Master Lottery Software

[Moses]

HI
Moses I took your 16 numbers and check them againt my lottery
There is 1554 records on the database from begging 1995 when G-Tech (propably) started to cooporate with polish lotto.

Check it:
There is one 6 hits (polish lotto is 6/49)
Game: 08-20-30-39-40-47 from 26 May 1999 matched 6 numbers.

There is fifteen hits of 5 in this group

And 144 hits of Four numbers.

Findings?

Hello Paul

That is very good result!
Can you find the chemistry for those 16 numbers or can anybody tell the relation for them?
Right now I am doing some experiment with 92 sets as follows

01 = 07 13 38 17 29 30 44 = 7 match 4s found in UK lotto
02 = 47 08 33 41 14 23 28 = 1 match 5 + 7 match 4s in lotto
03 = 37 13 05 32 26 06 08 = 3 match 4s
04 = 22 23 33 34 39 42 16 = 7 match 4s
05 = 36 25 37 20 43 34 31 = 5 match 4s
06 = 30 19 20 28 33 34 08 = 7 match 4s
07 = 04 25 06 01 16 10 47 = 7 match 4s

This is very interesting that lotto numbers are relatively taking about 7 matches to each line if you agree!
I'll find out more and let you know

BTW, has anyone seen Flexy?

Moses

 

[Flexalong]

Hello Paul

That is very good result!
Can you find the chemistry for those 16 numbers or can anybody tell the relation for them?
Right now I am doing some experiment with 92 sets as follows

01 = 07 13 38 17 29 30 44 = 7 match 4s found in UK lotto
02 = 47 08 33 41 14 23 28 = 1 match 5 + 7 match 4s in lotto
03 = 37 13 05 32 26 06 08 = 3 match 4s
04 = 22 23 33 34 39 42 16 = 7 match 4s
05 = 36 25 37 20 43 34 31 = 5 match 4s
06 = 30 19 20 28 33 34 08 = 7 match 4s
07 = 04 25 06 01 16 10 47 = 7 match 4s

This is very interesting that lotto numbers are relatively taking about 7 matches to each line if you agree!
I'll find out more and let you know

BTW, has anyone seen Flexy?

Moses

I am still here Moses, I am STILL waiting for you to prove the following claims:

1. "Based on several tests I proved that my theory will work for every single draw guaranteeing the 5 plus win if not jackpot"

2. "I am holding the UK records for the number of times that I won (over 10,000 time) including 18 times 5 numbers but they deny me the jackpot"

3. "I have been on UK front pages of news paper as "the man who cracked the lottrey"

And pleaseeeee, do you really expect anyone to buy 92 lines of 7 numbers each and every draw or are you telling me that they "will work for every single draw guaranteeing the 5 plus win if not jackpot"?!

Oh btw, I am not here to prove anything, YOU ARE!

 

[Flexalong]

Hi Guys

Well I see the discusion delevoped!!
I have a advice for both of you. If you would like to exchange yours point of view for some case please use email or another of way to internet communictaion. I am not interested here to read conversations if I we can call it like that - on this level. You have used three pages for nothing. So far this subject was interesting.

Moses you mentioned about IT before. You realise that some of your ideas for example loop thing is possible to close on one program but we have no access to enough strong computers to generate and analyze this data.
Second thing you promised me few months ago text from your closed website "Global Lottery Solution"If you have still my email please write to me if not I will write to you.

I you have any news from Uk lottery please share with us.

Flex please dont try to provoke Moses in hope he will tell you something more that he wants you.
And Guys please try to provide good discusion here.

Paul

The thing is I am not provoking Moses to tell me more about IT but rather, I am asking him to PROVE IT. See the difference?

 

[GameBelgium]

Hi Moses

I checked how your 16 numbers performed in the Belgian Lottery (6/42 - 2428 drawings). Since we only have 42 numbers, I dropped your last number, testing our lottery with only 15 numbers (full wheel):
1 2 3 4 8 10 12 17 20 21 26 30 35 39 40, results:
3x6
19x5+bonus
533x5
20.785x4
293.500x3

For testing purposes, I also wheeled a random combination of 15 numbers (full wheel):
1 8 9 11 13 17 18 20 24 27 31 32 34 38 41, results:
2x6
12x5+bonus
316x5
17.425x4
288.395x3

Don't know if this is any help at all?

