6/49 Discussion For January 19, 2005

[Karnac]

43 is a go Peter ...it hit as the bonus in 2091 and has hit 4 times after skipping 3 draws since then.

 

[peter]

I'm delighted to see you paid attention on my same last digit, and hundreds theory.I think we can crack this one, this time

 

[Karnac]

Had a typo on a previous post...go with 25 instead of 5 ...or playem both.

 

[Beaker]

Skipping last draw to 2189

34 has hit 50X after 1
34 has hit 54X after 13
34 has hit 45X after 21
34 has hit 61X after 34
34 has hit 60X after 36
34 has hit 64X after 42
34 has hit 46X after 8

For a total of 380 hits...still numero uno
Second place goes to 31 with 370 hits

Does this include bonus?

 

[Karnac]

Does this include bonus?

Yes Beaker...these hits are with bonus based on 2189 ,

 

[Karnac]

Beaker...check your mail

 

[Beaker]

Beaker...check your mail

Thanks for that.

My data doesn't agree with yours

For example I get 34 hitting 58x after 1
and 34 hitting 53x after 8

Can anyone else take a look at this to confirm?

 

[gsobier]

...I will confirm these with and without bonus when I got some time later on today... ...my history is 100% like BCLC is... ...this could be a case of incorrect history...

Thanks for that.

My data doesn't agree with yours

For example I get 34 hitting 58x after 1
and 34 hitting 53x after 8

Can anyone else take a look at this to confirm?

 

[Karnac]

Thats right Beaker ...based on draw 2190 as I posted earlier....what I sent is based on skipping a draw...ie 2189.....you did some work on this idea in the past I believe.

 

[Beaker]

...I will confirm these with and without bonus when I got some time later on today... ...my history is 100% like BCLC is... ...this could be a case of incorrect history...

thanks george.

34 is still high on the list

 

[gsobier]

Peter:

This could work out for you... ...I'm going to play that one set I've been playing you know about... ...you will know right away if I've been at the right place at the right time if it hits... ...would be really funny if it did.

Regards,
George

I'm delighted to see you paid attention on my same last digit, and hundreds theory.I think we can crack this one, this time

 

[Beaker]

Thats right Beaker ...based on draw 2190 as I posted earlier....what I sent is based on skipping a draw...ie 2189.....you did some work on this idea in the past I believe.

Ahhhh OK I'm with you.

Yes, I see your numbers now

Given 2189 what hits 2 draws later ie 2191

 

[gsobier]

Beaker:

I'm just doing my part to get everyone on the same page. My first suspicion is Karnac could have errors in his history data. Peter had this problem which was a case of 2 numbers being in the wrong place. Doing a checksum count looked right and there still was an error in a report he posted. Do you remember when we did all that?

Regards,
George

thanks george.

34 is still high on the list

 

[Beaker]

Beaker:

I'm just doing my part to get everyone on the same page. My first suspicion is Karnac could have errors in his history data. Peter had this problem which was a case of 2 numbers being in the wrong place. Doing a checksum count looked right and there still was an error in a report he posted. Do you remember when we did all that?

Regards,
George

Yes I recall that exercise.

It's always good to challenge the data. Discrepencies will occur from misunderstanding or data integrity.

Always better to be accurate.

 

[Karnac]

Here is how the help file describes the process.

SKIP...controls which game is used as the test game (1= LAST DRAW IN RANGE, 2=SECOND LAST GAME,ETC.) and which game after a match contributes to the chart. EXAMPLE: Default skip of 1 tests the last game and includes the numbers in the game after each matching game. A skip of two shows what numbers followed the second last game after skipping a game......I can do this for 5 skips.

 

[gsobier]

K:

I'm running out to the store to make an exchange of a faulty Router and then we should spend some quality time making sure your history is 100%. There are many players and only a few really have 100% accurate history data. The level of your game demands the integrity.

Regards,
George

Here is how the help file describes the process.

SKIP...controls which game is used as the test game (1= LAST DRAW IN RANGE, 2=SECOND LAST GAME,ETC.) and which game after a match contributes to the chart. EXAMPLE: Default skip of 1 tests the last game and includes the numbers in the game after each matching game. A skip of two shows what numbers followed the second last game after skipping a game......I can do this for 5 skips.

 

[gsobier]

Beaker:

Psst. If you want to capitalize on things like 4 repeaters, look in you own backyard... ...Ontario 49 clearly has more of them by percentage. There are less than 800 draws in Ontario 49 now and there was 4 repeaters already as compared the 6/49 where we have more than 2,000 draws.

There have been 4 draws with no repeaters there (only looking at regular numbers)... ...should see one 'cause its due... ...either a 3 or even another 4 repeater there could happen. You ask when, how the heck would I know... ...take a shot at it is all you can do.

Regards,
George

Yes I recall that exercise.

It's always good to challenge the data. Discrepencies will occur from misunderstanding or data integrity.

Always better to be accurate.

 

[hot4]

Last groups I posted didn't fit well. Two similar draws bad thing for all of us. May be there will be some winners next draw:

Group A: 7 10 21 24 26 28 29 32 38 (9)
Group B: 1 2 3 11 12 13 15 17 19 23 31 33 34 39 48 (15)

 

[gsobier]

Beaker:

I checked Karnac's history with mine and its 100% which means he has just like BCLC. So, it is very interesting to see the counts regarding 34 were different.

His Ontario 49 history has 10 draws different from mine. We are going to request the history from OLGC to get to the bottom of this because they don't provide it like BCLC does.

Regards,
George

Yes I recall that exercise.

It's always good to challenge the data. Discrepencies will occur from misunderstanding or data integrity.

Always better to be accurate.

 

[Beaker]

Beaker:

I checked Karnac's history with mine and its 100% which means he has just like BCLC. So, it is very interesting to see the counts regarding 34 were different.

His Ontario 49 history has 10 draws different from mine. We are going to request the history from OLGC to get to the bottom of this because they don't provide it like BCLC does.

Regards,
George

good

thanks for that confirmation