Side By Side Stratedgy

[fullhouse]

------------------------------------

Hi endbox,

35&36 already split on 22 and 23 APR. I wanted to play them and changed my mind because of that.
Please, can you confirm that we must play them when they reach the 16-19 or 20 even though they split before?


Thank you for your help.

taaroa

Hi Taaroa,

Yes, a pair of numbers QUALIFIES for the S-B-S strategy once they have gone 16 draws without one popping. You then proceed to bet on them for up to 4 draws. The 16--19 gap. And you will win at least 3 out of every 4 times, a pair enters that zone. Many enter few leave. So all you are to be concerned about is a pair going 16 draws without one popping. And then its time to start betting on them. It makes no difference how many times they popped before Taaroa. Until a pair like 35--36 REACH 16 draws, they haven't QUALIFIED. Don't think about anything else but that. And you won't get confused. Peace....

 

[taaroa]

Hi Taaroa,

Yes, a pair of numbers QUALIFIES for the S-B-S strategy once they have gone 16 draws without one popping. You then proceed to bet on them for up to 4 draws. The 16--19 gap. And you will win at least 3 out of every 4 times, a pair enters that zone. Many enter few leave. So all you are to be concerned about is a pair going 16 draws without one popping. And then its time to start betting on them. It makes no difference how many times they popped before Taaroa. Until a pair like 35--36 REACH 16 draws, they haven't QUALIFIED. Don't think about anything else but that. And you won't get confused. Peace....

-----------------------------------------

Hi fullhouse,

In fact, yesterday, we had 3 pairs who qualified : (20)(21); (32)(33); (48)(49) from the 23 APR 06. (20)(21) and (48)(49) with 17 draws no split and (32)(33) with 16 draws no split. Today 21 and 49 pop up. 12 and 13 pop up on 24 APR 06 at lunchtime.Yesterday, they were at 15 draws no split. 13 pop up to day on the 16th draw. My question is : as the zone is 16--19, must we play after the 15th draw or the 16th draw.

Thank you.

taaroa

 

[taaroa]

-----------------------------------------

Hi fullhouse,

In fact, yesterday, we had 3 pairs who qualified : (20)(21); (32)(33); (48)(49) from the 23 APR 06. (20)(21) and (48)(49) with 17 draws no split and (32)(33) with 16 draws no split. Today 21 and 49 pop up. 12 and 13 pop up on 24 APR 06 at lunchtime.Yesterday, they were at 15 draws no split. 13 pop up to day on the 16th draw. My question is : as the zone is 16--19, must we play after the 15th draw or the 16th draw.

Thank you.

taaroa

----------------------------------

Hi fullhouse,

I apologize because reading your precedent post, you already made it clear
that pairs qualify "once they have gone 16 draws without popping".
My precedent post is without object.

taaroa

 

[fullhouse]

----------------------------------

Hi fullhouse,

I apologize because reading your precedent post, you already made it clear
that pairs qualify "once they have gone 16 draws without popping".
My precedent post is without object.

taaroa

Yes Taaroa. the PAIR must not have split before 16 draws for it to qualify. So lets say for example number 1 is at 14 draws and number 2 is at 16 draws. That pair hasn't qualified yet. BOTH must be at least 16 draws no show.

So if we have a pair where say number 19 is at 16 draws and number 20 is at 23 draws. Then that pair has qualified for the S-B-S strategy. And you start betting on them. I hope that clears that up for you. It is the ZONE 16--19. Ad this to the Eliminator, and between them you cannot lose. It will be progress month in month out, if you follow them correctly. Peace....

 

[taaroa]

Yes Taaroa. the PAIR must not have split before 16 draws for it to qualify. So lets say for example number 1 is at 14 draws and number 2 is at 16 draws. That pair hasn't qualified yet. BOTH must be at least 16 draws no show.

So if we have a pair where say number 19 is at 16 draws and number 20 is at 23 draws. Then that pair has qualified for the S-B-S strategy. And you start betting on them. I hope that clears that up for you. It is the ZONE 16--19. Ad this to the Eliminator, and between them you cannot lose. It will be progress month in month out, if you follow them correctly. Peace....

---------------------------

Thank you fullhouse.

taaroa

 

[taaroa]

Yes Taaroa. the PAIR must not have split before 16 draws for it to qualify. So lets say for example number 1 is at 14 draws and number 2 is at 16 draws. That pair hasn't qualified yet. BOTH must be at least 16 draws no show.

So if we have a pair where say number 19 is at 16 draws and number 20 is at 23 draws. Then that pair has qualified for the S-B-S strategy. And you start betting on them. I hope that clears that up for you. It is the ZONE 16--19. Ad this to the Eliminator, and between them you cannot lose. It will be progress month in month out, if you follow them correctly. Peace....