 

[Kenya649]

Hi Moses

I checked how your 16 numbers performed in the Kenyan Lottery (6/49 - 302 drawings).

1 2 3 4 8 10 12 17 20 21 26 30 35 39 40, results:
6/6---------------->0
5/6---------------->0
4/6---------------->16
3/6---------------->48

Thanks

 

[Moses]

The thing is I am not provoking Moses to tell me more about IT but rather, I am asking him to PROVE IT. See the difference?

Hey Flexy

Where are your numbers and have you seen this message on lotterypost forum? People with knowledge do appreciate the work is been done but not you!

I had my own theory on breaking lottery so I had already written some highly optimized code that would search thru combinations comparing against upto 50 draws at a time. Unfortunately my theory didn't hold water because you could not predict future draws from my selected 15 numbers. So I was able to adapt my multi-threaded application to do your loop/bridge/belt algorithm in about 1 hour since I already had the framework in place. I haven't hooked up the multi-threaded part of it yet but will when I have time this coming weekend. Right now I can permutate thru 1 billion rotations in 10 minutes comparing matches against 50 past draws. Thats not a typo that is 1 billion rotations in 10 minutes comparing against 50 draws. I'm in the States, (Utah one of the few states without lottery, have to travel to Idaho), but since this is your theory, and your work I'm comparing those rotations against the first 50 UK draws to see what I find that may be of help to you.

So in 1 loop even with the repeating nature after 6280 rotations will I find the first UK lotto in drawn order using your algorithm or do I need to (re-seed for lack of better word) after 6280 rotations. Like I said I can do 6 billion rotations in 1 hour single-threaded. If I can find a way to rotate multi-threaded I could quadruple that with my quad processor. My background is I'm a senior software engineer that writes low level network file system drivers for 20 years. My expertise is in writing high performing distributed software.

Anyway just want to say good job on your theories and your observations. People are so focused on you just giving out lines that they are not focusing on some of your other observations like digitial endings. Anyway I read that other thread you mentioned from start to finish twice this weekend and each time learned something new after playing with my software and observing the rotations myself. Guess I need to read it again to know what to do after 6280.

I seriously don't know if your theory (I mean fact) holds true (I will be a believer for sure if I wake up in the morning having found the rotation to draw 1 of UK lotto in drawn order) but my gut feeling from eyeballing the rotations and eyeballing the UK draws is that they look very similiar indeed, especially the drawn order aspect of it. I'll let you know what I find in first 50 draws if anything. Maybe you already know the results. I chose the first 50 draws because the other UK lotteries did not exist yet. I'm one of those people that does not believe in completely random. I believe an edge can always be found but most times to find the edge means solving a problem in fashion that may be

 

[Moses]

Hi Moses

I checked how your 16 numbers performed in the Belgian Lottery (6/42 - 2428 drawings). Since we only have 42 numbers, I dropped your last number, testing our lottery with only 15 numbers (full wheel):
1 2 3 4 8 10 12 17 20 21 26 30 35 39 40, results:
3x6
19x5+bonus
533x5
20.785x4
293.500x3

For testing purposes, I also wheeled a random combination of 15 numbers (full wheel):
1 8 9 11 13 17 18 20 24 27 31 32 34 38 41, results:
2x6
12x5+bonus
316x5
17.425x4
288.395x3

Don't know if this is any help at all?

Hello there

Those 16 numbers are basically created on fixed distance and from them you can create a table!
Every number has a shadow or reverse number,
01 = 10 = 08 numbers distance
02 = 20 = 17 numbers distance
03 = 30 = 26 numbers distance
04 = 40 = 35 numbers distance

Now in reverse loop is
10 = 01 = 39 numbers distance and so on
If you create a table for all the numbers from 01 to 49 (mirror image) which have 08 numbers distance and all the other distances then you will have a grid which can be used for predictions! here is an example
34 = 43 = 08 number distance
12 = 21 = 08 number distance

Once the grid is complete then hold it against your lottery numbers and if the numbers appear from one side of string to another side then they are coming from specific loop which can be predicted in advance.
I hope this make sense!

Moses

 

[GameBelgium]

Hi again Moses.

I made the grid for the Belgian lottery (42 numbers) and came up with the following:
01-10-08
02-20-17
03-30-26
04-40-35
10-01-32
12-21-08
13-31-17
14-41-26
20-02-23
21-12-32
23-32-08
24-42-17
30-03-14
31-13-23
32-23-32
40-04-05
41-14-14
42-24-23

I hope I'm on the right track so far. But now I have this grid, what do I do with it? (just in case you're wondering: I did read through this post and the one on lottopost )

 

[Moses]

Hi again Moses.

