# Discussion June 28/6-49

#### Dennis Bassboss

##### Member
And when I was very little boy my tallest brother who was 49 always took me by the hand to cross the streets....

#### Beaker

##### Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
All the serious player should be playing the 01 as DN in the very next draw...
I like the look of that 1 also.

I may play a few from that trio - 1-3-8

#### peter

##### Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
And when I was very little boy my tallest brother who was 49 always took me by the hand to cross the streets....
and get a sausage from the sausage vendor, thats why I'm hooked on those weenies....

#### peter

##### Member
I just love those Dennis stories.

#### peter

##### Member
Back to lotto the bonus numbers from 2023,2024,& 2025 were all in last nights numbers,14,47,10.

#### peter

##### Member
Here is the positional chart, where the numbers are after last nights draw from oldest to newest.
Pos 1...2,4,5,6,18,17,3,7,1,12,10.=11 numbers.
Pos 2...13,16,19,20,9,8,11,22,14.=09 numbers.
Pos 3...28,23,24,21,29,25,15. = 07 numbers.
Pos 4...35,26,33,37,30,34,27. = 07 numbers.
Pos 5...38,31,46,42,39,41. =06 numbers.
Pos 6...48,45,49,44,40,47. =06 numbers.
Pos 7...43,32,36. = 3 numbers.
These 49 numbers are open, and come from 15 open draws, the lowest open draws, I have seen for some time.
Draws,1999,2012,2013,2014,2016,2017,2019,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27.

#### peter

##### Member
So looking at the above chart, my insight would say 3 numbers from Pos. 1 and none from Pos 7.

#### peter

##### Member
If I eliminate 1 number from Pos.1 and use that line as my picks, should 3 numbers come from here, that should qualify me as poster of the week.

#### Beaker

##### Member
Peter, I think we need to be very careful about that 43

I still see LD 1 and LD 0 here. and that 47 is DN for me with 46. Also, watch that 25 - could surprise and that would not be a coincidence for me

peter said:
Here is the positional chart, where the numbers are after last nights draw from oldest to newest.
Pos 1...2,4,5,6,18,17,3,7,1,12,10.=11 numbers.
Pos 2...13,16,19,20,9,8,11,22,14.=09 numbers.
Pos 3...28,23,24,21,29,25,15. = 07 numbers.
Pos 4...35,26,33,37,30,34,27. = 07 numbers.
Pos 5...38,31,46,42,39,41. =06 numbers.
Pos 6...48,45,49,44,40,47. =06 numbers.
Pos 7...43,32,36. = 3 numbers.
<sniped>
[

#### peter

##### Member
Beaker, I know you like that number, but with only 3 open numbers in the 7th position, I just can't pick one of them, It will be neat to come back after the draw and quote one of these posts.

#### peter

##### Member
That 14/15 consecutive is the loweset of all consecutives coming only 23 times previous, last in 1981.The 14/15 has NEVER, come in a draw that ends in SEVEN, this is a first!

#### Beaker

##### Member
peter said:
Beaker, I know you like that number, but with only 3 open numbers in the 7th position, I just can't pick one of them, It will be neat to come back after the draw and quote one of these posts.
I know how good your positional announcers are.

I like that number for this one but seeing it there me.

With double announcers it hasn't hit in 10 draws but it is one of top 10 overall - also low (1 hit) for 21 draws.

I have to more but I know you won't be surprised to see it in my final list

#### peter

##### Member
No, can't say that I would be surprised, my case is a bit different, I only have 8 numbers, I can't afford to be wrong on to many, but you have some fudge room allowing yourself to have a few incorrect ones.

#### peter

##### Member
Best consecutive for draws that end in EIGHT
32/33=8 times.
34/35=8 times.
Worst=24/25 = 0 times.

#### Beaker

##### Member
peter said:
No, can't say that I would be surprised, my case is a bit different, I only have 8 numbers, I can't afford to be wrong on to many, but you have some fudge room allowing yourself to have a few incorrect ones.
True enough - you have to be ruthless with your choices - I can afford one or two misses

I'll give you ruthless - 46-47

#### Beaker

##### Member
Peter, looking at your decade signature 1936 is the same as the last one.

1937-1938 is where this draw is headed without the 10's

In fact 1925-1928 has some clues

#### peter

##### Member
Beaker said:
True enough - you have to be ruthless with your choices - I can afford one or two misses

I'll give you ruthless - 46-47
Still inputing the numbers, but so far I'm inclined to play at least five numbers from positions 1 and 2.

#### Beaker

##### Member
peter said:
Still inputing the numbers, but so far I'm inclined to play at least five numbers from positions 1 and 2.
I have one list that has the following:

2-5-6-7-8-10-11-12-13-14-19-25

Never seen that before, so you never know - told you it might be weird

#### peter

##### Member
Beaker said:
Peter, looking at your decade signature 1936 is the same as the last one.

1937-1938 is where this draw is headed without the 10's

In fact 1925-1928 has some clues
Juding that, one would conclude the next draw to start with a double digit.

#### Beaker

##### Member
peter said:
Juding that, one would conclude the next draw to start with a double digit.
Well if history is any clue yes. But, you have to look at these high draw cluster periods. If you look you see 1-2-4 mixed in.