Bad advice from people who should know better
<<Once you've selected your 6 numbers, stick with them ! People claim that they want to change their numbers each draw to either select numbers that have come up the most or the least. This is flawed logic I'm afraid, because the lottery does not depend on past history (unlike blackjack), so every one of the 14 million-odd combinations of 6 numbers is equally likely in every single draw. It's also the reason why writing a computer program to predict lottery numbers is a stupid and pointless task (just call the random number generator 6 times - that's just as good as any other method).>>
The above is some of the advice from Merseyworld a UK lottery site on picking numbers. it is amazing how wrong advice can be. This is probably a plot to stop people winning. Our strategies depend entirely on previous draws. Previous draws do give an indication of future developments. We have proved this on this thread. Here is another example. If you had a 7 million draw file for the 6/49 and in the previous 3 draws the results were below the median, then it is very likely that the next draw will be above the median and you can discount the 7 million draws contained in the file. So all the 14 million possible combinations cannot have equal chances of being drawn.
<<Once you've selected your 6 numbers, stick with them ! People claim that they want to change their numbers each draw to either select numbers that have come up the most or the least. This is flawed logic I'm afraid, because the lottery does not depend on past history (unlike blackjack), so every one of the 14 million-odd combinations of 6 numbers is equally likely in every single draw. It's also the reason why writing a computer program to predict lottery numbers is a stupid and pointless task (just call the random number generator 6 times - that's just as good as any other method).>>
The above is some of the advice from Merseyworld a UK lottery site on picking numbers. it is amazing how wrong advice can be. This is probably a plot to stop people winning. Our strategies depend entirely on previous draws. Previous draws do give an indication of future developments. We have proved this on this thread. Here is another example. If you had a 7 million draw file for the 6/49 and in the previous 3 draws the results were below the median, then it is very likely that the next draw will be above the median and you can discount the 7 million draws contained in the file. So all the 14 million possible combinations cannot have equal chances of being drawn.

. Both were on their historical highs and by logic should have come in and they did as promised. Now according to advice given by Merseyworld we should ignore previous draws as they have no bearing on future draws. Who is kidding who? Whoever wrote that should be awarded a prize for being the the biggest mpara(foolish person) in the whole of Liverpool and the surrounding areas.