6/49 Discussion For September 24, 2003
- Thread starter gsobier
- Start date
Dennis:
That credibility looks like it dropped in the past 2 draws because there was [2 and 4] back to back
. The smart money would make an adjustment to zero in on [2 and 4] with a bit of tinkering. I'm looking at things like 29-20. My own feeling is the current report is too erratic. Minor changes make a difference. I have to get it right to produce the results.
I'm banking on a [4 and 2] one of these draws soon which does not want to show up for us and is over due... ...when we get back to back [4 and 2] (has happened in history) winnings will improve
.
I've also ran into a major eye opener... ...the data I have been using was checked against another source and there turned up discrepancies in my data
. Months ago Beaker and I did some general checking and I even went to the trouble of checking the counts of each number. I found out there were some sets which traded a number is in 37 and then 47 where it should have been 47 and then 37 in the next draw. Checking counts like I did is NOT going to ensure data integrity. The first data error which is mixed up for the 30-19 report was more than 200 draws ago. The results are a bit tainted due to that fact but far enough away to be of minimal impact.
So, the bottom line... ...my stuff I'm doing now is showing me results which I need to prove or disprove. I hope I can find some reliable things better to post than I've posted up to now.
While I've got your attention, I was wondering (could be nothing)... ...is 20 and 34 were correct or a typo... ...your usual advise is 20 and 43 and then a 20 and 34 as DN
for today. BTW, its probably right how you posted it but just caught my eye, thats all.
Regards,
George
That credibility looks like it dropped in the past 2 draws because there was [2 and 4] back to back
. The smart money would make an adjustment to zero in on [2 and 4] with a bit of tinkering. I'm looking at things like 29-20. My own feeling is the current report is too erratic. Minor changes make a difference. I have to get it right to produce the results.I'm banking on a [4 and 2] one of these draws soon which does not want to show up for us and is over due... ...when we get back to back [4 and 2] (has happened in history) winnings will improve
.I've also ran into a major eye opener... ...the data I have been using was checked against another source and there turned up discrepancies in my data
. Months ago Beaker and I did some general checking and I even went to the trouble of checking the counts of each number. I found out there were some sets which traded a number is in 37 and then 47 where it should have been 47 and then 37 in the next draw. Checking counts like I did is NOT going to ensure data integrity. The first data error which is mixed up for the 30-19 report was more than 200 draws ago. The results are a bit tainted due to that fact but far enough away to be of minimal impact.So, the bottom line... ...my stuff I'm doing now is showing me results which I need to prove or disprove. I hope I can find some reliable things better to post than I've posted up to now.
While I've got your attention, I was wondering (could be nothing)... ...is 20 and 34 were correct or a typo... ...your usual advise is 20 and 43 and then a 20 and 34 as DN
for today. BTW, its probably right how you posted it but just caught my eye, thats all.Regards,
George
Dennis Bassboss said:George you have simply become an asset to this board...and our Kung fu would be diminish without you...
As far as changes...Do what you think is best!
You have already earned a lot of credibility here!
Gotta consider 32 and 25 also for their skip and hit chart.
32 is out 7 and has hit 21 times on 7, at 6 it has hit 9 times. A very large increase. 25 is out 2 but has hit 42 times on 2. At one out it has only hit 27. Another large increase. Not guaranteeing they will hit, but they have to be considered.
32 is out 7 and has hit 21 times on 7, at 6 it has hit 9 times. A very large increase. 25 is out 2 but has hit 42 times on 2. At one out it has only hit 27. Another large increase. Not guaranteeing they will hit, but they have to be considered.
Dennis Bassboss
Member
George 34 has been announced like hell by 35 but yet not as much in this century....but that 34 has made us wait for him quite a long time....Now it is present under the last 5 draws...So I expect the 35 will drag this number....But I also count on a triple consecutive in the 30s...
I suspect that pair of consecutive 35-36 to repeat here...
So this is why I'm playing 37 along too...Because of the triple consecutives possibility here...
Now that 01 should drag the 20....And the 43 is also a good number...
I suspect that pair of consecutive 35-36 to repeat here...
So this is why I'm playing 37 along too...Because of the triple consecutives possibility here...
Now that 01 should drag the 20....And the 43 is also a good number...
Dennis:
That is cutting it pretty fine. I hope it works out for you. I'm doing things in a much different way to get hits. Reading and interpretation of previous draws is a very tricky business which requires much practice.
That triple consecutive is a long shot!
Regards,
George
That is cutting it pretty fine. I hope it works out for you. I'm doing things in a much different way to get hits. Reading and interpretation of previous draws is a very tricky business which requires much practice
.That triple consecutive is a long shot
!Regards,
George
Dennis Bassboss said:George 34 has been announced like hell by 35 but yet not as much in this century....but that 34 has made us wait for him quite a long time....Now it is present under the last 5 draws...So I expect the 35 will drag this number....But I also count on a triple consecutive in the 30s...
