Discussion June 25, 2003

[Dennis Bassboss]

I'll play LD0 max 1 per set.
The 30 is the better bet after 1 skip.
Being a higher freqency number didn't
have many announcer hits over and above to get excited about.
My LD analyzer is calling NO LD0.
LD6 and LD1 are favourites.

Looking at these DN's to cash in on:

17/45
9/26
15/21

My unmatched...LD thing thinks otherwise... Lots of wannabe ...But there's only one Dennis Bassboss...Lets see if I can go for another month without any strike out with these hints...I'll post my always stunning Hints ...just before the draw...

 

[Snides]

I think Snides mixed his lists up I like a bunch in that list also

I didn't mix anything up, when i post the worst picks, they are the numbers that are in the groups that 80% of the time (or higher) don't have any winning numbers in them..

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

For the cold pair chasers ....Check the 10-12 ...or the 17-42....

 

[Beaker]

I didn't mix anything up, when i post the worst picks, they are the numbers that are in the groups that 80% of the time (or higher) don't have any winning numbers in them..

I know you didn't mix anything up Mandi did
Expect at least 4-5 from that list

We'll see - good luck

 

[Geenie]

Better make sure your sets have 1 PRIME Number or you are in trouble.

2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 47

One of the reasons this draw is more
difficult to narrow down is many #'s
are looking good in skips "intervals".
Time to post them on the dart board.

 

[Beaker]

Better make sure your sets have 1 PRIME Number or you are in trouble.

2 3 5 7 11 13 17 19 23 29 31 37 41 43 47

One of the reasons this draw is more
difficult to narrow down is many #'s
are looking good in skips "intervals".
Time to post them on the dart board.

Thanks for the reminder Geenie Pretty sure my sets always have a few

Definitely have some for this one especially because we didn't have any last time
I think that's why I don't like Snides' list - he has 7/15 of those I think a few of those 7 may hit

 

[peter]

[I'll post my always stunning Hints ...just before the draw

What good are they just before the draw, post 'em now.

 

[gsobier]

Peter:

There is a better way... ...rent a time machine, get the results for a couple of years in the furture to bring back with you and then we can take turns with the .

Regards,
George

What good are they just before the draw, post 'em now.

 

[Geenie]

George

ladies first.

 

[luckystrike]

GUT INSTINCTS

MY RADAR IS GOING WACKY..AND MY GUT TELLS ME......

...NO 40'S FOR THIS DRAW

 

[luckystrike]

I'M LEANING TOWARDS A COUPLE OF SETS WITH THESE GEMS!!!!!!

..31..32..35.. AND THIS SET....

..10..21..23..

 

[Snides]

I know you didn't mix anything up Mandi did
Expect at least 4-5 from that list

We'll see - good luck

I dunno Beak, according to Mandi, there is only a 1.8% chance that there will be more than 3 numbers from that set.. course there was 4 times in the past 598 draws that her worst picks would have been able to hit the jackpot.. so there is a small margin of error

 

[Beaker]

I dunno Beak, according to Mandi, there is only a 1.8% chance that there will be more than 3 numbers from that set.. course there was 4 times in the past 598 draws that her worst picks would have been able to hit the jackpot.. so there is a small margin of error

Snides, I've gone against Mandi before and lost.

I've forced myself off some picks this time - and I could force myself off some others

Like Peter, there is still some time to make some changes before the draw

 

[Snides]

Tell ya what, I'll go out on a limb and let ya know that there should be between 2 and 4 (2 and 4 included, so either 2 3 or 4) numbers from each of these sets.. This is only accurate 60+% of the time..

set 1
2 3 4 9 11 12 13 16 17 18 20 23 25 27 28 30 32 36 45

set 2
1 5 6 7 10 14 15 19 21 22 24 31 34 35 37 38 39 40 42 43 44 46 47 48 49

want a bit more accuracy? 92.474916387959866220735785953177% of the time there will be between 1 and 5 numbers from both sets..

Here's the fine print, some of my worst picks for this draw are from a different grouping method, they are 3 5 7 12 13 21 27 42 and 47

 

[Beaker]

Re: GUT INSTINCTS

MY RADAR IS GOING WACKY..AND MY GUT TELLS ME......

...NO 40'S FOR THIS DRAW

Agree with you luckystrike - there will only be at most one here.

The BIG question is what other decade might miss

I think it may be 10's

 

[luckystrike]

IF I WAS TO PICK A NUMBER FROM THE FOURTY'S THIS DRAW...I WOULD HAVE TO WITHMON

#41

 

[Godload]

I like 4 and 16 for this draw after that 12 popped last draw. That 2 looks nice also. I agree with everyone else that that 29 is hot and a good bet to show again.
Not sure what to play for the repeater. 34 is the best repeater but I like that 25 also. I think that 28 looks really nice to play after that 22 popped last draw. Also that 47 looks ripe for the picking.
Hard call on this draw, lotta good numbers to play. It could go funky monkey. Could be the draw starting in the 20's, or it could have one number (1-10), one number (11-19) and then have the rest in the 40's. Some funky draws after that 22-25 show up together in a draw.

 

[peter]

Like Peter, there is still some time to make some changes before the draw

No makin changes for me, I bought my tickets already.

 

[peter]

Well first off in the last 3 draws we saw the 11, the 14, and last draw the 12, do you see the picture here, whats missing?It's the13

 

[peter]

Re: Re: GUT INSTINCTS

The BIG question is what other decade might miss

I think it may be 10's

The 20's is my best quess.