Sangoma-number divination

Springbok

Member
Kunjani Patrick

Two draws in the South African lottery. Is there a problem with the 6 month gap? Well the historical highs basically pointed out a pair in each draw. The other filters (inbetweeners etc) have given no indications as yet.
 

barge

Member
Hi Springbok Patrick123

Hit all 5 last night on the Tball, but only managed my stake back. 5 out of 25 is excellent. A small filter made up from the previous 5 draws may be useful to re-inforce a couple of possible pairs, and help to reduce the number pool?
 

Springbok

Member
E Sawubona Patrick

Long time no hear. I trust you are OK. Living in Jo'burg can be as exciting as living in Baghdad, Basra or Faluja but not Maseru.:) London lacks that kind of excitement. I really miss the combat zone, it kind of makes you more alive. All I have to do now is combat random numbers. But when I return I will need to brush up on my triggernometry.:)

I have been thinking long and hard on how to tweak the programme to make it easier to make multiple strikes on the same line. Experimenting with my homebrew stuff it is becoming increasingly clear that reducing the number field is of considerable help. When you hit pairs on the programme it duly presents 1176. Would it be possible for a user to select which numbers to delete, Say a person wished to work with a 34 number field, x numbers would be excluded and only pairs(trips) would be generated from this reduced field. To say the least, this can have a dramatic effect.
 

Springbok

Member
Avuxeni again Patrick

To explain further. What I do at the moment is to create 600 odd(I don't mean odd numbers) pairings on 36 out of the 49 numbers. I then stick the pairings into the Winnalotto folder. On the drawings screen I open this file and then invoke the filters(draad etc). The results tend to be quite dramatic in forecasting. Of course the 13 numbers deleted must not be in the winning numbers:) Also the target is the very next draw. So a certain precision is necessary. You get this right you are well on your way.
 
Hi Springbok,

In the last row in the drawing analysis screen you will notice three things:

File – the current history file loaded,
Column filter – the filter loaded (e.g. inbetweener4)
Number filter – how many numbers to use

You are interested in the last element. In order to create a number filter, write in the draw analysis screen, in the right side, the numbers you want (e.g.: from 1 to 36), like this:

1
2
3
….
36

In order to analyze the pairs or trips you have to select the tag option.

This is what I was saying. It would be nice to create this number filter based on a previous column filter. I explained before this logic. For example: If you want to play all the numbers that are contained in all the pairs that have the last 3 skips equal to 1, you first load the column filter, press pairs, number frequency and another button in order to create a number filter that will contain all the numbers indicated. On the other hand, if you have a filter that indicates many numbers that are not drawn you could create a number filter with all the numbers that are not indicated (have a frequency of 0 in the number frequency chart).
 

Springbok

Member
Hello Excellence

I am beginning to understand your logic. The basic idea makes the programme very,very potent. I will add more ideas later. But at the moment my main concern is the World Cup with the Springboks vs England. Winnalotto SE cannot forecast that:)

I cannot believe how stupid I was not realising I could use the tag and was relying on by alpha,beta etc files. Because the numbers were embedded it was a nightmare to change the pairings as every drawing would present different numbers to delete. Then I developed the limited pairings by re-writing a programme. Now it is a cake walk with the drawings screen. Despite that the pairings slaughter of the 49s continues unabated. I cannot believe the level of accuracy.
 
Hi Springbok,

The tag option doesn’t work as I believed. If you select 7 numbers as filter numbers you end up with 315 pairs. No number is really ignored. This doesn’t serve my interest, analyze only a group of numbers. But, it is very useful if you want to analyze just a smaller number of pairs.
 

Springbok

Member
Hello Excellence

I eventually realised that and went back to my homebrew stuff. I trust you noticed the historical highs in the last 6 draws would have made you a lot of money.:) I realised it.:agree: Of course the biggest triumph this weekend was not making money but watching the Springboks becoming World Rugby champions:dance1:
 

Springbok

Member
Tumela Patrick

I feel the previous draws of the SA lottery are valid. The historical high of 21 was forecasted by Winnalotto SE. At this stage I have not looked at the other filters.
 

Patrick123

Member
Tumela Springbok,

Talk about when it rains, it pours!!! I've been up to my bald patch in crocodiles!! :) I suppose I should not complain, at least the work is flowing.

:yes: :bouncy: BOKKE :yes: :bouncy:

I'll be continuing with the updates and hopefully can release it all before the weekend.

With regards to the filter, put all your numbers on a single line then select filter.

Alternately you can leave as is with Tag selected, but then create a column filter with the logic:

#25 > 0


Regards
Patrick
 

Springbok

Member
E Kunjani Patrick

Yes BOKKE:finger: :beer: :beer:

What I am doing now is making 6 x 6 grid for the 6/49. I take each line and make a couple of pairs and trips and slap them on the program. Using the filters I endeavor to see if I can locate the strongest pair and or trip which will appear next draw. In this type of grid one of the lines is redundant(based on experiments). If I can park 6 pairs , one per slot then that's it. Two numbers will come from one line. I am a bit ashamed of myself chasing pennies on betting on pairs for one number to come in. I am just about on first named terms with the cashier at the bookie:) He now says to me "Hello, Guv, and what are you intending to win today?". I sheepishly tell him I am just having a lucky streak:) I am pretty sure he has never seen such lucky streaks before-they could go on for eternity:) Better switch bookies-don't want him to have a nervous break down. There are many fish to fry in London.:)
 

Springbok

Member
Hello Barge

I have been re-reading Isolator revised and fooling around with the grids just to get the hang of it again. What interested me was the part Fullhouse mentioned about chasing doubles. If there was a lonely little number left on a line he would pair it with 2 or 3 numbers on another line to chase the double. Now if you use this technique on a grid you can pair this lonely little number with a draadsitter trip or pair. With a fair wind you could combine it with a historical high and hit the 3 number prize. With even a fairer wind an offset opening batsmen or an inbetweener could give you the 4 number prize.
 

barge

Member
Hi Springbok

A great game on Saturday................as a Scot I can happily say that!! Well done the Bokks
I have been trying the reduced 6/49 with mixed success, using the tag. Excellence is correct about the filtering not being complete, but I got some good results despite this. I haven't reached your level of skill/confidence yet in the results, maybe due to using too many filters, I might be better restricting myself to the 3 main ones.
I will test a grid or two, and report any good results.:look:
 
Hi Patrick,

Looking forward for the new upgrades. Until then I would like to signal a possible bug. In the column filter definitions, the “or” function has the same effect as the “and” function.