I made the grid for the Belgian lottery (42 numbers) and came up with the following:
01-10-08
02-20-17
03-30-26
04-40-35
10-01-32
12-21-08
13-31-17
14-41-26
20-02-23
21-12-32
23-32-08
24-42-17
30-03-14
31-13-23
32-23-32
40-04-05
41-14-14
42-24-23

I hope I'm on the right track so far. But now I have this grid, what do I do with it? (just in case you're wondering: I did read through this post and the one on lottopost )

Hello GameBelgium
These 16 numbers are dividing the 49 numbers in two sections or different fields. If they perform well against any lottery and happens more often then it is recommended to spend few quid and play the wheel of these 16 numbers but if you want to play variable numbers then you can use this grid as guideline for the future draws but however some part of your grid I think is missing as I do not see number 39 in there

If you think of 01 to 49 numbers as one big loop then from 01 to 10 there are 08 numbers distance but from 10 to 01 has 39 numbers distance
This is how I build the grid

01 ------------10----------01
---------08-----------39
02-------------20----------02
---------17-----------30
03-------------30----------03
---------26-----------17
04-------------40----------04
---------35-----------12
This is the UK latest thunder ball draw which 5 numbers were selected just from the simple grid above!
14/03/2009, 01,03,17,21,24,08
Now, you have the idea and you can develop your own grid with different numbers, every little information helps.

Moses

 

[Flexalong]

Hey Flexy

Where are your numbers and have you seen this message on lotterypost forum? People with knowledge do appreciate the work is been done but not you!

I had my own theory on breaking lottery so I had already written some highly optimized code that would search thru combinations comparing against upto 50 draws at a time. Unfortunately my theory didn't hold water because you could not predict future draws from my selected 15 numbers. So I was able to adapt my multi-threaded application to do your loop/bridge/belt algorithm in about 1 hour since I already had the framework in place. I haven't hooked up the multi-threaded part of it yet but will when I have time this coming weekend. Right now I can permutate thru 1 billion rotations in 10 minutes comparing matches against 50 past draws. Thats not a typo that is 1 billion rotations in 10 minutes comparing against 50 draws. I'm in the States, (Utah one of the few states without lottery, have to travel to Idaho), but since this is your theory, and your work I'm comparing those rotations against the first 50 UK draws to see what I find that may be of help to you.

So in 1 loop even with the repeating nature after 6280 rotations will I find the first UK lotto in drawn order using your algorithm or do I need to (re-seed for lack of better word) after 6280 rotations. Like I said I can do 6 billion rotations in 1 hour single-threaded. If I can find a way to rotate multi-threaded I could quadruple that with my quad processor. My background is I'm a senior software engineer that writes low level network file system drivers for 20 years. My expertise is in writing high performing distributed software.

Anyway just want to say good job on your theories and your observations. People are so focused on you just giving out lines that they are not focusing on some of your other observations like digitial endings. Anyway I read that other thread you mentioned from start to finish twice this weekend and each time learned something new after playing with my software and observing the rotations myself. Guess I need to read it again to know what to do after 6280.

I seriously don't know if your theory (I mean fact) holds true (I will be a believer for sure if I wake up in the morning having found the rotation to draw 1 of UK lotto in drawn order) but my gut feeling from eyeballing the rotations and eyeballing the UK draws is that they look very similiar indeed, especially the drawn order aspect of it. I'll let you know what I find in first 50 draws if anything. Maybe you already know the results. I chose the first 50 draws because the other UK lotteries did not exist yet. I'm one of those people that does not believe in completely random. I believe an edge can always be found but most times to find the edge means solving a problem in fashion that may be

Well Jimmy and some of the guys here obviously don't see anything wrong with a guy who brags about:

1. "Based on several tests I proved that my theory will work for every single draw guaranteeing the 5 plus win if not jackpot"

2. "I am holding the UK records for the number of times that I won (over 10,000 time) including 18 times 5 numbers but they deny me the jackpot"

3. "I have been on UK front pages of news paper as "the man who cracked the lottrey"

And you know what the worse thing is, this guy can't even back it up!

Btw, my 16 numbers, do what you want.

