winning numbers
- Thread starter kosteczki
- Start date
Brad
Member
Try Nick's LottoStatistics site for some of the files you mentioned.
The Czech Sportka site has a listing of their prev draws, and then a link to the most recent. Theirs is not a download format but displays in an easy to copy text.
The Czech Sportka site has a listing of their prev draws, and then a link to the most recent. Theirs is not a download format but displays in an easy to copy text.
OK I have the following databases though they may be behind by a draw or 2 now, if anyone knows of any more 649 games out there can you please let me know and inform me as to where I can get it's historical database.
I have
Canada
Canadian 649
Western 649
Ontario 649
Quebec 649
Still need atlantic 649
USA
Georgia / Kentucky (Doesn't use a bonus)
Ohio
Pennsylvania (Doesn't use a bonus)
New Jersey (Doesn't use a bonus)
Washington (Doesn't use a bonus)
Wisconsin (Doesn't use a bonus)
Any other state have a 6/49????
Other Countries
Germany
Greece (Doesn't use a bonus number)
Hong Kong
Malaysia
Spain
South Africa
South Africa Plus
Taiwan
Turkey (Doesn't use a bonus number)
UK
Any other country run a 6/49???
If anyone would like any of these databases let me know.
I have
Canada
Canadian 649
Western 649
Ontario 649
Quebec 649
Still need atlantic 649
USA
Georgia / Kentucky (Doesn't use a bonus)
Ohio
Pennsylvania (Doesn't use a bonus)
New Jersey (Doesn't use a bonus)
Washington (Doesn't use a bonus)
Wisconsin (Doesn't use a bonus)
Any other state have a 6/49????
Other Countries
Germany
Greece (Doesn't use a bonus number)
Hong Kong
Malaysia
Spain
South Africa
South Africa Plus
Taiwan
Turkey (Doesn't use a bonus number)
UK
Any other country run a 6/49???
If anyone would like any of these databases let me know.
databases of history
Personally, I think databases that track history are a waste of time and effort. All they should do is give one a % of numbers drawn for each position. (maybe expose cheating) How? If one knows all quantities for each possible position in advance then one knows, over time, how these numbers occur. There will be slight variations in the short term unless cheating is going on. W
Personally, I think databases that track history are a waste of time and effort. All they should do is give one a % of numbers drawn for each position. (maybe expose cheating) How? If one knows all quantities for each possible position in advance then one knows, over time, how these numbers occur. There will be slight variations in the short term unless cheating is going on. W
W Kaenzig said:
This is what you believe. How can you know this other than what you have been told? I don't want this to be the case any more than you do but I suspect that some lotto drawings in some places are sometimes rigged. Even though it appears to be just logical, there is too much fantasy and power riding on the whole scheme for it to be completely clean, always. The lottery has become a powerful institution in so many ways. The belief that it is clean and never rigged is like believing that politicians never lie.
no comparison of the 2
I believe politicians lie very frequently. So, no comparison of these 2 entities can relate. Do the Canandian, and Lotteries elsewhere require Public Certified Accountants to audit the procedings? In the U.S. they do. Lotto industries have to be honest as they can be "caught mathematically" in many cases. Perhaps not at first, but eventually they will be found out.
One way you may check this mathematically is to check the outcome of all numbers by %. If there are some big swings of % within each number drawn by position, (lowest to highest) compared to all possible quantites by position (%). ---some dishonestly may be happening. But, one time or a few won't tell the tale. It has to be a consistent distortion. W
I believe politicians lie very frequently. So, no comparison of these 2 entities can relate. Do the Canandian, and Lotteries elsewhere require Public Certified Accountants to audit the procedings? In the U.S. they do. Lotto industries have to be honest as they can be "caught mathematically" in many cases. Perhaps not at first, but eventually they will be found out.
One way you may check this mathematically is to check the outcome of all numbers by %. If there are some big swings of % within each number drawn by position, (lowest to highest) compared to all possible quantites by position (%). ---some dishonestly may be happening. But, one time or a few won't tell the tale. It has to be a consistent distortion. W
W Kaenzig, currently from the databases I have there is about 16,000 draws ( I know I am still missing a bunch) but so far I have checked the frequency of all numbers drawn and they are all right on or very close to each being drawn 2.04% of the time. Which is the aevrage not counting the bonus number. These databases are for that theory I was working on
http://www.lotto649.ws/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6155&perpage=15&pagenumber=1
ChrisJ
I got a few of the databases from Lotto Pro, but for some reason the atlantic 649 database won't let me open it with excell.
Also the following lotteries I couldn't find any 649 databases in lotto pro
Michigan Winfall 6/49
Virginia Lotto South 6/49
France Lotto Nationale 6/49+b
Hong Kong Mark 6- 6/49+b
India SuperLotto 6/49
Portugal Totoloto 6/49
my email is mbadura@hotmail.com so if you have these and want to send them it would be greatly appreciated.
http://www.lotto649.ws/showthread.php?s=&threadid=6155&perpage=15&pagenumber=1
ChrisJ
I got a few of the databases from Lotto Pro, but for some reason the atlantic 649 database won't let me open it with excell.
Also the following lotteries I couldn't find any 649 databases in lotto pro
Michigan Winfall 6/49
Virginia Lotto South 6/49
France Lotto Nationale 6/49+b
Hong Kong Mark 6- 6/49+b
India SuperLotto 6/49
Portugal Totoloto 6/49
my email is mbadura@hotmail.com so if you have these and want to send them it would be greatly appreciated.
2.04% ??
Hey kosteczki, I don't understand the 2.04%. My calculations show that each nr should show up 12.24%. One arrives at this by simply taking 1,712,304 (each nr shows up this amount of times) and dividing by the odds (13,983,816). However, I was referring to position, not overall. W
BTW I haven't checked Indiana lately. But the big one used to be 6/48. Unless they recently changed. W
Hey kosteczki, I don't understand the 2.04%. My calculations show that each nr should show up 12.24%. One arrives at this by simply taking 1,712,304 (each nr shows up this amount of times) and dividing by the odds (13,983,816). However, I was referring to position, not overall. W
BTW I haven't checked Indiana lately. But the big one used to be 6/48. Unless they recently changed. W