6/49 Discussion For November 19, 2003

gsobier

Member
Here is what my program says:
(either four, three, or five most of the time from here) :agree:
01 02 05 06 07 10
11 12 13 14 15 17
18 19 20 23 27 30
32 33 36 37 38 39
40 41 43 46 48 49


No more than three from here is most likely:
(2 were here, in the last draw)
03 04 08 09 16 21
22 24 25 26 28 29
31 34 35 42 44 45
47


For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
4 and 2: 334
3 and 3: 266
5 and 1: 234
2 and 4: 091
6 and 0: 050
1 and 5: 022
0 and 6: 003


Good luck to all players:agree2:!

Regards,
George:)
 

colonel4

Member
Interesting that 5 winning numbers for Nov. 15 were in the foreign games Dennis posted for the last draw. Putting those draws together makes a set of 25 numbers.
 

metalator

Member
gsobier said:
[

For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
4 and 2: 334
3 and 3: 266
5 and 1: 234
2 and 4: 091
6 and 0: 050
1 and 5: 022
0 and 6: 003


[/B]
What do these mean? and how many number of draws to study to be most effective in predicting, for the last year, two, or the whole history?
 

gsobier

Member
Re: Re: 6/49 Discussion For November 19, 2003

metalator:

Thank you for asking, the 1000 draws does not reflect any of those things... ...I picked 1000 to help illustrate how reliable the report is... ...using the entire history is a variable in its self:agree:.

Regards,
George:)
metalator said:
What do these mean? and how many number of draws to study to be most effective in predicting, for the last year, two, or the whole history?
 
Last edited:

Beaker

Member
colonel4 said:
Interesting that 5 winning numbers for Nov. 15 were in the foreign games Dennis posted for the last draw. Putting those draws together makes a set of 25 numbers.
You heard it here first :agree:

That's why we post them - been doing that for awhile colonel4 - watch the SA/UK lottos in particular.

Few draws back, we hammered the 29 DN from those lottos ;) and by the way, they all went high for this one as advertised ;)
 

Beaker

Member
I'll post this here - it will be lost forever - but that 34 from last draw as DN was completely in line with a high draw. 34 is part of alot of high draws ;)

file that under Beaker's gems :lol:
 

metalator

Member
gsobier said:
For the last 1000 draws, we had the following results:
4 and 2: 334
3 and 3: 266
5 and 1: 234
2 and 4: 091
6 and 0: 050
1 and 5: 022
0 and 6: 003

[/B]
thanks for answering one of the questions, but i'm still confused about how to read these numbers what is 4 and 2 and what is 334, etc ?
 

charles2

Member
Re: Re: 6/49 Discussion For November 19, 2003

metalator said:
thanks for answering one of the questions, but i'm still confused about how to read these numbers what is 4 and 2 and what is 334, etc ?


he's saying that [with the program he uses to generate his numbers in which he has back tested] in 334 of the last 1000 draws, 4 of the numbers drawn were in his top set of 30 numbers and 2 came from his bottom set of 19 numbers ..etc etc..
 

Pradeep

Member
My Guru said

There is box of choklets. 49 entries. Any one can pop up at any time.
____________________________________________________

Do you know who is my Guru?
 
Re: My Guru said

Pradeep said:
There is box of choklets. 49 entries. Any one can pop up at any time.
____________________________________

Do you know who is my Guru?
Who's Harry Crump?.......And Where? He is a direct descendant of the honorable Gump family...that lives in the Forest....
Watch that 01-20-43 strike force....And my last set posted too...
:agree: :agree2:
 

Maggie

Member
This is a tough one this week for some reason. I want to say again mainly high. Maybe one under 10. :confused:

Teens, 20's and 30's are high on my list (right now).
 

Beaker

Member
Just did my decade announcer thingy again

WOW!! :dizzy: :dizzy: :eek: :eek:

These weird draws will continue - next 4.

We will see something bizzare here - and it looks like its a REAL HIGH draw on the way could start in the 20's or 30's

Look at 652-654, 720-724, 985-989, 1280-1283 and more recently 1704-1705 region for the clues.

I got a similar indication in 1544. 1545 was REAL LOW :notme:
 

Beaker

Member
Maggie said:
I gotta agree with that, Beak. It's starting high...:agree:
Looking at the quad announcers 14 times - 4 started high.
Out of the top 18 quad announcers, 3 are low 1-6-9 at 3 times each.
 
Top