6/49 Discussion For September 24, 2003

peter

Member
Re: INTERESTING........

luckystrike said:
PETERS PIC'S HAVE NO 1'S..& NO TEENS......UHMMMM TWO DECADES TO MISS....

FLORIE SEES LOTS OF ONES IN THIS DRAW........




:dang: :confused: I'LL HAVE TO KEEP STUDYING THIS ONE....:agree:
Luckystrike: It's one of the Beak's Laws, .... you can't fight it.
That gem, is as good as gold! :agree2:
 

peter

Member
Dennis, I see you listed your location as " as far away as possible"
Are you in Jail? or did your wife kick you out?:lol: :lol: :lol: :wavey:
 
And closer to that jackpot...

peter said:
Dennis, I see you listed your location as " as far away as possible"
Are you in Jail? or did your wife kick you out?:lol: :lol: :lol: :wavey:
I like your set Peter...After the 15 ...the 01...Could hit hard in the high spectrum.... :agree:
Concerning the ''as far away as possible...''
It is only about controversy.....And disrespectfull comments...
But I might add to it that line....''And closer to that jackpot''...
 

Howzat

Member
Canadian Lottery Results

Hi,

Can someone tell me where I can get the Canadian 649 draws upto date since the first draw??

I'm setting up a chart call Chart2847 for Canadian 649 game.
The draws must be in drawn order as this is very important for the chart to be accurate.


Cheers mates.
Howzat:)
 

Beaker

Member
Re: Canadian Lottery Results

Howzat said:
Hi,

Can someone tell me where I can get the Canadian 649 draws upto date since the first draw??

I'm setting up a chart call Chart2847 for Canadian 649 game.
The draws must be in drawn order as this is very important for the chart to be accurate.


Cheers mates.
Howzat:)
All of them - mid-page - in a self-extracting file

http://www.bclc.com/app/Lotto649/Home.asp

Looks like bclc has redone their site - looks nice :agree2:
 
Beaker said:
Seeing LD 0 here

10-30-40-20
yep some of them will come for sure...The 10-20-30 range are the top candidates....I already spoke about that 20 being announced overwelmingly by that 01....
I don't see more than two LDs 00 tough...
20-30 or 10-20 ...
I might go with 10-20
:agree:
But LDs of 01 is where my focus is....Just because of my unmatched LDs thingy...
 

Beaker

Member
Dennis Bassboss said:
<snip>
But LDs of 01 is where my focus is....Just because of my unmatched LDs thingy...

I'm going to play 21-41 but the others 11-31 are good also.:agree:

That 1 could repeat here :worry:

More later......
 

gsobier

Member
Re: And closer to that jackpot...

Dennis:

Its a shame:no: people choose to be rude on the forum. Would they have the same guts in person:eek:?

Regards,
George:)
Dennis Bassboss said:
I like your set Peter...After the 15 ...the 01...Could hit hard in the high spectrum.... :agree:
Concerning the ''as far away as possible...''
It is only about controversy.....And disrespectfull comments...
But I might add to it that line....''And closer to that jackpot''...
 

Beaker

Member
Re: WED.DRAW....

luckystrike said:
HERE ARE TWO THAT WILL BE IN MY FINAL SET............

..1..&..5.. ...MIGHT USE THEM AS MY DN'S :eek:
5 :agree2:

Take a look at the Best Bet thread - lots of good ones lining up there :eek:
 

Randal

Member
I AM GOING TO BUY ONE QUICKPICK FOR THIS ONE :D
I love $10M draws :)
Florie said:
I see tons of ones in these draws. Could it be a birthday draw?
That rarely happens, so the outlook of that happening is bleak. :|
gsobier said:
Dennis:

Its a shame:no: people choose to be rude on the forum. Would they have the same guts in person:eek:?

Regards,
George:)
I'd probably give good ol'Dennis a hug. :D
 
I also think there is a good chance for a 0 LD this draw. I prefer the 20 or 30.

As for cold numbers like the 8,28, and 42... the way I categorize Cold numbers, these are the only three in there right now, and the average pool size for this category is 6 numbers. This leads me to believe that the 28 could sleep a while longer until such time as more cold numbers show up... now watch it come out and bit me!
 
The Weatherman said:
I also think there is a good chance for a 0 LD this draw. I prefer the 20 or 30.

As for cold numbers like the 8,28, and 42... the way I categorize Cold numbers, these are the only three in there right now, and the average pool size for this category is 6 numbers. This leads me to believe that the 28 could sleep a while longer until such time as more cold numbers show up... now watch it come out and bit me!
I tend to agree with you about the cold numbers...Some might be too cold but lets look at the coldest pairs...From the last 300 draws...All of these bonus included...
cold--------current
pairs------skip
(28,45)---- 390=000
(04,05)---- 367=000
(08,38)---- 344=000
(10,12)---- 334=000
(04,17)---- 288
(17,42)---- 281
(28,29)---- 279
(04,10)---- 278
(38,41)---- 265
(05,39)---- 264
(12,33)---- 254
(02,45)---- 242
(20,21)---- 236
(42,49)---- 234
(08,32)---- 232
(29,31)---- 230
(06,42)---- 223
(16,19)---- 221
(16,35)---- 221
(14,19)---- 218
(23,37)---- 215
(37,42)---- 215
(23,48)---- 214
(47,49)---- 214
(09,21)---- 213
(04,32)---- 210
(19,23)---- 208
(39,47)---- 207
(19,42)---- 205
(22,42)---- 205
(42,43)---- 203
(10,22)---- 200
(22,38)---- 200
(02,42)---- 195
(17,33)---- 194
(32,48)---- 193
(21,41)---- 192
(31,41)---- 192
(35,43)---- 191
(21,45)---- 189
(42,45)---- 189
I'd say that we will see more than one of these in the draws to come.....But look carefully at the numbers involved with LD 01...
:agree: :eek:
 
Last edited:

Sidebar

Top