Which is the correct mix to use Pick3?

Suppose the next numbers (real data tested)

2 3 6
2 6 7
2 6 9
2 7 8
2 8 9
5 7 7
5 7 8
1 2 6
1 2 8
2 2 3
5 7 9
6 6 7
0 2 3
6 7 7
0 2 9
1 2 2
6 7 8
6 7 9
2 2 7
2 2 9
2 3 4
7 7 7
7 7 8
2 3 8
2 4 5
2 4 7
7 7 9
7 8 8
7 8 9
7 9 9
0 1 2
2 4 9
5 5 7
5 6 7
2 5 6
0 2 7
1 2 4
2 2 5
2 5 5
2 5 7

Total Hits in 100000 random numbers:
Straights Boxed
3936 15235
I lost 9.3564 per draw if i buy only boxed, also I lost 20.32 per draw if i buy only straights,

The question is Could a mix of numbers (straight and boxed) improve my odds or the mix could not improve odds?
 
Another experiment;

The infamous 2 out of 3

Numbers:

0 9 4
1 8 9
3 1 0
3 9 2
3 4 8
4 2 1
5 7 6
8 0 2

Results:

Total Hits in 100000 random numbers:
Straights Boxed
784 3738
I lost 0.7648 per draw if i buy only boxed, also I lost 4.08 per draw if i buy only straights,

A possible mix of Straight and boxed could improve the odds?
 

Teufellj

Member
Correct or Best Mix?....

Grandmaster,

Although you appear to have solid data, there can be no proper mix unless it's short term---three to twelve entrys perhaps? What I see is quite a few ballset changes and because of this, your long term info would be invalid. A possible way to counteract this phenomena is to use a static set of---twenty-eight last wins-mixed with a second set (if your area has two games) to equal fourteen per day and evening games or twenty-eight for one game to be kept updated daily. Here in Ohio, when I see no single matching digit for the previous days play, I know to change my setup. You are showing several doubles; again, I would change the strategy. I won't get into statistics but what you printed is---broken fields of numbers with a change every so often. I play by the instinct of several years of wins and losses and I do believe that there is no true scientific way or program that can counteract the way that the digits has to come out in play.
Hope our choo-choos are on the same track with the reasoning above! This would apply to either electronic arrangements or following the bouncing balls!

Teufellj...
:agree:
 
Grandmaster,

Although you appear to have solid data, there can be no proper mix unless it's short term---three to twelve entrys perhaps? What I see is quite a few ballset changes and because of this, your long term info would be invalid. A possible way to counteract this phenomena is to use a static set of---twenty-eight last wins-mixed with a second set (if your area has two games) to equal fourteen per day and evening games or twenty-eight for one game to be kept updated daily. Here in Ohio, when I see no single matching digit for the previous days play, I know to change my setup. You are showing several doubles; again, I would change the strategy. I won't get into statistics but what you printed is---broken fields of numbers with a change every so often. I play by the instinct of several years of wins and losses and I do believe that there is no true scientific way or program that can counteract the way that the digits has to come out in play.
Hope our choo-choos are on the same track with the reasoning above! This would apply to either electronic arrangements or following the bouncing balls!
Teufellj...:agree:


Hi,

Teufellj,

Thank you for the response, I also believe that it is very difficult to beat the odds in a pick 3 (1 in 1000 chance), but to get 50% or more in winnings regularly is possible, there are few systems that work and I'm trying to find 2 keys, the correct number of draws to play and the correct mix (straight, boxed) to minimize the lost and to maximize the chance to beat the odds.
 

Teufellj

Member
RE:

Grandmaster,
Hit and run tactics are the things to use. You and I both know that the winning edge is in favor of the entity that produces the programs namely the area of government in charge of gambling games. I don't know that 50% is a winnable probability, a little less I can agree with because I hit a minimum of three wins per week. Yes, I have dry spells but I get enough to stay afloat using the States money. Playing low key is a good way to not gain attention by the BIG BOYS. I would that you take a gander at a program that I introduced for the Pick3 game on the Daily lottos page, if you inspect it deeply you will see what I mean. I am hitting very well but I am also incorporating a little self-created program and counting pair sets for a triangulation point of entry. Just these three programs gives me the---"what If Scenerio" and the" How To" if a sticky area should arise. All combined tells me what pattern to lead with and what I can filter out.

Teufellj...
 

CMF

Member
A good RNG will give you about 50% and so will a same set of numbers with a good structure that you play every draw.

Ball Sets and Conspiracy Theories by Lotto Operators have nothing to do with it.

Colin
 

Teufellj

Member
RE:CMF

Howdy there, CMF,

Yes, I too can agree with what you stated but here in Ohio, we don't see eye to eye about the ball set changes. Having observed this game for many years, my gamblers eye, says otherwise. I have worked out a code that tells me with a great deal of reliability when a change has occured. Have you ever noticed an abrupt change in the numbers for no apparant reason and try as you may, you just can't find a lead or trail? Ever wonder why? I have programs that check the obvious trails and program setups that peer into the many many reflected numbers scenerio, all based on the 'what if' and 'why' and 'what will happen if this is done this way or that way?' I have created "TTT's" both with the Bell Curve and with the special digits that range just outside of the sine way plus the negative approach, etc. Yes sir, I'll have to disagree on that point.

