Dennis Bassboss
Member
Watch also for the 26-34 closely Beaker....
Question for LT
- Thread starter Goswinus
- Start date
Goswinus
Member
Hi Beaker,
Thanks for your kind words.
Sorry I didn't read your question before.
Although Dennis already gave you an answer, my program gets a little different result, which is strange, 'cause I'm using data files that Dennis gave me.
0+0 : 186
0+1 : 100
1+0 : 529
1+1 : 172
2+0 : 420
2+1 : 156
3+0 : 172
3+1 : 059
4+0 : 048
4+1 : 010
5+0 : 009
5+1 : 004
6+0 : 002
This is a really nice set. My compliments to you!
Thanks for your kind words.
Sorry I didn't read your question before.
Although Dennis already gave you an answer, my program gets a little different result, which is strange, 'cause I'm using data files that Dennis gave me.
0+0 : 186
0+1 : 100
1+0 : 529
1+1 : 172
2+0 : 420
2+1 : 156
3+0 : 172
3+1 : 059
4+0 : 048
4+1 : 010
5+0 : 009
5+1 : 004
6+0 : 002
This is a really nice set. My compliments to you!
Dennis Bassboss
Member
It is not from the database that I have sent you ...but from another database that I very rarely use...don't worry the database you have is perfect it is from my LDs checker program and I have recheck that one on numerous occasions...I'll recheck my datas later ...I might be the one that made a mistake here....
(P.S. this is what happens sometimes with these automatic updates) All the other files you have should be O:K: too I got them from a very trusworty place...
By the way thanks for your hard work Goswinus ...I'm sure that the players from B.C. will appreciate it...A big thank you again my friend!
(P.S. this is what happens sometimes with these automatic updates) All the other files you have should be O:K: too I got them from a very trusworty place...By the way thanks for your hard work Goswinus ...I'm sure that the players from B.C. will appreciate it...A big thank you again my friend!
Last edited:
Goswinus
Member
Dennis,
here's some follow up information on the 13 number S7 set I have mentioned in this thread before:
01 04 08 19 29 34 35 36 37 41 43 44 45
0+0 : 24 (21 *** 3)
0+1 : 20 (27 *** 6)
1+0 : 80 (0)
1+1 : 29 (26 *** 11)
2+0 : 78 (3)
2+1 : 34 (9)
3+0 : 71 (1)
3+1 : 23 (23 *** 5)
4+0 : 27 (8)
4+1 : 14 (64 *** 34)
5+0 : 08 (140 *** 88)
5+1 : 02 (42)
6+1 : 02 (125)
value: 322
As you can see, I have added some information between parenthesis.
The first number indicates how many draws ago this result came out.
The *** indicate that this number is higher than average (draws / occurences).
The number following the *** is the number of draws overdue.
For example:
5+0 came out 8 times, which is rougly 1 in 52 times.
The last time 5+0 came out was 140 draws ago.
140 - 52 = 88.
But there's some more news:
I have added another option to my best-set-search program. I can make it concentrate on a certain number of regular balls correct.
For instance: When I look at 5 numbers correct (both 5+0 and 5+1), the best set (so far) is:
08 21 24 29 32 34 36 37 38 41 43 44 45
0+0 : 25 (25 *** 8)
0+1 : 07 (67 *** 8)
1+0 : 81 (2)
1+1 : 35 (9)
2+0 : 96 (0)
2+1 : 43 (11 *** 1)
3+0 : 62 (1)
3+1 : 16 (106 *** 80)
4+0 : 21 (17)
4+1 : 09 (37)
5+0 : 14 (43 *** 13)
5+1 : 03 (23)
value: 281
As you can see, the value is very much lower, which is the reason this set didn't come out before.
But 17 times 5 correct (14+3) is SPECTACULAR!
This is roughly once in 25 times!
Apart from that, the 5+0 result (averages once in 30 draws) is also 13 draws overdue.
Any thoughts anyone?
Any wishes for other angles?
here's some follow up information on the 13 number S7 set I have mentioned in this thread before:
01 04 08 19 29 34 35 36 37 41 43 44 45
0+0 : 24 (21 *** 3)
0+1 : 20 (27 *** 6)
1+0 : 80 (0)
1+1 : 29 (26 *** 11)
2+0 : 78 (3)
2+1 : 34 (9)
3+0 : 71 (1)
3+1 : 23 (23 *** 5)
4+0 : 27 (8)
4+1 : 14 (64 *** 34)
5+0 : 08 (140 *** 88)
5+1 : 02 (42)
6+1 : 02 (125)
value: 322
As you can see, I have added some information between parenthesis.
