Discussion Sept 17

[Nick Koutras]

Using the 49/6 history of the last 25 draws
I've noticed that the pairs below (2-tuplets)
are lagging in comparison with the Normal Distribution
of the 2-tuplets.

I strongly believe that on the upcoming 1-3 draws some of
these pairs will show up.

If you have some indication as of one of your LD's or
DN's, you can pick up the proper pairs.

There are 39 pairs that they lag in "at least" 6 pairs!

This is a new improved function on then N-tuplets function
to display the hits of N-tuplets for n Last Draws.

0103
0119
0149
0208
0440
0446
0534
0543
0620
0631
0644
0721
0736
0747
0917
0928
1039
1129
1340
1427
1449
1632
1638
1847
1920
2036
2632
2635
2841
2942
2946
3040
3143
3235
3244
3839
4143
4449
4649

 

[Nick Koutras]

Don't ignore that hit pattern of 16 and 36, if ya look at the hit sequence there seems to be some kinda order there forming in the mass chaos of a random event. Order in disorder, harmony in disharmony, or it may just be coincidence.

Can you be more specific as of what
you see in that pattern?

Using the Total history for 49/6
1636 have appeared together 26 times
and that falls in the middle of the distribution.

16 & 05 = 7 times 36 & 13 =17 times
16 & 31 = 36 times 36 & 39 =39 times


What is the history Duration you use?

 

[Beaker]

Can you be more specific as of what
you see in that pattern?

Using the Total history for 49/6
1636 have appeared together 26 times
and that falls in the middle of the distribution.

16 & 05 = 7 times 36 & 13 =17 times
16 & 31 = 36 times 36 & 39 =39 times


What is the history Duration you use?

I believe the pattern he is talking about is hit/skip

That 16 has skipped 3 draws then hit for the past 3 times - it is due. Also, the 36 has skipped 7 for the past 3 - it also is due.
This is recent history for both those numbers and is a good trend to watch.

I agree with Godload - one or both could be there for this one. They fit with the hot LD 6

 

[peter]

Great numbers Beaker!

 

[Beaker]

Great numbers Beaker!

Thanks - I took your best ones

 

[Godload]

Beaker is correct I am referring to the hit/sequence. I am not saying both will show but the trend looks nice, especially for 16. I wasn't saying absolutely play them but they should be considered because of the trend.

 

[Nick Koutras]

I believe the pattern he is talking about is hit/skip

That 16 has skipped 3 draws then hit for the past 3 times - it is due. Also, the 36 has skipped 7 for the past 3 - it also is due.
This is recent history for both those numbers and is a good trend to watch.

I agree with Godload - one or both could be there for this one. They fit with the hot LD 6

Thanks Beaker.

Both numbers had a Peak of success
but they Slowed Down again.

This looks like a good idea
for a procedure, to identify
what such a pattern does.

 

[Nick Koutras]

Beaker is correct I am referring to the hit/sequence. I am not saying both will show but the trend looks nice, especially for 16. I wasn't saying absolutely play them but they should be considered because of the trend.

Thanks,

I understand your point.
Our claims are always hypothetical.
The idea is to be able to arrive to some
conclusions through hypotheses..

Thanks again.

 

[Pradeep]

Pradeep Is mad but some times he speaks truth.

This is want pradeep said Last time
__________________________________
Peter thinks of number 13.
Last time he was right. If he predicts 13 then 13 comes.