Patrick123
Member
I basically wheeled 15 numbers onto 16 tickets from my selection and ended up getting the 10, 33 and 25, so just a 3/6 for me.
Regards
Patrick
Regards
Patrick
Master Lottery Software
- Thread starter Moses
- Start date
Hi Patrick
Look very carefully at this example. It is based on Ion Saliu's observation that if a number's last two skips are equal to or are less than the median then they have a greater probability of hitting. Here is an example from the South African lottery forecasting Saturday's draw based on the data file up to the previous Wednesday. I increased the parameter to the last 3 draws being equal or less than the median.
{15,25} median 2( skips 0,0,2)
{25,33} median 3 (skips 0,0,2)
{25,39} median 2 (skips 0,0,1)
Each pair hits one of the winning numbers. You have solved 50% of the lottery. It is a bit of a cake walk.
So it is necessary to back test and practice using this technique.
I wonder how random lotteries are? It makes you think, doesn't it?
Look very carefully at this example. It is based on Ion Saliu's observation that if a number's last two skips are equal to or are less than the median then they have a greater probability of hitting. Here is an example from the South African lottery forecasting Saturday's draw based on the data file up to the previous Wednesday. I increased the parameter to the last 3 draws being equal or less than the median.
{15,25} median 2( skips 0,0,2)
{25,33} median 3 (skips 0,0,2)
{25,39} median 2 (skips 0,0,1)
Each pair hits one of the winning numbers. You have solved 50% of the lottery. It is a bit of a cake walk.
So it is necessary to back test and practice using this technique.I wonder how random lotteries are? It makes you think, doesn't it?
Excellence
Member
Hi BP,
Regarding your system based on the pairs and trips frequency, how many draws you think are necessary to analyse in order to obtain the same results in a 6 / 49 lottery?
Hi Patrick,
I have to say again that a frequency column will be a great addition to WinnaLotto.
Hi Springbok,
A greater probability of hitting when? Whitin what range?
Regarding your system based on the pairs and trips frequency, how many draws you think are necessary to analyse in order to obtain the same results in a 6 / 49 lottery?
Hi Patrick,
I have to say again that a frequency column will be a great addition to WinnaLotto.
Hi Springbok,
Springbok said:
A greater probability of hitting when? Whitin what range?
black prince
Member
Hi Excellence
I'm back testing a new and very promising filter. It points to which
group of numbers to play. This filter shows me the strongest group of numbers
to play. I'll say more if my back testing confirms whether it's reliable at least 90% or
more. This could be an important break through.
-BP
I'm back testing a new and very promising filter. It points to which
group of numbers to play. This filter shows me the strongest group of numbers
to play. I'll say more if my back testing confirms whether it's reliable at least 90% or
more. This could be an important break through.
-BP
Hello Excellence
The very next draw. Tomorrow is a Bank Holiday and I will examine this in great detail and see what exactly happens and try and work out precise forecasting techniques. So far random testing is very successful in the 6/49 game but this phenomena must be looked at closely. I will also look at it from the point of view of the layers in the Bright6 and 632 applications. The name of the game here is accuracy for the ext draw.
Excellence said:
The very next draw. Tomorrow is a Bank Holiday and I will examine this in great detail and see what exactly happens and try and work out precise forecasting techniques. So far random testing is very successful in the 6/49 game but this phenomena must be looked at closely. I will also look at it from the point of view of the layers in the Bright6 and 632 applications. The name of the game here is accuracy for the ext draw.
Hello everybody
Are you run out of steam, exhausting all digital avenues and still no joy?
Well, I could have told you at the beginning that digital endings that however mathematically is valid and looks promising but needs a pocketful of cash to play the system and also takes a lot of wheeling, backtracking and comparing to old data which is really not my cup of tea!
What it amazes me is you guys tried all avenues to find a pair or triple, to be perfectly honest I don’t see the need for software’s or major programming to predict a pair especially when the basic information can provide you pair or triple so easily!