Teufellj...:rolleyes:
 

CMF

Member
Teufellj
When the numbers don't quite go the way you want or expect one could be excused for thinking the damm things are just plain random. Drats! Coises be upon them. Begat and begorah. It's the devil's doing. Coises be upon him too.
Colin
 

Teufellj

Member
CMF

Hello again, CMF,

This person is "hearing" what you have said. Though we both may be good players; My opinion about the ball set changes are cast. No doubt about it there is a lot of random HORSEFEATHERS in the setups everywhere! Surely you wouldn't jest by stating that program operators are infallible and never err? Ask any webmaster about what happens when they have a program deadline and very short on time to produce said change or whatever on a publicly viewed website. It stands to reason that if a program is cramped for time for a production debute some errors are going to occur. Some are accidental and some are accidentally on purpose but they do happen and more frequently than you or I can ever imagine. Ballset changes may be in my imagination: just like imagining TV 'glitches' that don't occur when a very high stakes draw is televised and either the camera jumps conveniently or there is a quick switch from the announcer to the drawing bins with that same very observable glitch.
I like your quick thoughts and semi-dry wit but---!

Teufellj...
 

CMF

Member
Teufellj

I have taken your calamities and concerns about the Ohio Pick4 to heart and consulted with the pesky leprechorns that reside at the bottom of my garden. (Whatever cavorting about they do down there I am sure is responsible for the unnaturally fast growth of my lawn creating extra work for me.)

Anyway, they whispered to me where you had gone wrong. It seems for the Ohio Pick4 you need to use a Magic Matrix. This apparently is a derivation of my Bark & Charcoal Structured Set method as explained on my Website <Blankety Blank>.

Here it is - I don't think they gave me the best possible one but over the 2472 Draws it gave a 259% return putting one in front by some $31,524 with 17 straights, 4 4Way, 1 6way, 22 12Way and 16 24Way.

2559
0657
2249
8777

8 Combs from this:
2559
0657
2249
8777
2028
5627
5547
9797

Now, if you have fairies, elves or leprechorns at the bottom of your garden I respectfully suggest you seek a better solution from them which will apply to the future not the past.

May the Saints nourish your goodwill and provide you with bountifull blessings and treasure - not too mention the Luck of the Irish.

Colin
 
Last edited:

Teufellj

Member
CMF

My dear fellow,

I can see that we are stalemated. Shall we not kick the dead dog any further? You and I are set in different directions with but one goal in mind---To win the best information that we are apt to gain and beat the Company at its own game, right? With that in mind I'll see you at the bank! :wavey:

Teufellj...

"Let Your Fairy-Godmother Do The Digging Lest You Get Your Paddy Fingers Dirty!"
 

CMF

Member
No, No Teufellj

Nothing personal here, I'm enjoying the mastication, regurgitation and general chewing of the cud.

Now, what I would like to see from the Cover and Wheelie boys and girls is with the benefit of hindsite a Cover or Wheel that comes remotely close to the yield of that little Magic Matrix.

Are they up to it?

Let's see Teufellj.

Colin
 

Teufellj

Member
RE:RE:RE:

Colin,

I didn't figure this session for anything other than a jam of ideas. I'm a person at the bottom of the dignity pile. Wheels are once in a while good but they are extremely time consuming. I enjoy getting "my hands dirty" in lottery configurations and none of those gimpy imps (wee bonnie people) are allowed to help. When you mentioned "cover and wheel folks" it kinda reminds me of a convertible car from the old days (50's-60's) The top went down in nice weather but when it started to rain---the top hung up in mid closure and everybody was all wet. At times it's interesting to watch some of the spaceship math that's supposed to win a three ball lottery. I have always proposed that the pick3 lottery is so simple that it's difficult. When my generation went to school---1+1=2---not astrophysics corundums to squeeze every neucleic part out of a digit to manuver that number into another zone. The adage of "K.I.S.S." is well founded!
Later on my friend,

Teufellj...
 

CMF

Member
Teufellj

My friend I think we are getting somewhere. Sometimes our fellow members when they bicker over my Cover is better than your Cover forget that it's all about entertainment (with possible riches.)

Our Wheelie Wheelie/Cover Brethren must eventually realize that you need something better than a lawn mower engine to win a motor race. If the race track allows 400 mph then you need an engine that can do that.

Artificial mathematical constraints applied to selecting Lotto numbers give at the most the same yield as Random Selection of numbers or Quick Picks.

I'm not real sure what Real World use covers have - I think it has something to do with shipping spare parts for car engines in the most efficient way ie the engine will not work if a 10c part is not included.

Blessings in abundance be upon you and may the Saints herald the gloriousness of your name. (Woops, I think I went a bit Ionese then!)

Colin :chug:
 

Teufellj

Member
COLIN

With that ending, I believe that you've kissed the Blarny Stone too long and perhaps your lips got stuck? Hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa! :lol:
Sometimes I just slay me! Buenos noches amigo,

Teufellj...
 

Sidebar

Top