Regarding the tag option. I tried your recommendation, created a filter column with the specified code but the results where the same. Also, if someone would like to use a smaller group of numbers, will probably want to use also a column filter to those numbers, other than #25 > 0.
 

Springbok

Member
Thinking like a nerd

While sitting in the Underground hurtling beneath London and reading the newspaper I came across an article. The Ministry of Defence(MoD) under their section known as the Defence, Science and Technology Laboratory wants to recruit nerds. They want "unusual minds" to provide technological solutions for the defence and security of the kingdom. These nerds are the ones who create computer games and are experts in tackling virtual problems. The advert had a city under attack by alien spacecraft. This intrigued me. How do nerds think? I don't play computer games except for that old Dos game known as Wolfenstein.How would a nerd approach the lottery? Could I turn myself into a pseudo-nerd? Could the lottery be turned into a game? Here is my first attempt.

A...... B
XXX XXX
XXX XXX
XXX XXX
XXX XXX
XXX XXX
XXX XXX

The diagram represents a 6 X 6 matrix representing 36 numbers. Let them be alien spacecraft. 6 squadrons, each squadron has 6 attack craft. 6 of those craft are going to zap you with deadly rays unless you shoot them down. You are allowed 6 shots of your photon cannon. Each shot can blow 3 aliens up. Which ones would you aim at. You must get all 6, if you miss one then you are a piece of carbonised toast. Any suggestions out there? Any nerds out there? Obviously not all the craft in row A will be the ones trying to zap you.
6 shots will equal 1 volley. You can have as many volleys as you want.
 

barge

Member
Hi Springbok

I was a Nerd, way beyond my teens, into Doom in fact, (and some teaching later) sadly that was a single person shoot-em-up, and not a lot of help. I remember Space Invaders, which dates me more than I would like.:)
I am attacking the grid as you suggest......one of the problems is the variability of the 13 missing numbers. I am choosing these from the anti filters, unless you might suggest a better way of doing it?
 

barge

Member
Springbok,
I ran a few tests, and you are spot on. Checking the next draw (skipped in the history file), the only number missing was the one I missed using the anti filters..........in a seven number draw. :)
 

Springbok

Member
Hello Barge

My imagination has no limits:) I bet many folk put there would lock me up in the funny farm. Space Invaders is still around. I got the full set of Wolfenstein(DOs based) for £5 at E-bay. It made my day as I just love the game. You can keep the modern stuff that needs zillions of gigabytes and a video card costing a fortune.
Anyway back to lotteries. What I do to get rid of 13 numbers(6/49 game) is particular to me. You will have noticed that in a typical result one decade is normally missing. So you find the decade. Generally it is one that has overstayed its welcome ie it has been there for at least 4 or 5 of the last draws.I think the 30's decade will be absent tonight. I also redefine a decade as any 10 numbers. I operate 5 M10 files. Each file has a mixed bag of 10 numbers embedded in a VB 6 program eg M10Alpha3 could be 4 ,13,23,,26,34, 37 39,41,44,47.The M10 tells me the file groups sets of 10 numbers. the pseudonumber "3" consists of that particular group. All I look for is groups that have overstayed their welcome. This M10 system is pretty good as it gives you lots of scope to find these overstaying group. The other 3 numbers i could just randomly delete. This system works well. I can also use my M5 files. I definitely have lotsa choice although I wonder if too much choice is a good thing,
Going back to the concept of Space Invaders(again my imagination is in turbo-charge mode). Darth Vader controls that invasion fleet of 6 squadrons. You have got to read his mind like going over to the dark side:) You know one thing-there have been previous attacks and every attack is slightly different so no previous pattern will repeat anytime soon. Also you have some filters in the programme that can help you read his mind or some of it at least. I assume you realise that we are looking at the trips thats why your photon cannon can destroy 3 alien craft at a time.
I am hopping mad at the moment. I went to place a bet at the local bookie and they were closed until midday. So I left it at that thinking I wont win lunchtime but at teatime. The pair was 11, 35. So you can see why I am hopping mad.
PS Beware of the anti-filters. They are like that Ancient Greek puzzle. All Cretans lie, I am a Cretan.
 

Springbok

Member
Hi Barge again

And another thing. When you use historical highs, never touch them unless they have a minimum skip of 20. This gives you extra security. At the moment using a 1000 draw history there are 4 candidates with a 100% recommendation. The top two are at a skip of 19 and 2 are at a skip of 16. The top two will only become operational tomorrow when they hit a skip of 20. The bottom two still have 4 draws before they can be considered. Whenever I see a whole bunch of candidates with skips ranging from 17 into the twenties I think if the hymn, "We plough the fields and scatter the good seed on the land......" I would expect a forthcoming rich harvest in the next few days in those circumstances:)
Also experiment with the 6 number game excluding the bonus ball. Here the skips you need to start will be higher.
 

Sidebar

Top