discussion for oct 9 draw

[Maggie]

I see what you mean, Beaker, that 27 does show itself a few times around that draw.

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

I see what you mean, Beaker, that 27 does show itself a few times around that draw.

And so are the high teens Maggie!Searching the 16-26....

 

[renata]

Is this dumb or what?

O.k I may be saying something very dumb here but I'll say it anyway
I think I am going to play high here, like the 30's and 40's with maybe a couple of 20's like that 20 and 27 and I will repeat the 12 or 13 but I have a fuuny feeling that HIGH draw is uppon us.

 

[Beaker]

Re: Is this dumb or what?

O.k I may be saying something very dumb here but I'll say it anyway
I think I am going to play high here, like the 30's and 40's with maybe a couple of 20's like that 20 and 27 and I will repeat the 12 or 13 but I have a fuuny feeling that HIGH draw is uppon us.

Beaker will travel the opposite road!! The road less travelled

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

Re: Is this dumb or what?

O.k I may be saying something very dumb here but I'll say it anyway
I think I am going to play high here, like the 30's and 40's with maybe a couple of 20's like that 20 and 27 and I will repeat the 12 or 13 but I have a fuuny feeling that HIGH draw is uppon us.

There are no dumb questions here...It could go that way ...I have spotted some draws going high seaching the past draws...

 

[Beaker]

Re: Re: Is this dumb or what?

There are no dumb questions here...It could go that way ...I have spotted some draws going high seaching the past draws...

Yes, in fact that 16-26 announces really high

 

[Maggie]

Now, that I sort of know one of the things to be looking for, I would have to say that I can't ignore either the 2 or 3. I don't think I would start off my numbers with a high one.

 

[Dennis Bassboss]

Now, that I sort of know one of the things to be looking for, I would have to say that I can't ignore either the 2 or 3. I don't think I would start off my numbers with a high one.

This is my fear here ...I do not like it but I keep seeing a low number on my way...The double announcers grid will answer many of my questions here...I'll start working on it...

 

[Maggie]

Look at 1373, next draw following started low.(4)

I know that draw is going way back, but still....

 

[renata]

I'm going out for a while, so I will look at the posts later tonight or tomorrow, and see what you all have come up with.
Have a good night, talk to you all later.

 

[Beaker]

Look at 1373, next draw following started low.(4)

I know that draw is going way back, but still....

The draw with the closest profile to the last 10 draws is 1438 followed closely by 872,873.

A more recent draw like the last 10 is 1922 - its not as good as the others.

 

[Beaker]

Now, that I sort of know one of the things to be looking for, I would have to say that I can't ignore either the 2 or 3. I don't think I would start off my numbers with a high one.

I'll be playing them - for now

 

[Maggie]

Hopefully, I'll get this thing figured out in my lifetime.
I really would like to be able to "imagine the freedom"

 

[Maggie]

The draw with the closest profile to the last 10 draws is 1438 followed closely by 872,873.

A more recent draw like the last 10 is 1922 - its not as good as the others.

Ah.. so that's where the 15 comes into play. Does the 23 figure in there somewhere?

 

[mon]

Ok I see that a low number may come up wed draw and I also agree with what has been said in the discusions I also think we may see 40 or 41 come in to play also maybe 43

 

[renata]

o.k another question

I have another question that might sound..... well, strange.
When you wheel your numbers do you first put them in numerical order? Or do you keep them in a random order, and which way is best?
I'm going to try to wheel my own using the wheel that Beaker suggested on Saturday. If I can get my numbers down to 14 numbers.

 

[renata]

Re:wacky numbers

On September 25th I played alot of the numbers that have been talked about here for this draw and that draw yeilded me nothing but I think that I just played them too early so I might actually play some of them for this draw. Here are those numbers, tell me what you think.
1,3,5,12,13,15,20,23,25,26
27,33,34,36,40,43,47,49

 

[Beaker]

Re: o.k another question

I have another question that might sound..... well, strange.
When you wheel your numbers do you first put them in numerical order? Or do you keep them in a random order, and which way is best?
I'm going to try to wheel my own using the wheel that Beaker suggested on Saturday. If I can get my numbers down to 14 numbers.

I guess you should re-read my post to you in this thread at the bottom. Focus on Step 2

 

[renata]

Thanks for the help Beaker, maybe we will meet at 33 Bloor St. after this draw

 

[dwoods99]

Originally posted by Maggie in thread from last draw picks
Boy, you don't see that 16 for weeks and weeks and then bang, it comes out 3 draws in a row. All I can say is Bad Numbers.

The last time we saw a string of 16, I had predicted it, but in no way did I expect it 4 times in a row (last 2 as bonus) -- draws 1935-1938.

And now it's interesting to see that draw 1935 had 16 and bonus 18, and was followed by 13-16-18. Draw 1950 (9/28) had 16-17, and was followed by 13B-14-16-18. Which brings out to the latest 12-13-16. And of course, we see that 01 has come out 3 times now.

If you also look at the last 20 draws, there's a relationship between 11 and 14. When 11 showed up (draws 1933-1943), 14 followed it.