Elimination of 16 numbers out of 49 in a 6/49 Lottery
- Thread starter BushHappy
- Start date
ChiefWiggum
Member
Robert Perkis has a method for eliminating numbers.
It is explained on a web-site.
Perhaps another member can give you the URL.
I cannot remember the URL at the moment.
It is explained on a web-site.
Perhaps another member can give you the URL.
I cannot remember the URL at the moment.
Deleting numbers
Here are some ideas on deleting numbers with reference to the South African 6/49 lottery and any other 6/49 lottery:
1/ Delete numbers from all 5 of the decades, say 2 or 3 per decade randomly.
2/ Look at the first column and the sixth column. In the SA lottery 6 is the median number. Numbers from 1 to 6 have appeared 57% of the time. If those numbers appeared in that column in all of the last 3 draws then statistically none of them will appear in the fourth consecutive draw so you can junk them(bye bye 6 numbers). Check out the sixth column. Numbers 45 is the median. So numbers 45 to 49 have appeared approximately 50% of the time. Again if this has happened in the last 3 consecutive draws then junk them(bye bye 5 numbers). Checking the occurences of these events in the SA draws will bear this out.
3/ There is another way of junking between 10 to 20 numbers, but this is quite involved and I will explain in a few days time.
Here are some ideas on deleting numbers with reference to the South African 6/49 lottery and any other 6/49 lottery:
1/ Delete numbers from all 5 of the decades, say 2 or 3 per decade randomly.
2/ Look at the first column and the sixth column. In the SA lottery 6 is the median number. Numbers from 1 to 6 have appeared 57% of the time. If those numbers appeared in that column in all of the last 3 draws then statistically none of them will appear in the fourth consecutive draw so you can junk them(bye bye 6 numbers). Check out the sixth column. Numbers 45 is the median. So numbers 45 to 49 have appeared approximately 50% of the time. Again if this has happened in the last 3 consecutive draws then junk them(bye bye 5 numbers). Checking the occurences of these events in the SA draws will bear this out.
3/ There is another way of junking between 10 to 20 numbers, but this is quite involved and I will explain in a few days time.
Prediction of numbers to omit for SA Lottery on 18/9/2004
Springbok,
I have tried to develope my own system for predicting the numbers to omit. Here are 14 numbers to omit for tomorrow's draw:
2 6 7 8 9 18 20 23 30 31 36 37 42 46
Lets see how accurate my prediction is.
Can you also sumbit a prediction before tomorrow's draw?
Springbok,
I have tried to develope my own system for predicting the numbers to omit. Here are 14 numbers to omit for tomorrow's draw:
2 6 7 8 9 18 20 23 30 31 36 37 42 46
Lets see how accurate my prediction is.
Can you also sumbit a prediction before tomorrow's draw?
Beaker
Member
http://www.lotto-logix.com/txthouse/winthelottery.htmlChiefWiggum said:
There is a section, approximately in the middle of that article, specifically on number reduction.
The whold thing is worth the read.
Forecast for SA lottery 18 Sept
Here are 22 numbers:
5 6 7 8 9 11 12 14 16 18 21 22 23 25 26 27 29 31 32 35 27 39 40 41 42 43
Now one or two decades will be missing in tonight's draw (unless all 5 decades are present) which is unlikely. Decide which decade(s) will be missing and you will knock out a few more numbers. For heaven's sake don't waste your time wheeling. I don't know what software you are using but if you are using Lotwon632 like I do then create 20 or so d6 files and use the high probablityi filters for Purging.
Best of Luck(and much skill) will aid you. It can be done. The more you beat down the luck component and fill it with skill the better your chances are. The great thing about the UK lottery is it has the same difficulty as the SA lottery but the prize is tens of millions of rands in real money..
Here are 22 numbers:
5 6 7 8 9 11 12 14 16 18 21 22 23 25 26 27 29 31 32 35 27 39 40 41 42 43
Now one or two decades will be missing in tonight's draw (unless all 5 decades are present) which is unlikely. Decide which decade(s) will be missing and you will knock out a few more numbers. For heaven's sake don't waste your time wheeling. I don't know what software you are using but if you are using Lotwon632 like I do then create 20 or so d6 files and use the high probablityi filters for Purging.
Best of Luck(and much skill) will aid you. It can be done. The more you beat down the luck component and fill it with skill the better your chances are. The great thing about the UK lottery is it has the same difficulty as the SA lottery but the prize is tens of millions of rands in real money..
Pedictions for Sat 18/9/4
Springbok,
Very good. Only 1 out of your 22 numbers came up - namely 29.
Is the method you used the one you are going to explain in a few days time?