-------------------------------------

Hi fullhouse,

Your last post make me think a lot (Yes! it's true! men).
In fact, the idea I had of the SBS strategy was erroneous. I thought that
you must wait for a pair in the same line as 14-15 in : 5 9 14 15 23 36 42, and then wait the 16-19 zone and bet. Yes, I was tired, very tired but I'm retired now, so...
So, I reread the thread and followed the pairs (highlighted on an Excel spreadsheet). And then, I saw graphically where my error was. Now, it is not
that simple to see the pairs. I understand now why some pairs you bet where not in my history file. In fact, these pairs were on 2 different lines, the more often case. I really thought there was something wrong but now, I know.

Thank to you fullhouse, I'm on the right way now. Thanks again.

taaroa

 

[fullhouse]

-------------------------------------

Hi fullhouse,

Your last post make me think a lot (Yes! it's true! men).
In fact, the idea I had of the SBS strategy was erroneous. I thought that
you must wait for a pair in the same line as 14-15 in : 5 9 14 15 23 36 42, and then wait the 16-19 zone and bet. Yes, I was tired, very tired but I'm retired now, so...
So, I reread the thread and followed the pairs (highlighted on an Excel spreadsheet). And then, I saw graphically where my error was. Now, it is not
that simple to see the pairs. I understand now why some pairs you bet where not in my history file. In fact, these pairs were on 2 different lines, the more often case. I really thought there was something wrong but now, I know.

Thank to you fullhouse, I'm on the right way now. Thanks again.

taaroa

You are welcome. Things will be quite for the next 3 days. In both the Eliminator and S-B-S strategy. As there will be no potential qualifiers until at least the 6th of May. But that will give me time to update the ISOLATOR. And show its value on here. Peace...

 

[fullhouse]

The Pattern never changes.

Okay still a bit off the Strict 16--19 zone. But two pairs have come through to be contenders for the S-B-S strategy. Numbers (11)(12) are 12 draws no split. And numbers (43)(44) are 11 draws no split. If 11&12 don't split lunchtime tomorrow I will begin covering them lightly. From experience the gap between qualifiers tend to have a pattern. And there is usually always winners around the 7th to the 9th of each month. And that means one of these two pairs are highly lightly to give us our second winner for May. I know (11)(12) has an excellent record. Not so sure about (43)(44) Maybe Syscrash can work his magic and give me their history. Peace...

 

[fullhouse]

No change.

Okay numbers (11)(12) split teatime today after 13 draws, with number 12 popping. I had some money on them. They are a very reliable pair that rarely get past 16 draws let alone 19. That leaves numbers (43)(44) I am not so confident about this pair. They are 13 draws no split, so I don't think they will split Lunchtime tommorow. I will begin my campaign from the teatime draw if they don't. But I think they may well make it to the strict 16--19 draw zone. As we are due a qualifier. Hey where is Endbox?? I was thinking Mission impossible 3 came out a few days ago. Maybe he is busy, Lol! Peace.

 

[taaroa]

See next post

 

[taaroa]

Okay numbers (11)(12) split teatime today after 13 draws, with number 12 popping. I had some money on them. They are a very reliable pair that rarely get past 16 draws let alone 19. That leaves numbers (43)(44) I am not so confident about this pair. They are 13 draws no split, so I don't think they will split Lunchtime tommorow. I will begin my campaign from the teatime draw if they don't. But I think they may well make it to the strict 16--19 draw zone. As we are due a qualifier. Hey where is Endbox?? I was thinking Mission impossible 3 came out a few days ago. Maybe he is busy, Lol! Peace.

------------------------------------------------------

Hi fullhouse,

Another good forecasting! Congratulations: Just on teatime as you said.
I just bet on number 44, just one euro. I also bet 5 euros on number 45 which pop up at lunchtime. I often play one number that I called JPM from the writer who spoke about it. Simple but you must use the history without bonus.
Look at the more out decade and the more out last digit.

Example : For the today drawing.

DECADES

1 10 20 30 40

2 1 2 1 0
0 0 3 1 2
0 1 1 3 1
1 1 2 1 1
2 2 1 1 0

I take the 40 for there was no number drawned last draw in that decade.

LAST DIGITS

First line : header

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0
0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0
1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0

You see that final 5 had 3 drawings void.

So, 40 and 5 give 45.

I did not made statistics on the success of that method. It work sometimes, sometimes not. I'm searching at what time to play it.

Take care.

taaroa

 

[endbox]

Hi fullhouse

Okay numbers (11)(12) split teatime today after 13 draws, with number 12 popping. I had some money on them. They are a very reliable pair that rarely get past 16 draws let alone 19. That leaves numbers (43)(44) I am not so confident about this pair. They are 13 draws no split, so I don't think they will split Lunchtime tommorow. I will begin my campaign from the teatime draw if they don't. But I think they may well make it to the strict 16--19 draw zone. As we are due a qualifier. Hey where is Endbox?? I was thinking Mission impossible 3 came out a few days ago. Maybe he is busy, Lol! Peace.

