6/49 Discussion For January 19, 2005

[gsobier]

...the only reason I won't post it is because I'd be breaking a promise if I made with another member... ...you are asking me to do something unethical here... ...I can't and won't do that, sorry... ...it is unfortunate that set was mentioned in the first place... ...I for one, would never reveal it ever existed...

Thanks, Beaker for that set. George, I cannot figure people like you. I am far from an expert but I chip in when I can. For instance, last draw, my two best bets came through.The draw before that I hit one best bet. Now I am starting to see why a guy like DB jumps ship. We are here, supposedly, to help each other win. Yet, we have private e mails with tips many of us are not privy to. It does not make sense to me.

 

[peter]

...the only reason I won't post it is because I'd be breaking a promise if I made with another member... ...you are asking me to do something unethical here... ...I can't and won't do that, sorry...

That is very honorable of you George
That's what integrity is all about, you have my respect.

 

[gsobier]

...from the looks of it, that set has fallen out of play where those numbers have dwindled off... ...2192 might have a clean miss for all 6 of them if things unfold as they have done before...

That is very honorable of you George
That's what integrity is all about, you have my respect.

 

[Beaker]

George,

my apologies for making reference to that set here - that was inappropriate since your discussion was offline.

Won;t happen again.

colonel4,

don't be too hard on George - it is my fault for asking him about that set - he made reference to it in confidence in another forum - I should not have mentioned it here.

The set I posted - the Goswinus best 6 - is still a good reference to use.

Let's let this thread die and move to the next draw.

 

[gsobier]

Beaker:

Thats ok, don't worry about it, I've explained the conditions and circumstances. I've kept my word and life goes on.

Regards,
George

George,

my apologies for making reference to that set here - that was inappropriate since your discussion was offline.

Won;t happen again.

colonel4,

don't be too hard on George - it is my fault for asking him about that set - he made reference to it in confidence in another forum - I should not have mentioned it here.

The set I posted - the Goswinus best 6 - is still a good reference to use.

Let's let this thread die and move to the next draw.