The first number indicates how many draws ago this result came out.
The *** indicate that this number is higher than average (draws / occurences).
The number following the *** is the number of draws overdue.
For example:
5+0 came out 8 times, which is rougly 1 in 52 times.
The last time 5+0 came out was 140 draws ago.
140 - 52 = 88.
But there's some more news:
I have added another option to my best-set-search program. I can make it concentrate on a certain number of regular balls correct.
For instance: When I look at 5 numbers correct (both 5+0 and 5+1), the best set (so far) is:
08 21 24 29 32 34 36 37 38 41 43 44 45
0+0 : 25 (25 *** 8)
0+1 : 07 (67 *** 8)
1+0 : 81 (2)
1+1 : 35 (9)
2+0 : 96 (0)
2+1 : 43 (11 *** 1)
3+0 : 62 (1)
3+1 : 16 (106 *** 80)
4+0 : 21 (17)
4+1 : 09 (37)
5+0 : 14 (43 *** 13)
5+1 : 03 (23)
value: 281
As you can see, the value is very much lower, which is the reason this set didn't come out before.
But 17 times 5 correct (14+3) is SPECTACULAR!
This is roughly once in 25 times!Apart from that, the 5+0 result (averages once in 30 draws) is also 13 draws overdue.
Any thoughts anyone?
Any wishes for other angles?
Dennis Bassboss
Member
yes Goswinus one last favor ....could you do the best set from the announcers files that I have sended yesterday ...I would like to see something very similar then what you just did...(regular balls corrects) we might have some winners in there ...I would say between 2 or 3 in tonights draws out of 6....
You are awesome Goswinus!!!
You are awesome Goswinus!!!
Goswinus
Member
From the file you have sent me, 'simply the best' delivers the following set:
15 27 30 31 34 43:
0+0 : 663 (0)
0+1 : 116 (32 *** 15)
1+0 : 705 (7 *** 4)
1+1 : 082 (24)
2+0 : 268 (2)
2+1 : 028 (38)
3+0 : 037 (9)
3+1 : 003 (1122 *** 486)
4+0 : 003 (403)
4+1 : 000 (0)
5+0 : 000 (0)
5+1 : 000 (0)
6+0 : 001 (1014)
6+1 : 000 (0)
value: 471
'Concentrating on 4' delivers the following results:
17 26 30 34 43 48
0+0 : 708 (0)
0+1 : 107 (31 *** 13)
1+0 : 705 (2)
1+1 : 098 (7)
2+0 : 229 (12 *** 3)
2+1 : 014 (128)
3+0 : 032 (8)
3+1 : 006 (814 *** 496)
4+0 : 005 (24)
4+1 : 001 (136)
5+0 : 000 (0)
5+1 : 000 (0)
6+0 : 001 (9)
6+1 : 000 (0)
value: 417
Value is lower, but 3+1 seems to be overdue in both cases, but 3+1 came out 6 times before as opposed to 3 times in the first set.
Does this help?
15 27 30 31 34 43:
0+0 : 663 (0)
0+1 : 116 (32 *** 15)
1+0 : 705 (7 *** 4)
1+1 : 082 (24)
2+0 : 268 (2)
2+1 : 028 (38)
3+0 : 037 (9)
3+1 : 003 (1122 *** 486)
4+0 : 003 (403)
4+1 : 000 (0)
5+0 : 000 (0)
5+1 : 000 (0)
6+0 : 001 (1014)
6+1 : 000 (0)
value: 471
'Concentrating on 4' delivers the following results:
17 26 30 34 43 48
0+0 : 708 (0)
0+1 : 107 (31 *** 13)
1+0 : 705 (2)
1+1 : 098 (7)
2+0 : 229 (12 *** 3)
2+1 : 014 (128)
3+0 : 032 (8)
3+1 : 006 (814 *** 496)
4+0 : 005 (24)
4+1 : 001 (136)
5+0 : 000 (0)
5+1 : 000 (0)
6+0 : 001 (9)
6+1 : 000 (0)
value: 417
Value is lower, but 3+1 seems to be overdue in both cases, but 3+1 came out 6 times before as opposed to 3 times in the first set.
Does this help?
