prediction and some help please??

ferrabi

ferrabi

Member
wassup people

Last week i played lotto 649 and i developed a system(secret prediction method) well i played it on wed, those were the # i played with.. 1,2,4,5,6,8,10,11,14,15,16,17,18,20,22,23,24,25,29,30,33,35,36,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,48,49.

and the numbers that came up were 7,20,24,25,29,36,45
the only number not on my pics was 7 but hey 6outof7 is not bad
but can some one tell me the odds with 33 numbers instead of 49???

and just for the heck try these numbers for saturday if anybody is willing
1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11,14,15,16,17,18,20,22,23,25,27,30,33,35,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,48,49

thanks and enjoy
 
G

GillesD

Member
33 numbers (from a secret prediction method?)

With 33 numbers, you can come up with 1,107,568 different combinations of 6 numbers. This represents only 7.92% of all the 13,983,816 combinations.

At best, with the 5 winning numbers (20, 24, 25, 29 and 45) and the bonus number (36) on one ticket, it would have given you $168,533.55
 
R

roger.www

Member
ferrabi said:
wassup people

Last week i played lotto 649 and i developed a system(secret prediction method) well i played it on wed, those were the # i played with.. 1,2,4,5,6,8,10,11,14,15,16,17,18,20,22,23,24,25,29,30,33,35,36,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,48,49.

and the numbers that came up were 7,20,24,25,29,36,45
the only number not on my pics was 7 but hey 6outof7 is not bad
but can some one tell me the odds with 33 numbers instead of 49???

and just for the heck try these numbers for saturday if anybody is willing
1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11,14,15,16,17,18,20,22,23,25,27,30,33,35,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,48,49

thanks and enjoy
Click to expand...
The problem is that is is difficult to find a wheeling system that will accommodate 33 numbers and give you a good shot at 5 numbers.
Last Wed I also had 5 numbers + bonus
in a sample of 28 numbers, the best my wheeling system could come up with
was 4/6.
You should tweak your "secret" system so you have less numbers in your sample then look for a good wheeling system.

How consistently do you predict 5 numbers in 33 using your system ?
 
D

dhs

Member
roger.www said:
The problem is that is is difficult to find a wheeling system that will accommodate 33 numbers and give you a good shot at 5 numbers.
Last Wed I also had 5 numbers + bonus
in a sample of 28 numbers, the best my wheeling system could come up with
was 4/6.
You should tweak your "secret" system so you have less numbers in your sample then look for a good wheeling system.

How consistently do you predict 5 numbers in 33 using your system ?
Click to expand...


Studying for 649 tonight Roger!No luck elsewhere for me!

DHS
 
L

Lotto$Master

Member
if you are going to play 20 number ..

just uses numbers in a row.. like 10 to 30...

better than having numbers all over the place.
 
ferrabi

ferrabi

Member
Thanks for all the replys,
yeah i know 33 numbers is still alot,even to wheel..
i am gonna see how this saturdays numbers come up and maybe try to reduce the numbers after that

if i get a good ratio again then maybe its worth to look into.
the way this system is done i think every other week you will have a good ratio like 6/7 and next maybe 3/7 but i don't know and i don't fell like testing it on previous result. when i can test them on the upcoming results.
i think i might be able to reduce it to maybe 25 but even with that its still alot of numbers..
 
ferrabi

ferrabi

Member
well after this saturdays results
i got 4 plus the bonus, but on paper again..

so after 2 draws i don't know if it is a good sign or what but
6/7 and 5/7 is not that bad.. i don't know how other systems come out though.

some feedback would be appreciated.

i guess it kinda works. i am gonna try to revise the theory a bit for the next wednesday's picks. and try to reduce the numbers

thanks
 
bloubul

bloubul

Member
Hi ferrabi

What method do you use to select your numbers? I also battle to bring the total numbers with good effect down.

BlouBul :cool:
 
ferrabi

ferrabi

Member
ok this it
i take all the numbers that were drawn in the past 7 draws, and then any numbers that were drawn twice or three(rare) or times and i discard them. this usually leaves me with about 30-36 numbers.(and thats it) and from there you could you could use several other methods to reduce them even more.
 
bloubul

bloubul

Member
Hi ferrabi

I did some tests with your method, yaaee you do get up to 7#'s thats on paper!!!!!!!!. Did you "EVER GOT 5#'s IN ACTUAL PLAY", if you did what metod/wheel did you use. The most I can get in a row is 4#'s and that is over a 100 lines?

