649 tips and strategies
- Thread starter Beaker
- Start date
New theory????
Francis Isaac
I am happy you came out with a new theory for a 6/49 lottery and I sure hope you will share it with us. But at the same, you can expect quite a few comments on it. And I will be certainly be one of the most critical ones but I have the tendency to base my comments on hard facts, not perceptions, assumptions or similar concepts.
Already, I can make two comments:
A - Number 1 as the most occuring number:
When you say "the most occurring number in the 6/49 lottery is number one", it depends on how you look at numbers and here are a few examples:
- no, number 1 is not the most occuring number in the 49 numbers (taken as a whole), it is simply one out of 49;
- yes and no, number 1 is the most occuring number in all 49 numbers (each digit taken individually) but it shares this distinction with numbers 2, 3, and 4 with 15 occurences while number 0 occurs only 4 times;
- yes, number 1 is the most occuring number if you consider the deltas with 12.24% of all deltas being 1;
- and so on.
So please be specific when making a statement like this.
B - Winnings with your theory:
I am happy you got 5 winning numbers in the UK lottery (with only one number off for the last one). But I sure hope you invested wisely the amount you won, because the draw you mentionned happened on March 7th, 1998. Did you repeat such a good performance lately or has your theory provided you with a steady (and positive) income? Here we have a member that has achieved this quite a few times. (No name please).
Francis Isaac
I am happy you came out with a new theory for a 6/49 lottery and I sure hope you will share it with us. But at the same, you can expect quite a few comments on it. And I will be certainly be one of the most critical ones but I have the tendency to base my comments on hard facts, not perceptions, assumptions or similar concepts.
Already, I can make two comments:
A - Number 1 as the most occuring number:
When you say "the most occurring number in the 6/49 lottery is number one", it depends on how you look at numbers and here are a few examples:
- no, number 1 is not the most occuring number in the 49 numbers (taken as a whole), it is simply one out of 49;
- yes and no, number 1 is the most occuring number in all 49 numbers (each digit taken individually) but it shares this distinction with numbers 2, 3, and 4 with 15 occurences while number 0 occurs only 4 times;
- yes, number 1 is the most occuring number if you consider the deltas with 12.24% of all deltas being 1;
- and so on.
So please be specific when making a statement like this.
B - Winnings with your theory:
I am happy you got 5 winning numbers in the UK lottery (with only one number off for the last one). But I sure hope you invested wisely the amount you won, because the draw you mentionned happened on March 7th, 1998. Did you repeat such a good performance lately or has your theory provided you with a steady (and positive) income? Here we have a member that has achieved this quite a few times. (No name please).
Francis Isaac
Member
Grandmaster said:
Hi Grandmaster,
My understanding is that the lottery is absolutely predictable over time and one of the ways of proving this is to collect all the data either Canadian or UK lottery depending on where you reside. You then write a program that will allow you to see how the lottery results and the combinations of 13,983,816 agree with each other. If there is an agreement, then, the lottery cannot be predictable because it is acting in accordance with its theoretical values. The next thing to do is to look at each number in each column and see how that is behaving when compared with the lottery results. There is absolutely no need for complicated mathematical formula because all of this depends on number counting and that depends on a good program. You see, past data has a significant relevance to the future behaviour of this system. Without past data, you cannot predict the future occurrence of the numbers. The system is chaogic and for those who know, every chaos system must have simple pattern in it.
Francis Isaac
Member
Re: New theory????