My method was 100% accurate, but then I only predicted 14 numbers that would not appear. My method is long and time consuming, it will be difficult to explain. It uses very strict and conservative rules, which explains why I only managed to predict 14 numbers.
If you added our two methods together, then only 1 out of 28 numbers - namely 29 appeared.
Springbok,
Very good. Only 1 out of your 22 numbers came up - namely 29.
Is the method you used the one you are going to explain in a few days time?
My method was 100% accurate, but then I only predicted 14 numbers that would not appear. My method is long and time consuming, it will be difficult to explain. It uses very strict and conservative rules, which explains why I only managed to predict 14 numbers.
If you added our two methods together, then only 1 out of 28 numbers - namely 29 appeared.
Question
Hi,
I've been using lotwon on the UK649 for some time with variable results, and I'm curious about the best method of number elimination, and whether you use a wheel to place your bets? I have a few other questions re st files, but maybe we could talk on the International forum?
Barge
Hi,
I've been using lotwon on the UK649 for some time with variable results, and I'm curious about the best method of number elimination, and whether you use a wheel to place your bets? I have a few other questions re st files, but maybe we could talk on the International forum?
Barge
bloubul,
I also support the Blue Bulls and live in Pretoria. I run a syndicate and am always looking for ways to improve the Win/Cost Ratio.
My method of number elimination is still working. The incorrect prediction rate is about 1 in 10. It has been as good as 0 in 14.
I looked at Springbok's method and agree that it does not always work. Maybe his other method will work better.
I think his ideas are good and am busy working on called the "Springbok Number Eliminator"
I also support the Blue Bulls and live in Pretoria. I run a syndicate and am always looking for ways to improve the Win/Cost Ratio.
My method of number elimination is still working. The incorrect prediction rate is about 1 in 10. It has been as good as 0 in 14.
I looked at Springbok's method and agree that it does not always work. Maybe his other method will work better.
I think his ideas are good and am busy working on called the "Springbok Number Eliminator"
Eliminating numbers
I think it would be more accurate to say eliminating zones. Here is a diagram of the 6/49 lottery.
1. xxxxx
xxxx
2. xxxxx
xxxxx
3. xxxxxx
xxxxx
4. xxxxx
xxxxx
5. xxxxx
xxxxx
The numbers at the side represent the decades. 1 is 1 - 9
2 is 10 - 19
3 is 20 - 29 and so on
Each decade is split into 2 halves(except for 1)
I have left the numbers out as we are interested in zones. Each decade has 3 zones. A is the first half and B is the second half. C represents the whole zone. Every lottery draw can be analysed according to these zones.Here is a recent UK 6/49 draw:
*** 6 11 12 19 37 44 ***
Analysis will result in the following formation: B C B A .
6 is represented by the B as it is in the second half of the first decade . 11 12 19 is represented by C as it covers both the zones in that decade. 37 is B being in the second half and 44 is A being in the first half. What is interesting is that if you played the next draw and your numbers matched the B C B A formation then you are wasting your time and money. Patterns do not repeat any time soon. The draws can be classified accoding to how many decades which are missed out. You have to become a decade specialist and only play according to that decade specialism. 4 decade scenarios are the most prevelant or you could be more patient and be a 3 decade specialist. In the 4 decade scenario there are 6 possible sub-scenarios according to which decade that does not appear. Now if you decide to be a 4 decade specialist then record the pattern of the last 100 draws according to the lettered formations and see how long it takes for a pattern to repeat. Try and work out the pattern for the next draw. analysis will tell you which patterns will not appear. At a later stage I willl explain ideas that could help ichoosing zones especially in the first and last letters.Experiment and let me know what you think of this.
I think it would be more accurate to say eliminating zones. Here is a diagram of the 6/49 lottery.
1. xxxxx
xxxx
2. xxxxx
xxxxx
3. xxxxxx
xxxxx
4. xxxxx
xxxxx
5. xxxxx
xxxxx
The numbers at the side represent the decades. 1 is 1 - 9
2 is 10 - 19
3 is 20 - 29 and so on
Each decade is split into 2 halves(except for 1)
I have left the numbers out as we are interested in zones. Each decade has 3 zones. A is the first half and B is the second half. C represents the whole zone. Every lottery draw can be analysed according to these zones.Here is a recent UK 6/49 draw:
*** 6 11 12 19 37 44 ***
Analysis will result in the following formation: B C B A .