I'm here !!.........Nice one

Was going to bet on 12 today , but it was a case of "shall I , sharn't I".....So decided to wait for strict 16....19 zone , & proceeded to loose
But never mind , take care endbox

 

[fullhouse]

I'm here !!.........Nice one

Was going to bet on 12 today , but it was a case of "shall I , sharn't I".....So decided to wait for strict 16....19 zone , & proceeded to loose
But never mind , take care endbox

Hey good to hear from you again Endbox.
I know its hard to make that decision sometimes. Because the legitimate starting point is after 16 draws. I can afford to start early. But if there is one pair worth going early with it is (11)(12) They haven't gone beyond 15 draws this year.

Still we have numbers (43)(44) next. They have already gone to 17 draws this year. And may well do it again. So we will see. Peace...

 

[fullhouse]

Pre-qualification

Okay numbers (43)(44) are at 15 draws no split. And if they don't split lunchtime today. Will be the 26th pair to enter the strict 16--19 zone in 2006.We haven't had a pair split between 17--19 for a while and I can see this pair doing the honours around that point. I will keep you posted, peace.

 

[fullhouse]

------------------------------------------------------

Hi fullhouse,

Another good forecasting! Congratulations: Just on teatime as you said.
I just bet on number 44, just one euro. I also bet 5 euros on number 45 which pop up at lunchtime. I often play one number that I called JPM from the writer who spoke about it. Simple but you must use the history without bonus.
Look at the more out decade and the more out last digit.

Example : For the today drawing.

DECADES

1 10 20 30 40

2 1 2 1 0
0 0 3 1 2
0 1 1 3 1
1 1 2 1 1
2 2 1 1 0

I take the 40 for there was no number drawned last draw in that decade.

LAST DIGITS

First line : header

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0
0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 0
0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
0 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 0 0
1 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0

You see that final 5 had 3 drawings void.

So, 40 and 5 give 45.

I did not made statistics on the success of that method. It work sometimes, sometimes not. I'm searching at what time to play it.

Take care.

taaroa

Hi Taaroa,

That is an interesting concept you have there. I don't fully understand it yet. But if it is working, use it. Peace..

 

[fullhouse]

Another sub 16 win.

Numbers (43)(44) split today after 15 draws. With 44 popping at lunchtime. I had it covered so made some loot. Things are too good at the moment. So no pairs are even making the strict 16-19 zone. The only pair on the horizon at the moment are 35 & 36 at 11 draws no split. And they recently produced a split after 16 draws. So I can't see them making 16 again. So I may start very light on them from tomorow to make a little extra loot. Will keep you updated Peace...

 

[taaroa]

Hi Taaroa,

That is an interesting concept you have there. I don't fully understand it yet. But if it is working, use it. Peace..

-------------------------------------------------

Hi fullhouse,

This method is from a booklet I bought in 1992.
Its about Due decades and last digits.
To be clear, decades are:
units : 1 to 9
10s : 11 to 19
20s : 21 to 29
30s : 31 to 39
40s : 41 to 49

Last Digits are :

0 : numbers ending with 0 (10-20-30-40)
1 : numbers ending with 1 (1-11-21-31-41)
2 : etc...

You search the decade which is most due (cold, out). Ex : 40
You search the last digit which is most due. Ex : 8
The number to play is 48.

Look at the history for last drawings. I think it's easier to understand looking at this.

LAST DIGITS DECADES
N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 B 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 10 20 30 40

8 May 2006 Teatime 6 17 18 22 38 45 9 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 Line 16 26
8 May 2006 Lunchtime 5 7 15 31 39 44 40 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 2 Line 15 26
7 May 2006 Teatime 5 7 8 12 19 33 37 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 2 0 2 0 Line 14 40 44 20 24
7 May 2006 Lunchtime 2 13 15 26 31 45 18 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 1 1 Line 13 7
6 May 2006 Teatime 7 8 12 18 29 48 34 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 Line 12 7
6 May 2006 Lunchtime 1 2 33 41 45 46 20 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 Line 11 14 19
5 May 2006 Teatime 2 8 13 22 27 30 42 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 Line 10 5
5 May 2006 Lunchtime 22 26 27 38 41 46 20 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 1 2 Line 9 15
4 May 2006 Teatime 17 29 32 33 34 41 4 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 1 Line 8 18
4 May 2006 Lunchtime 1 16 22 25 32 47 3 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 Line 7 38
3 May 2006 Teatime 1 5 10 16 23 33 4 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 Line 6 48 41
3 May 2006 Lunchtime 7 20 34 36 42 45 39 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 2 Line 5 8
2 May 2006 Teatime 5 13 26 40 47 49 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 3 Line 4 38
2 May 2006 Lunchtime 5 10 19 29 30 42 21 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 1 Line 3
1 May 2006 Teatime 7 15 16 25 26 35 47 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 Line 2
1 May 2006 Lunchtime 4 14 18 22 27 31 33 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 Line 1


The author said he had 20% success (1/5). I have not check it myself but
I can see that could be an interesting method. I think we can probably apply your zone concept and your progressive staking method.

