Brad
Member
OPEN vs 100% Guarantee Wheels
When making wheels I usually opt for a full guarantee be it 3if3, 3if4 etc., but a large chunk of the 100% requirement seems to be realized in finding the last ~10% of the cover.
For example: 24,6,3,6 wheel needs 29 lines for a 100% guarantee, but only 12 lines for 91%.
That translates to a cost reduction of 60% for a loss of 9% of potential wins. In smaller wheels the reduction may be less (vice versa for larger wheels) but the savings are still there.
I've noticed this before but have not really paid close attention. It would seem to make sense to play open wheels, does anyone have thoughts on or experience with this type of approach ?
When making wheels I usually opt for a full guarantee be it 3if3, 3if4 etc., but a large chunk of the 100% requirement seems to be realized in finding the last ~10% of the cover.
For example: 24,6,3,6 wheel needs 29 lines for a 100% guarantee, but only 12 lines for 91%.
That translates to a cost reduction of 60% for a loss of 9% of potential wins. In smaller wheels the reduction may be less (vice versa for larger wheels) but the savings are still there.
I've noticed this before but have not really paid close attention. It would seem to make sense to play open wheels, does anyone have thoughts on or experience with this type of approach ?
Last edited: