 & of course 28 on the ELIMINATOR , take care endbox

 

[syscrash]

Don't think No 24 is being put in the machine!!!.......Only kidding , I too made a bit today on 25 & of course 28 on the ELIMINATOR , take care endbox

First, I would like to say that that (23)(24) is overdue. In fact, this pair has reached his highest SKIPS records since ever . We haven't saw that pair December 15, 2005!.. that make 287 SKIPS!

Second, I suspect that they forgot to put number 24 in the draw too...

Tomorow will be very interesting... I think it will worth to throw some money on that pair fovouring the (23) despite fact the 24 is REALLY overdue....

Good luck everyone.

 

[endbox]

First, I would like to say that that (23)(24) is overdue. In fact, this pair has reached his highest SKIPS records since ever . We haven't saw that pair December 15, 2005!.. that make 287 SKIPS!

Second, I suspect that they forgot to put number 24 in the draw too...

Tomorow will be very interesting... I think it will worth to throw some money on that pair fovouring the (23) despite fact the 24 is REALLY overdue....

Good luck everyone.

Hi Syscrash , nice to hear from you , yes the next few draws will be interesting , take care endbox

 

[fullhouse]

Don't think No 24 is being put in the machine!!!.......Only kidding , I too made a bit today on 25 & of course 28 on the ELIMINATOR , take care endbox

Lol! It would appear not Endbox,

Well really the only reason number 24 surprises me at the moment is because it is the only number to ever go back to back over 35 draws. Of course a number can go over 60 draws and has done on at least two occasions to my knowledge.

That is why, like I said in an earlier posting. It is very unwise to try and ride out a losing streak for any one number. Just like someone in a Casino trying to pick one number on a roulette wheel. You could be there all night and that number wouldn't hit. I once heard of someone in a London casino betting on number 36, 70 times and it never came. Then they gave up walked to the bar for a stiff drink. And two spins later, there it was. This is why I developed bet limits for both of my strategies. You have to have a sensible limit.

Lets hope numbers (23)(24) know their limit, Lol! Peace...

 

[endbox]

Hi fullhouse

Lol! It would appear not Endbox,

Well really the only reason number 24 surprises me at the moment is because it is the only number to ever go back to back over 35 draws. Of course a number can go over 60 draws and has done on at least two occasions to my knowledge.

That is why, like I said in an earlier posting. It is very unwise to try and ride out a losing streak for any one number. Just like someone in a Casino trying to pick one number on a roulette wheel. You could be there all night and that number wouldn't hit. I once heard of someone in a London casino betting on number 36, 70 times and it never came. Then they gave up walked to the bar for a stiff drink. And two spins later, there it was. This is why I developed bet limits for both of my strategies. You have to have a sensible limit.

Lets hope numbers (23)(24) know their limit, Lol! Peace...

Wise words fullhouse ..........Going to retire for the night , been a busy day (mission impossible & all that ) take care endbox

 

[fullhouse]

Wise words fullhouse ..........Going to retire for the night , been a busy day (mission impossible & all that ) take care endbox

Okay Ethan ,I will deny all knowledge of your existence, Lol! Peace...

 

[fullhouse]

Everyting gets its turn.

Just as there has been alot of action lately in the 13-15 draw zone. Now it is time for things to re-balance and have pairs split in the 17--19 zone. Today numbers (23)(24) went to 18 draws no split. And numbers (03)(04) have just qualified for the 16--19 zone. I expect at least one of these pairs to split between 17--19. Because the last two winners split after 16 draws.

Again just like the Eliminator, I read what is going on, and it saves me funds and maximizes profits. So I didn't touch number (03) & (04) today there has already been winners at 14 draws and 15 draws recently. And I staked very little on numbers (23)(24) in the lunchtime draw. So from tommorow I will get more serious. Another considerarion is that these 2 pairs make up 4 of the last 6 numbers in Eliminator 26. That means it is a virtual certainty that at least one pair won't make it out of the Strict 16--19 zone.

I will keep you posted, Peace.

 

[syscrash]

Just as there has been alot of action lately in the 13-15 draw zone. Now it is time for things to re-balance and have pairs split in the 17--19 zone. Today numbers (23)(24) went to 18 draws no split. And numbers (03)(04) have just qualified for the 16--19 zone. I expect at least one of these pairs to split between 17--19. Because the last two winners split after 16 draws.

Again just like the Eliminator, I read what is going on, and it saves me funds and maximizes profits. So I didn't touch number (03) & (04) today there has already been winners at 14 draws and 15 draws recently. And I staked very little on numbers (23)(24) in the lunchtime draw. So from tommorow I will get more serious. Another considerarion is that these 2 pairs make up 4 of the last 6 numbers in Eliminator 26. That means it is a virtual certainty that at least one pair won't make it out of the Strict 16--19 zone.

I will keep you posted, Peace.

Well said Fullhouse,
Concerning the pair (3)(4) last time we saw them together was 30 draws ago... April 28, 2006. So I'm not sure about betting on the double this times.
Concerning, the (23)(24), as I said earlier, this pair is WAY overdue. But I'm not sure about the number (24)... it acts in some strange way. We have never saw a number making a double 39 SKIPS. That's really, really strange... if Fullhouse didn't tell me that number are physicaly drawn from balls, I seriously suspect that they generate the number randomly and forgot to put some number in the draws.

Peace everyone...

 

[fullhouse]

Well said Fullhouse,
Concerning the pair (3)(4) last time we saw them together was 30 draws ago... April 28, 2006. So I'm not sure about betting on the double this times.
Concerning, the (23)(24), as I said earlier, this pair is WAY overdue. But I'm not sure about the number (24)... it acts in some strange way. We have never saw a number making a double 39 SKIPS. That's really, really strange... if Fullhouse didn't tell me that number are physicaly drawn from balls, I seriously suspect that they generate the number randomly and forgot to put some number in the draws.

Peace everyone...

Hi Syscrash its been a while how are you man?

I was wanting to ask for your help regarding numbers 3/4 23/24 Because it is also RARE to get two pairs like that in an Eliminator in the last 6 numbers/ So I wanted to know the history of those 2 pairs for the S-B-S strategy. Like how often they have been to 17 draws or more. You may be right about numbers 3/4. But as I write this we have had the lunchtime draw. And there are now 5 numbers left. 3,4,21,23,24 So it is imminent. That one of those 2 pair will split VERY soon. 23,24 is now on its last chance to stay in the 16--19 ZONE. So if they don't split at teatime. I will be heaping on 3,4 because they're almost certain to split in the ZONE. Number 24 has me scrathing my head Syscrash. But the only thing that made me realize SOME number had to go this long. Was that here we're over one third through the year. And no number has broken 45 draws yet. And that is very unusual. So although I am surprised its number 24 that is going to do it. It was expected from some number.

I will update later.Peace..

 

[syscrash]

Hi Fullhouse,

I'm fine , so.. this time SBS strategie is a loosing one...

Concerning the data you've requested... it will take some time to develop because my database doesn't manage SBS occurence history... I'll try to do what I can next week...

 

[fullhouse]

Mixed results

Hi Fullhouse,

I'm fine , so.. this time SBS strategie is a loosing one...

Concerning the data you've requested... it will take some time to develop because my database doesn't manage SBS occurence history... I'll try to do what I can next week...

Well not really Syscrash. My hunch was right. I backed off 23,24 only putting enough on them to retrieve the stake for 3,4. I put 3 times as much on 3&4. And luckily number 4 obliged. This is the only thing I don't like about the S-B-S strategy Syscrash. When you have two qualifiers in the zone at the same time. You have to make a decision as to which one to favour. This is a problem you never have with the Eliminator, as the spacing stops that from happening. I have more faith in pairs below 20 than I do in pairs in the 20s. The 20s always seem to produce more losers.

So here is how we now stand for the S-B-S strategy in 2006.

22 WINS
05 LOSSES.
OVERALL S/R 4.4--1

NOW, as one door closes another one opens. Numbers (02)(03) are now 13 draws no split. So I will be starting on them lightly from tomorrow. Peace...

 

[fullhouse]

Okay, there is alot of action taking shape in the S-B-S strategy. Numbers (02)(03) are now 17 draws no split. So I will be favouring number 3 as its also key to Eliminator 26.

The interesting situation though is with numbers (38)(39)(40) they are all 14 draws no split. With numbers (39)(40) being 15 no split. That is a long time for a bridge of 3 numbers. And they should split in the next 2--3 draws maximum.

So this is where things balance out for the S-B-S strategy. And the number of qualifiers increases to compensate for the lack of them in the first third of the month. I will keep you posted. Peace.

 

[fullhouse]

Mixed day!

Well I had mixed fortunes with the S-B-S strategy today. I made some profit with numbers (38)(39) at Lunchtime. As (38)(39) split after 14 draws and (39)(40) split after 15 draws. But lost some on numbers (02)(03) which are taking us all the way. Now the only thing I am reminded of is, we are overdue a pair splitting after 19 draws. So they may well split tommorow lunchtime.