GillesD said:
Francis Isaac
Member
Francis Isaac said:
Francis Isaac
Member
Hi Lottobug,
it is not possible to just give you a hard fact based on a simple mathematical formula because there simply is not one simple formula to predicting the lottery. What I did was to study the system by challenging certain fundamental facts like:
1. Is the lottery a true representation of a random system?
2. Is it predictable?
3. Can we use past data to predict possible future six number combinations?
4. Does each combination of numbers occur equally?
5. Is the chances of winning the lottery 1 in 13,983,816.
Patience is a virtue and without patience, we cannot learn or understand so, please bear with me as I start to throw hard fact at you and there are so many which will be revealed here free to all members who are interested for the sake of understanding.
it is not possible to just give you a hard fact based on a simple mathematical formula because there simply is not one simple formula to predicting the lottery. What I did was to study the system by challenging certain fundamental facts like:
1. Is the lottery a true representation of a random system?
2. Is it predictable?
3. Can we use past data to predict possible future six number combinations?
4. Does each combination of numbers occur equally?
5. Is the chances of winning the lottery 1 in 13,983,816.
Patience is a virtue and without patience, we cannot learn or understand so, please bear with me as I start to throw hard fact at you and there are so many which will be revealed here free to all members who are interested for the sake of understanding.
Francis Isaac
Member
Beaker said:Indeed - new method - 10 years to develop - on my website
I'll leave this thread alone for now
Hi Beaker,
There is no need to leave because there is so much to tell and it will all be free. I will reveal as much as I can here in this forum. To be quite honest, I cannot wait but you must realised that if someone has studied a system for 10 years, they must have so much to say that it is just not possible to say it in one go. I will be bringing so much hard fact but I really would like to use the results from the Canadian Lottery so that members can check my fact. The trouble is that I have just downloaded all the results since 1982 and it will take me sometime to put it all in my program but I will try. If you are really interested in the Lottery and you like numbers a lot, then, please wait and give me sometime to start to give you hard facts. This will be like a learning curve.
Francis Isaac
Member
Beaker said:
Hi Beaker,
No I am not familiar with that work. If you can dig out the post, I will be intersted in reading it.
Francis Isaac
Member
Hi Karnac,
I hope that I will not let you down but you have to make up your own mind as to the way I have studied the lottery and whether it has any practical use for you and the rest of all the members in this forum.
I hope that I will not let you down but you have to make up your own mind as to the way I have studied the lottery and whether it has any practical use for you and the rest of all the members in this forum.
Number 1 combinations
Francis Isaac
When you said "number one is the most occurring number but only in column one or draw 1 because it has the most amount of combination in that column. The combination is 1,712,305.", I do not think you are totally right.
A - I get a total of 1,712,304 combinations (not 1,712,305) with the number 1 in first position. Typing error of your part or wrong logic from either you or me, we should see as most likely thornc or PAB wil come up with a value of their own. Small error you will say but may be it was that kind of small error that prevented you from winning the jackpot in the UK lottery.
B - Yes, number 1 is the most occuring number in first position BUT have you looked at number 49 in the sixth position, oddly enough it also occurs 1,712,304 times, so your statement is only half-true. And coincidences being coincidences, all other numbers (from 2 to 48) also occur 1,712,304 times but sadly enough, spread over all six positions.
But I do not think this provides any usefull information as we are not betting on a horse-racing lottery where position is most important contrary to a 6/49 lottery.
Francis Isaac
When you said "number one is the most occurring number but only in column one or draw 1 because it has the most amount of combination in that column. The combination is 1,712,305.", I do not think you are totally right.
A - I get a total of 1,712,304 combinations (not 1,712,305) with the number 1 in first position. Typing error of your part or wrong logic from either you or me, we should see as most likely thornc or PAB wil come up with a value of their own. Small error you will say but may be it was that kind of small error that prevented you from winning the jackpot in the UK lottery.
B - Yes, number 1 is the most occuring number in first position BUT have you looked at number 49 in the sixth position, oddly enough it also occurs 1,712,304 times, so your statement is only half-true. And coincidences being coincidences, all other numbers (from 2 to 48) also occur 1,712,304 times but sadly enough, spread over all six positions.
But I do not think this provides any usefull information as we are not betting on a horse-racing lottery where position is most important contrary to a 6/49 lottery.
