Bankers update
This post is the follow up to the little experiment we did in other forum with Jimmy!
For those whom were following that thread and to refresh your memory the actual theory was related to my letter to Lot Com explaining that there is database in place called “Bankers” which all the results for all lotteries are selected from this banker!
This was the result of my discovery that if I find all match 3s for current draw (7 numbers including BB) then one of those lines will have match 3 to future draw and also will have one match 3 for the draw after plus one link number! This would be like a cycle of three numbers from one draw and three numbers from the following draw which has joined by the link number! This cycling system will guarantee that there is not going to be repeated 6 numbers generated in future draws and also as the results grow then lottery database become self sufficient and independent which can operate without using bankers anymore as well as providing opportunity for the operator by make the wider range of choices to select their numbers from!
What Jimmy did was, he created a program which was linking the match 3s from one result to the next chain of the match 3s and combining the two halves and then joining them by a possible common link between the two sets of results! The predicted results were in 1000s and still unable to predict match 6 for the future draw!
Where did we go wrong?
What Jimmy and I did was to produce BULK predictions using all possible match 3s found without using any filtering system, at that point we had no idea how to implement the filtering system! But what if we were implemented the following facts to that Jimmy’s program as filtering system?
The future or new draw has zero repeated numbers to current draw
The future or new draw has one repeated numbers to current draw
The future or new draw has two repeated numbers to current draw
The future or new draw has three repeated numbers to current draw (unlikely)
The future or new draw has four repeated numbers to current draw (very unlikely)
Ever since I came up with this theory the pattern of information which has been existed for years died off almost immediately and I could not find or see match 3s inside the found results for the previous draw anymore but I could only find just few match 2s which at the time I thought my theory is gone down under again and I have reached the dead-end but after some study I can say it is still possible to generate the future draw for the jackpot numbers using the same technique but this time add some facts to the program as filtering system!
xx xx xx Draw 1
------------ Link
------------------ yy yy yy Draw 2
-------------Link
zz zz zz Draw 3
Above cycles provides enough information which can agree with all previous studies and theories that I had in past such as;
• The link number from the old draw to new however that the link number could be invisible (invisible link can be obtained from the first category above)
• The link between the first, centre and the last numbers (ball)
• The patterns for the reverse numbers
• The link between the different lotteries and so much more that we can find out in due course as we provide examples.
Invisible Links
If you obtain the last two UK lotto results from lottery website then you have this
10/08/2011, 02,04,07,27,43,44,45 --- Wed draw
06/08/2011, 01,14,18,24,26,28,19 --- Sat draw
As you can see there is not any connection or link numbers between the two draws (Sat to Wed) but if you take a look at the lotto daily draw we have this following
09/08/2011, 04,11,22,27,33,44,35 --- Tues draw
There are three numbers (04,27,44) which links the Tues draw to Wed draw where nobody’s is thinking the daily draw results are relevant to lotto results!
The other invisible link is; if we extract all match 3s for the current draw and all match 3s for the previous draw then between the two different files of match 3s there are good few invisible links!
For example Sat draw has 84 match 3s in the history of draws (3 numbers match from the total of 7 numbers, 4 numbers do not match = file A) 13 lines or results have match 2s to Wed draw and no match 3s!!!
We do the same for Wed draw file B. This draw has 97 match 3s in history of draws but only 11 lines or results are matching two numbers to the past Sat draw, two lesser matches from the Sat draw!
You think because we do the vice-versa match 3 finding so the results for both draw should be identical but it is not!
Now, we have three numbers already matched to the result in both files A+B and 4 numbers per line did not match, if you slide both files against each other then you will see there are number of matches that you can find which separates each categories above!
This means there is a forth link which is not in the results or the two draws that we are searching for but they are in the actual matches 3s that we found so I call them invisible links!
There is more to tell you but I would rather wait to get some feedback first, any comments are welcomed!
I wonder if Jimmy is on this forum too and still interested to participate by upgrading the program or anybody else here!
P.S. as for the database, I could not use your formula so if anybody wants the half finished database to finish it up but must put it back on this forum then let me know please!