Also, and something to get very interested in. A 3 number bridge numbers 1,2,3 are now 9 draws no split. This cannot go on much longer. Another thing to conisider. The best number in the draw with the best 5 year record is number (02) And it is now 19 draws no show. This number hasn't broken 28 draws in 5 years. So if there were ever a single number to hunt. This is it. And I will be giving it priority. While defending it with numbers 1 & 3. So lets see what tommorow brings, keep you posted. Peace...

 

[fullhouse]

Cool down time.

Another loss today for the S-B-S strategy. With numbers (02)(03) going to 20 draws no split. I am not too worried though. As there is a 3 number bridge going on. Numbers 1,2,3 are now 11 draws no split. Here is my reason for being optimistic. Below is their 2.3 year history of 10 draws no split or longer.

(08/08/04)--(10)
(23/01/05)--(10)
(28/03/05)--(13)
(20/06/05)--(13)
(18/05/06)--(11) ?

As you can see going beyond 10 draws for those 3 numbers is an exlusive occurance. So I will be continuing to favour number 2 and defend with numbers 1 & 3 tommorow.

Back to the S-B-S strategy we now stand at

22 WINS
06 LOSSES
OVERALL S/R 3.6--1

For 2006. Like I said things always re-balance as the year progresses. And the middle third of the year (MAY---AUGUST) tends to perform slightly below the standard of the first and last thirds. There has also been alot of action in the 13--15 ZONE recently. Which is taking precedent over the strict 16--19 ZONE. Nevertheless, this will again rebalance over the months. Our latest entry are numbers (14)(15) which are now 14 draws no split. So I will cover them lightly from tomorrow. Peace...

 

[fullhouse]

Surprise, surprise...

I am quite surprised that numbers (02) & (03) have gone to 23 draws no split. But on the other hand. They are part of a 3 number bridge with number 1. And history has shown that once they get past 10 draws, they go to 13 before splitting. Which hopefully will be lunchtime tomorrow. I have been favouring number 2 and putting just enough on numbers 1 & 3 to return my stake. And I will continue to do so tomorrow.

We also have a legitimate qualifier for the strict 16--19 ZONE. Numbers (14) & (15) are now 16 draws no split. And it is soon time for a win in that region. Also numbers (01) & (02) are 13 draws no split. But I am playing 1 as 2s defender. So I will keep you posted. Peace

 

[fullhouse]

Side by Side results.

Because I have now started a new strategy with the ISOLATOR. I have decided to be more selective about what I bet on in the S-B-S strategy. Otherwise I will have too many bets flying all over the place.

Using a method I read about in an excellent book about Roulette. From now on I only cover pairs that make it to the 16 draw gap. For 2 bets, so after the 17 draw gap I let it go. But there has to be one losing pair first before I start betting on a qualifying pair.

So for example if the previous pair split after draw 19. The next pair that makes it to the 16th draw has now qualified to bet bet on. It is rare to get more than 3 pairs in a row break 17 draws. So this method will cut my bets down alot. But maintain a good strike rate. Peace...

 

[fullhouse]

Freaky May!

Well I have seen some strange things happen over the years. But this May really is throwing it at us. Normally the only upset is a number breaking 50 draws in May or June. But this year we have had two new records broken.

Firstly number 24 decided it wanted to go on two holidays in a row producing losing streaks of 38 & 45. Now even more amazing. One of the usually best pairs in the draw. Numbers (02) & (03) have just finished a startling run of 32 draws before splitting. That pair may not break 30 draws again for another 4 or 5 years if EVER!

Now the last 2 pairs in the S-B-S strategy have given us.

18 DRAWS (14)(15)

32 DRAWS (02)(03)

So that means at worst we should have a pair split after 16 or 17 draws with one of the next two pairs. Numbers (17)(18) are the latest qualifiers. And are now 16 draws no split. There are some exciting possibilities presenting themselves between the ISOLATOR and S-B-S strategy for predicting more than one number at a time.

For example, the latest pair to qualify in the ISOLATOR are numbers (24)(25) and they could be matched up with number (17) or (18) in 2 doubles. We are bound to have regular numbers being drawn together from both strategies. I will be observing this over the coming weeks. Peace...

 

[endbox]

Hi fullhouse

Still not neglected this side of things (not yet anyway! )
With the potential of the ISOLATOR (revised) doing amazing things , I've almost forgot about SBS ........Anyway 17 & 18 slipped away now 22 draws no split....The nearest qualifier I have is 38 & 39 at 15 draws no split .......I have to admit that the new revised ISOLATOR has blown me away in alot of respects ! .......But as you say I think they have the potential to work together , take care endbox