1 8 9 13 23 38 39
2 3 8 9 23 28 38
2 9 13 17 20 23 38
1 9 17 20 23 38 42
3 8 9 13 38 39 42
1 3 9 13 17 38 39
3 8 9 38 39 41 47
2 8 9 13 38 39 41
1 2 9 20 28 38 39
1 2 5 9 17 38 39
2 3 8 9 13 17 38
1 3 9 13 28 38 41
1 2 3 9 20 38 41
1 2 3 5 9 28 38
1 3 9 17 28 38 42
1 9 13 20 38 41 47
2 5 9 28 38 41 42
2 9 20 28 38 42 47
3 8 9 13 23 28 39
1 2 9 13 17 23 39
1 9 17 20 23 39 41
1 5 9 17 23 39 42
1 3 9 13 23 41 42
3 5 8 9 20 23 41
2 3 9 17 20 23 41
3 5 9 20 23 28 47
2 8 9 13 23 42 47
2 5 9 13 20 23 47
5 8 9 23 28 41 42
1 2 9 20 23 28 41
1 3 5 8 9 17 39
3 5 9 17 39 42 47
8 9 13 20 39 41 47
1 5 9 13 39 41 42
8 9 17 28 39 41 42
1 5 9 20 28 39 42
1 2 3 9 13 20 42
2 3 5 9 13 28 47
2 5 8 9 13 17 42
1 9 13 17 20 28 47
2 8 9 17 20 41 42
2 5 8 9 20 28 42
1 2 9 17 41 42 47
2 8 13 23 28 38 39
1 8 23 28 38 39 41
1 3 5 13 23 38 47
3 5 13 17 23 28 38
1 8 13 20 23 28 38
1 2 8 13 23 38 42
13 17 23 28 38 41 47
1 3 17 38 39 41 47
13 20 38 39 41 42 47
2 13 17 38 39 42 47
8 17 38 39 41 42 47
1 2 8 20 38 39 42
1 8 17 20 28 38 39
2 3 13 17 28 38 47
3 8 28 38 41 42 47
1 3 17 20 28 38 41
2 5 13 20 38 41 42
1 2 13 28 38 41 47
1 2 5 8 17 38 42
3 13 23 28 39 41 42
3 8 23 28 39 41 47
5 8 13 17 23 39 47
1 13 23 28 39 42 47
1 8 17 23 28 39 42
2 5 23 28 39 41 47
1 2 17 23 28 39 41
1 5 17 20 23 28 39
2 3 8 13 20 23 47
1 2 3 5 23 28 47
2 5 8 13 23 28 41
2 13 17 20 23 28 41
5 13 17 23 28 41 42
8 17 20 23 28 41 42
2 5 8 17 23 41 47
5 8 17 20 23 28 47
2 5 17 20 23 28 42
1 3 5 13 17 39 41
2 3 5 20 39 41 47
8 13 17 20 39 41 42
1 2 5 8 13 28 39
1 8 20 28 39 41 47
1 2 5 8 20 39 41
5 8 28 39 41 42 47
1 3 8 13 17 28 47
2 3 13 28 41 42 47
2 3 8 20 28 41 42
2 3 5 17 20 42 47
1 2 3 5 17 20 28
5 8 13 17 20 28 41

 

[Moses]

Well Jimmy and some of the guys here obviously don't see anything wrong with a guy who brags about:

1. "Based on several tests I proved that my theory will work for every single draw guaranteeing the 5 plus win if not jackpot"

2. "I am holding the UK records for the number of times that I won (over 10,000 time) including 18 times 5 numbers but they deny me the jackpot"

3. "I have been on UK front pages of news paper as "the man who cracked the lottrey"

And you know what the worse thing is, this guy can't even back it up!

Btw, my 16 numbers, do what you want.