6 is represented by the B as it is in the second half of the first decade . 11 12 19 is represented by C as it covers both the zones in that decade. 37 is B being in the second half and 44 is A being in the first half. What is interesting is that if you played the next draw and your numbers matched the B C B A formation then you are wasting your time and money. Patterns do not repeat any time soon. The draws can be classified accoding to how many decades which are missed out. You have to become a decade specialist and only play according to that decade specialism. 4 decade scenarios are the most prevelant or you could be more patient and be a 3 decade specialist. In the 4 decade scenario there are 6 possible sub-scenarios according to which decade that does not appear. Now if you decide to be a 4 decade specialist then record the pattern of the last 100 draws according to the lettered formations and see how long it takes for a pattern to repeat. Try and work out the pattern for the next draw. analysis will tell you which patterns will not appear. At a later stage I willl explain ideas that could help ichoosing zones especially in the first and last letters.Experiment and let me know what you think of this.
BushHappy number eliniation method
Andrew (winhunter),
I will attempt to do as you ask. This may take a while as I will have to translate my method, which is sketched on various pieces of paper into words. If you automate the method, will the program be available to me?
Cheers,
BushHappy
Andrew (winhunter),
I will attempt to do as you ask. This may take a while as I will have to translate my method, which is sketched on various pieces of paper into words. If you automate the method, will the program be available to me?
Cheers,
BushHappy
BushHappy number eliniation method
Andrew (winhunter),
I have started on this task and already, it is about 5 pages of Excel. When I have finished it I would like to send the Excel file to you as it has additional information, tables and formulas. I will only be able to post the description here in many parts as each message is limited to 10000 characters. Should I post in this same thread or start a new thread as Iam sure it will initiate lots of discussion? If so which thread should I post it in?
LT,
Please can you tell me if there is a way of sending this Excel file to Andrew or can I somehow post it on your web page?
Cheers,
BushHappy
Andrew (winhunter),
I have started on this task and already, it is about 5 pages of Excel. When I have finished it I would like to send the Excel file to you as it has additional information, tables and formulas. I will only be able to post the description here in many parts as each message is limited to 10000 characters. Should I post in this same thread or start a new thread as Iam sure it will initiate lots of discussion? If so which thread should I post it in?
LT,
Please can you tell me if there is a way of sending this Excel file to Andrew or can I somehow post it on your web page?
Cheers,
BushHappy
Perkis & your Number elimination systems
Dear All,
I don't think there is a specific "formula" to quickly eliminate 10, 12 or 16 digits out of a 49 number game. Its not that simple. I've employed Perkis's suggestion--which actually peertained to the Florida 6/53 game(that effectively removed 11 digits and turned it into a 6/42 game)-- but it doesn't work well with my Canadian lotto system. Oftentime, one of the numbers in the following draw appeared in the batch of numbers that I just eliminated with Perkis's formula.
Basically, it looks like one may have to source one's own numbers because each lotto game has different biases. The only system that reduces the odds in a significant way is the Lottery Director Filtering system. By the Way, has anyone had any CONSISTENT success with Gail Howard's methods of eliminating numbers from draws? Personally, I tend to avoid Cold Numbers which haven't appeared in the last say 16 draws but I also try to not to play numbers which have just appeared in the previous draw. Someone on the Internet has noted that there is only a 45% chance of a repeat appearance of even one of these numbers in the next draw.
What are your number elimination systems, ladies & gentlemen? And do they work for you on a consistent basis--ie give you better than 50-50 odds at a win? Have you had much luck with Ms. Howard's number elimination systems? I have 'browsed' through the Internet and have seen some posters claim that the her prediction results aren't that impressive. Regards.
Dear All,
I don't think there is a specific "formula" to quickly eliminate 10, 12 or 16 digits out of a 49 number game. Its not that simple. I've employed Perkis's suggestion--which actually peertained to the Florida 6/53 game(that effectively removed 11 digits and turned it into a 6/42 game)-- but it doesn't work well with my Canadian lotto system. Oftentime, one of the numbers in the following draw appeared in the batch of numbers that I just eliminated with Perkis's formula.
Basically, it looks like one may have to source one's own numbers because each lotto game has different biases. The only system that reduces the odds in a significant way is the Lottery Director Filtering system. By the Way, has anyone had any CONSISTENT success with Gail Howard's methods of eliminating numbers from draws? Personally, I tend to avoid Cold Numbers which haven't appeared in the last say 16 draws but I also try to not to play numbers which have just appeared in the previous draw. Someone on the Internet has noted that there is only a 45% chance of a repeat appearance of even one of these numbers in the next draw.
What are your number elimination systems, ladies & gentlemen? And do they work for you on a consistent basis--ie give you better than 50-50 odds at a win? Have you had much luck with Ms. Howard's number elimination systems? I have 'browsed' through the Internet and have seen some posters claim that the her prediction results aren't that impressive. Regards.