Francis Isaac
Member
Re: Number 1 combinations
[
Hi Giles,
You are partly correct in the combination of number 1 in position one. It was a typing error from my part. I also agree that number 49 in position six has exactly the same combination as number one but one statement that I strongly disagree with is that the position of the numbers does not matter. The position of the numbers is absolutely fundamental to their occurrence in the 6/49 lottery. IF you put a particular number in the wrong position, your chances of winning will decrease dramatically and I can provide you with endless data to prove this. You must take great care in which position you put which number. I know that you said that there is nothing new in what I have to say so far but now, that is a very new statement. Position, Position, Position is one of the most important fact when it comes to choosing your lottery numbers in 6/49 lottery.
[
Hi Giles,
You are partly correct in the combination of number 1 in position one. It was a typing error from my part. I also agree that number 49 in position six has exactly the same combination as number one but one statement that I strongly disagree with is that the position of the numbers does not matter. The position of the numbers is absolutely fundamental to their occurrence in the 6/49 lottery. IF you put a particular number in the wrong position, your chances of winning will decrease dramatically and I can provide you with endless data to prove this. You must take great care in which position you put which number. I know that you said that there is nothing new in what I have to say so far but now, that is a very new statement. Position, Position, Position is one of the most important fact when it comes to choosing your lottery numbers in 6/49 lottery.
Francis Isaac
Member
Re: Re: Number 1 combinations
Francis Isaac said:
Lotto 6/49 and BC49
Francis Isaac
Both Lotto 6/49 and BC49 are both 6/49 lotteries with 6 winning numbers and a bonus number. Lotto 6/49 is sold across Canada while BC49 is for British Columbia. Many provinces (Quebec, Ontario, etc.) have these regional lotteries, usually costing less but with lower prizes.
With its long history (over 2200 draws), Lotto 6/49 can provide more representative and significant statistics if you want to compare actual and expected values.
Francis Isaac
Both Lotto 6/49 and BC49 are both 6/49 lotteries with 6 winning numbers and a bonus number. Lotto 6/49 is sold across Canada while BC49 is for British Columbia. Many provinces (Quebec, Ontario, etc.) have these regional lotteries, usually costing less but with lower prizes.
With its long history (over 2200 draws), Lotto 6/49 can provide more representative and significant statistics if you want to compare actual and expected values.
Francis Isaac
Member
Re: Lotto 6/49 and BC49
GillesD said:
I would not combine the two, it is liking making predications based on combining the U.K. and Germany's lottery.
The bulk of the players here play the national 649, with 2214 draws, you should have sufficient data.
If you combine the two, I would say your data would be immaterial, and of little use.
The bulk of the players here play the national 649, with 2214 draws, you should have sufficient data.
If you combine the two, I would say your data would be immaterial, and of little use.
Mixed databases
Francis Isaac
I agree completely with peter. If you want a large database, do as I did, generate random combinations of 6 or 7 numbers (if you want a bonus number included). I have a 15,000 combinations database that I use for various purposes.
Also I do not fully understand your emphasis on position when you choose your numbers. Pick your numbers as you want but there is one and only way you can win: your numbers MUST match the numbers on the balls coming out of the machine. And they can come out in any order (for example: 03-08-13-19-34-41 or 41-34-19-13-08-03 or 08-19-41-03-13-34 or any of the other 717 possible permutations). The order they come out is immaterial to the amount you win but the amount you win is directly related to the number of matches between your chosen numbers and those drawn.
Francis Isaac
I agree completely with peter. If you want a large database, do as I did, generate random combinations of 6 or 7 numbers (if you want a bonus number included). I have a 15,000 combinations database that I use for various purposes.
Also I do not fully understand your emphasis on position when you choose your numbers. Pick your numbers as you want but there is one and only way you can win: your numbers MUST match the numbers on the balls coming out of the machine. And they can come out in any order (for example: 03-08-13-19-34-41 or 41-34-19-13-08-03 or 08-19-41-03-13-34 or any of the other 717 possible permutations). The order they come out is immaterial to the amount you win but the amount you win is directly related to the number of matches between your chosen numbers and those drawn.