1 8 9 13 23 38 39
2 3 8 9 23 28 38
2 9 13 17 20 23 38
1 9 17 20 23 38 42
3 8 9 13 38 39 42
1 3 9 13 17 38 39
3 8 9 38 39 41 47
2 8 9 13 38 39 41
1 2 9 20 28 38 39
1 2 5 9 17 38 39
2 3 8 9 13 17 38
1 3 9 13 28 38 41
1 2 3 9 20 38 41
1 2 3 5 9 28 38
1 3 9 17 28 38 42
1 9 13 20 38 41 47
2 5 9 28 38 41 42
2 9 20 28 38 42 47
3 8 9 13 23 28 39
1 2 9 13 17 23 39
1 9 17 20 23 39 41
1 5 9 17 23 39 42
1 3 9 13 23 41 42
3 5 8 9 20 23 41
2 3 9 17 20 23 41
3 5 9 20 23 28 47
2 8 9 13 23 42 47
2 5 9 13 20 23 47
5 8 9 23 28 41 42
1 2 9 20 23 28 41
1 3 5 8 9 17 39
3 5 9 17 39 42 47
8 9 13 20 39 41 47
1 5 9 13 39 41 42
8 9 17 28 39 41 42
1 5 9 20 28 39 42
1 2 3 9 13 20 42
2 3 5 9 13 28 47
2 5 8 9 13 17 42
1 9 13 17 20 28 47
2 8 9 17 20 41 42
2 5 8 9 20 28 42
1 2 9 17 41 42 47
2 8 13 23 28 38 39
1 8 23 28 38 39 41
1 3 5 13 23 38 47
3 5 13 17 23 28 38
1 8 13 20 23 28 38
1 2 8 13 23 38 42
13 17 23 28 38 41 47
1 3 17 38 39 41 47
13 20 38 39 41 42 47
2 13 17 38 39 42 47
8 17 38 39 41 42 47
1 2 8 20 38 39 42
1 8 17 20 28 38 39
2 3 13 17 28 38 47
3 8 28 38 41 42 47
1 3 17 20 28 38 41
2 5 13 20 38 41 42
1 2 13 28 38 41 47
1 2 5 8 17 38 42
3 13 23 28 39 41 42
3 8 23 28 39 41 47
5 8 13 17 23 39 47
1 13 23 28 39 42 47
1 8 17 23 28 39 42
2 5 23 28 39 41 47
1 2 17 23 28 39 41
1 5 17 20 23 28 39
2 3 8 13 20 23 47
1 2 3 5 23 28 47
2 5 8 13 23 28 41
2 13 17 20 23 28 41
5 13 17 23 28 41 42
8 17 20 23 28 41 42
2 5 8 17 23 41 47
5 8 17 20 23 28 47
2 5 17 20 23 28 42
1 3 5 13 17 39 41
2 3 5 20 39 41 47
8 13 17 20 39 41 42
1 2 5 8 13 28 39
1 8 20 28 39 41 47
1 2 5 8 20 39 41
5 8 28 39 41 42 47
1 3 8 13 17 28 47
2 3 13 28 41 42 47
2 3 8 20 28 41 42
2 3 5 17 20 42 47
1 2 3 5 17 20 28
5 8 13 17 20 28 41

Hey Flexy

How many times you say the same thing? You started to boar mmmmeeeezzzzzzzzzzzz!
You’re just humiliating yourself and prove how keen you are to get info from me!
This will be the last reply to you

Moses

 

[GameBelgium]

Moses, nr 39 is missing in my grid because the Belgian lottery has 42 numbers only. So the grid with 16 numbers would be:

01-----10-----01
----8------32---
02-----20-----02
---17------23---
03-----30-----03
---26------14---
04-----40-----04
---35------05---

I tested the 16 numbers with the past results:
2x6
17x5+bonus
... not a very spectacular result. But having said that, I got better results, using just 15 numbers from the 6/49 grid you posted earlier on! I don't know what to make of this result.

 

[Moses]

Moses, nr 39 is missing in my grid because the Belgian lottery has 42 numbers only. So the grid with 16 numbers would be:

01-----10-----01
----8------32---
02-----20-----02
---17------23---
03-----30-----03
---26------14---
04-----40-----04
---35------05---

I tested the 16 numbers with the past results:
2x6
17x5+bonus
... not a very spectacular result. But having said that, I got better results, using just 15 numbers from the 6/49 grid you posted earlier on! I don't know what to make of this result.

Hi GameBelgium

I am sorry to say that I have no knowledge about lottery 642 or indeed any lottery with even numbers! I cannot adapt my programs to do the search either but like I say you can use different method or your own grid made up to your standards!
The purpose of creating these kind of grids is to have specific field to compare it to the actual draw! Random numbers have no field and cannot be used as guideline!