Let’s take some of the UK latest results as example
05/04/2008,45,30,07,49,23,41,02
09/04/2008,08,01,06,32,14,17,12
12/04/2008,44,46,49,04,22,17,26
16/04/2008,10,14,38,29,04,31,43
19/04/2008,24,38,19,42,46,05,27
23/04/2008,10,39,23,41,15,34,33
26/04/2008,40,39,16,37,04,01,35
30/04/2008,15,41,35,33,44,31,09
03/05/2008,17,02,42,36,32,15,04
There is almost guaranteed that one number will be a repeat from draw before and one number from the two draws ago so what is a big deal to find a pair? If you run 7 X 7 (latest two draws) you will have a pair but the question is what you’re going to do with the pairs?
I can also tell you this if you split the Sat and Wed draws then you still can find the same information again and if you split the Sat OR Wed draws the same information still appears so you don’t need software to produce predictions and all you need is observations!
This draw below had one number from draw before and 3 numbers from two draws before it and if anybody played the wheel of 7 X 7 would made a healthy profit!
30/04/2008,15,41,35,33,44,31,09
Regards,
Moses
Are you run out of steam, exhausting all digital avenues and still no joy?
Well, I could have told you at the beginning that digital endings that however mathematically is valid and looks promising but needs a pocketful of cash to play the system and also takes a lot of wheeling, backtracking and comparing to old data which is really not my cup of tea!
What it amazes me is you guys tried all avenues to find a pair or triple, to be perfectly honest I don’t see the need for software’s or major programming to predict a pair especially when the basic information can provide you pair or triple so easily!
Let’s take some of the UK latest results as example
05/04/2008,45,30,07,49,23,41,02
09/04/2008,08,01,06,32,14,17,12
12/04/2008,44,46,49,04,22,17,26
16/04/2008,10,14,38,29,04,31,43
19/04/2008,24,38,19,42,46,05,27
23/04/2008,10,39,23,41,15,34,33
26/04/2008,40,39,16,37,04,01,35
30/04/2008,15,41,35,33,44,31,09
03/05/2008,17,02,42,36,32,15,04
There is almost guaranteed that one number will be a repeat from draw before and one number from the two draws ago so what is a big deal to find a pair? If you run 7 X 7 (latest two draws) you will have a pair but the question is what you’re going to do with the pairs?
I can also tell you this if you split the Sat and Wed draws then you still can find the same information again and if you split the Sat OR Wed draws the same information still appears so you don’t need software to produce predictions and all you need is observations!
This draw below had one number from draw before and 3 numbers from two draws before it and if anybody played the wheel of 7 X 7 would made a healthy profit!
30/04/2008,15,41,35,33,44,31,09
Regards,
Moses
black prince
Member
Hi Moses
I believe a new thread should be started for 'WinnaLotto' and the posts
related to 'Winnalotto' be moved over. This thread should be devoted to
'Ending Digits'. Your theories needs daily development, while 'Winnalotto'
should have more development at the same time. There are many stratagies
to forcaste lottery. It may turn out that pairs, trips and ending digits solve
the problem together. 'Ending Digits' takes quite a bit of mathematical
knowledge and not all who visit this thread can stay with it. Chaos, fractical
theory, etc. Even programming it could be a major challenge. Back testing
will require very strong programming skills. I hope the Administrator of this
site could perform this soon. I want to read more about your ideas, but
not mixed with 'Winnalotto'.
-BP
I believe a new thread should be started for 'WinnaLotto' and the posts
related to 'Winnalotto' be moved over. This thread should be devoted to
'Ending Digits'. Your theories needs daily development, while 'Winnalotto'
should have more development at the same time. There are many stratagies
to forcaste lottery. It may turn out that pairs, trips and ending digits solve
the problem together. 'Ending Digits' takes quite a bit of mathematical
knowledge and not all who visit this thread can stay with it. Chaos, fractical
theory, etc. Even programming it could be a major challenge. Back testing
will require very strong programming skills. I hope the Administrator of this
site could perform this soon. I want to read more about your ideas, but
not mixed with 'Winnalotto'.
-BP
black prince said:
Hi BP
I am sorry if I sound pessimistic but to the best of my knowledge there is not a single software out in the market which can guarantee a constant win, such of software simply does not exist and if any win produced from any software is totally based on fluke!
You keep on talking about winnalotto program but let me tell you this, I have exhausted all avenues to predict numbers and have developed all kind of software and none of them could win me any money!
If you want to win then it means you have to come up with more accurate method of predictions with grater knowledge of lottery respectfully!