Moses
HiMoses said:
This post is the follow up to the little experiment we did in other forum with Jimmy!
For those whom were following that thread and to refresh your memory the actual theory was related to my letter to Lot Com explaining that there is database in place called “Bankers” which all the results for all lotteries are selected from this banker!
This was the result of my discovery that if I find all match 3s for current draw (7 numbers including BB) then one of those lines will have match 3 to future draw and also will have one match 3 for the draw after plus one link number! This would be like a cycle of three numbers from one draw and three numbers from the following draw which has joined by the link number! This cycling system will guarantee that there is not going to be repeated 6 numbers generated in future draws and also as the results grow then lottery database become self sufficient and independent which can operate without using bankers anymore as well as providing opportunity for the operator by make the wider range of choices to select their numbers from!
What Jimmy did was, he created a program which was linking the match 3s from one result to the next chain of the match 3s and combining the two halves and then joining them by a possible common link between the two sets of results! The predicted results were in 1000s and still unable to predict match 6 for the future draw!
Where did we go wrong?
What Jimmy and I did was to produce BULK predictions using all possible match 3s found without using any filtering system, at that point we had no idea how to implement the filtering system! But what if we were implemented the following facts to that Jimmy’s program as filtering system?
The future or new draw has zero repeated numbers to current draw
The future or new draw has one repeated numbers to current draw
The future or new draw has two repeated numbers to current draw
The future or new draw has three repeated numbers to current draw (unlikely)
The future or new draw has four repeated numbers to current draw (very unlikely)
Ever since I came up with this theory the pattern of information which has been existed for years died off almost immediately and I could not find or see match 3s inside the found results for the previous draw anymore but I could only find just few match 2s which at the time I thought my theory is gone down under again and I have reached the dead-end but after some study I can say it is still possible to generate the future draw for the jackpot numbers using the same technique but this time add some facts to the program as filtering system!
xx xx xx Draw 1
------------ Link
------------------ yy yy yy Draw 2
-------------Link
zz zz zz Draw 3
Above cycles provides enough information which can agree with all previous studies and theories that I had in past such as;
• The link number from the old draw to new however that the link number could be invisible (invisible link can be obtained from the first category above)
• The link between the first, centre and the last numbers (ball)
• The patterns for the reverse numbers
• The link between the different lotteries and so much more that we can find out in due course as we provide examples.
Invisible Links
If you obtain the last two UK lotto results from lottery website then you have this
10/08/2011, 02,04,07,27,43,44,45 --- Wed draw
06/08/2011, 01,14,18,24,26,28,19 --- Sat draw
As you can see there is not any connection or link numbers between the two draws (Sat to Wed) but if you take a look at the lotto daily draw we have this following
09/08/2011, 04,11,22,27,33,44,35 --- Tues draw
There are three numbers (04,27,44) which links the Tues draw to Wed draw where nobody’s is thinking the daily draw results are relevant to lotto results!
The other invisible link is; if we extract all match 3s for the current draw and all match 3s for the previous draw then between the two different files of match 3s there are good few invisible links!
For example Sat draw has 84 match 3s in the history of draws (3 numbers match from the total of 7 numbers, 4 numbers do not match = file A) 13 lines or results have match 2s to Wed draw and no match 3s!!!
We do the same for Wed draw file B. This draw has 97 match 3s in history of draws but only 11 lines or results are matching two numbers to the past Sat draw, two lesser matches from the Sat draw!
You think because we do the vice-versa match 3 finding so the results for both draw should be identical but it is not!
Now, we have three numbers already matched to the result in both files A+B and 4 numbers per line did not match, if you slide both files against each other then you will see there are number of matches that you can find which separates each categories above!
This means there is a forth link which is not in the results or the two draws that we are searching for but they are in the actual matches 3s that we found so I call them invisible links!
There is more to tell you but I would rather wait to get some feedback first, any comments are welcomed!
I wonder if Jimmy is on this forum too and still interested to participate by upgrading the program or anybody else here!
P.S. as for the database, I could not use your formula so if anybody wants the half finished database to finish it up but must put it back on this forum then let me know please!
Moses