Here what I was doing earlier

I decided to test run the 92 sets against UK lotto (main draw)
Below is the lotto latest draw;
14/03/2009,09,16,25,29,31,37,24

Line 05 matches 3 numbers to this draw
05 = 36 25 37 20 43 34 31

I wheel searched line 5 against lotto history of draws and I found five match 4s to line 05;
25/10/2008, 38,31,01 ,43, 20,46,36
16/08/2006, 16,04,25 ,20, 31,08,43
11/10/2003, 03,11,06 ,20, 34,43,36
06/02/2002, 13,36,02 ,20, 40,37,34
25/05/1996, 08,26,42 ,20, 34,43,25

Above are in drawn order and notice number 20 in the centre! None of these matches that I found take match 3 to the actual lotto draw but we have a brand new draw introduced last week and here is the draw 5 of it
16/03/2009, 04,06,20,21,36,37,48 (sorted order, drawn order not available)
Three numbers 20,36,37 matches to 06/02/2002!
You can find the information for the new draw from eurotelemillions.com

I think, it would be wise to suggest that we can use these 92 lines as samples for 1000s of draws to find out the relations between the draws and also which draw equals to which!
As an example line 05 of 92 took match 4 to five draws, 0080,0639,0814,1110,1340, now what we have to find is which other lines of 92 will take the same matches as line 05!
This is one way of finding the relation of one draw to another or perhaps which of the lines will find the adjacent etc!

Moses

 

[Flexalong]

Hey Flexy

How many times you say the same thing? You started to boar mmmmeeeezzzzzzzzzzzz!
You’re just humiliating yourself and prove how keen you are to get info from me!
This will be the last reply to you

Moses

How many times? Ermmm....as many times as you have evaded your own claims of being "The Man Who Cracked The Lottery"? Btw it's Bore not Boar!

And look whose talking about being humiliated....OH it's the guy who got his own claims shafted back down his throat. Oh btw the moment you got all worked up and ran off your mouth on what YOU CAN'T PROVE, I lost all keenness!

And last reply to me you say? We shall see....

1. "Based on several tests I proved that my theory will work for every single draw guaranteeing the 5 plus win if not jackpot" Lie!

2. "I am holding the UK records for the number of times that I won (over 10,000 time) including 18 times 5 numbers but they deny me the jackpot" Big Fat Lie!!

3. "I have been on UK front pages of news paper as "the man who cracked the lottrey" Outrageous Lie!!!

 

[Moses]

Hi Moses

Will you please give an example, I tried but it does not work out you have describe:"In most cases the chains are 4 to 3 or 3 to 4, you can well tell that the lottery numbers are produced from two different halves"

BlouBul

Hello bloubul

I have thread about National Lottery on lottopost.co.uk
I explained about the drawn order numbers which are based on tree routes with some samples!
I sent the exact information to lottery commission and Camelot removed all the drawn order from their website!
The point from drawn order is that, it makes the prediction far too easy for those who play the larger sums or syndicate!

Hope this helps!

Moses

 

[turtle0747]

Hello GameB

Moses, nr 39 is missing in my grid because the Belgian lottery has 42 numbers only. So the grid with 16 numbers would be:

01-----10-----01
----8------32---
02-----20-----02
---17------23---
03-----30-----03
---26------14---
04-----40-----04
---35------05---

I tested the 16 numbers with the past results:
2x6
17x5+bonus
... not a very spectacular result. But having said that, I got better results, using just 15 numbers from the 6/49 grid you posted earlier on! I don't know what to make of this result.

Hello GameB

I have been following Moses on this. I am trying to figure how you did your grid. I see where the 1 10 8 came from. How are you coming up with 1 32 2 23 on the right-hand side???

 

[GillesD]

Juste simple questions

...
Right now I am doing some experiment with 92 sets as follows

01 = 07 13 38 17 29 30 44 = 7 match 4s found in UK lotto
02 = 47 08 33 41 14 23 28 = 1 match 5 + 7 match 4s in lotto
03 = 37 13 05 32 26 06 08 = 3 match 4s
04 = 22 23 33 34 39 42 16 = 7 match 4s
05 = 36 25 37 20 43 34 31 = 5 match 4s
06 = 30 19 20 28 33 34 08 = 7 match 4s
07 = 04 25 06 01 16 10 47 = 7 match 4s
...
Moses

I have a few questions for you, before I put more comments in this thread.

A - Since English is not my first language, do I understand well your post when I say that:
- with set #1, you got 7 times 4 winning numbers
- with set #2, you got 7 times 4 winning numbers and once 5 winning numbers
- with set #3, you got 3 times 4 winning numbers
- with set #4, you got 7 times 4 winning numbers
- with set #5, you got 5 times 4 winning numbers
- with set #6, you got 7 times 4 winning numbers
- with set #6, you got 7 times 4 winning numbers

B - Am I right in assuming you got this based on the results for UK 6/49 lottery (currently with 1381 draws)?