BlouBul :cool:
 
ferrabi

ferrabi

Member
bloubul
yes i have gotten 5 numbers but on super 7 with this method and my girlfriend hit 5 on with super7 because thats what i use to play..
and that was with 4 rows and my girl friend hit it with 2 rows
it was for 102.90$
but i haven't really tried to play it with 649
 
G

GillesD

Member
Reducing numbers to choose from

ferrabi said:
ok this it
i take all the numbers that were drawn in the past 7 draws, and then any numbers that were drawn twice or three(rare) or times and i discard them. this usually leaves me with about 30-36 numbers.(and thats it) and from there you could you could use several other methods to reduce them even more.
Click to expand...

For the fun of it, I applied your method to the history of Lotto 6/49 (2420 draws) and I got the following results:

-- A -----B
30-32---02.6%
33-35---36.0%
36-38---54.6%
39-42---06.8%

Column A gives how many numbers remain after removing those appearing 2 or more times in the last 7 draws (including the bonus number) and in column B, it is the frequency (in %) for this range of numbers. Altogether, the minimum remaining numbers is 30 and the maximum is 42.
 
ferrabi

ferrabi

Member
Thanks gillesd
that actually helps because it always varies of how many numbers you can eliminate. i am kinda working on trying to further reduce the numbers. and is there any way to find out the statistic of how many numbers by my method are drawn weekly?(cause i don't have any software for it) i do everything by pen and paper method.

the numbers for april 4 2007 (ferrabi method)
1,2,3,4,5,6,8,10,11,12,14,15,17,18,20,21,22,23,25,27,29,30,31,33,35,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,47,48,49

reduced numbers to 18 (beta version) lol
3,8,10,11,12,17,18,21,23,27,30,31,33,38,39,40,42,47

good luck to all..cuz 38 million is a sweet dream.
 
ferrabi

ferrabi

Member
hello
well it was a good draw,(5,16,21,25,40,48, b31)
i forgot to put 16 in the post (ferrabi method), but it is in my method(if you don't beleive you can check your self)
so thus the method would have produced 6out6 and the bonus
7/7

so i think there is something to my method. (it just produces too many numbers for now) so i need to work on the method for further succesful reductionz.

any suggestions would be appreciated.
 
L

luckyhorse

Member
well ferrabi i took your method but included the bonus number in the elimination then i used gail howards skips due chart and inputted the last 7 draws back when it was all said and done i camre up with this set of 17 for the super 7 2,3,6,8,9,11,14,22,23,24,38,41,42,44,45,46,47 i will try to narrow it furhter for the next draw this is for super 7 april 6:beer:
 
wazzappenning

wazzappenning

Member
can anyone tell him where to find the stats on stuff like 2-4 #s will be odd 2-4#s will be under the median (24) i think, etc.
 
ferrabi

ferrabi

Member
hey wazzappenning
the reason i use 7weeks, because lotto 6/49 is a sevens game.. every time there is a draw there are 7 numbers picked, plus the draw has 49 numbers which is also a power of 7^2
so i think that by using 7 weeks would only be perfect, because if you start going back further the numbers frequence distributions starts to even out. and(basically means you can't have hot and cold numbers). and if you use less weeks you don't eliminate enough numbers to make any difference.


i dont know if this makes any sense..

plus the results kinda show for them selves. for the past 3 draw i've hit
6/7
5/7
7/7

i think my method is only the first step "cracking the lottery" or "playing for profit". all it does is reduces the "litter of numbers" from 49 to somewhere in the 30.
.
.
.
.
luckyhorse
well i am not familiar with "gail howards skips due chart" i am kinda new to this stuff..but i do have one peice of advice, this is something i noticed with lotto 649 the bonus numbers that were picked in last 7 draws, that are not eliminated with my method, do tend to come for the following draw, :)

ferrabi method (6/49, for saturday april 7th 2007)
1,2,3,4,6,8,9,10,11,12,14,15,17,18,20,22,23,24,27,29,30,33,35,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,47,48,49
 
ferrabi

ferrabi

Member
luckyhorse
oh yeah one other thing,i think you should use last 6 weeks for super 7. and not 7. it should give you more accurate numbers because
you are playing with 8 numbers and it's out of 47
8x7 =56
8x6 =48 this seems more "perfect" its closer to 47 so and probably more accurate
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Sidebar

Top