Discussion Sept 17

Maggie

Member
I like those ones too, Beaker. Decisions, decisions..:dizzy:
This draw is starting to prove to be a little tricky.
 
Beaker said:
Maggie, you mentioned low ones earlier.

The best candidates are 2-3-6-9
;)

Hi Beaker,


Can you elaborate your procedure
to arrive to that conclusion?

It looks like a very good candidate
for a procedure in LottoStatisticsXL.
 

Beaker

Member
Nick Koutras said:
Hi Beaker,


Can you elaborate your procedure
to arrive to that conclusion?

It looks like a very good candidate
for a procedure in LottoStatisticsXL.
Sorry Nick, not really much of a procedure for these. I believe you have something for the announcer data already :agree:. this is where I am getting the 2-3 from. The 6 is hot and I don't think it is finished yet. Finally, that 9 looks like it's ready to drop again. :agree2:

Pretty hard to code "gut" feel into software - not very objective :notme:
 

Beaker

Member
Brad said:
Well, if they can program Artificial Intellingence, why not Artificial Gut Feeling ... AGF :confused: ;)
Boy if we could, we'd be rich :lol: Aren't they a mutual fund company :eek: :eek:

You really need to train that 6th sense to win here.

There must be a way.....


:read:
 
Beaker said:
Boy if we could, we'd be rich :lol: Aren't they a mutual fund company :eek: :eek:

You really need to train that 6th sense to win here.

There must be a way.....


:read:

I'll give you a good procedure to identify
some very good numbers by using LottoStatisticsXL

1. Make a list of the numbers you belive
that they will *not* hit.
Min 6 such numbers.
If you have more than 10 then the guarantee is
increasing exponentially.
2. Use the What Comes... procedure
with the following settings.
-1 0 1 set to 0 = what comes with
Hits set to '00 = we assume that none of these numbers will hit
Group..Enter your numbers here using 2 digits per number.
The other setting can be the default settings.

3. From the displayed distribution select
a. the tails ie: 1-2 more frequent
b. the 1-2 less frequent

I used the same procedure for my best group of numbers post above.
I assumed (actually LottoAnnouncersXL indicated that
these numbers will not hit ==> '11371339152806481402032335
 

Beaker

Member
Nova001 said:
My first playing numbers:

2 - 4 - 9 - 13 - 23 - 26 - 27 - 35 -38 - 41 - 44 - 46
Nova001, this is a fantastic set :agree2:

You're going to hit something here :agree2:

Welcome and keep posting :agree:
 
I knd of like the 4 and 8 LD's also... As far as the 6's and 7's, hard to get a read as to how long they can stay hot, just that I noticed more of these numbers starting to cool off...only time will tell the tale.

I do think the Hot/Warm numbers are primed for a big hit... at least five if not 6... alternately, only one and two at the most of numbers from further back from their last appearance.

I do think there could be one or two from this group of 6.7 LD's this draw: 26,27,46,47.
 

Beaker

Member
The Weatherman said:
I see less percipitation in the 8-14 and 43-49 zones in the next ten draws or so... in other words, blanking more often.
These areas have been hot of late no doubt. I'm going to play afew from here until I get a clear indication they are done.

These things have a habit of hitting over and over.

One number I see is that 30 . If that one comes it will be outta the blue :eek:
 

Geenie

Member
30 is on my list as well! It follows 43 consistently as well.

The ones are showing more for this draw like 2, 4 and 9.

I'm assuming either a 2/4 or 3/3 split for Low/High
Not many overdue numbers left!
 
Last edited:

Florie

Member
25 is showing as a could be possible repeater.

Thinking of 10, 17 also


So many numbers to choose from, not enough time to study them. Going :nuts: Quick pick, maybe. Okay, :uzi: me.
 

Beaker

Member
Florie said:
25 is showing as a could be possible repeater.

Thinking of 10, 17 also


So many numbers to choose from, not enough time to study them. Going :nuts: Quick pick, maybe. Okay, :uzi: me.
:smash: <---- Beaker
:spiny: <--- Florie

You are too good a player to swing to the dark side ;)
 

Godload

Member
Don't ignore that hit pattern of 16 and 36, if ya look at the hit sequence there seems to be some kinda order there forming in the mass chaos of a random event. Order in disorder, harmony in disharmony, or it may just be coincidence. :sad:
 
The Weatherman said:
I see less percipitation in the 8-14 and 43-49 zones in the next ten draws or so... in other words, blanking more often.

What you are saying is that from
0809101112131443444546474849 you expect no numbers.

If your assumption is correct then the following
usually happen:



What Comes WITH... 0809101112131443444546474849 having... 0-0 Hits There are: 240 Cases
Results Freq Sz NBs...
1__________________1___________ 55 1 31
11_______________1_________1___ 54 1 18
______1___________1__________1_ 52 1 34
______________11_______1_______ 51 1 36
_2___1__1____11___1___1_1__1___ 49 3 193342
______________________1________ 48 1 32
___________1_____11__1__1_1____ 47 1 06
____1___1___11_11___1___11_____ 45 2 0735
__1_____1__________1_1_2_1_1___ 43 2 1620
_1_111______1______11__1_11__1_ 42 3 242938
____1__1__1_111_11__________1_1 40 2 2141
___1_____21____1___111____1___1 39 2 0537
11112_31________1__1111_1_1_11_ 38 5 0322273940
__________1__1__1_1________1__1 37 1 26
1_1__1____________1______1___1_ 36 2 0123
______1_11_____________________ 35 1 25
__1__1____111_1__1_1_1_________ 34 2 0430
_______________1________1______ 33 2 0228
_______1__1____1______1____1_1_ 30 1 15
__1___________________1________ 28 1 17


So the conclusion shall be for your case:

31 18 34 36 are the most likely numbers to show up and
possibly 17,15,2,28.

You shall expect minimum 2 from these if your assumption is correct!

You can use LottoStatisticsXL to do such Hypotheses and
arrive to some meaningful conclusions.
 

Sidebar

Top