C -Your best result listed is with set #02 ( 47 08 33 41 14 23 28) with once 5 winning numbers. When I go back up to post #557 in this thread, I find that the numbers for set #02 are listed as 47 08 33 41 24 23 28. Where is the error? Is it 14 or 24 as the fifth number? And what I find even more odd, is that when I test with the set #2 posted initially, there is no longer a 5 winning numbers.

Before I continue, could you just answer these 3 questions with straight answers like:
Yes, you are right, GillesD, in all cases
or
Yes, you are right for question A, - No, you are wrong on question B as I used the first 1379 draws, - No, GillesD you misread the initial post, it was indeed a 14, not a 24.
or any simple answer to the questions without making any accusations on my motive or unrelated remarks.

Thanks

 

[Moses]

I have a few questions for you, before I put more comments in this thread.

A - Since English is not my first language, do I understand well your post when I say that:
- with set #1, you got 7 times 4 winning numbers
- with set #2, you got 7 times 4 winning numbers and once 5 winning numbers
- with set #3, you got 3 times 4 winning numbers
- with set #4, you got 7 times 4 winning numbers
- with set #5, you got 5 times 4 winning numbers
- with set #6, you got 7 times 4 winning numbers
- with set #6, you got 7 times 4 winning numbers

B - Am I right in assuming you got this based on the results for UK 6/49 lottery (currently with 1381 draws)?

C -Your best result listed is with set #02 ( 47 08 33 41 14 23 28) with once 5 winning numbers. When I go back up to post #557 in this thread, I find that the numbers for set #02 are listed as 47 08 33 41 24 23 28. Where is the error? Is it 14 or 24 as the fifth number? And what I find even more odd, is that when I test with the set #2 posted initially, there is no longer a 5 winning numbers.

Before I continue, could you just answer these 3 questions with straight answers like:
Yes, you are right, GillesD, in all cases
or
Yes, you are right for question A, - No, you are wrong on question B as I used the first 1379 draws, - No, GillesD you misread the initial post, it was indeed a 14, not a 24.
or any simple answer to the questions without making any accusations on my motive or unrelated remarks.

Thanks

Gilles Drummer
You know, off line people call you drummer?

I don't read your post as I know there is either spelling error or some kind of numerical error then you want to discredit me! You have been doing this for past 10 years and didn't succeed!
When I ask you question, you'll go in hiding and when everything is forgotten you'll come back to ask question! You are pulling a hair from tons of rubble
Show or point me to one constructive lottery scenario created by you ever!

I am still waiting for your answer, page 54

Moses

I have been asking this question for sometime but no-one ever answered my question in mathematical terms! I am not interested why is never happened as I know the lottery system is corrupt but what I am looking for is how we can calculate or workout the actual breakdown or possibility, can you understand this and can you help?
And anyways Gilles, how long is Canadian lottery going for and this situation just happened in Nov 2008? I think they must got my hint at last or somebody went and told them to do something about it!
Possible = Likely, can you tell me the difference please? The way I see it if there is a possibility then there is certainty to happen besides in your good example you compared 6 from 6 and 5+ from 6 again! We don’t have 5+/6 and it should be 5 from 7 (power ball, Bonus ball) and it just happened to ZERO with no payments to payout, what a clever move and now you can brag about it too!
What if this was happened in different prize category 3 and 4 or 3 and 5? The person get 5 numbers right will receive much lesser payment and that would have cause some war, wouldn’t it?
This is what is all about the organisers pocketing money due to people negligence!
What will you do Gilles D if you had 5 numbers right and get $10 and you next door neighbour get 3 numbers and wins more than you? Don’t say it is possible BUT unlikely plllllllllllllllllllllllease!

 

[turtle0747]

Waiting for Answer

Hello GameB

I have been following Moses on this. I am trying to figure how you did your grid. I see where the 1 10 8 came from. How are you coming up with 1 32 2 23 on the right-hand side???

Can you people stop arguing and answer some questions?? Maybe we can get somewhere with a win??

 

[Moses]

Can you people stop arguing and answer some questions?? Maybe we can get somewhere with a win??

Bravo turtle0747