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Yes it does ...I bet you that 2 or 3 numbers from one of these 2 sets will show up tonight....my hints for tonight are the 26 and the 34 and the other numbers between them are looking good too...I can't wait to see tonight's results but I have to thank you again here
I'll play a small set by mixing some of these numbers....I feel really good about them....one number that I overlooked was the 15....Thanks again!
I'll play a small set by mixing some of these numbers....I feel really good about them....one number that I overlooked was the 15....Thanks again!
Goswinus
Member
These two sets make up one set of 9.
15 17 26 27 30 31 34 43 48
0+0 : 381 (0)
0+1 : 095 (32 *** 11)
1+0 : 680 (3)
1+1 : 154 (7)
2+0 : 391 (2)
2+1 : 066 (33 *** 4)
3+0 : 104 (8)
3+1 : 017 (128 *** 15)
4+0 : 014 (138 *** 1)
4+1 : 002 (24)
5+0 : 000 (0)
5+1 : 000 (0)
6+0 : 002 (9)
6+1 : 000 (0)
value: 1.003
Although the value is low (I've seen values of 1.100) this set has won 2 jackpots, and one of them only 9 draws ago. What a pitty!
15 17 26 27 30 31 34 43 48
0+0 : 381 (0)
0+1 : 095 (32 *** 11)
1+0 : 680 (3)
1+1 : 154 (7)
2+0 : 391 (2)
2+1 : 066 (33 *** 4)
3+0 : 104 (8)
3+1 : 017 (128 *** 15)
4+0 : 014 (138 *** 1)
4+1 : 002 (24)
5+0 : 000 (0)
5+1 : 000 (0)
6+0 : 002 (9)
6+1 : 000 (0)
value: 1.003
Although the value is low (I've seen values of 1.100) this set has won 2 jackpots, and one of them only 9 draws ago. What a pitty!
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Goswinus said:These two sets make up one set of 9.
15 17 26 27 30 31 34 43 48
0+0 : 381 (0)
0+1 : 095 (32 *** 11)
1+0 : 680 (3)
1+1 : 154 (7)
2+0 : 391 (2)
2+1 : 066 (33 *** 4)
3+0 : 104 (8)
3+1 : 017 (128 *** 15)
4+0 : 014 (138 *** 1)
4+1 : 002 (24)
5+0 : 000 (0)
5+1 : 000 (0)
6+0 : 002 (9)
6+1 : 000 (0)
value: 1.003
Although the value is low (I've seen values of 1.100) this set has won 2 jackpots, and one of them only 9 draws ago. What a pitty!
It might be in for another ride...
But with this theory and stuffwe will catch one before it strikes believe me my friend!
These numbers are good all around mixing numbers for a vast different scenarios....
.....9 draws ago
Results with 12 numbers
I do not know if this is what you want exactly but with the numbers 08, 12, 14, 20, 21, 27, 34, 36, 39, 41, 43 and 47, the results (not considering the bonus number) for 1907 draws would have been (with WN being winning numbers):
0 WN - 289 times
1 WN - 718 times
2 WN - 588 times
3 WN - 236 times
4 WN - 60 times
5 WN - 14 times
6 WN - 2 times
Did you use the first draws of Lotto 6/49 to pick those numbers?
Because with those 12 numbers in the first 6 draws, you would have gotten respectively 4 WN, 4WN, 2 WN, 2 WN, 4 WN and 4 WN.
I do not know if this is what you want exactly but with the numbers 08, 12, 14, 20, 21, 27, 34, 36, 39, 41, 43 and 47, the results (not considering the bonus number) for 1907 draws would have been (with WN being winning numbers):
0 WN - 289 times
1 WN - 718 times
2 WN - 588 times
3 WN - 236 times
4 WN - 60 times
5 WN - 14 times
6 WN - 2 times
Did you use the first draws of Lotto 6/49 to pick those numbers?
Because with those 12 numbers in the first 6 draws, you would have gotten respectively 4 WN, 4WN, 2 WN, 2 WN, 4 WN and 4 WN.
Last edited:
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Very interesting stuff Gilles!
Brad
Member
Re: 20nr sets for 6/49
Came across a set with 26 jackpots, however I don't think it's had one for a while...see what you think...
