Sangoma-number divination

barge

Member
Springok

I agree that this will help the overall search, I have been using various grids and, to a lesser extent the program, but in an unstructured way. Trying it sensibly and logging results should help. Now that I am using the SE correctly, (I think), I hope to get better results for comparison.
Numbers produced by the grids this week: 7,8,11,16,26,30,32,33,34,37,41,47,49
I need to brush up on my skips to narrow things down to a usable (smaller) group.
Off subject a little, the 4th decade has been much in evidence over the past few weeks, to the extent that you could have bet on random pairs from it, at 10p a time, and probably made money!! :eek:
 

Patrick123

Member
I presume that they (4th decade) will start drying up as re-balancing starts occurring.

I'm in the process of adding the analysis of the hit/skip probability based on the entire range of skips of all the balls, pairs or trips. This will then help trim down the plethora of 100%s we see in the trips N+x>H column.
I will post it in an hour or 2's time.
Trips in this adjusted top percentage for lunchtime {7,8,15,23,41,42,47}
 

Patrick123

Member
Okay, I've updated the program, I added in extra analysis (the DP - Draw probability column).

You select which type you want before loading.
Simple - based of the skip values of the ball/pair or trip only.
Basic - based of the high values of all the balls/pairs or trips.
Detailed - based of all the skip values of all the balls/pairs or trips.

I also tidied up a few small variable errors that had crept in.
 
First off let me thank Springbok and Patrick for their hard work. Patrick, thank you so much for your generosity in sharing your program as well!!! Speaking for many, I'm sure, it's much appreciated.

I'm still trying to wrap my mind around all of your analysis columns. The game I'm playing is only 67 draws old (5/39), but I already see promise in this method. I'm sure it will become more statistically accurate as the draws continue. I'm trying to fully understand though the analysis... I'm loading my draws and running trips median due button on the left. Then I sort z-a. The top trips are the "most probable" to appear, is this correct? Or should I be going by the top DP percentages?

I hate to say that your new version may have a bug by the way. I load my text 5/39 file. And now it stays in limbo "analysing" forever. It doesn't matter if simple, basic, or detailed is selected. Can anyone else confirm this?

Thanks again you guys!!!!!!!!!:beer:
 
I could certainly try that. Thanks!

I need to figure out this bug first. I can't run anything now. Still waiting to hear from Patrick.
 

Patrick123

Member
Hi Jokerh1977,
Yes, it was a small bug, I was checking for only the 'equal to' instead of the 'less than or equal to' this is fixed and the update loaded. As I've been testing with 100+ draws, I think it only manifested itself in the lower number of draws.

Remember, the program is still in development phase, so there are still to be plenty of changes. (Especially the DP Column). Remember to read though all the gems of info that Springbok has given, then you'll be able to zoom in on the different selections, and winners.

I'll get an updated manual typed soon... Promise!

Regards
Patrick
 

Patrick123

Member
Hi Turtle0747,
I've modified the prediction screen to allow up to 70 numbers, which should cater for your requirements. Please let me know if any limitation occurs if it cannot handle more than 49 numbers.

Regards
Patrick
 
Patrick,
Thanks a bunch!!! I'll read over these last 20 pages again. I think what's a little confusing is that Springbok is using his software and you are using yours. So the terminology is somewhat different. Once again, I appreciate your hard work!

Best,
Josh
 

Patrick123

Member
Yep, you hit the nail on the head, Springbok, is, if I may say, the equivalent of the salt crusted sailor, I still need to taste the seawater.

Regards
Patrick
 

Patrick123

Member
Barge,

Maybe we are seeing too far into the future, between us, we predicted 5 out of 7 numbers for the teatime draw with 16 numbers. :eek:
Barge:
7,8,11,16,26,30,32,33,34,37,41,47,49

Me:
{7,8,15,23,41,42,47}


Not too shabby if I may say so & not too bad for the lunchtime draw(4 out of 16) either!

Regards
Patrick
 

barge

Member
Patrick123

Many thanks (and to Springbok) for another update to an already excellent program, I have finally found my way around it, except that altering the N+x>=H, doesn't seem to make much difference to the output, but this is probably my inexperience, I am still getting "good" output on the runs tonight on the real real Tball 5 number..using the new DP.(mainly on pairs ) To be honest I have only spent a short time with it so far, will do some more tomorrow, but later in the day.

I hadn't realised how successfull these selections were, you guys are definitely progressing! Great work.
 

Patrick123

Member
Thanks barge,
You guys(SpringBok especially) will ensure my 6/6 one day.

The N+x>=H will only display more values in that column, so treat it more as a cut off for the display. If you set the value at say 50, you wil see a lot more of the declining percentages in the N+x>=H column than just the 100's and 50's reflecting there.
Regards
Patrick
 

Springbok

Member
Jokerh1977

Basically there is no difference the way Patrick uses the system or me. If you use Patrick's software looking for suitable pairs then you will go through 1176 pairs in the 6/49 game. If you look at a file such as alpha you have 24 pairings to try and choose from. If you see nothing there then you go to bravo etc. So at any one time you are looking at a chunk of 24 pairs. The huge advantage of the home grown stuff lies in searching for triples. An alpha, beta file etc each has 16. Looking at Patrick's software for triples is tricky because there are thousands to go through.
 

bloubul

Member
Hi Springbok.

Hoe gaan dit met jou daar in die vreemde. I've been on the road for the last three weeks and another two awaits. Where can I download the 49's that you and Patrick123 are talking about. Are you winning with Patrick123 software?

Laat weet!!!!!!

BlouBul :cool:
 

Springbok

Member
The power of 10p

Assume you had the ability to pick a winning number for the next 6 draws. Assume you had 10p. This is what would happen:-
1st draw-----55p
2nd draw-----£3
3rd draw------£16.5
4th draw------£90.75
5th draw------£499
6th draw------£2745

All from an initial stake of 10p. After each win the stake was retained and only money won was used. In three days 10p grew to £2745.

Is this difficult? Yes. Is it impossible? No.:)
 
Winalotto Fla 6/53

Patrick123

Thanks! It is working now. Before when I tried to load FLA 53 I was getting an exception error to program. That has disappeared. Will give this a try, Up to $33 Mil.

Turtle0747
 

Patrick123

Member
Basically the way I handle the doubles or triples, is to list them all using on the Ball Analysis screen. I then click on any cell of the 'N+x>=H', 'Rebalance', 'Median Due', or the 'DP Perc' Column, I then right-click and select 'Sort column (z->a).
From here I run my eye over the numbers that make up the pairings or the triples, and pick up the numbers that have multiple occurances in the top range, e.g. if 5 and 17 showed quite frequently, I'd then concentrate on the 5-17 pairing.

Hi Bloubul,

I received your email, but I'll reply here. Essentially I have re-written the program from scratch(should actually call it version 2), I think you may still have the original version. It's available from the same link as before. I've included the UK 49 (49B.csv) with the zip file.


Today, I added in a graphing function - sometimes a picture speaks a 1000 words.

To see the graph of any column, select a cell in that column(as described above), right-click and choose 'Graph Column', repeat this process for the columns you want in the graph, then select the graph tab to see it.

Hi Turtle0747,
That's great to hear. Good luck with the draw and remember anyone who wins, must send Springbok & I a postcard (and maybe a million as well) ;)

Regards
Patrick
 

Sidebar

Top