I am here to tell you about my experiences and give you all the knowledge I have about lottery then it might come useful to some and perhaps realise the only possible way to win is observation and not fancy software!
When winnalotto predict 16/17 numbers and only 4 of them are correct you’re talking about big pool of predictions with a little reward and yet that reward still not guaranteed so I decided to take Springbok advice and produce 25000 set of universal numbers based on 4 different loops! For the last Sat draw I had one match 6 within 25000 set (Bonus Ball Prize) 10 match 5s and 140 match 4s but the info doesn’t finish here there is more to tell and if you’re interested I can post them here for everybody!
Regards,
Moses
black prince
Member
Moses
What I like about discussing lottery on this forum is the flow of ideas. I feel
like a scientist reseacher seeking an answer. Everyone's contributions are
welcomed. My belief, for now, is to win more often keeping at least financially
even until that Jackpot comes along. I also believe, but can't verify yet,
that it will take elements of lottery theory, observation, and intuition of
numbers to be successful. Remember, it only takes winning the Jackpot once
to change your life. Springbok, Patrick123, and others inspire me to keep
searching for new ideas. I want to hear more about your method. It could
become part of the solution to this puzzle.
-BP
What I like about discussing lottery on this forum is the flow of ideas. I feel
like a scientist reseacher seeking an answer. Everyone's contributions are
welcomed. My belief, for now, is to win more often keeping at least financially
even until that Jackpot comes along. I also believe, but can't verify yet,
that it will take elements of lottery theory, observation, and intuition of
numbers to be successful. Remember, it only takes winning the Jackpot once
to change your life. Springbok, Patrick123, and others inspire me to keep
searching for new ideas. I want to hear more about your method. It could
become part of the solution to this puzzle.
-BP
Hi Moses
Software will not deliver you the jackpot a la black box. It can be of considerable help though. For example take Winalotto, if you load an alpha file of 24 pairs and sort Skip1 column you will see before you a shape-giving the lottery some sort of shape helps you to get a grip on it. 3 or 4 pairs with skip values from 0 to 2 will appear next draw. 2 or 3 from skip values 3+ will appear in the next draw. If you could pick the correct 6 pairs and slot them into the six slots in the 6/49 game you will be 64 combinations from the Jackpot. Purging them with Bright6 or 632 will cakewalk you to the Jackpot in two or three combinations. Of course you have to find the correct 6 pairs. If a person was foolish enough to pick all the pairs with skip values 0 to 2 then that person will fall flat on his face. Same with all pairs from skip values 3+. If a person picked one pair from the 0 to 2 sector and 5 pairs from the 3+ sector then that would be foolish and so on. So this simple observation using Winnalotto shows you how to pick and how not to pick pairs. This can be of considerable help. Having Bright 6 or 632 will add a further considerable advantage. If not then I would suggest a prayer to St Jude.
Software will not deliver you the jackpot a la black box. It can be of considerable help though. For example take Winalotto, if you load an alpha file of 24 pairs and sort Skip1 column you will see before you a shape-giving the lottery some sort of shape helps you to get a grip on it. 3 or 4 pairs with skip values from 0 to 2 will appear next draw. 2 or 3 from skip values 3+ will appear in the next draw. If you could pick the correct 6 pairs and slot them into the six slots in the 6/49 game you will be 64 combinations from the Jackpot. Purging them with Bright6 or 632 will cakewalk you to the Jackpot in two or three combinations. Of course you have to find the correct 6 pairs. If a person was foolish enough to pick all the pairs with skip values 0 to 2 then that person will fall flat on his face. Same with all pairs from skip values 3+. If a person picked one pair from the 0 to 2 sector and 5 pairs from the 3+ sector then that would be foolish and so on. So this simple observation using Winnalotto shows you how to pick and how not to pick pairs. This can be of considerable help. Having Bright 6 or 632 will add a further considerable advantage. If not then I would suggest a prayer to St Jude.
Springbok said:
Hello BP and Springbok
I think you're missing my point, in order to find a solution to lotteries you must understand the principal of it and then raise questions and try to find the answers for them like;
Is the lottery really random, if no then is it fragile?
What if someone really cracks the lottery?
Will the organisers keep on giving the jackpot just to the same person?