6-10-13-14-15-23-25-26-27-30-31-32-33-35-38-40-43-44-46-47
3+0...901 4+0...356 5+0...51 5+1...25 6+0...18 6+1...08
Not sure how accurate 3 to 5 hits are (they may overlap) or how they distribute over the history, someone may want to check this out? Can't vouch for my data base, normally I play BC49, but this may be of interest to 'nationals'.
Cheers
Came across a set with 26 jackpots, however I don't think it's had one for a while...see what you think...
6-10-13-14-15-23-25-26-27-30-31-32-33-35-38-40-43-44-46-47
3+0...901 4+0...356 5+0...51 5+1...25 6+0...18 6+1...08
Not sure how accurate 3 to 5 hits are (they may overlap) or how they distribute over the history, someone may want to check this out? Can't vouch for my data base, normally I play BC49, but this may be of interest to 'nationals'.
Cheers
Last edited:
Goswinus
Member
Great catch, Brad!
Here are the stats according to my program which uses the 6/49 datafile I received from Dennis. I think it's very accurate!
06 10 13 14 15 23 25 26 27 30 31 32 33 35 38 40 43 44 46 47
0+0 : 032 (F60 - A96 = -36 ***)
0+1 : 027 (F71 - A12 = 59)
1+0 : 186 (F11 - A9 = 2)
1+1 : 130 (F15 - A2 = 13)
2+0 : 373 (F6 - A1 = 5)
2+1 : 256 (F8 - A16 = -8 ***)
3+0 : 329 (F6 - A6 = 0)
3+1 : 217 (F9 - A10 = -1 ***)
4+0 : 183 (F11 - A14 = -3 ***)
4+1 : 098 (F20 - A49 = -29 ***)
5+0 : 034 (F57 - A0 = 57)
5+1 : 016 (F120 - A42 = 78)
6+0 : 016 (F120 - A463 = -343 ***)
6+1 : 010 (F191 - A5 = 186)
As dwoods99 mentioned, the 6+1 came out 5 draws ago.
The 6+0 however, is long overdue.
Here are the stats according to my program which uses the 6/49 datafile I received from Dennis. I think it's very accurate!
06 10 13 14 15 23 25 26 27 30 31 32 33 35 38 40 43 44 46 47
0+0 : 032 (F60 - A96 = -36 ***)
0+1 : 027 (F71 - A12 = 59)
1+0 : 186 (F11 - A9 = 2)
1+1 : 130 (F15 - A2 = 13)
2+0 : 373 (F6 - A1 = 5)
2+1 : 256 (F8 - A16 = -8 ***)
3+0 : 329 (F6 - A6 = 0)
3+1 : 217 (F9 - A10 = -1 ***)
4+0 : 183 (F11 - A14 = -3 ***)
4+1 : 098 (F20 - A49 = -29 ***)
5+0 : 034 (F57 - A0 = 57)
5+1 : 016 (F120 - A42 = 78)
6+0 : 016 (F120 - A463 = -343 ***)
6+1 : 010 (F191 - A5 = 186)
As dwoods99 mentioned, the 6+1 came out 5 draws ago.
The 6+0 however, is long overdue.
Brad's 20 numbers
Your data is good Goswinus
These 20 numbers got 6 winning numbers 26 times but it has been oddly distributed.
It got 6 numbers 11 times in draws #1 to 500, but then only 3 times in draws #501 to 1000. Then it got hot again with 10 times in draws #1001 to 1500 and back to a poor performance with only 2 times in draws #1501 to 1907.
Your data is good Goswinus
These 20 numbers got 6 winning numbers 26 times but it has been oddly distributed.
It got 6 numbers 11 times in draws #1 to 500, but then only 3 times in draws #501 to 1000. Then it got hot again with 10 times in draws #1001 to 1500 and back to a poor performance with only 2 times in draws #1501 to 1907.
Do you consider the Bonus number, I do not.
As far as the numbers 01, 04, 12, 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 27, 31, 34, 36, 38, 41, 44, 45, 46 and 47, I get 16 times with 6 winning numbers. with:
2 times in draws 1 to 500;
1 time in draws 501 to 1000;
3 times in draws 1001 to 1500;
8 times in draws 1501 to 1907.
As far as the numbers 01, 04, 12, 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23, 24, 27, 31, 34, 36, 38, 41, 44, 45, 46 and 47, I get 16 times with 6 winning numbers. with:
2 times in draws 1 to 500;
1 time in draws 501 to 1000;
3 times in draws 1001 to 1500;
8 times in draws 1501 to 1907.