I suspect that pair of consecutive 35-36 to repeat here...
So this is why I'm playing 37 along too...Because of the triple consecutives possibility here...
Now that 01 should drag the 20....And the 43 is also a good number...
!Re: Re: Canadian Lottery Results
Thnx very much Beaker...You will be surprised to what the lottrey does, but let me finish the chart and I will share with everyone through emails.
I have tested this chart on UK 649,RSA 649,Germany 649,and it working wonders on all three lotteries.
The Canaddian lottery should be among the these bounds as well,provided these results are accurate on the website.
Howazt
Beaker said:All of them - mid-page - in a self-extracting file
http://www.bclc.com/app/Lotto649/Home.asp
Looks like bclc has redone their site - looks nice
Thnx very much Beaker...You will be surprised to what the lottrey does, but let me finish the chart and I will share with everyone through emails.
I have tested this chart on UK 649,RSA 649,Germany 649,and it working wonders on all three lotteries.
The Canaddian lottery should be among the these bounds as well,provided these results are accurate on the website.
Howazt
Dennis Bassboss
Member
I think that I'm going to start taking these more seriously...This is happenning quite often lately....Dennis Bassboss said:By looking at possible starting and ending positions posted by some players already I have these quints without bonus they have all hit twice already in the history..regular numbers only...
01-03-19-32-47
01-10-16-44-45
01-12-18-23-47
02-03-13-17-23
02-05-29-35-37
02-41-42-44-47
05-06-33-44-49
05-10-35-36-45
05-31-34-36-38
08-34-37-39-47
08-34-38-43-46
09-11-21-28-37
09-13-27-28-38
09-27-28-37-46
10-30-37-44-49
12-16-20-36-47
12-16-20-43-44
15-20-36-37-49
23-27-31-41-42
24-28-33-38-46
There are more but I posted the ones that I think are relevant to what to expect according to the posts and the picks that I saw...
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Dennis Bassboss said:I agree Beaker...The goal with the quints is to have 3 or 4 from the numbers forming the quint...Add 3 others and Kaboom!
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Re: Re: WED.DRAW....
Congratulations buddy that one was right on the money!Beaker said:5
Take a look at the Best Bet thread - lots of good ones lining up there
Dennis Bassboss
Member
Like it happenned regularly in the past....This thread will produce more winners in the upcoming draws....It is packed with infos relevant for more draws to come...It is a driving engine towards many real wins...
Dennis Bassboss
Member
And as usual Dennis really hit this respectfull number!Dennis Bassboss said:Do not forget one thing here 35 has announced 34 a staggering 62 times..
Re: Re: Re: Canadian Lottery Results
Beaker,
I was very dissapointed by BCLC as they don't provide the results in drawn order(the way they have come out of the machine)
example.let say 1-4-5-2-7-3 BB 6,then this means..
Ball 1 was the first out of the machine on that draw date etc.
This sequence is very importtant to lottery players like me.
Why play such a lottery if they cannot provide such an important information.
Good Lukc for Saturday..
Howzat
Howzat said:Thnx very much Beaker...You will be surprised to what the lottrey does, but let me finish the chart and I will share with everyone through emails.
I have tested this chart on UK 649,RSA 649,Germany 649,and it working wonders on all three lotteries.
The Canaddian lottery should be among the these bounds as well,provided these results are accurate on the website.
Howazt
Beaker,
I was very dissapointed by BCLC as they don't provide the results in drawn order(the way they have come out of the machine)
example.let say 1-4-5-2-7-3 BB 6,then this means..
Ball 1 was the first out of the machine on that draw date etc.
This sequence is very importtant to lottery players like me.
Why play such a lottery if they cannot provide such an important information.
Good Lukc for Saturday..
Howzat
Beaker
Member
Re: Re: Re: Re: Canadian Lottery Results
- even from the lotto people
Unfortunately getting draw order data is not easy. I have never seen itHowzat said:Beaker,
I was very dissapointed by BCLC as they don't provide the results in drawn order(the way they have come out of the machine)
example.let say 1-4-5-2-7-3 BB 6,then this means..
Ball 1 was the first out of the machine on that draw date etc.
This sequence is very importtant to lottery players like me.
Why play such a lottery if they cannot provide such an important information.
Good Lukc for Saturday..
Howzat
- even from the lotto people
Beaker
Member
Beaker said:One number I am seeing alot of hits for is the 5
5-6? ? 5-9 ??
I had them but couldn't pull the triggerBeaker said:That's interesting. I'd like to put 16 as a DN with something from LD 7 - I was thinking 47
BUT, there is something with that 10 that I am looking at
<--- Beaker