Francis Isaac
Member
Hi Peter,
I take your point. I have separate data for the UK and German lottery and I have also combine the two for my own reason and the reason is that I hope to play both the UK and German lottery once I have the means or shall I say enough members to do so. As far as using the data to predict future Canadian Lottery results, I will not combine the two data but I will focus on the 649 draws for my prediction.
I take your point. I have separate data for the UK and German lottery and I have also combine the two for my own reason and the reason is that I hope to play both the UK and German lottery once I have the means or shall I say enough members to do so. As far as using the data to predict future Canadian Lottery results, I will not combine the two data but I will focus on the 649 draws for my prediction.
Francis Isaac
Member
Re: Mixed databases
GillesD,
It is important that the data you use for prediction is past data from the machine themselves because each random generation of numbers behaves differently. I want to have the confident of knowing that a particular random system has not produced certain numbers in certain positions and I then make my prediction accordingly. Also what is important is not in which order the balls drop from the machine but when the numbers are then put in order so that we can understand it. Don't forget that the numbers are in order according to their theory anyway, what appears to be random is in which order the combination of six numbers comes out. Let me explain what I mean by positioning by using two combinations of numbers and they are:
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6
1 2 30
1 2 30
In the top combination without focusing on the rest of the other numbers, the combination 1,2 and 30 in position D3 is much lower than 1,2 and 30 in position D4. 1,2 and 30 in position D3 has 969 combinations and 1,2 and 30 in position D4 has 4617 combinations. My message is that you should play by chance because by understanding chance, you can increase your realistic chance of winning the jackpot.
GillesD,
It is important that the data you use for prediction is past data from the machine themselves because each random generation of numbers behaves differently. I want to have the confident of knowing that a particular random system has not produced certain numbers in certain positions and I then make my prediction accordingly. Also what is important is not in which order the balls drop from the machine but when the numbers are then put in order so that we can understand it. Don't forget that the numbers are in order according to their theory anyway, what appears to be random is in which order the combination of six numbers comes out. Let me explain what I mean by positioning by using two combinations of numbers and they are:
D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6
1 2 30
1 2 30
In the top combination without focusing on the rest of the other numbers, the combination 1,2 and 30 in position D3 is much lower than 1,2 and 30 in position D4. 1,2 and 30 in position D3 has 969 combinations and 1,2 and 30 in position D4 has 4617 combinations. My message is that you should play by chance because by understanding chance, you can increase your realistic chance of winning the jackpot.
red0412303609
Member
patience is my virtue
ok Francis ---
I am all ears---
nice to know someone else is committed to number co incidence/s... Let me tell you this and every one else here-- here in Australia we have a lotto game that plays 6 from 35 numbers -- although the pay outs are some what small-- ie-- rouughly $4000- I have won several times using wheeling systems and Key numbers--- ie-- always choosing one number and 5 wheeled numbers-- to date I am up about $15,000 over 4 years- and thats on top of my original investment-- it takes me about 11 hrs to compile my chosen numbers - fill in the tickets and have them processed. I am happy thus so far that the amount won is justifyable to the time put in. you could say it works out to roughly $150 per hr in profit. So I firmly believe that numbers and lotto and winning is simple and fun.
Lets break new ground-- this includes one and all, and I hope that we will win the big one over an over again.
cheers to all.
anthony - in western australia
ok Francis ---
I am all ears---
nice to know someone else is committed to number co incidence/s... Let me tell you this and every one else here-- here in Australia we have a lotto game that plays 6 from 35 numbers -- although the pay outs are some what small-- ie-- rouughly $4000- I have won several times using wheeling systems and Key numbers--- ie-- always choosing one number and 5 wheeled numbers-- to date I am up about $15,000 over 4 years- and thats on top of my original investment-- it takes me about 11 hrs to compile my chosen numbers - fill in the tickets and have them processed. I am happy thus so far that the amount won is justifyable to the time put in. you could say it works out to roughly $150 per hr in profit. So I firmly believe that numbers and lotto and winning is simple and fun.
Lets break new ground-- this includes one and all, and I hope that we will win the big one over an over again.
cheers to all.
anthony - in western australia