Take care

taaroa

 

[taaroa]

-------------------------------------------------

Hi fullhouse,

This method is from a booklet I bought in 1992.
Its about Due decades and last digits.
To be clear, decades are:
units : 1 to 9
10s : 11 to 19
20s : 21 to 29
30s : 31 to 39
40s : 41 to 49

Last Digits are :

0 : numbers ending with 0 (10-20-30-40)
1 : numbers ending with 1 (1-11-21-31-41)
2 : etc...

You search the decade which is most due (cold, out). Ex : 40
You search the last digit which is most due. Ex : 8
The number to play is 48.

Look at the history for last drawings. I think it's easier to understand looking at this.

LAST DIGITS DECADES
N1 N2 N3 N4 N5 N6 B 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 10 20 30 40

8 May 2006 Teatime 6 17 18 22 38 45 9 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 Line 16 26
8 May 2006 Lunchtime 5 7 15 31 39 44 40 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 2 2 Line 15 26
7 May 2006 Teatime 5 7 8 12 19 33 37 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 2 2 0 2 0 Line 14 40 44 20 24
7 May 2006 Lunchtime 2 13 15 26 31 45 18 0 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 3 1 1 1 Line 13 7
6 May 2006 Teatime 7 8 12 18 29 48 34 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 Line 12 7
6 May 2006 Lunchtime 1 2 33 41 45 46 20 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 3 Line 11 14 19
5 May 2006 Teatime 2 8 13 22 27 30 42 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 2 1 1 Line 10 5
5 May 2006 Lunchtime 22 26 27 38 41 46 20 1 1 0 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 3 1 2 Line 9 15
4 May 2006 Teatime 17 29 32 33 34 41 4 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 1 Line 8 18
4 May 2006 Lunchtime 1 16 22 25 32 47 3 0 0 2 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 1 Line 7 38
3 May 2006 Teatime 1 5 10 16 23 33 4 1 0 0 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 0 Line 6 48 41
3 May 2006 Lunchtime 7 20 34 36 42 45 39 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 2 Line 5 8
2 May 2006 Teatime 5 13 26 40 47 49 4 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 3 Line 4 38
2 May 2006 Lunchtime 5 10 19 29 30 42 21 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1 1 Line 3
1 May 2006 Teatime 7 15 16 25 26 35 47 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 2 2 1 1 Line 2
1 May 2006 Lunchtime 4 14 18 22 27 31 33 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 Line 1


The author said he had 20% success (1/5). I have not check it myself but
I can see that could be an interesting method. I think we can probably apply your zone concept and your progressive staking method.

Take care

taaroa

-------------------------------

Reading the history file is difficult. Attaching the Excel file is impossible.
So, Copy and paste the chart into a word file.
Replace spaces with tab : ^t
Copy and paste to an Excel file.

Please ask for help if you don't understand the method of searching the numbers.

taaroa

 

[endbox]

Hi All

With the reluctance of number 24 to make a show , an interesting little cluster is begining to develop......
23 & 24 at 12 draws no show
24 & 25 at 11 draws no show
Might bet light on them tomorrow

With 35 & 36 now at 13 no show , they too have got to be worth a flutter , take care endbox

 

[fullhouse]

With the reluctance of number 24 to make a show , an interesting little cluster is begining to develop......
23 & 24 at 12 draws no show
24 & 25 at 11 draws no show
Might bet light on them tomorrow

With 35 & 36 now at 13 no show , they too have got to be worth a flutter , take care endbox

Hi Endbox,

Absolutely! You know these numbers can be like buses. One doesn't come for a while and then several turn up. I am actually quite surprised about number (35)(36) because on the first of May they went 16 draws. And are now 13 draws, that doesn't happen often. So I will be covering them from lunchtime tomorrow as I do all pairs that reach 13 draws.

Numbers (23)(24) are also worth considering. Especially given that number 24 has gone on a world cruise. Its almost as if it isn't in the draw. I have never seen a number perform so badly over that long a period of time. So yes, we have much to think about now. As we reach the first third of the month. I will be very surprised if one of those pairs doesn't reach the STRICT 16--19 ZONE. We are long overdue a qualifying pair. And there is rarely longer than 10 days between winners. So given that the last pure winner was (35)(36) on the 1ST of May. The 11th, 12th should be the very longest we have to wait for the next winner. Peace...