If no then how can they make a sure of that never happens or preventing this situation?
Is there ever been twice or more jackpot winner anywhere in the world?
If the prize pool was in thousands rather than millions then would lottery still be interesting and worth gambling?
How can the organisers split the earnings and take their profit in advance before the draws and so on?
As you find the answers then you’ll come to the conclusion that there has to be very sophisticated and smart software which thinks for every corner now for us to beat such software blindfolded is very hard but not impossible if you start thinking in the same line as they think!
Just imagine there are 60 million people or more were in one casino do you seriously think the casino can still make profits? I don’t think so then how can lottery take the challenge of the whole nation and still go home dry?
Therefore the big question is how do they avoid millions of players and manage to come up with one or two jackpot winners?
The answer to that is multiple lotteries! By switching one number (usually from the low key number) from one lottery to another they can save or rollover the jackpot and we only check our ticket against the main draw whilst if you check your ticket against all draws then you’ll see one of your lines was a possible jackpot winner and you have all the numbers in one line but in different draw, time after time, mmmh!
Now, based on 4 lotteries that we have in UK I created 4 loops and developed 25116 sets of seven numbers (6279 per loop) and put all in one big circle in 4 quarters!
0 to 6279 in first quarter for lotto 6/49
6280 12558 in second quarter for Thunder 5/34
12559 18837 in third quarter for Euro 7/50
18837 to 25116 in last quarter for Daily in that order 7/27
The results from these sets are unbleivable which I tried to paste them on the forum but due to the size (831709 characters) I could not do it! Any idea how or where I can paste them?
Regards,
Moses
black prince
Member
Moses
Try this website: http://www.box.net/
Free Temporary Internet Storage. We can all access and share your file from this.
-BP
Try this website: http://www.box.net/
Free Temporary Internet Storage. We can all access and share your file from this.
-BP
Patrick123
Member
Hi Moses,
This is definitely one of the features that I'll be adding into the program. I've noticed this trend in the SA lotto as well since you've pointed it out, and is becoming one of the first things I look for.
Regards
Patrick
This is definitely one of the features that I'll be adding into the program. I've noticed this trend in the SA lotto as well since you've pointed it out, and is becoming one of the first things I look for.
Regards
Patrick
Patrick123
Member
Out of interest, digits ending with a 2 or 4 have not come up within the last three draws...
Another point to note relating to digit ends, we've had
a triple double,
a single double,
a single triple,
a triple double, and finally
no double or triples.
So I'm expecting at least one or two doubles to show as well.
Regards
Patrick
Another point to note relating to digit ends, we've had
a triple double,
a single double,
a single triple,
a triple double, and finally
no double or triples.
So I'm expecting at least one or two doubles to show as well.
Regards
Patrick
Patrick123 said:
Hi Patrick an all
Every little information helps or gets us closer, hopefully it will win somebody something!
BTW this is where you can download the 25000 sets
www.lottopost.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?tid=257
www.lottopost.co.uk/forum/attachment.php?aid=27
Once you (anybody/everybody) have got them then let me have your lotto numbers and I'll do the search for you just to see what we can find!
Regards,
Moses
black prince
Member
Moses
Iam playing Powerball 5/55 + PB (1 to 42): When you say let me know your
lotto numbers, do you mean my picks?
-BP
Iam playing Powerball 5/55 + PB (1 to 42): When you say let me know your
lotto numbers, do you mean my picks?
-BP
Patrick123
Member
Moses said:
Hi Moses,
You file is only reflecting 2117 sets, I think the forum trimmed it as it reached the size limit. You might have to compress the file in a zip format.
Regards
Patrick
Patrick123 said:
Hi Patrick
Thanks for that, I'll try again and let you know!
What do you think of the UK latest draws?
07/05/2008,09,12,10,31,16,30,03 --- 1291 Lotto
07/05/2008,13,19,11,29,14,03 ------ 0754 Thunder
07/05/2008,19,13,25,21,08,15,02 --- 1444 Daily
02D,03L,03T,08D,09L,10L,11T,12L,13T,13D,14T,15D,16L,
19T,19D,21D,25D,29T,30L,31L
Two of my lines which should have been jackpot winners but only managed to match 4 numbers and other two numbers appeared in Daily draws!!
Moses